The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Simon Weller to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
el
Github user nlivens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1523#issuecomment-215336954
@DaanHoogland, @remibergsma, @swill, @jburwell, these are rather small
changes, if any of you could review, that would be great!
---
If your project is set up for
Congratulations Simon!
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
Regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 April 2016 08:24
To: dev
Subject
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-215338991
@rhtyd Hmm, that's odd. My logs showed that the lock prevented the script
from running twice and our problems were also solved with this.
Before we had race co
Hi Will,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> ...I have CC'ed in both the ACS dev@ list and the ASF board@ list to try to
> keep everyone on the same page...
Thanks - with my board member hat on what's important is that relevant
changes are mentioned in your next report to the
Congrats! :-)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Angus"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 28 April, 2016 08:44:36
> Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Simon Weller
> Congratulations Simon!
>
>
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-215346544
@rhtyd: I tested and you are partially right. My test script:
https://gist.github.com/wido/a236e9f065cef85b0497990e3d4798e6
When using the 'with open() as X' s
On 25/04/16, 4:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote:
>
>> Op 25 april 2016 om 12:45 schreef Abhinandan Prateek
>> :
>>
>>
>>
>> At shapeblue we are also working towards enabling ipv6 specially for
>> advanced networking/ospf.
>> Our approach is more of bottom up where we plan to streamline ba
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215347141
I am not against this restructure perse. But shall we not try to change to
many things at once?
We have enough on our plates, so talking about leaving Maven se
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-215347296
@dsclose I think it is better to split this PR into some isolated PRs, as
the issues are isolated.
to be honest, some commits looks good to me ( as we have s
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1270#issuecomment-215348912
Changes LGTM. UI changes so CI results doesn't matter.
@anshul1886 From the fix looks like applicable to all browsers, is that
correct?
---
If your project
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282#issuecomment-215350146
@anshul1886 The fix is only for XS snapshots. What about other HVs?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1493#issuecomment-215350128
@swill there are in total 25 malicious clients that can block for 60s for
all 5 (max.) server worker threads; so worst case we should have waited for at
least 25*60/5
Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1297#issuecomment-215350363
Applied successfully to 4.8 and tested, it works fine as far as I could
tell, but the SG change operation goes through even if the VM is online, so
"CLOUDSTACK-9203 P
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215352448
@DaanHoogland @wido @mlsorensen @jburwell @agneya2001 @koushik-das
@terbolous @resmo @K0zka review and LGTM please?
@swill I think we've resolved all outsta
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-215353110
@wido +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1408#issuecomment-215353392
reviewed updated PR, LGTM
cc @swill
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje
Hi, see in-line
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
>>Since we know the MAC address and the /64 prefix we can *calculate* the
>>address
>>a Instance will take. With that we do not have to store the address in a
>>database.
>
> Doing bit of research on this ma
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/956#issuecomment-215364487
Changes LGTM.
@swill This can be merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Congrats Simon!
Kind regards,
Nick Livens
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Congrats! :-)
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Paul Angus"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursda
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/955#issuecomment-215365287
@SudharmaJain Any updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/928#issuecomment-215366187
@karuturi Any updates on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/927#issuecomment-215366546
@karuturi Any updates?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1270#issuecomment-215368331
@koushik-das Other browsers except IE stopped supporting that attribute. So
it will not have impact. This can also be verified by seeing in other browsers
consol
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#issuecomment-215372191
LGTM. Had already given one earlier based on simulator testing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282#issuecomment-215375588
@koushik-das All hypervisor uses XenServerSnapshotStrategy so it should be
applicable on all hypervisors.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Hi All,
looks like the systemvm templates are not getting built correctly in
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-master.
The build version is in correctly set to 4.6, Im not sure but i think the
build version in
/etc/cloudstck-release is also getting wrongly set inside the temp
In the job configuration, I see the version as 4.6.0.
I am not sure if that is where it reads from. I changed it to 4.9.0
- export version=4.6.0
+ export version=4.9.0
I will keep an eye on the job. Let me know if there are any issues with
this change.
~Rajani
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:34 PM,
AFAIK it hasn't been necessary to update the systemvm template yet, that is
probably why it still shows as 4.6.0.
--
Erik
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Bharat Kumar
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> looks like the systemvm templates are not getting built correctly in
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/jo
> Op 28 april 2016 om 10:50 schreef Nux! :
>
>
> Hi, see in-line
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> >>Since we know the MAC address and the /64 prefix we can *calculate* the
> >>address
> >>a Instance will take. With that we do not have to
People,
The PMC has ask Rafael to join them to oversee the project and he has
gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Rafael and wish him
wisdom in his new task.
on behalve of the PMC,
--
Daan
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215389142
+1 on the feature. Based on testing done on the simulator with root admin
and normal user for a few APIs
+0 on the immediate removal of command.properties/st
Guess I should have facilitated everybody's mail filters
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> People,
>
> The PMC has ask Rafael to join them to oversee the project and he has
> gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Rafael and wish him
> wisdom in his new task
Congrats Rafael,
> On Apr 28, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> People,
>
> The PMC has ask Rafael to join them to oversee the project and he has
> gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Rafael and wish him
> wisdom in his new task.
>
> on behalve of the PMC,
> --
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-215391701
@swill @rhtyd: I looked through all the code and fixed it. Is was just two
more scripts.
wido@wido-desktop:~/repos/cloudstack$ grep -R "MySQLdb" *
wido@wid
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-215392929
@wido that is true, so will simply fixing the imports and usage work?
I found using `git grep MySQLdb`:
```
client/bindir/cloud-update-xenserver-licens
welcome, kiwi. Good work and keep going.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Nick LIVENS wrote:
> Congrats Simon!
>
> Kind regards,
> Nick Livens
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Nux! wrote:
>
> > Congrats! :-)
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
>
ah..makes sense. Thanks Erik. I will revert the config change.
~Rajani
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> AFAIK it hasn't been necessary to update the systemvm template yet, that is
> probably why it still shows as 4.6.0.
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Bha
Congratulations Sebastien !!
Best Regards,
Sanjeev N
Chief Product Engineer, Accelerite
Off: +91 40 6722 9368 | EMail: sanjeev.neelar...@accelerite.com
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2016 11:41 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apa
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#issuecomment-215401063
@swill CI Test good, 2+ reviews. Ready to Merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Congrats Rafael :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Daan Hoogland"
> To: "dev"
> Sent: Thursday, 28 April, 2016 11:59:28
> Subject: Rafael Weingartner joining the PMC
> People,
>
> The PMC has ask Rafael to join them
Very exciting Sebastien. Congratulations!
We're a heavy user of containers, so we'll definitely be taking a look at this
when it is released.
- Si
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 6:41 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: market...
Congratulations Rafael!
- Si
From: Nux!
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 7:06 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rafael Weingartner joining the PMC
Congrats Rafael :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Ok Wido, thanks for the clarification, it sounds good.
>From my point of view, if there is a clear relation between IPs and VMs, then
>as an operator I am happy.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Wido den Hollan
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1522#issuecomment-215407693
LGTM. Verified in api.log that job id is getting appended.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#issuecomment-215408560
is there any UI change possible?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1409#issuecomment-215409715
Tested this in a 4.8 lab. I agree that there is little point in running CI
against this, as it's a config change.
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up f
4.9 will require a new system vm template when we add the strongswan
support and ospf, but I don't think I have added anything yet which will
require a new system vm (yet).
Rohit started a dev@ thread about a week or so ago on this topic for us.
On Apr 28, 2016 7:38 AM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote:
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1523#issuecomment-215410690
thought the code looks sane, could you be bothered to show the error in a
marvin test, Nick. It seems a good candidate to enter the regression suite.
---
If y
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#issuecomment-215410772
We'll take a look at this in a separate PR. We don't use the UI.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-215419241
@rhtyd I grepped *after* my modifications :)
Yes, the API between MySQLdb and mysql.connector is the same. The only
difference is the import and the connection
Github user nlivens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1523#issuecomment-215421778
@DaanHoogland, you already have a UserData test script, do you want us to
add this test to the same script, or create a new one for it?
---
If your project is set
Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455#issuecomment-215427658
@swill , it is all green now. Can you please merge this PR ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Congratulations!
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Simon Weller wrote:
> Congratulations Rafael!
>
> - Si
>
>
> From: Nux!
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 7:06 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Rafael Weingartner joining the PMC
>
> Congr
> Op 28 april 2016 om 14:22 schreef Nux! :
>
>
> Ok Wido, thanks for the clarification, it sounds good.
>
> From my point of view, if there is a clear relation between IPs and VMs, then
> as an operator I am happy.
>
Yes, there will. So for a POD VLAN you will assing *ONE* IPv6 /64. That giv
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215438021
I would love to dump Maven for Gradle. However, I agree with @wido -- we
currently have much higher priorities to address. For me, it is fun to banter
a bit abou
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215446492
Enjoying the discussion I would like to -1 for the entire refactor all at
once. I changed this project because it was feasible and convenient. I can see
myself
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1523#issuecomment-215447324
@nlivens I don't care for more scripts, just for a test showing the problem
so we no it doesn't regress. Whatever meets the goal easiest.
---
If your project
Thanks Bertrand,
I can put a report together for the next board meeting if that will be
helpful. Would you prefer that I remove the board@ list from this thread
and only keep the ASF Infra team CC'ed?
Cheers,
Will
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> On W
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/956#issuecomment-215451916
Do we have any verification that this does what it is supposed to? It
would be good if we could get some form of verification posted that this
behaves as expected.
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282#issuecomment-215460320
@anshul1886 I see in some other places in that file when
`snapshotDao.remove(snapshotId);` is called there is a `return true` right
after it. Can you help me underst
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1522#issuecomment-215463060
This change is pretty straight forward and it has been manually verified by
@koushik-das in addition to the output originally posted by @nathanejohnson. I
think this
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-215472985
So are we happy with the state of this? How should I adjust my CI to
validate this fix?
I currently have:
```
yum -y install maven tomcat mkisofs
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215479369
In reading this, is it the case that if someone upgrades from a previous
version to 4.9 (with this code included) they will not be able to take
advantage of this func
Github user dsclose commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519#issuecomment-215480948
@ustcweizhou How would you recommend I separate this? I can imagine
separating the issues broadly into two parts:
1. **Routing tables and iptables rules sho
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455#issuecomment-215481337
Yes, I think this one is ready... Can I get one more LGTM code review on
this one?
@pdube @kiwiflyer @DaanHoogland @rafaelweingartner
---
If your projec
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1522#issuecomment-215486284
Code is straight forward and makes sense. I validated it works in the lab.
LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1522#issuecomment-215486826
@swill This is Ready to Merge
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1474#issuecomment-215492977
We're pulling this in for testing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1522#issuecomment-215493805
its added to my merge queue. I need to get through this queue today, it is
getting long now. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1474#issuecomment-215494066
cool thanks. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-215501683
@swill existing users won't be automatically migrated to use this feature,
see the admin-doc PR that documents the upgrade/migrate procedure; though new
installations
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-215502330
@swill for the CI you can install using pip with: (this is also in
tools/travis/install.sh)
pip install --upgrade --egg
http://cdn.mysql.com/Downloads/Connector-P
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-215504839
I see this in the output when Marvin is installed.
```
Requirement already up-to-date: mysql-connector-python>=1.1.6
```
If I check the version I h
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-215505081
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 85
Skipped: 0
Failed: 0
Errors: 0
```
**Associated Uploads**
**
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-215506015
These CI results basically show that the standard VM workflow in KVM is not
affected. I don't have the ability to test this on VMware, but I know you guys
are alread
Just found a cool perk many would benefit from on this list.
JetBrains is a company behind many development tools.
AppCode
CLion
DataGrip
dotCover
dotMemory
dotPeek
dotTrace
Hub
IntelliJ IDEA
Kotlin
MPS
PhpStorm
PyCharm
ReSharper
RubyMine
TeamCity
Upsource
WebStorm
YouTrack
If you are ASF comm
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455#issuecomment-215512619
@sanju1010 though the code looks alright I don't like the integration test
should be snooping under the hood. I would rather see them behave as black-box
tests
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-215529568
@rhtyd @rafaelweingartner I could discover the problem by deleting `cloud`
and `cloud_usage` database, then `cloudstack-databases-setup` to create them
blank and r
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1473#issuecomment-215531806
@remibergsma can you force push again so we can try to get it all green?
Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Thank you all for the warm welcome. It is an honor to be part of the Apache
CloudStack (ACS) committee. I will try to work as much as I can to help the
PMC, committers, and contributors on improving the ACS. Sometimes I might
not be as present as others (as it is happening now), but that is due to
Congratulations Simon,
Let’s keep up with the good work ;)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> welcome, kiwi. Good work and keep going.
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Nick LIVENS <
> nick.liv...@nuagenetworks.net
> > wrote:
>
> > Congrats Simon!
> >
> > Kind regards,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1348
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1510
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1522
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1270
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-215546030
@nvazquez,
What does that mean?
First we are executing all of the `schema-XXXtoYYY.sql`, then all of the
`schemaXXXtoYYY-cleanup.sql`? Instea
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1454
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1517
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1409
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-215548103
@rafaelweingartner exactly, I meant to explain that I realized that first
all `schema-XXXtoYYY.sql` were executed and after they finished, all
`schema-XXXtoYYY-cle
Github user rhtyd commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-215548664
@nvazquez that's by design -- all upgrade paths (migration code and the
schema files) are run first and after that only the cleanup scripts are ran
---
If your proje
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1436#issuecomment-215548871
@sanju1010 please review the CI run results when you have a second.
Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1513#issuecomment-215549283
We'll pull this in for testing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1466#issuecomment-215549970
I confess that without looking the code, I thought the same as @nvazquez.
First we would execute schema-XXXtoYYY.sql, schemaXXXtoYYY-cleanup.sql and
th
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1433#issuecomment-215551223
Running CI now. Will have results later tonight or tomorrow...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-215551291
Running CI now. Will have results later tonight or tomorrow...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1521#issuecomment-215552234
@DaanHoogland please rebase as master has caused merge conflicts...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1496#issuecomment-215552813
@abhinandanprateek please rebase as this currently has merge conflicts with
master. Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
