@Pierre-Luc: Why did we have to roll back XenServer 7? I seem to remember
it being because our SAS controllers were too old and were not supported.
Is that right?
*Will Stevens*
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Marty Godsey wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to mention.. This is XenServer 7.1 and not 7.
Github user niteshsarda commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1978
@borisstoyanov : The test cases which are failing are not related to my
code changes.
Can you please verify ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
@karuturi This seems to be ready for merge (tag:mergeready).
It has 3 LGTMs and tests are passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Thanks Syed!
On 3/3/17, 3:52 AM, "Syed Ahmed" wrote:
I've talked to folks here and I don't think I can give write access to you
for the Wiki. I will create a google form and lets' use that instead.
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:58 PM, sachin patil wrote:
> @syed I tried to edit the Candidates colu
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> I've talked to folks here and I don't think I can give write access to you
> for the Wiki. I will create a google form and lets' use that instead.
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 2:58 PM, sachin patil wrote:
>
>> @syed I tried to edit the Candidates
Hi Jeff,
I tested in my setup with latest master rebasing.
I did not see the add:true (ips.json) when ips are removed from the UI.
Removed public ip is not configured on the eth2 interface.
Here is the output:
4: eth2: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP
qlen 1000
link/ether 06:f6:cc:00:00
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908
@ProjectMoon
I have today this PR after rebasing latest master. I did not observe the
add:true for the removed ip.
Here is output from the ips.json and ip addr show output.
Her
Nice little thing Will,
One question: if I read the code correctly it ‘go’es and tries all mirrors at
once and whichever responses first is redirected to the client. This might well
be the same every time. This might be the one closest to the mirror302 and not
to the client. Is that correct or
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1911
@mrunalinikankariya Can you provide some marvin test? Also is it possible
to add some snapshots/test results?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1797
LGTM on the code changes. Make sense to keep listVirtualMachines and
listNics in sync for nic response.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1961
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
