[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1884: Add global setting for enable/disable Metrics...

2017-01-02 Thread rashmidixit
GitHub user rashmidixit opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1884 Add global setting for enable/disable Metrics feature The Metrics view for each type of entity basically fires APIs and calculates required values on the client end. For e.g. to display mem

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1885: CLOUDSTACK-9724: Fixed missing additional pub...

2017-01-02 Thread jayapalu
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1885 CLOUDSTACK-9724: Fixed missing additional public ip on tier network w… In VPC tier network acquire an ip and configure the PF service on it. VR now will have the two ip addresses on the inte

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC1)

2017-01-02 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, the voting window is over now but we've not reached enough binding votes to graduate this candidate to a release. Voting will be now open until we've enough binding votes or any -1/blockers. The PMC is requested for vote participation. Thanks. Regards. F

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8

2017-01-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-438 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1886: CLOUDSTACK-9728: Fixed traffic sentinel HTTP ...

2017-01-02 Thread jayapalu
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1886 CLOUDSTACK-9728: Fixed traffic sentinel HTTP 414 error response Url generated by CCP to request traffic sentinel for usage stats is too long causing HTTP 414 Request-URI Too Long error respon

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...

2017-01-02 Thread mike-tutkowski
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 Can you tell me which line was throwing a NullPointerException in the code that you fixed? Thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC1)

2017-01-02 Thread Milamber
Hello, I try to upgrade from 4.9.1.0 to 4.9.2.0 RC1, and I've this error: 2017-01-02 21:28:28,424 WARN [o.a.c.s.m.c.ResourceApplicationContext] (main:null) (logid:) Exception encountered during context initialization - cancelling refresh attempt: org.springframework.context.ApplicationContext

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...

2017-01-02 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 @mike-tutkowski Its in bug description. Are you not seeing this issue on your end? 2016-08-26 14:34:36,709 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-1:ctx-90c9ba3a) (logid:115e39ad) ==

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC1)

2017-01-02 Thread Sergey Levitskiy
@milamber Looks like it is an execution of a wrong upgrade path. The last entries before the exception is coming from schema-490to4910.sql which is not supposed to run during 4.9.1 to 4.9.2 upgrade. Did you get the code from 4.9.2.0 RC2 branch? On 1/2/17, 1:46 PM, "Milamber" wrote: Hell

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...

2017-01-02 Thread serg38
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 @mike-tutkowski @anshul-gangwar @nvazquez I believe the same issue is addressed in PR1735 but in a more consistent fashion --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1847: CLOUDSTACK-9691: Fixed unhandeled excetion in list s...

2017-01-02 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1847 @serg38 seems so both addressing same issue. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1741: Updated StrongSwan VPN Implementation

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741 @swill @jayapalu updates on this, is this good to go? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1735: CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for sna...

2017-01-02 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94362119 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotManagerImpl.java --- @@ -517,10 +517,10 @@ public String getSecondaryStorageURL(SnapshotVO sna

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1735: CLOUDSTACK-9570: Bug in listSnapshots for sna...

2017-01-02 Thread anshul1886
Github user anshul1886 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735#discussion_r94362243 --- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/snapshot/ListSnapshotsCmd.java --- @@ -115,8 +115,10 @@ public void execute() {

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC1)

2017-01-02 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Bruno, Thanks for starting testing 4.9.2.0 (RC1). You've found a valid bug. Since 4.9.1.0 was not announced, it's less likely for users to hit this but I'll fix this and start another RC today. During the 4.9.1.0->4.9.2.0 upgrade path, it re-runs the 490to4910 upgrade path. The fix is sim

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1887: schema: Fix upgrade issue for 4.9.1.0->4.9.2....

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1887 schema: Fix upgrade issue for 4.9.1.0->4.9.2.0 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack 4910-upgrade-fix Alterna

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC1)

2017-01-02 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, An upgrade issue was found, I'm closing this voting round for RC1. I'll start another voting round shortly. Regards. From: Sergey Levitskiy Sent: 03 January 2017 10:47:50 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC1)

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1887: schema: Fix upgrade issue for 4.9.1.0->4.9.2....

2017-01-02 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1887 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-02 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi All, I've created a 4.9.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.2.0-RC20170103T1228 Commit: dfc39c1f088dc9979a53bd0de4dfd0e5b266bd0f Source release (checksums

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

2017-01-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appe

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.2.0 (RC2)

2017-01-02 Thread Rohit Yadav
+1 (binding) - Based on upgrade tests, all pass no blockers. Manual upgrade tests from 4.9.1.0. - Based on Travis tests (with simulator) and Trillian tests (with xenserver 6.5, kvm centos6/centos7 and vmware 55u3) on: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 (these test results from RC1 a

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1864: CLOUDSTACK-9710: Switch to using JDK 1.8

2017-01-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appe

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1871: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in ...

2017-01-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appe

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1871: [4.9] CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in ...

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1832: CLOUDSTACK-9652 Job framework - Cancelling async job...

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832 @karuturi please squash your changes and fix the merge conflict. We've merged very large changes that were squash to a single commit, it becomes easier to then cherry-pick them or revert them. -

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 @blueorangutan package --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1826: CLOUDSTACK-9675: Cloudstack Metrics Miscellaneous bu...

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1826 Thanks @rashmidixit I'll review them soon. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1819: CLOUDSTACK-9653 The system capacity was not getting ...

2017-01-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1819 @rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appe

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1826: CLOUDSTACK-9675: Cloudstack Metrics Miscellaneous bu...

2017-01-02 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1826 @rashmidixit can you squash your changes, thanks. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1837: [4.9] Smoketest Health

2017-01-02 Thread blueorangutan
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1837 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-439 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d