Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-211785290
@swill thanks, the change builds into systemvm.iso and no new template is
necessary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#discussion_r60188424
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
2.5
1.2
1.0-20081010.060147
-5.5
+6.0
--- End diff --
@r
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1365#issuecomment-211785845
@swill we're good with this PR and it is not dependent on any other PR. For
building noredist rpms/deb, one can use this repo with the dep-jars --
https://github.c
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-211786322
@swill thanks Will, I'll try to split this PR into two to isolate what
changes are causing this in your env and see if we can get it fixed/improved
separately
-
Github user shwetaag commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#discussion_r60193089
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_volumes.py ---
@@ -603,7 +603,134 @@ def test_01_volume_attach_detach(self):
"Check the st
Github user shwetaag commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#discussion_r60193647
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_volumes.py ---
@@ -603,7 +603,134 @@ def test_01_volume_attach_detach(self):
"Check the st
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1402#issuecomment-211818185
@alexandrelimassantana @swill Thanks guys, fixed it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Hi all,
Currently, there is no reliable way to tell whether an offering was created
for an Isolated Network or for tiers in a VPC. This is determined based on
providers. (ConfigurationManagerImpl.isOfferingForVpc)
In the UI, you have the possibility to check a flag for "VPC" during
creation of a
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1376#issuecomment-211859221
The changes are only limited to UI, so there is no need to run
smoke/integration tests.
Cursory look at the changes looks fine.
@swill I think these shou
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1375#issuecomment-211860481
@swill Again UI changes related to l10n. I think these can be merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1374#issuecomment-211860607
@swill Again UI changes related to l10n. I think these can be merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1394#issuecomment-211864757
Merging as UI change and 2 LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1394
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi all,
Will and I had some discussions around systemvm template on one of the PRs, I
wanted to bring the discussion here on dev@.
Provided we've some features merged before the freeze date in May, we will need
to build a new systemvm-template with likely following new packages (assuming
the f
Github user kansal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1418#issuecomment-211873904
@GabrielBrascher These adjustments can be done, but I don't see any point
of introducing the function calls. Anyhow this code is not used anywhere else
in the whole
> Op 19 april 2016 om 13:22 schreef Rohit Yadav :
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Will and I had some discussions around systemvm template on one of the PRs, I
> wanted to bring the discussion here on dev@.
>
> Provided we've some features merged before the freeze date in May, we will
> need to build a new
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1333#issuecomment-21190
@nitin-maharana Looks like there is some problem. In confirmation dialog
when I click "yes" nothing happens and on clicking "no" the offering is
changed.
---
Github user dmabry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#discussion_r60222132
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_volumes.py ---
@@ -603,7 +603,134 @@ def test_01_volume_attach_detach(self):
"Check the stat
Github user dmabry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#discussion_r60222679
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_volumes.py ---
@@ -603,7 +603,134 @@ def test_01_volume_attach_detach(self):
"Check the stat
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-211911369
This failed to compile. Can you have a look?
```
[INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (compile) @ cloud-apidoc ---
log4j:WARN No appenders could be
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-211915697
@mlsorensen did you do a code review of this or are you just excited about
the change. :)
Ideally I would get another LGTM before merging. I am pretty confi
Github user dmabry commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#discussion_r60225742
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_volumes.py ---
@@ -603,7 +603,134 @@ def test_01_volume_attach_detach(self):
"Check the stat
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1402#issuecomment-211916588
Thanks. Looks good now...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#discussion_r60226618
--- Diff: packaging/centos7/cloud-management.service ---
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Description=CloudStack Management Server
After=syslog.target net
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1376#issuecomment-211917846
Thanks koushik. I tend to agree with you on this one. I will add it to my
merge list. Thanks...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-211918504
The command ââumaskâ at âscripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.shâ is
using â022â as a parameter, while the one at
âpackaging/centos63/cloud-mana
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1375#issuecomment-211918463
This one looks like it will have merge conflicts with #1376.
@milamberspace should I first merge #1376 and then have you rebase this PR and
fix the conflicts before
I will go to a talk this evening about http://gatling.io/ Is there anybody
busy testing cloudstack this way? What tools are you using?
nice to hear,
--
Daan
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-211923768
@swill okay I'll check this out and see if I can reproduce the failure.
I'll keep you posted.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Hey All,
The planning of the CCC event in Montreal is in full swing. A lot of
people have submitted talks, so this is going to be an awesome event. We
currently have a venue booked, but based on the number of talks submitted,
this event may be bigger than we were initially expecting, so we may ne
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1394#issuecomment-211926700
@koushik-das I am not seeing the commit in master. Did you merge into 4.7
and then forward merge into 4.8 and then forward merge into master???
---
If your project
Thanks for starting this discussion Rohit. :)
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Will and I had some discussions
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-211930508
@bhaisaab I will let you address @rafaelweingartner's comment. If you
choose to make a change, it will not impact the 'readiness' of this PR. I am
not sure which on
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-211932110
@bhaisaab thank you sir. sorry this is proving to be a bit complicated. i
appreciate the support.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1459#issuecomment-211936017
## CI RESULTS
### 84/85 TESTS PASSED
The test that failed is a test that commonly fails in my environment and
has been verif
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1394#issuecomment-211943539
@swill I didn't fwd merge into 4.8 and master. Are we fwd merging for every
individual commit in order to avoid conflicts?
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1394#issuecomment-211947137
Every commit that goes into 4.7 gets fwd-merged into 4.8 and then gets
fwd-merged into master. We have tools in `cloudstack/tools/git/` which make
this process MUCH
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/26
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1394#issuecomment-211954088
@swill I wanted to understand if it is ok to do these fwd merges once every
week/fortnight (based on number of commits that went into the release branch)
or do
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211957155
@rafaelweingartner I pushed new changes, would integration tests be needed
for this pr? I have tested api calls with new ids parameters and succeeded
---
If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1394#issuecomment-211958527
@koushik-das oh, i understand your question better now. i would like to do
it on every commit. It makes the commit history clearer and it mitigates
conflict issues.
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211962282
@nvazquez I have added this to my CI queue. I have a pretty serious
backlog, so it may take me a few days to get to it though. In the mean time,
lets see if we can
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211965259
That's cool! Thanks @swill!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Hi All,
I'm running an initiative to improve CloudStack logging. I'm going to be
analysing logs and re-categorising the DEBUG, INFO, WARN and ERROR where
appropriate such that we can reduce the default logging level to INFO without
losing important troubleshooting information, while at the sam
I like this initiative Paul. I just wanted to check with you. Do you know
if there is any confidential information like credentials or the like that
is logged in the management server log? I thought we had done a push at
one point to make sure no sensitive data was logged, but I don't remember
f
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#discussion_r60255522
--- Diff:
server/test/com/cloud/api/query/MutualExclusiveIdsManagerBaseTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache So
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#discussion_r60255794
--- Diff:
server/test/com/cloud/api/query/MutualExclusiveIdsManagerBaseTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache So
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#discussion_r60256696
--- Diff:
server/test/com/cloud/api/query/MutualExclusiveIdsManagerBaseTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+//
+// Licensed to the Apache So
Thanks Will,
As far as I know anything sensitive is removed or obfuscated (vcenter password
displayed as h**). IP addresses and hostnames are shown.
Users may want to use a tool like SED to replace IP addresses or internal
domain names
http://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/remove-ip-a
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211988788
@nvazquez I have a question about the method "getIdsListFromCmd".
If we inform an ID and a list of IDs (not empty) at the same time, what
should be the
Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1459#issuecomment-211989957
Thanks @swill!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Thanks Paul. Are you looking for only logs with errors or are you just
looking for just any management server logs?
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:45
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1459#issuecomment-211991515
I have one LGTM. I need one more and this PR is ready to merge. Thanks
guys...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
No problem.
Good question - Any and all logs. Often, it's the mundane stuff which obscures
the messages that you really need to see!
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
Regards,
Paul Angus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
--
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211993545
@rafaelweingartner Actually the idea was that they were mutually exclusive,
that only of them should be provided, emulating `listVirtualMachines` API
method behavi
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211994713
The method name is ok. I just asked to confirm how you see the method
workings. I only feel that the Javadoc should say that, whenever the ID
variable is
Github user syed commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-211995051
@rafaelweingartner I've added the test mocking the `BufferedWriter`. When I
tried to run the tests I found that the test required `agent.properties` and
`log4j.xml` wh
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211996504
Ok, I would modify javadoc and add a test for that particular case
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user syed commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1423#issuecomment-211996541
@bhaisaab Do you have an idea of why Marvin is failing on my dev setup?
I've followed the guide mentioned
[here](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK
Github user syed closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1423
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
I'm looking forward to visiting you guys in Montreal again.
Thanks for organizing the conference!
> On Apr 19, 2016, at 7:37 AM, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> Hey All,
> The planning of the CCC event in Montreal is in full swing. A lot of
> people have submitted talks, so this is going to be an awes
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-211999079
Sorry if I am very picky sometimes; but, I believe that the more clear we
are about a method behavior and the more tests to enforce that behavior we
have,
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-212001526
No problem, I appreciate your comments and think they are really helpful ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
I built ACS 4.8 on Centos 7 ARM on a Raspberry PI B 2. With ACS 4.8 built
on a Centos 7 x86_68 for the cloudstack_agent code.
And I am planning on managing a cluster of Intel Centos 7 kvm hypervisors.
I was wonder if anyone has tried a mixed platform configuration before. I
will report back m
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-212008157
I included last changes and squashed all commits into one
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
We load test with real production work load :)
I know thats not the answer you want to hear. By the way, dont hit 8250
without a recent non-blocking SSL Handshake patch - it will disconnect
all other agents.
Or perhaps - try without patch and with patch - to see if you can find a
breaking point.
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-212009376
That is great.
Now reading your documentation, I noticed another question.
And if both are null? Or if ID is null and IDs is empty? The way it is no
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#discussion_r60272259
--- Diff: packaging/centos7/cloud-management.service ---
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Description=CloudStack Management Server
After=syslog.target network.targ
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#discussion_r60275113
--- Diff: packaging/centos7/cloud-management.service ---
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Description=CloudStack Management Server
After=syslog.target net
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-212034630
@swill we may ignore them, those are non-issues unless @rafaelweingartner
has strong opinions
@rafaelweingartner things you can do to improve your reviews:
Regarding packer, I believe cosmic has done most of that. See
https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/systemvm-packer/blob/master/README.md
Erik
Den tirsdag 19. april 2016 skrev Rohit Yadav
følgende:
> Hi all,
>
> Will and I had some discussions around systemvm template on one of the
> PRs, I
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-212040090
@bhaisaab I think you are being too hard on @rafaelweingartner. He simply
asked a question because the format was presented differently in two different
files in the
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-212043816
Cool, I added both test cases
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#discussion_r60284224
--- Diff: packaging/centos7/cloud-management.service ---
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Description=CloudStack Management Server
After=syslog.target network.targ
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-212060526
@swill I've explained my intent above, and it was not intended to be hard
on @rafaelweingartner either
While he's indeed putting good effort on PRs, I'm seeing
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1423#issuecomment-212062046
@syed looks like marvin plugin is missing; if you've both python 2.6/2.7
(looks like nose is using python 2.6) make sure to install it for the one you
use (the def
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212063057
@swill I looked at it, looks like an environment issue? I was able to build
it without issue (also did not find 'root_admin' key in the code. I've rebased
master a
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-212063724
@swill no problem, I'll deal with this during weekends and see how much we
can safely get into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212064683
I was confused by this as well. I will kick off another CI run against
this PR and see if I have the problem again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212065155
@swill just completed local build here: (also pushed -f, let's see if
Travis reports any failure)
[INFO]
-
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212065979
@borisstoyanov would like to share our QA results, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212071544
@bhaisaab my environment builds it twice. Once with packaging and once
without. If I have the problem again, I will send you the command that was run
that had the p
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1420#issuecomment-212074504
@bhaisaab thank you, I appreciate the effort. ð
I am actively trying to get more people involved in code review, so we will
have to lead by example for w
Github user dmabry commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#issuecomment-212085924
Ok, I have made the requested changes. Please review and let me know if
there is anything else I need to change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can repl
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1497#issuecomment-212097103
@Nv, that is great. The code now LGTM.
There is a problem with Jenkins, maybe a push âf can solve it?
Your work as always is very good ;)
I b
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212106389
The tests are now being run, so this time everything built alright. I will
have results for you later tonight or in the morning. :)
---
If your project is set up f
All,
What is the correct way to request some additional rights on the Apache Jira
instance?
I'd like to be able to assign some issues to myself (and other members of my
team).
Thanks,
- Si
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> All,
>
>
> What is the correct way to request some additional rights on the Apache
> Jira instance?
>
> I'd like to be able to assign some issues to myself (and other members of
> my team).
>
>
I believe the general way is to state your user
>
>From: Erik Weber
>Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 3:44 PM
>To: dev
>Subject: Re: Apache Jira rights for the ACS project
>
>>On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>>
>> What is the correct way to request some additional rights o
Paul,
Are you wanting for focus on logs on releases later than a particular version
(e.g. 4.6)?
- Si
From: Paul Angus
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 10:55 AM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: CloudStack Logging
No pr
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212127186
@bhaisaab @swill Hey Guys, I've successfully checkout and build the PR,
will continue with testing tomorrow. I'd like to take the opportunity to tell
you I've
Before my current employer/job I worked at an A/B testing startup where I
scaled their geo-distributed data-acquisition/cdn servers to capture/serve each
up to 50k requests/second -- for internal network testing, we used wrk, ab,
JMeter and we also wrote and ran a custom tool, and for external (
Thank for sharing Erik.
Regards.
From: Erik Weber
Sent: 19 April 2016 23:15
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.9 systemvmtemplate
Regarding packer, I believe cosmic has done most of that. See
https://github.com/MissionCriticalClou
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-212129730
@borisstoyanov awesome, thanks. Are you able to push the test results to
the PR? I have built a tool (https://github.com/cloudops/upr) to hopefully
simplify the pus
All,
As I am sure many have observed, we have a large number of committers [1] who
are no longer active. Currently, we no status that continues to recognize
someone’s committer merit while allowing them to declare inactive in the
project. To address this gap, I am proposed amending our projec
This was recently sent to ComDev (d...@community.apache.org) and I feel it
is worth sharing.
Cheers,
Erik
-- Forwarded message --
From: Niclas Hedhman
Date: Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:50 AM
Subject: Advice for community participation to lower tension
To: d...@community.apache.org
Ev
GitHub user syed reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1423
[CLOUDSTACK-9296] Start ipsec for client VPN
This fix starts the IPSEC daemon when enabling client side vpn
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull http
退订
wangyuyang1...@163.com
Another way to look at it would be to make isolated network a special case of
VPC (having a single tier).
-Koushik
From: Nick LIVENS
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 2:46 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Network offerings for Isolated Net
you should be able to assign issues now.
~Rajani
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Simon Weller wrote:
> >
> >From: Erik Weber
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 3:44 PM
> >To: dev
> >Subject: Re: Apache Jira rights for the ACS project
> >
> >>On Tue, Apr 1
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
