>>>
>>> Citrix has been hosting "download.cloud.com" for quite some time now
>>> and it holds the System Templates for all the releases and some tools.
>>> Going forward, this content needs to be moved from
>>> "download.cloud.com".So, we will be moving this content to
>>>
Hi guys,
we are running intro strange situation, where local our /MNT folder on KVM
nodes (where Secondary Storage gets mounted by Default) - becomes full 100%.
During snapshots create, volume is moved from Primary Storage (CEPH our
case) to /MNT/xx - but sometimes this folder seems to b
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#discussion_r57429458
--- Diff: api/src/com/cloud/network/vpc/VpcProvisioningService.java ---
@@ -26,13 +25,11 @@
public VpcOffering getVpcOffering(lon
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1371#discussion_r57429500
--- Diff: api/src/com/cloud/network/vpc/VpcProvisioningService.java ---
@@ -26,13 +25,11 @@
public VpcOffering getVpcOffering(lon
@Sebastien, thanks for the feedback. please note that the goal of this
exercise was not to impact any users during this migration and hence the
efforts to place the content at a location where we could move it to. Since
Wido is ok with hosting the content on 'cloudstack.apt-get.eu', it is eve
+1 on keeping the download sites company agnostic.
Shouldn't we take the opportunity and create a download.cloudstack.org or
similar now?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Sebastien Goasguen"
> To: dev@cloudsta
Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1330#issuecomment-201243710
_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
I agree with Nux.
Does not Apache CloudStack have its own domain?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Nux! wrote:
> +1 on keeping the download sites company agnostic.
>
> Shouldn't we take the opportunity and create a download.cloudstack.org or
> similar now?
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1451#issuecomment-201246728
@insom any chance you can supply some test-mech?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Rohit, I had a first glance and it looks promising; +1 You have been
thourough on the fs. One question that comes to mind is whatever happened
to the role base access That Min and Pradhi(not sure if I remeber her name
correctly) where implementing for 4.4. It failed then because the work was
taking
The idea looks good. I have provided some questions/comments on the FS itself.
Thanks,
Koushik
From: Rohit Yadav
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Request for comments
Hi Daan,
Thanks for the comments.
Yes, I looked into it but the IAM-services related work started by some of our
former colleagues was not in a good shape to be picked up, it also introduced
resource level fine-grain ACLs that would have required a lot of effort to both
implement and test thor
Hi Koushik,
Thanks for the comments on the FS, I've replied to all of them and updated the
FS (for example, default param in APIs).
Let me know on this ML thread or on the FS if you've further
questions/comments. Thanks.
Regards.
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Raja Pullela
> wrote:
>
> @Sebastien, thanks for the feedback. please note that the goal of this
> exercise was not to impact any users during this migration and hence the
> efforts to place the content at a location where we could move it to. Since
> Wido
you know you are great, right?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> Yes, I looked into it but the IAM-services related work started by some of
> our former colleagues was not in a good shape to be picked up, it also
> introduced resource
Github user syed commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1331#issuecomment-201355723
@kollyma This was happening for swift because the `template.properties`
file was not correctly populated. So, when a management restart happens, it
syncs data from the
Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1326#issuecomment-201368034
_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Github user swill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438#discussion_r57485802
--- Diff:
services/secondary-storage/server/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/resource/NfsSecondaryStorageResource.java
---
@@ -395,16 +391,9 @@ protected
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1438#issuecomment-201476824
I don't think these tests failing are relevant to this change. We agree
this is ready to be merged? Only against master?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-201491672
There is a lot going on here and I don't like that Travis is failing since
it tends to be pretty stable. Also, Travis is failing with a "Pull Request
#1397 maven: Up
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-201496521
@swill Travis has been failing for several PRs when the test exceed the
timeout period (30mins) https://travis-ci.org/apache/cloudstack/jobs/117688064
This has
Github user jburwell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-201497762
@swill I agree there a lot of incongruent changes in this PR. I would like
to see it decomposed. For example, the Bouncy Castle upgrade should be
completely sepa
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1449#issuecomment-201531706
I am pretty comfortable with this PR given the scope of the change. Thanks
@milamberspace for testing. Should this be committed against 4.7 and then
forward merged?
Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1323#issuecomment-201576078
_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Github user alexandrelimassantana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1451#issuecomment-201610435
@insom with this changes there is still one place where the applyConfigToVR
is not provided with this timeout parameter (line 183, same class). This
f
Github user insom commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1451#issuecomment-201620444
@alexandrelimassantana Agreed, thanks for the review. I've added a commit
removing the prototype with the default. That has allowed me to remove that if
altogether an
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-201657556
@swill I've fixed for Travis now, locally I was successfully able to run
more than 50 smoke/component tests against simulator. The Travis test result
printer is fi
Github user alexandrelimassantana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1402#issuecomment-201681267
@remibergsma can't you asking false instead of "false" ? If the function
accepts boolean values I think that it would be more efficient.
Besid
Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1322#issuecomment-201706492
_Link to logs Folder (search by build_no):_
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yj3wnzbceo9uef2/AAB6u-Iap-xztdm6jHX9SjPja?dl=0
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
29 matches
Mail list logo
