Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1524#issuecomment-216030450
This time around Jenkins is happy and Travis times out :-s
```
No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially indicates a
stalled build
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1524#issuecomment-216030504
Force pushed a final time, else I give up on this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1486#issuecomment-216030568
Also force pushed this one again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1421#issuecomment-216030620
Force pushed again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Yep. Looking like there is a bug in that file. Thanks for testing. :)
On May 1, 2016 1:40 AM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
> Here are my tests (run from http://ideone.com/).
>
> The short story is that having multiple methods with the same name (even
> if one is an instance method and one is a class
The question then becomes, do we want to keep the instance or the class method?
There exists the same problem for at least one other pair of methods.
Since the class method is listed second in the file currently, it is the only
one of the two that can be utilized. That being the case, we might j
However, from a design standpoint, I prefer the instance method here as it
would be nice to ask the object itself to place itself in maintenance mode.
So, it's really a question of just staying backward compatible (the class
method) or a possibly better design (the instance method).
It will be easy to grep if there class methods, so we should start there.
If not, then I agree that an instance method is probably the best way to
go.
On May 1, 2016 12:41 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike"
wrote:
> However, from a design standpoint, I prefer the instance method here as it
> would be nice to
I was just "concerned" that those who have their own Marvin tests that are not
checked in might be broken if I don't keep the class method.
From: Will Stevens
Sent: Sunday, May 1, 2016 12:03 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Python Question (wi
Ya. Let's see how prevalent the class method is to start with and we will
cross that bridge after.
On May 1, 2016 2:07 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
> I was just "concerned" that those who have their own Marvin tests that are
> not checked in might be broken if I don't keep the class method.
> ___
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1525
Status of tests
This PR is not meant to be merged, but instead be able to give a point in
time status of our current tests (on KVM).
I have just finished a 3 day run of all of our tests
Github user remibergsma closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1524
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1524#issuecomment-216064935
@kiwiflyer Sorry but this seems to have issues. We run this in prod with
Cosmic but apparently some other patch is missing here in order for this to
work proper
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1525#issuecomment-216065039
And now for the files...
**Associated Uploads**
**`/tmp/MarvinLogs/2MVR8P:`**
*
[failed_plus_exceptions.txt](https://objects-east.
Github user alexandrelimassantana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1523#issuecomment-216070253
@cristofolini that would not be that simple, there is userDataApplied
variable which is extern to the loop. It would be better to turn lines
2496-2515
Github user ymolinet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040#issuecomment-216074096
Hi,
I'm trying to install CloudStack on Debian 8.
it's necessary to add lsb-release in dependencies for the system detection
during installation.
E
Github user cristofolini commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1518#discussion_r61694862
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/test/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/resource/VmwareResourceTest.java
---
@@ -117,4 +154,79 @@ public void testSta
So, the problem exists with both enableMaintenance and cancelMaintenance for
hosts and with enableMaintenance for storage (not with cancelMaintenance for
storage).
A bunch of UI scripts use those class methods (I didn't see us trying to use
the instance methods anywhere).
I believe those class
"A bunch of UI scripts use those class methods (I didn't see us trying to use
the instance methods anywhere)."
I meant that a bunch of test scripts use those methods (not UI scripts).
> On May 1, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
>
> So, the problem exists with both enableMaintenance an
19 matches
Mail list logo
