Hi all,
I'm using a cluster of CS 4.9.3 with 2 nodes.
After couple of weeks, I get "No database selected for the
transaction" error in logs and I have to restart the CS services to
resolve the issue.
Could you help me about it?
Here is the logs:
2017-11-21 10:37:35,641 WARN [c.c.c.d.ManagementSe
Also, have seen that with 4.10 with two management servers on one of them.
21 нояб. 2017 г. 3:36 ПП пользователь "Alireza Eskandari" <
astro.alir...@gmail.com> написал:
> Hi all,
> I'm using a cluster of CS 4.9.3 with 2 nodes.
> After couple of weeks, I get "No database selected for the
> transac
Alireza,
Can you share your db.properties file (you may replace password/ips with dummy
ones)?
- Rohit
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 2:32:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: No database selected for the transaction
Also
I hit the same issue with the debian9-systemvmtemplate PR. Earlier, the egress
traffic option used to accept 0.0.0.0/0.
- Rohit
From: Nux!
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2017 11:09:26 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: egress fw problems in 4.10?
Thanks Jayapal,
Indeed, I c
Rohit,
I see it accepts 0.0.0.0/0 on the source CIDR, but then transforms that into
10.1.1.0/24 (or whatever), I'd imagine it could do the same with the
destination CIDR and just "rename" 0.0.0.0/0 into 0.0.0.0/1.
However this is not a Cloudstack problem as I see it, it's an ipset
bug/feature,
I should say that I'm using a cluster of MariaDB on Galera with 3
nodes. All of them are master but I'm using one node at a time by
assign a virtual IP to it.
Here is db.properties on node1:
# management server clustering parameters, change cluster.node.IP to
the machine IP address
# in which the
Hi all
The current LTS release is 4.9 which is EOL in June 2018 according to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
AFAIK there are no works planed for a new LTS. The release pace has
slown down (the high pace and leaving users behind fixes was the reason
for the LTS).
I am s
Hi Lucian,
It looks like a legit bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297092
When you add 0.0.0.0/0 as destination cidr, this execute on VR and fails:
# ipset add destCidrIpset-4 1.0.0.0/0
ipset v6.30: The value of the CIDR parameter of the IP address is invalid
The workaround a
When there is 0.0.0.0/0 for dest cidr do not add/skip the ipset match option in
iptables. This will fix the issue.
-Jayapal
On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Hi Lucian,
It looks like a legit bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12
Jayapal - I tried that, that leaves the ipset empty and egress traffic does not
work for guest VMs.
This is seen in iptables (filter):
[..snipped..]
-A FW_EGRESS_RULES -m set --match-set destCidrIpset-4 dst -j ACCEPT
-A FW_EGRESS_RULES -j DROP
[..snipped..]
And no members are seen:
root@r-4
Hi,
When there is 0.0.0.0/0 for dest cidr, while adding iptables do not include '
-m set --match-set destCidrIpset-4 dst’ .
For 0.0.0.0/0 no need to add this in ipset.
This should be fixed in VR code.
Thanks,
Jayapal
> On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:22 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Jayapal - I tried
All,
I wanted to revive this thread and bring recent progress to your attention:
- We're now able to build debian9 based systemvmtemplates successfully that
work okay-ish as CPVM/SSVM host and some initial networking support (dns, dhcp,
basic zone, advanced zone: firewall, pf, snat etc.) for
Jayapal - nice, can you send a PR please?
- Rohit
From: Jayapal Uradi
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 5:33:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: egress fw problems in 4.10?
Hi,
When there is 0.0.0.0/0 for dest cidr, while adding iptables do not inc
It makes more sense to me too.
On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 12:04 +0100, Rene Moser wrote:
> Hi all
>
> The current LTS release is 4.9 which is EOL in June 2018 according to
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
>
> AFAIK there are no works planed for a new LTS. The release pace
Hello, it sounds very reasonable. The more lifecycle information the better
for adopters.
21 нояб. 2017 г. 8:56 ПП пользователь "Marc-Aurèle Brothier - Exoscale" <
ma...@exoscale.ch> написал:
> It makes more sense to me too.
>
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 12:04 +0100, Rene Moser wrote:
> > Hi all
>
Hi Rohit
First, thank you very much for the effort!
On 11/21/2017 01:07 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Please advise if you can collaborate with me on this, especially around
> testing. Thanks!
I have some 2 "nice to have"s, AFAICS these haven't been addressed yet:
- SNMP readonly listen on "linklo
Hi,
I'm trying out terraform and had success so far, except for the vpn customer
gateway feature.
For some reason, terraform fails to create it, though I use the same options as
in UI/cloudmonkey where it works just fine.
The snippet for it is:
resource "cloudstack_vpn_customer_gateway" "defau
Check
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/77864992fe8f80dbabd1240f6373d2ba3e98713c/utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java#L1221
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying out terraform and had success so far, except for the vpn
> customer gateway feat
Thanks Chiradeep,
Checked but brain says no. What should I have learned from there?
AFAIK this is a terraform fail.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Chiradeep Vittal"
> To: "dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 November,
Hi Nux,
Could it be your cloudstack version ? modp3072 is recent I think in
CloudStack so if you run a older version maybe it's not there?
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Thanks Chiradeep,
>
> Checked but brain says no. What should I have learned from there?
>
> AFAIK this is
Hi Lucian,
Try the the following in config, ‘-‘ instead of ‘;’ after the aes256 in the
config.
New: "sha1-aes256-modp3072”
Old: "sha1-aes256;modp3072”
Thanks,
Jayapal
On Nov 22, 2017, at 5:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion
mailto:pd...@cloudops.com>> wrote:
Hi Nux,
Could it be your cloudstack version ?
Please review the PR.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2334
-Jayapal
On Nov 21, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Jayapal - nice, can you send a PR please?
- Rohit
From: Jayapal Uradi
mailto:jayapal.ur...@accele
Sound good for me too
On 21/11/2017 11:04, Rene Moser wrote:
Hi all
The current LTS release is 4.9 which is EOL in June 2018 according to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
AFAIK there are no works planed for a new LTS. The release pace has
slown down (the high pace an
23 matches
Mail list logo
