Folks,
We have been using GitHub for PR now for a while, it seems to work despite the
fact that we still have to get used to the workflow.
We lack some privileges on the mirror to be able to use labels etc.
I would also be in favor of using Issues and why not the Wiki. Basically I
personally wo
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-150898083
copy-pasting mike's response from email (
http://markmail.org/message/bptis5kitr2chqcn ). looks like its still not
working for him with vmware-managed storage
>
+1 !
This would be a HUGE time saver from a RM perspective.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 25 Oct 2015, at 08:05, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> We have been using GitHub for PR now for a while, it seems to work despite
> the fact that we still have to get used to the workflow.
> We lac
Managed VMware storage == solidfire?
I believe there is a solid fire specific PR as well that we could merge to
solve all cases.
Is this correct Mike?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 25 Oct 2015, at 08:09, karuturi wrote:
>
> Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
>
>https://gith
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/950#issuecomment-150900045
@borisroman @remibergsma I've rebased on latest master and force pushed it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/926#issuecomment-150900227
@remibergsma code is updated
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
On 25/10/2015 07:05, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Folks,
We have been using GitHub for PR now for a while, it seems to work despite the
fact that we still have to get used to the workflow.
We lack some privileges on the mirror to be able to use labels etc.
I would also be in favor of using Issu
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/926#issuecomment-150911520
rerunning the ssvm and vpc tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/918#discussion_r42943657
--- Diff:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ private void orchestrateStorageMigration(fin
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/918#issuecomment-150917120
@DaanHoogland good point. I prefer to throw an exception if the pool is
null.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975#issuecomment-150917774
@remi: yep did the OVM3 dance, together with KVM and separately from OVM3.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Hi Remi,
On 24-Oct-2015, at 4:43 PM, Remi Bergsma
mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
2) VR password server broken
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8957
==> Rohit is working on this, or not? No recent update. Please unassign if
someone else needs to take over. Do you nee
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 Oct 2015, at 14:15, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Hi Remi,
On 24-Oct-2015, at 4:43 PM, Remi Bergsma
mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote:
2) VR password server broken
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8957
==> Roh
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/918#issuecomment-150938750
ok, so
if (destpool == null) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException("missing storage pool");
}
or something like that? Or would you rather see a Nu
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975#issuecomment-150946842
@DaanHoogland Could you please do a code review of this PR? Thx!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/971
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150947060
@DaanHoogland Could you please paste the nose command you run and the
output. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/849#issuecomment-150948113
LGTM, based on a set of tests that I run on this branch:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardwa
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/976#issuecomment-150948580
LGTM, based on a set of tests that I run on this branch:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardwa
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/916#issuecomment-150948753
Hi @kansal Can you please rebase this with current master? I tried running
some tests but face old problems. Also, what about the db migration script to
fix old
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/894#issuecomment-150948834
@sudhansu7 Can you please rebase with current master so I can run some
tests? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/973#issuecomment-150953447
@remibergsma @DaanHoogland LGTM :+1:
Thanks for adjusting the unit test.
```
Running com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResour
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/976#issuecomment-150954032
lgtm based on code review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-150954369
@remibergsma I destroyed the vms in which I ran it already.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975#discussion_r42948653
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/ovm3/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/ovm3/resources/Ovm3HypervisorGuru.java
---
@@ -105,9 +105,6 @@ public boolean
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975#issuecomment-150959103
one comment, code looks fine otherwise
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/973
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/812
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/966
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
I am actually having issues with 4.5.2 branch and creating templates from a
snapshot on Ceph rbd primary and nfs secondary.
Some ppl reported this working, but it just doesn't work for me. While creating
a template from a volume or snapshot i hit timeout error after about 5-10 mins,
which is o
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975#issuecomment-150965104
Pinging @snuf to respond to the comment here
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/976
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/801#issuecomment-150966983
@KrisSterckx Please rebase against current master. That will allow me to
run some tests once @jburwell reviews the changes. Then we'll have to discuss
when we
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/969#issuecomment-150967148
Hi @rodrigo93 can you please rebase against current master? Then I can run
soms tests. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Correct, this is still not working for me on VMware with managed storage.
I'm not at home at the moment, but I plan on rebuilding my environment from
scratch and trying this again with the latest code as soon as I can.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, karuturi wrote:
> Github user karuturi commente
FYI that CloudByte also uses managed storage.
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Correct, this is still not working for me on VMware with managed storage.
>
> I'm not at home at the moment, but I plan on rebuilding my environment
> from scratch and trying this again with the la
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/964#issuecomment-150979025
@remibergsma @snuf I've run the following tests:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardware=false
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/849#issuecomment-151016206
@remibergsma thanks a lot for running the tests.. I rebased it with the
current master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-151018044
Are we OK with this PR, everyone? If so, at this point in the release, is
it the job of the RM to merge or should I do that? Thanks!
---
If your project is s
There might be a better but for simple js changes, I do the below and restart
jetty
$ cp ./ui/scripts/domains.js ./client/target/generated-webapp/scripts/domains.js
$ rm ./client/target/generated-webapp/scripts/domains.js.gz
$ cp ui/scripts/domains.js client/target/cloud-client-ui-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/
I will update the PR with required changes suggested by @pvr9711.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:36 PM, remibergsma wrote:
> Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/902#issuecomment-150838537
>
> @sanju1010 Any update on this?
>
>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/964
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/968#issuecomment-151027065
@mike-tutkowski currently only RM can merge, so I'll do that once the
criteria are met. I need 2x LGTM and some tests run on this branch. So far, I
see only a LG
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-151028024
Just talked to @karuturi and we think we should merge this now and look
into the remaining VMware issue (as reported bu @mike-tutkowski) as a separate
issue. Can
Let me re-build my entire CS environment from scratch tomorrow and confirm
the problem exists still.
Get back to you soon,
Mike
On Sunday, October 25, 2015, remibergsma wrote:
> Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecom
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-151028340
OK @mike-tutkowski thanks! I'll merge this now so you can build it from
master. Please let us know if you still have issues, as I'd love to resolve
those as well
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/954#issuecomment-151029210
Once I re-build my CS env in the morning, I'll run through a bunch of tests
in the morning and afternoon and get back to you.
On Sunday, October 25
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/950#issuecomment-151037118
@miguelaferreira Can you please have a look why both Travis and Jenkins are
unhappy again? Thx!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this emai
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977
CLOUDSTACK-8746: VM Snapshotting implementation for KVM
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/ustcweizhou/cloudstack vm-snapsh
50 matches
Mail list logo