GitHub user SudharmaJain opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1738
CLOUDSTACK-9566 instance-id metadata for baremetal VM returns ID
There is difference in instance-id metadata across baremetal and other
hypervisors.
On Baremetal
[root@ip-17
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1716
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 126
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=100
Failed=3
Skipped=6
_Link to logs Folder (searc
GitHub user ArmedGuy opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1739
Fix xapi pluginlib for XenServer 7
This makes cloudstack_pluginlib.py compatible with XenServer 7 dom0, as
(from what I gathered) simplejson was included by default as "json" in the
version t
All,
The Juniper contrail plugin is failing for last few hours, this plugin has not
been maintained in last few years, except for codebase/architectural changes no
changes were made to the plugin itself in last 2 years.
The Jenkins failure is due to the dependency not available, further the m
> Op 27 oktober 2016 om 13:00 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> All,
>
>
> The Juniper contrail plugin is failing for last few hours, this plugin has
> not been maintained in last few years, except for codebase/architectural
> changes no changes were made to the plugin itself in last 2 years.
>
>
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
Pinging for review -- @sateesh-chodapuneedi @koushik-das @sureshanaparti
@karuturi @murali-reddy and other vmware contributors/maintainers
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1739
PR #1711 has this and bunch of other changes needed for XS7 support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user ArmedGuy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1739
Ah, my bad then. Thought I had searched for it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user ArmedGuy closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1739
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user yvsubhash opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1740
CLOUDSTACK-9572 Snapshot on primary storage not cleaned up after Storâ¦
Snapshot on primary storage not cleaned up after Storage migration. This
happens in the following two scenarios
Li
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
@swill We will try to wrap up this PR by next week. I will also try to
post the test results then we will push the changes after LGTMs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
@jayapalu I need to get all my changes merged into this PR though. This PR
has bugs as it is. I will open a new PR with a merge of your changes and my
changes today.
---
If your project is set u
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Updated StrongSwanVPN Implementation
This PR is a merge of @jayapalu changes in #872 and the changes I had to
make to get the functionality working.
I have done pretty extensive testing
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
I am not able to merge my changes with @jayapalu's branch, so I have
created a new PR #1741 which includes everything from this PR as well as all
the changes I had to make to get both Remote Access
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1729
Trillian test result (tid-205)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 35126 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 6:12 AM
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Disable open inactive plugins: Contrail plugin
> Op 27 oktober 2016 om 13:00 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
CVE-2016-6813: Apache CloudStack registerUserKeys authorization vulnerability
CVSS v3:
9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L)
Vendors:
The Apache Software Foundation
Accelerite, Inc
Versions affected:
CloudStack versions 4.1 and newer are affec
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@jburwell I have reviewed all the smoke tests and I have not found at any
place we skipping because of a version mismatch so we are good there. I still
have to figure out why some of the tests are
All,
Since this CVE was a severe issue and there are several CloudStack 4.5.x
users who may still want a patch, I've went ahead and cherry-picked Marc's
CVE fix on top of last release 4.5.2.1 to create a community-backed 4.5.2.2
tag [1] that can be used by anyone to build packages. This was not
of
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1716
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 127
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=102
Failed=3
Skipped=6
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@rhtyd & @jburwell this PR requires a new System VM template to function.
I have a XenServer test environment which I have been using where I deploy RPMs
and the System VM which I build with Jenk
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1742
CLOUDSTACK-9544: Check access on account trying to generate user API keys
This is to merge Marc's fix on 4.8+ branches.
Tests run:
$ nosetests --with-xunit --xunit-file=test-results.x
Just because recent builds are failing does not really mean that no one is
using it. In my experience working with different companies who have ACS
in production, a lot of them are using much older versions of ACS (4.4 for
example). Only a subset of companies keep their ACS install "close" to
mas
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1716
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 128
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=2
Skipped=6
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1716
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 129
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=2
Skipped=6
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Will, you make a fair point and we should not be removing plugins just because
they fail to build but that's NOT what I've said.
Let me break down my arguments:
- The only obligation project has is towards any CloudStack users who may be
using these plugins, but given the state of the plugin
I second this. I am aware of the customers who are actively using this. In
fact, I have a PR to be merged in this area. Rather, we need to fix the build
failures
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1715
Thanks,
Subhash
On Oct 27, 2016, at 10:50 PM, Will Stevens
mailto:wstev...@cloudops.
Venkata,
Fair enough, in that case let's work towards fixing the build issue.
Do we have anybody from Juniper or have contacts with people at Juniper who can
help us with following:
- Publish and host the dependency artifacts at a reliable maven repository
- Refactor and switch the plugin
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1638
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1742
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1742
CLOUDSTACK-9544: Check access on account trying to generate user API keys
This is to merge Marc's fix on 4.8+ branches.
Tests run:
$ nosetests --with-xunit --xunit-file=test-results
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1742
Merging this based on code reviews and tests on private@/security@, and
test lgtm above ^^.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1742
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@swill we had lost our Jenkins setup, while I've built all I could not get
a systemvmbuilder job setup yet, so let me do that first so we can build
systemvmtemplates once again. blueorangutan acts
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1694
@rhtyd LGTM on code review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1712
@rhtyd LGTM on code review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1701
@rhtyd LGTM on code review...add more such admin UI stuff that admin end up
using manually
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1717
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-106
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1719
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-108
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1718
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-107
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
41 matches
Mail list logo
