All,
I'm trying to investigate who uses (and/or develops/maintains) F5 (network
plugin that is shipped with CloudStack) in production?
Please share your feedback, experiences and usage. Thanks.
Regards.
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2
I am +1 to removing code without maintainers, as long as it's not a core
feature.
Erik
tir. 27. des. 2016 kl. 08.23 skrev Rohit Yadav :
> All,
>
>
>
>
>
> Java7 has eol-ed, it's about time to move to Java8 for both codebase and
> runtime [1].
>
>
>
>
>
> An experimental PR [2] shows that moving
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
CLOUDSTACK-9692: Fix password server issue in redundant VRs
The password server in RVRs has wrong parameters as the gateway of guest
nics is None.
In this case, we should get the gatewa
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/775
Any update on this. This is a very old PR pending for a long time. Rebased
the branch with latest 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/844
rebased with latest master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
> Op 27 december 2016 om 8:23 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> All,
>
>
> Java7 has eol-ed, it's about time to move to Java8 for both codebase and
> runtime [1].
>
>
> An experimental PR [2] shows that moving to Java8 is fairly straight forward.
> The only component that is failing is F5 networ
HI Rohit/ Wido,
After adding below dependency to f5/pom.xml the build is successful. Below
is the log for both FAILURE and successful BUILD.
Sudhansus-MAC:f5 sudhansu$ java -version
java version "1.8.0_65"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_65-b17)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (bu
+1
Maybe we should send an email to the dev and users lists with something
like this:
---
Dropping F5 Support
The F5 plugin currently does not have any maintainers and it is holding us
back from making an important move to Java 8. If you depend on this plugin,
we recommend that you contact the dev@ li
Haha. Rohit already did what I suggested. I am only just getting through my
emails. :)
On Dec 27, 2016 9:05 AM, "Will Stevens" wrote:
> Maybe we should send an email to the dev and users lists with something
> like this:
> ---
> Dropping F5 Support
> The F5 plugin currently does not have any mai
GitHub user serg38 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/30
Added Sergey and Nicolas to committers
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/serg38/cloudstack-www patch-1
Alternatively you ca
GitHub user serg38 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/31
Addingn Sergey and Nicolas to committers
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/serg38/cloudstack-www patch-2
Alternatively you
GitHub user serg38 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/32
Adding Sergey and Nicolas to commiters
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/serg38/cloudstack-www master
Alternatively you can
Github user serg38 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/31
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user serg38 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/30
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1872
CLOUDSTACK-3223 Exception observed while creating CPVM in VMware Setup with
DVS
Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-3223 Exception observed while creating CPVM in VMware Setup with
DVS
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
Trillian test result (tid-741)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 43945 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Hi Sudhansu,
Thanks for sharing the fix, looks like at least the build failure is fixed with
your change.
I'll update the PR shortly, I think with your suggested fix we should be good
to switch to jdk1.8.
I've also found and updated F5 dependency version to v12.1 library that is
jdk1.8 compa
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
Trillian test result (tid-740)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 48925 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
Trillian test result (tid-742)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 49351 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
@rhtyd Added more guest OS mappings and rebased against latest master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/926
rebased with latest master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1357
rebased with latest master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
@sureshanaparti Seems build timed out. Can you please try force push?
```
[INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.3:findbugs (findbugs) @
cloud-plugin-user-authenticator-md5 ---
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
@rhtyd I think we can deal with this in another PR, as you suggest.
@syed Does any of that code look like something that might have been
changed for archiving managed snapshots? I
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1854
@mike-tutkowski @syed I was aiming at 4.9.1.0-rc1, and put this workaround
for now: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1863/files
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
@ustcweizhou is there an existing marvin test to validate this?
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1767
Hi @rhtyd @koushik-das @ustcweizhou,
I refactored this PR removing previously created API commands, only adding
an optional parameter (`cleanupdetails`) on `updateVirtualMachine` and
`
Github user luhaijiao commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
This function seems broken since 4.7. That's also one of the major
reasons we are reluctant to upgrade to 4.9.x since we have quite a few clients
using RVR now.
I would suggest to r
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-432
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1871
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1873
CLOUDSTACK-9709: Updated the vm ip fetch task to use the correct the â¦
Updated the vm ip fetch task to use the seperate thread executor
Also fixed in this
If a vm with iso atta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-433
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1852
@rhtyd This is a minor improvement and hence in master. I have updated the
corresponding bugs' fix version.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
36 matches
Mail list logo
