[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1616: Added missing rules on router config, fixed ordering...

Github user karuturi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1616 @swill missing required LGTMs.. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

+1 (binding) I built the 4.9.0-rc2 packages (http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/custom/490rc2/) and tested: - Upgraded an existing KVM (basic zone/shared network) deployment from a 4.7.1.1 environment - Fresh adv zone and adv networking - VR firewall, pf, acls, egress/ingress rules an

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

> Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens : > > > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > *https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.9.0-RC20160725T1656 >

Re: Working Site-to-Site VPN gets disconnected and VPC seems to forgets ACL’s

Hi Simon, thanks for your reply.Currently we don't use private gateways - this deployment never made it that far ;-) It's always a very simple setup because we are testing several scenarios (especially regarding the network setup) to find a solution for this issue. @ Jayapal You'll find the out

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Hi Wido, I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I fixed it by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root pom.xml: https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/commit/0ede472334114341e68eea5e3da37599b71f52e4#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036R47

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

I have seen this periodically over the past couple months. On Jul 26, 2016 5:01 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: > > > Op 25 juli 2016 om 23:05 schreef Will Stevens >: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've created a 4.9.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > > > Git Branch and Com

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Yes, I've experienced this as well going back probably 4 months or so. I eventually just took the plugin out of our build (as we don't use it). - Si From: Will Stevens Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:44 AM To: Wido den Hollander Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1616: Added missing rules on router config, fixed ordering...

Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1616 @karuturi yes, but it is a blocking issue for RC2 and I need to get RC2 out. Do you have problems with anything? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your r

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Juniper changes are unrelated to the Marvin packaging. Why is it in that PR? On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Wido, > > > I also hit this issue but only when building CentOS7 packages today, I > fixed it by adding/declaring the juniper repository explicitly in the root >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Will please re-read the PR summary, thanks. I added the juniper api mvn repository fix to fix for failing el7 rpms packages. Regards. rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 7:52 PM +0530, "Will

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

I'm having trouble building the code on Ubuntu 14.04: Tests run: 146, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.661 sec <<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest testMemoryFreeInKBsDomainReturningOfSomeMemoryStatistics(com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.reso

VMware Primary Storage Question

Hi, Does anyone know why you have to explicitly note the IP address of vCenter Server and the datacenter when adding cluster-wide primary storage based on VMFS? http://imgur.com/a/BVJuq It seems like we already provided this info when we added the datacenter to the zone that your VMware cl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Mike, your system has a old jna version can you upgrade your 1.7 jdk and jna and/or try building with mvn -Djna.nosys=true? Regards. From: Tutkowski, Mike Sent: 27 July 2016 09:07:32 To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Clouds

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

Thanks, Rohit From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 10:41 PM To: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2 Mike, your system has a old jna version can you upgrade your 1.7 jdk and jna and/or try build

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.9.0 RC2

+1 (binding) I ran the following automated tests (details below): TestVolumes.py (with and without its XenServer resigning option) TestSnapshots.py TestVMSnapshots.py TestAddRemoveHosts.py I built a cloud from scratch (using a script) with this RC. I ran the automated tests that I listed above