Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@borisstoyanov moreover, can you please restart the network with cleanup,
to see if the new VRs can start ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
code LGTM
@yvsubhash it would be nice if you can reformat part of the code with java
code conventions.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@ustcweizhou
- I was able to restart the network with cleanup. New VR came up with
duplicated eth2 and eth3.

removed the host uuid from SR label so that any host which has ac
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106137098
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/StorageManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1078,6 +1082,16 @@ public void cleanupStorage(boolean recurring) {
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106134695
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -194,18 +194,22 @@ protected boo
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r103894706
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1181,6 +1181,17 @@ public boolean configure(String name, Map params)
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867#discussion_r106133214
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/SnapshotObject.java
---
@@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ public void
processEvent(
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 469
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=3
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (search
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106145072
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -584,105 +583,64 @@ private void
checkForNonDedicatedResources(Virtu
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106142726
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/deploy/DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -584,105 +583,64 @@ private void
checkForNonDedicatedResources(Virtu
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1853#discussion_r106138864
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/dc/dao/DedicatedResourceDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -312,6 +317,65 @@ public DedicatedResourceVO findByHostId(Long hostId) {
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@rafaelweingartner
Tried using both cpuentitlement cpu reservedCapacity but retrieved values
from vmware are zero.
While going through docs , I saw **summary.runtime.maxCpuUsag
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
nics in database seems ok, so it looks some issue in creating
ip_associations.json
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Complete removal of the plugin was my solution to the problem of the jar
file's dependencies. If it's not used or maintained, then it should be
removed, in my opinion. Disabling it in the build is a good first step.
*Jeff Hair*
Technical Lead and Software Developer
Tel: (+354) 415 0200
j...@green
Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1269
Thanks for the response @anshul1886.
I am sorry, but I disagree with you. I think that it gets more stable and
readable with less duplicated code. In my humble opinion, it is eas
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
Awesome! This seems a good approach to deal with the issue.
@jayakarteek and @nvazquez thanks for the effort.
@jayakarteek sorry for all of the stubbornness ;)
You reall
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106185108
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/host/ReconnectHostCmd.java ---
@@ -100,17 +103,18 @@ public Long getInstanceId() {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106185631
--- Diff: engine/components-api/src/com/cloud/agent/AgentManager.java ---
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@
public void pullAgentOutMaintenance
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106186279
--- Diff:
plugins/network-elements/netscaler/src/com/cloud/network/element/NetscalerElement.java
---
@@ -512,7 +512,11 @@ public void
doInTra
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/837#discussion_r106188366
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/alert/AlertManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -767,7 +767,9 @@ public void sendAlert(AlertType alertType, long
dataCenterId
Folks,
It has been a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these tickets.
In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; most of the PRs
I see have Jira ticket associated and everything seems to be getting better
by the time; let’s not loose momentum. However, we still have some
GitHub user olivierlemasle opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2008
Fix datetime format of snapshots events
Include the timezone in datetime format of snapshot events, to be
consistent with every other events.
"eventDateTime" was added by @chipchilde
sorry Rafael, I haven't taken the time to look at more then a few. Go
ahead, for my part
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Rafael Weingärtner
wrote:
> Folks,
> It has been a week. I am assuming that no one knows about these tickets.
>
> In the last years, our workflow has been improved greatly; mo
Hi Jeff,
Could you please provide more details (e.g. CloudStack version,
CloudStack management log)?
Seems that the log came from [1]. I will check on it.
[1]
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/cs/CsAddress.py
Cheers,
Gabriel.
Em 1
It's coming from the config scripts on the routers, yes. This is version
4.9.2.0 (it's a fork, but should be similar enough to vanilla). I'm not
necessarily noticing problems with it. Connectivity from public IPs on
Isolated networks seem to be working. I'm just wondering what this message
means, a
As far as I know, the log exists for a long time. However, I am not
aware of potential issues.
Hope that someone can share his/her wisdom on this one.
Cheers, Gabriel.
Em 15/03/2017 13:10, Jeff Hair escreveu:
It's coming from the config scripts on the routers, yes. This is version
4.9.2.0 (
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106001103
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
Does anyone know what `first_i_p` represents in the `ips.json` dbag? I am
assuming it is the Source NAT IP, but I can't find it represented anywhere in
the code (other than in a test). If it doe
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2003
@swill
first_i_p in json -> firstIP in java. This is formatted by google.gson
it is defined in api/src/com/cloud/agent/api/to/IpAddressTO.java, and used
in server/src/com/cloud/netwo
Hi,
This one appears to have been fixed a long time ago. I marked it as Fixed and
closed the ticket.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1524
This one is not a big deal. I marked it as Won’t Fix and closed the ticket.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1432
I went t
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106303439
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106306374
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106311985
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106313430
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/StoragePoolTagsDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -77,4 +92,71 @@ public void deleteTags(long poolId) {
Github user ramkatru commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user ramkatru commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1855
tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
43 matches
Mail list logo