Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Bharat, I’d suggest removing all tests that fail for some reason, not being an error in the PR. This will result in a smaller set of tests that “always pass”. Once a test doesn’t pass anymore, we know the PR has an issue. Then your CI system provides value. Right now, there are so many fail

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3470

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Build failed in Jenkins: build-systemvm64-master #778

See -- [...truncated 3360 lines...] 100% [Packages 28.5 MB] 100% [Working] 100% [Packages 28.5 MB] 100% [Packages 28.5 MB] 100% [

RE: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Bharat, I will work Sanjeev on fixing the failed tests. We can create a bug to track this. Best, Raja -Original Message- From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2016 1:27 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Bharat Kumar Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL

VmStatsCollector and memory utilization

Hi Devs! I'm just playing with graphite/grafana and stats.output.uri. First, thanks! That's a great feature. But, there's no memory information so far, right? I looked into StatsCollector.java but even the VmStats interface shows only ressources for cpu, net- and disk-I/O. Are any memory statis

Re: VmStatsCollector and memory utilization

Hi Stephan, Memory utilisation of Vm has been introduced in 4.6.1 with CLOUDSTACK-8800 . I think you are using lower version. Thanks Sudhansu Sahu On 15/03/16 2:33 pm, "Stephan Seitz" wrote: >Hi Devs! > >I'm just playing with graphite/gr

Re: VmStatsCollector and memory utilization

HI Stephan, The pull request is still open. So the feature is still not available. Thanks Sudhansu On 15/03/16 2:53 pm, "Sudhansu Sahu" wrote: >Hi Stephan, > >Memory utilisation of Vm has been introduced in 4.6.1 with CLOUDSTACK-8800 >. >I

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Remi, Thanks for the inputs. I agree with you, May be i need to modify the CI report and not report if any of the known issues fail. We can still have the known_issues header to track what needs to be fixed. Thanks, Bharat. On 15-Mar-2016, at 1:26 PM, Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schube

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: maven: Upgrade dependency versions

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-196753522 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 97 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=105 Failed=9 Skipped=4 *

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: maven: Upgrade dependency versions

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1397#issuecomment-196757927 @bvbharat Thanks for sharing, some failures could be due to env related issue. Please see if my comments below help you to improve your infra: - Tests wer

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Bharat, I’d say remove the tests that fail, to get a report with only tests that pass. Regards, Remi From: Bharat Kumar mailto:bharat.ku...@accelerite.com>> Date: Tuesday 15 March 2016 at 10:40 To: Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3471

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [Bug-Id: CLOUDSTACK-9306]Replace testdata...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1436#issuecomment-196797692 LGTM. one remark out of scope: let's consider externalizing the urls to facilitate handling such issues in the future. --- If your project is set up for it, y

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3472

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9269: Missing field for Switch...

Github user bvbharatk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1396#issuecomment-196858713 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 98 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=106 Failed=8 Skipped=4 *

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3473

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3474

See -- [...truncated 28691 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

github organisation cloudstack

devs, There is a github organisation called cloudstack, to which we have more control then to the apache/cloudstack repo on github. We need to decide as community what to do with it. What are we going to do in this new organisation? Will we let/ask Schuberg Philis to put cosmic in there? Will be

Re: github organisation cloudstack

It seemed pretty obvious that being hold back by Apache's traditional infra was a big problem. I am not a developer, but even I have noticed the revolution github brought with it. I say we push it forward.. I am not exactly sure how this will affect our Apache status.. Lucian -- Sent from the

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3475

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3476

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without ...

GitHub user mike-tutkowski opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441 CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without id is failing with Unable to… … determine the storage pool of the snapshot You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3477

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9297: delete snapshot without ...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1441#issuecomment-197164602 tested on KVM, it is good. so XenserverSnapshotStrategy LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear