AFAIK, there is no job that automatically pushes templates. I
manually copied the templates from build
https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-master-systemvm/272/
to http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/
Thanks,
~ Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On July 12, 2017
Thanks Rajani,
I created the upgrade paths and am no test compiling. Expect a PR in the next
hour (I added the new path to every version not just past 4.0)
On 12/07/17 08:41, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
I made the pom changes on master to 4.11.0.0-SNAPSHOT
4.10 branch is created
https://builds.cloudstack.org/view/release/job/build-systemvm is configured to
push the systemvm for a version taken from a parameter
On 12/07/17 08:45, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
AFAIK, there is no job that automatically pushes templates. I
manually copied the templates from build
ht
Hi,
Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator?
Obviously the service talked about here[1] isn’t available in the container, so
I can’t just 'service cloudstack-usage restart’.
[1]:
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.8/usage.html#conf
maybe a double post due to mail issues:
Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can.
# yum install cloudstack-usage
assuming centos as base. It makes sense to look at the docker
definition and do it there
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:07 AM, John McDonnell
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any idea how to start it w
Ok, then it isn’t installed but that it can.
# yum install cloudstack-usageit makes sense to look at the docker definition
and do it there
On 12/07/17 09:07, "John McDonnell" wrote:
Hi,
Any idea how to start it when running in the Docker simulator?
Obviously the service t
John,
too bad but that indeed means it isn’t running. You can double check with
# service cloudstack-usage status
cloudstack-usage is stopped
and if need be
# service cloudstack-usage start
Starting CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage [ OK ]
I am not running the con
Hi Will,
I'm not sure what you want, but the scripts/files are here:
https://github.com/shapeblue/Trillian/tree/master/Ansible/roles
- Rohit
From: Will Stevens
Sent: 11 July 2017 17:47:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] drop support for C
Thanks Rohit.
On Jul 12, 2017 6:32 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
Hi Will,
I'm not sure what you want, but the scripts/files are here:
https://github.com/shapeblue/Trillian/tree/master/Ansible/roles
- Rohit
From: Will Stevens
Sent: 11 July 2017 17:47:06
To: dev@
All,
Few months ago I had started discussion on Host HA for CloudStack and given
4.10 is voted and to be announced with master branch cut I would like to
re-kick discussion around reviewing and acceptance of the feature that is
pending since Feb 2017.
To briefly share some key points:
- Thi
All,
Based on the reviews and Marvin test runs, I've merged and fwd-merged the
branch to 4.10 and master branches. From now onwards, our PRs will get tested
against latest Travis images using openjdk (previously used oraclejdk).
- Rohit
From: Rohit Yadav
Sen
Hi all,
I see the following in the xenserver logs, indicating xapi connections getting
timeout frequently due to SSL timeouts leading to opening of new xapi
connections continuously. Did any body see it. Is there any way to increase the
SSL connection timeout.
Jul 4 23:25:06 xenserver-duymle
Hi
Yes I dropped all databases.
But I was trying to create manually by myself all the databases and initial
schemas manually..
Well finally reading the thread "Developer Guide - Current Setup Guide"
helped me and I found what I missed to do :-) (sorry for the noise)
As a starter I'd like to know i
Sorry Oliver, I don't think we use such a tag. Good suggestion though. For now,
look at findbugs and such tools for things you could re-factor.
On 12/07/17 13:42, "Olivier Lamy" wrote:
Hi
Yes I dropped all databases.
But I was trying to create manually by myself all the databases an
All,
Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze
the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release
plan as soon as next week.
- Rohit
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit
We are very excited about this feature set, as it adds some really important
features for KVM.
We don't use NFS, so I think our goal will be seeing what we can contribute to
include Ceph on the supported storage list.
- Si
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Wednesday, Jul
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can
> freeze the scope for 4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a
> release plan as soon as next week.
>
>
Support for XenServer 7.1 would be nice
We've also seen in the past initiatives like object store and 'secondary
storage free' zones. We may not want to cement the idea that we have
secondary storage as a mountable filesystem that is highly available.
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:40 PM Marcus wrote:
> Can we not rely on secondary storage
Can we not rely on secondary storage for config drive? I'd much rather see
it generated dynamically into a temp space during VM start, or (less
desirable) even during VM create on primary storage (perhaps in a
configdrive) directory where the root disk resides. It just seems like a
bad idea to rel
19 matches
Mail list logo
