Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1639
@abhinandanprateek
https://github.com/blog/2224-change-the-base-branch-of-a-pull-request
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
CloudStack UI used dictionary, dictionary2 and index jsp files.
The dictionary jsp files simply added a dictionary (java script object or
map) by reading through messages properties for va
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1639
@abhinandanprateek yes, click on `edit` on your PR you should be able to
change the base branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1511
@jburwell these are major changes so they need to go into master,
targetting 4.10, or 4.11. This PR was created based on Daan's original PR, I'll
resume working on this soon.
---
If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1611#discussion_r79337718
--- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py ---
@@ -224,6 +225,15 @@ def createClusters(self, clusters, zoneId, podId,
vmwareDc=None):
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1669
LGTM, I've checkout the PR, builded it and deployed a simulator zone, then
ran through a few localizations and did exploratory testing in the UI, all seem
to work fine.
---
If your proj
Thanks for sharing Martin, I'm glad it worked for you.
Regards.
From: martin kolly
Sent: 13 September 2016 00:52:49
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Rohit Yadav
Subject: Re: CS 4.9 NIO Selector wait time PR-1601
We could fix the issue by generating new pairs of ss
GitHub user abhinandanprateek opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1674
CLOUDSTACK-9460: For long running transactions, if the connection is
timed out by the mysql server then refresh it
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1643
@jburwell created a new PR for 4.8 here
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1674. I was getting many conflicts
due to which I decided to create a new PR and cherry picked the co
Github user koushik-das commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r79357165
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
@pdion891
Below is the Remote access vpn config, update left with the VR public ip.
#ipsec remote access vpn configuration
conn L2TP-PSK
authby=psk
pfs=no
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
@jburwell Jenkins was failing unrelated unit-test failure. I have triggered
new Jenkins build which has passed. Changed the title of the PR to reflect that
its fixing issues CLOUDSTACK-9480
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
@murali-reddy recurring failures will be listed as failing since last n
runs.
The router related tests(lb, network ops) are failing due to this PR.
Are the tests running(manual or BVT)
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1666
I think in the latest code change, `fwr` is not defined before and hence
`fwr +=` operation will fail.
Also, the ICMP rule is still appended and not Inserted in the beginning. Is
that ok? (
GitHub user abhinandanprateek opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1675
CLOUDSTACK-9453: WIP
1. Adding small sized macchinina template as built in templates
2. Adding methods so the test writers haev choice to use any of these
3. Updateing te
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1639
Thanks @karuturi @rhtyd
I created a new one for 4.8 here
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1675 @jburwell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
@rhtyd @pdion891 @swill
I have squashed the commits. Added the template changes to install
strongswan 5.2.
Can one you trigger the systemvm template job on this branch.
---
If your pr
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664
@jburwell Yes, currently working on breaking the methods into multiple
smaller units, and adding unit tests. Along with these adding the marvin tests
from the other PR so that PR co
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591
LGTM @jburwell I checked the changes against the values defined in
`AlertService` and they check out perfectly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1591
@jburwell we can merge this, since it's a doc change no tests are needed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
Thanks @jayapalu I'm rebuilding some infra, I'll get back to you soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1602
Thanks for your help @jburwell !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1675
Macchinina template doesn't seem to work in vmware hypervisor. When VM
deployed eth0 is not created. We probably need to make sure a template is fully
operational on all 3 hypervisors to include
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1639
Macchinina template doesn't seem to work in vmware hypervisor. When VM
deployed eth0 is not created. We probably need to make sure a template is fully
operational on all 3 hypervisors to include
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r79389208
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
I will start doing some testing on this today. Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1676
CLOUDSTACK-9502: DS template copies donât get deleted in VMware ESXi with
multiple clusters and zone wide storage (include CLOUDSTACK-9386 into 4.9
release branch)
Include #1560 into 4.9 re
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1560
Thanks @jburwell, I've opened new PR (1676) against 4.9 release branch
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Hi!
We'ld like to add some of the provisioned Networks, IPs and VM into our
docu / inventory DB.
By now, we're gathering infos from the ACS DB as well as from the API -
filtering start/end-date.
To get things in a more elegant way, I'ld like to run our skripts
event-triggered.
So my question is:
We have been using Vyatta (and then Vyos) after the fork for all of our
production routers for over four years now. It is rock solid and
performs better than the Juniper routers we replaced them with. It is
debian based underneath its custom shell whose syntax is very much like
Juniper. A sudo
Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1615#discussion_r79419754
--- Diff: test/integration/smoke/test_ssvm.py ---
@@ -1197,3 +1205,148 @@ def test_10_destroy_cpvm(self):
# Call to verify cloud process is
Thank you for the feedback Matthew. The Debian 6 EOL thing is something
that VyOS has taken very seriously. Everything has been ported to Debian 8
now, but it is still in beta and is not considered 'stable' yet because
they have not been able to regression test the entire feature set yet. In
tal
Hi!
Just to add my 2 cents to that thread:
I'ld really like to see something like vyatta or pfsense integrated as
"standard" VR.
We'd also talked internally about replacing the VR with some more
mature "appliance"-like router distro.
pfsense e.g. comes AFAIK with no defined API but instead has
Stephan,
ACS has supported publishing events to RabbitMQ and Kafta for a few releases
now. See this doc:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.9/events.html
It's pretty easy to setup and the events make it very easy to trigger third
party interactions.
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/798
Hi @jburwell, yes, actually I was working on other PRs but now I can pick
up this one, is it ok?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Thanks Simon!
That was exactly what I was looking for!
Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 15:44 + schrieb Simon Weller:
> Stephan,
>
>
> ACS has supported publishing events to RabbitMQ and Kafta for a few
> releases now. See this doc: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projec
> ts/cloudstack-admin
Hey Guys,
Will and I had a discussion in the morning on around VyOS and I have an
idea that could work, here me out.
The way Cloudstack currently communicates with VR is via the Hypervisor
(let's assume KVM and XenServer for now). The management server sends a
command as a JSON to the hypervisor
GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1677
CLOUDSTACK-8830 : CLONE - VM snapshot fails for 12 min after instance
creation Summary: Change in API behavior in vCenter 6.0.0. The name for VM
Power On task is null on VMware vCenter 6.0, wherea
Hi All,
From the looks of this thread and the different preferences that parties have,
the way forward looks to be a model that allows multiple different VRs to be
used is the answer.
This is something that I have had in mind for some time now.
By abstracting the roles and configuration of the
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1677
@jburwell I took code from @maneesha-p and added some changes from your
review in last PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Abstracting that interaction would also make future implementations MUCH
less painful and allows third parties who want their networking products
to be CS compatible to write their own implementation of a published API
that CS defines. Let them do the legwork for their products, expand CS
compa
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1676
@jburwell We just re-run integration tests. The same environment as 1560.
You can now safely back out 1560 and forward merge this one.
'''
test DeployVM in anti-affinity groups for pr
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
@rhtyd have you gotten this system VM to build? I am having trouble
getting it to finish building.
My build is failing here...
```
+ log DEBUG 'on_exit: clean_vbox'
+ local lev
43 matches
Mail list logo
