Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#issuecomment-162615010
Built it again, turned feature on, still looks good. Merging!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162616151
LGTM based on these tests:
```
test_01_vpc_privategw_acl
(integration.smoke.test_privategw_acl.TestPrivateGwACL) ... === TestName:
test_01_vpc_priv
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1178#issuecomment-162616790
@miguelaferreira gave me some explanations about the problem and how he was
going to fix it. I went through the code and also checked the tests he wrote.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1178
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1142#issuecomment-162624037
agree with @bhaisaab , @nlivens this will certainly decrease the failure
rate ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162624822
Ping @remibergsma @miguelaferreira @DaanHoogland
Test passed as expected!
```
Test redundant router internals ... === TestName:
test_0
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162631636
* Environment
- Hardware required: TRUE
- Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1
- One KVM Host on CentOS 7.1
- Agent + Common R
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1162#issuecomment-162644589
LGTM:
Old default behaviour is to enable service:
```
[root@cs1 x86_64]# cloudstack-setup-management --tomcat7
Starting to configure CloudSt
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1162
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162647475
@wilderrodrigues I think we're fine. That test also passes here:
```
Test redundant router internals ... === TestName:
test_02_RVR_Network_FW_PF_SSH
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1142
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user michaelandersen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1156#issuecomment-162651522
So removed my last comment about field 7 to 6. We need to choose 1 type of
template os for both kvm and xen and base the test on that. @sanju1010: the
ma
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1097
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1158
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1186
Updating pom.xml version numbers for release 4.6.2-SNAPSHOT
Set next version in 4.6 release branch to version 4.6.2-SNAPSHOT.
Using ` ./tools/build/setnextversion.sh`.
Ping
Hi all,
We managed to get quite some PRs merged in over the last few days. Thanks for
helping out! It will be a great new release with interesting new features and
of course some bugs fixed.
One PR that didn’t make it, is the VPN improvement and that’s a pity. It seems
Jayapal was working on i
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162668836
@jayapalu Unfortunately I got no response and I cannot merge it without
knowing if it is even finished.
Please send an update asap and if it is finished
Hi,
I am having a problem getting the virtual router to leave the "Starting"
state on 4.6 and 4.7.
I am making use of the correct system VM template in each case, but the
virtual router claims it requires an upgrade.
This is in a Basic Zone and using local storage for the system VMs.
Thoughts?
Note: The CS MS is saying it can't connect to the virtual router. I can
ping the virtual router manually from the CS MS, but I can't SSH into it
(not sure if I should be able to).
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a problem getting the virtual router to
open the console and poke into it :-)
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Note: The CS MS is saying it can't connect to the virtual router. I can
> ping the virtual router manually from the CS MS, but I can't SSH into it
> (not sure if I shou
Well, it does have an IP address assigned on Eth0 that falls within my
user-VM range.
The only other IP address it states is the loopback.
I'm not sure what's "normal."
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> open the console and poke into it :-)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:1
Normally I run my system VMs on XenServer and that seems to work fine at
the moment.
I just had a need to run a VMware-only environment today, so came across
this issue with the virtual router (on two different setups of mine).
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Well, it do
I just tried it on 4.5, though: works fine on that version.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Normally I run my system VMs on XenServer and that seems to work fine at
> the moment.
>
> I just had a need to run a VMware-only environment today, so came across
> this issue wit
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162761653
@remibergsma @bhaisaab I am working on uploading the test case results for
the site2site vpn.
Meanwhile some one can pick up this branch and generate the syste
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1082#issuecomment-162762394
Hi @remibergsma, here I attached the snapshots. See the cursor arrows.
![step-1_nitin](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/12583725/11648062/cb47e4
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162788704
Thanks @jayapalu
@terbolous can you test remote access vpn please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162789887
@terbolous Remote access vpn i have tested It.
I have triggered a job for systemvm template on my github branch for
strongswan changes.
http://jenkins.build
@michaelandersen, if we want to use that template it only works for kvm. So
either we have to skip the tests for other hypervisors or make the similar
templates for all other hypervisors as well.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:00 AM, michaelandersen wrote:
> Github user michaelandersen commented on th
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1156#issuecomment-162797528
@sanju1010 it works for XenServer as well atleast, haven't tried VMware.
But you'll have to change your script to adjust to the different output
---
If your proj
GitHub user nlivens opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1187
Adapted HypervisorUtilsTest to no longer give false positives
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/nlivens/cloudstack 4.6_test_i
Github user nlivens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1187#issuecomment-162797756
@bhaisaab, @remibergsma, this is the ported commit for 4.6 described in
PR#1185
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user kansal closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1125
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162803159
@jayapalu Hmmm the job is not starting?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo