Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1416#issuecomment-185092215
@DaanHoogland Please give one LGTM to close the PR as it is just the
change in commit message and PR title .
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1416#issuecomment-185092625
please ask @remibergsma and @runseb , as they had opinions on it before.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1416#issuecomment-185092942
@remibergsma and @runseb Please give one LGTM to close the PR as it is
just the change in commit message and PR title .
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1078#issuecomment-185115973
Testcase result:
snapshot hardning ... === TestName: test_01_snapshot_hardning_kvm | Status
: SUCCESS ===
ok
snapshot hardning ... === SKIP: Sk
Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1031#issuecomment-185115938
Testcase result:
Test migrate Volume (root and data disk) ... === TestName:
test_01_migrate_root_and_data_disk_nonlive | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Github user GabrielBrascher commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1406#discussion_r53149620
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeObject.java
---
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ public static VolumeObject getV
Github user GabrielBrascher commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1406#discussion_r53150413
--- Diff:
engine/storage/volume/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/volume/VolumeObject.java
---
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ public static VolumeObject getV
Github user kishankavala commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-185176731
@nvazquez
Can you please repond to my earlier question also.
>> How is the nfs.version set in image_store_details table?
---
If your project is set up
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-185194859
Sure @kishankavala, to set NFS version for a store with id
STORE_ID you'll need to insert a record in
image_store_details_table which has:
* store_id = STORE_I
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1414#issuecomment-185251677
Do we want to rotate logs only based on size?
What about using that âminsizeâ and the timestamp (daily)
configuration? I do not know the system vms
Github user serg38 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1361#issuecomment-185256350
If requirements to use particular NFS version is known beforehand it can
be specified during the image store creation using details argument
details[0].key=nfs.vers
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1415#issuecomment-185273600
Merging this change on #1397
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user bhaisaab closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1415
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
forgot to mention: version 4.7.1 I don't think that matters but still.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> H,
>
> If I upload a new certificate from the infrastructure tab, the timestamp
> of the certificates in the consoleproxy in /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/certs
> stay the s
Glenn,
thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the SSVM has been destroyed.
We don't have any firewall in between. ACS and XenServers are located in
the same /22. I've double checked every connection and there's no
iptables or similar in the way.
Instead of the SSVM, I've just successfully checked i
Glenn,
thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the SSVM has been destroyed.
We don't have any firewall in between. ACS and XenServers are located in
the same /22. I've double checked every connection and there's no
iptables or similar in the way.
Instead of the SSVM, I've just successfully checked i
Hi Daan,
Did you try the api call instead of the UI? I believe the UI has a bug (it
filters the private key and it doesn't appear in the db). API call worked for
me.
Regards, Remi
Sent from my iPhone
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 18:52, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> forgot to mention: version 4.7.1 I d
> On Feb 16, 2016, at 7:01 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
>
> Team,
>
> We have a couple of things we need collaborate on:
>
> 1. Per Remi's request below, we need some folks familiar with the release
> process to either help, or document steps required to completed the release
> notes, docs and we
H,
If I upload a new certificate from the infrastructure tab, the timestamp of
the certificates in the consoleproxy in /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/certs
stay the same, even after destroying teh cpvm. Am I doing something wrong
or expecting the wrong thing to happen?
thanks,
--
Daan
Stephan,
When you restart the management process, do you see any logs indicating it's
trying to peer with another management server?
- Si
From: Stephan Seitz
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Glenn Wagner
Subje
Both work but the certificate never gets installed in the cpvm, it gets
loaded in memory directly through the command. thanks.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:01 PM, Remi Bergsma
wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> Did you try the api call instead of the UI? I believe the UI has a bug (it
> filters the private key
The msid is generated from the MAC address of the host when the service starts,
the two IDs are subtly different do you have some bonding in place that is
maybe miss-configured, which is generating the 2nd MAC?
Paul Angus
VP Technology , ShapeBlue
t: @cloudyangus
e: paul.a
Daan,
the new certificate and key are stored in datab
ase, and imported int
o realhostip.keystore
if t
he certificate is u
ploaded together with a key.
2016年2月17日星期三，Daan Hoogland 写道：
> H,
>
> If I upload a new certificate from the infrastructure tab, the timestamp of
> the certificates in the
Github user rodrigo93 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/798#discussion_r53253724
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -1464,4 +1440,45 @@ private String de
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/798#discussion_r53255088
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java
---
@@ -1464,4 +1440,45 @@ private S
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-185506918
Hi John,
Here is the l2tp configuration file, IP address voluntarily sabotage:
```
conn L2TP-PSK
authby=secret
pfs=no
Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1245#issuecomment-185550227
Test result after modifications:
Check Netmask value in database ... === TestName:
test_01_netmask_value_check | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
-
Github user pritisarap12 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1245#issuecomment-185550931
Updated the testpath with review comments:
--Validation of netmask
--check it is from correct CIDR
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user resmo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1414#issuecomment-185579250
Actually the logrotating is running every hour (by size), which can not be
done with logrotate time interval. We have had problems in the past filling up
/var (and /
Hi all,
It’s been a long time, but the Wolverine is not dead yet. ;)
Currently we have 175 opened PRs, which we all agree to be a lot, given the
fact that few people, if any, are testing/merging them. I have been a bit off
the radar, but from next week I will start helping to get some of those
30 matches
Mail list logo
