Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
lgtm on code review @rhtyd
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
Trillian test result (tid-770)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 45108 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 204
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=101
Failed=3
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847
@karuturi Seems this is ready for merge, with code LGTMs and based on test
results published by @cloudmonger ?
The 4 test failures seems not relevant to this patch with code cha
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
code LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1812
Looks like this is ready for merge. None of the test failures are related
to this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1890
FIX issue on preshared key if we disable/enable remote access vpn
Way to reproduce the issue
(1) enable remote access vpn
root@r-8349-VM:~# cat /etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.any.secrets
: P
All,
I've been working on moving our codebase and runtime-environment to Java 8, and
since this is a much needed big change I want your feedback and blessings on:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
In order for this to work, I had to make changes in our veewee-based
systemvmtempl
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> All,
>
>
> I've been working on moving our codebase and runtime-environment to Java 8,
> and since this is a much needed big change I want your feedback and blessings
> on:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
>
>
> In order for
Code review LGTM
Erik,
The PR I've proposed does not change the base Debian distro, it's still Debian
7 (wheezy) and not Jessie. I would like to avoid making too many changes in the
same PR, especially moving to Jessie which won't be straight forward as it
would introduce several changes, major package version
I agree with Rohit about not making too many changes at once. I know we
both agree that we should be going to Jessie, but let's do it in phases.
Going to Java 8 is a big enough step for right now, lets stabilize that and
then we can look at updating the system vm template after.
*Will STEVENS*
Le
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
All, for transparency this comment has the build log of the new
systemvmtemplate attached:
[systemvm-buildlog.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/687704/systemvm-buildlog.txt)
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
Thanks @wido I'll rever that line, though the dhcp-3 is a virtual package
that actually install isc-dhcp-client, see
https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/dhcp3-client
---
If your project is set up
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
@rhtyd Understood, no problem, just trying to keep the changes in this PR
clean. All changes should be Java 8 related.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
Thanks @wido I've reverted and updated the PR now, you can refresh to see
the updated changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
Overall the changes look good to me. But can you explain why for example
you changed the dhcp package name? It doesn't seem related to Java 8.
All in favor of this switch, just checking wh
> Op 5 januari 2017 om 16:06 schreef Will Stevens :
>
>
> I agree with Rohit about not making too many changes at once. I know we
> both agree that we should be going to Jessie, but let's do it in phases.
> Going to Java 8 is a big enough step for right now, lets stabilize that and
> then we ca
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
Looks good now @rhtyd
LGTM for the code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1888
I walked through the diffs and they LGTM. I did not actually run the code,
however, because I'm in the middle of another CloudStack project and I don't
have the resources available at the
Yes, I understood that your proposal didn't change the debian version, I
suggested that it should do, since when we do update the debian version we
have to test everything over again anyway.
That said, I won't oppose your proposal, I'm +1 of upgrading to jdk 1.8
--
Erik
tor. 5. jan. 2017 kl. 1
GitHub user sureshanaparti opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1891
CLOUDSTACK-9730: [VMware] Unable to add a host with space in its name to
existing VMware cluster
Issue: Unable to add a host with space in its name to existing VMware
cluster
R
GitHub user sureshanaparti opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1892
CLOUDSTACK-9731: Hardcoded label appears on the Add zone wizard
Hardcoded label (label.remove.this.physical.network) appears on the Add
zone wizard
You can merge this pull request into
Hi all,
After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.9.2.0 *passes* with
4 PMC + 0 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
4 person (Wido, Bruno, Rajani, Rohit)
+1 (non binding)
none
0
none
-1
none
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now prepare the release announcement to go o
I've fixed it now, please recheck.
Regards.
From: ?zhan R?zgar Karaman
Sent: 04 January 2017 17:59:10
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.9 api docs went missing
Hi;
I think they are setting up the api page for new CloudStack release, its not
accessib
I am not a developer, but thanks you all for this another great achievement !
Understand how hard to get all the things sorted out. Just thinking we
probably need 1-2 assistants to support RM going forward, share the workload
like documentation, release notes, PR tracking...
These comparati
its working again, thanks Rohit
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> I've fixed it now, please recheck.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: ?zhan R?zgar Karaman
> Sent: 04 January 2017 17:59:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.9 api docs w
27 matches
Mail list logo
