Github user nlivens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1452#issuecomment-203794406
@pedro-martins, I do like it, but we didn't change that code, we just
restructured it a bit so I didn't want to touch the original code, I can still
make that chang
Github user shwetaag commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455#issuecomment-203818359
Did Code walk through . LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user eriweb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455#issuecomment-203855979
@remibergsma @wilderrodrigues @borisroman you guys have been testing a lot
previously, would this change work for you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user wilderrodrigues closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Thanks Koushik, I'll add my reply to your comments.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
On Mar 28 2016, at 2:08 pm, Koushik Das wrote:
Thanks Rohit, for the replies. Added some mo
Using cloudmonkey, pass args: (note lowercase)
details[0].key=nicAdapter details[0].value=vmxnet3
If it's not working, check if the version of CloudStack supports this feature
(overriding the default nic adapter setting using template details).
Alternatively, you can pass this while deploying t
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#issuecomment-203884447
@wilderrodrigues will you create a new PR for this ? This PR is not merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
HI Rohit,
I have reviewed the FS and it looks good . I have updated my suggestion on
createRolePermission API on FS it self .Please check and share your views.
Regards
Sadhu
suresh.sa...@accelerite.com
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Th
Thanks Sadhu.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@accelerite.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 6:01 PM
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.o
Thanks Rohit. Unfortunately I am not able to use cloudmonkey (which is
awesome btw) in this case since this is being built into a bigger tool. I
am currently using my own library: https://github.com/swill/csapi
With a bunch of trial and error I was able to figure out that it had to be
passed as
Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1263#issuecomment-203947763
@DaanHoogland @rafaelweingartner @pdube removed those ".class" files, also
all checks have passed.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438#issuecomment-203997224
Code LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438#issuecomment-204001802
Tests were performed and reviews executed; so, should we merge this or the
#1427?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
GitHub user nvazquez opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1457
CLOUDSTACK-9333: Exclude clusters from OVF operations
JIRA TICKET: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9333
It is proposed to add a way to exclude hosts from selected clu
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438#issuecomment-204005852
I think we should probably merge this one and not #1427. Do you agree?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438#issuecomment-204006448
I agree, but I was the one that opened the PR, so in my opinion, my opinion
should no count much here :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can re
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204005079
Great!!! 2 LGTM received. Can we have this merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204005766
I guess so, if no one objects.
The code was extensively reviewed, test cases (unit ones) were written,
functional test were executed. For me this
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1260#issuecomment-204004213
@bvbharat I see that a test failed; I checked the logs and it seems that it
was because it failed to apply the port forwarding rule. However, I could not
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204008304
Did we run the whole BVT test suite on it as well? I see a few integration
test run, but not many. If we think it is ready to go, I can merge it in...
---
If your
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204010549
I am running tests against real hardware right now for this. Assuming
everything goes will I will merge it right after. Thx...
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204011239
ok thanks ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204011495
Testing my first PR with my shiny new CI environment. :P
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204013813
Out of curiosity, is it running automatically testing all of the opened PRs?
Curiosity 2, is it real hardware or a buble?
---
If your project is set
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204015303
I have to manually kick off the PRs for now, I have not automated it yet.
Still getting going.
It is deployed as hypervisor on hypervisor using bubble, so it
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204015782
Sure it answered ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204016332
I am hoping to get things more automated as I get more comfortable with
everything, but I just had to get something in place so I can start getting
through this PR ba
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204019262
That is cool. This will certainly be a great benefit to our community.
What are the resources (CPU, memory, HD) requirements to run this appliance?
-
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204025261
**Minimal**
CPU Intel 4 core 64-bit processor with virtualization extensions
RAM 16GB
HDD 20GB
**Recommended**
CPU Intel Skylake 4 core 64-bit
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204025586
nice thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1263#issuecomment-204043787
The code seems ok now. LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438#issuecomment-204045871
I opened #1427 and I agree, @rafaelweingartner and @swill so please go
ahead. I will close #1427
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1427#issuecomment-204046109
#1438 covers this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user DaanHoogland closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1427
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Conversation moved to dev@ so everyone has better visibility. Thanks for
the feedback Chris... :)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> None here on my part, and thanks for direct CC. The cloudstack dev
> email was such that I had to unsubscribe, but I have been monitoring
thanks if possible if you could CC my apache email I’d appreciate it
on those threads so I can contribute.
-Original Message-
From: Will Stevens
Date: Thursday, March 31, 2016 at 10:47 AM
To: jpluser
Cc: Sam Ruby , David Nalley ,
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Subject: Re: [LOGISTICS] Mo
No problem. I will try to keep you CC'ed with this email so you can
contribute. :)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> thanks if possible if you could CC my apache email I’d appreciate it
> on those threads so I can contribute.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Could someone with access to those VMs check the problem?
It seems that there is an envrioment misconfiguraiton
-- Forwarded message --
From: Apache Jenkins Server
Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:24 PM
Subject: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #7108
To: cloudstack-comm.
Rafael, I think you need to ask infra.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Could someone with access to those VMs check the problem?
> It seems that there is an envrioment misconfiguraiton
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:
Thanks, I will do that ;)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Rafael, I think you need to ask infra.
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Could someone with access to those VMs check the problem?
> > It seems t
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1457#issuecomment-204147535
@nvazquez after reading your explanation at the PR's body I understood the
change.
That change can be used to any kind of hypervisor, right?
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1457#issuecomment-204152844
@rafaelweingartner How about 'cluster.exclude' or
'cluster.storage.operations.exclude'. I think the latter is the better choice.
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1457#issuecomment-204153083
@serg38, I agree with you.
The name 'cluster.storage.operations.exclude' seems to suit better the
parameter.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
I have a web-service that serves CloudStack templates, the SSL on the
download web service is signed by internal CA. This means i need to
inject the intermediate CA as well as ROOT CA into SSVM's java keystore
- for java client to be able to recognize the Certs and download the
template from remote
Hi,
I'm not sure what changed in my environment, but now I'm having trouble running
my Marvin tests.
I've un-installed and re-installed Marvin, but it doesn't seem to fix this
issue. I've also run pip install --upgrade pycurl, but that didn't fix it
either.
=== TestName: Failure: | Status
Hi,Boris you are welcome, and expect your shares .
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 6:19 AM, ilya wrote:
> Hi Boris
>
> Welcome!
>
> On 3/28/16 5:21 AM, Boris Stoyanov wrote:
> > Hi CloudStack,
> >
> > My name is Boris Stoyanov (Bobby) and today is my first day @ShapeBlue.
> I’m based in Sofia, Bulg
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1457#issuecomment-204197434
@nvazquez I was thinking, isn't there any documentation/enumeration for all
of the possible parameters to be used at the "cluster_details" table?
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1443#issuecomment-204199455
It is a nice clean up, thanks @GabrielBrascher
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
I don't remember ever explicitly building libcurl, but maybe I'll have to do
that.
> On Mar 31, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm not sure what changed in my environment, but now I'm having trouble
> running my Marvin tests.
>
>
> I've un-installed and re-instal
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-204216991
My tests verified that this was ready to merge. Merged...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user sanju1010 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1455#issuecomment-204248348
@alexandrelimassantana , cleanup does not clean the db connection. So it
should work for other tests as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Just an FYI that going to an older version of pycurl seems to have fixed the
issue for me:
mtutkowski-LT:~ mtutkowski-LT$ pip show pycurl
---
Metadata-Version: 1.0
Name: pycurl
Version: 7.19.0
Summary: PycURL -- cURL library module for Python
Home-page: http://pycurl.sourceforge.net/
Author: Kjet
Hi Mike,
This could be an issue with Pycurl. Try to install or upgrade pycurl since
MarvinPlugin module might be dependent on Pycurl.
Best Regards,
Sanjeev N
Chief Product Engineer, Accelerite
Off: +91 40 6722 9368 | EMail: sanjeev.neelar...@accelerite.com
-Original Message-
From: Tut
Thanks for the reply, Sanjeev.
As it turns out, going back to version 7.19.0 of pycurl fixed the issue for me.
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 10:58 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Marvin Question
Hi Mike,
This could
I dont have permissions in cwiki for commenting on any wikipage. Can somebody
provide me the same.
I am reviewing some design docs and need to post review comments on it.
My username is shwetaag
Registered with email : shwet...@gmail.com
Thanks
Shweta
Principal Product Engineer, CloudPlat
GitHub user cloudsadhu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1458
BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-9331:added code in marvin frame&new config file for
advBaremetal support â¦
Added code in marvin framework&new config file to support baremetal
advanced testcases
You
58 matches
Mail list logo
