Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575#issuecomment-120803952
@abhinandanprateek @jburwell @wilderrodrigues ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/575#issuecomment-120815287
Looks good to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user nitt10prashant opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/579
CLOUDSTACK-8626 :[Automation]fixing test/integration/component/test_pâ¦
â¦s_max_limits.py for lxc hypervisor
test results
Test Try to deploy VM with admin accou
LGTM
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:02 AM, nitt10prashant wrote:
> GitHub user nitt10prashant opened a pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/579
>
> CLOUDSTACK-8626 :[Automation]fixing test/integration/component/test_p…
>
> …s_max_limits.py for lxc hypervisor
>
>
I agree with Daan,
Lazy consensus QA is not going to improve code quality. If anything we're
highlighting a structural issue with the amount of resource available to review
these PRs - which is a different issue and would need looking at as such as it
is fundamental to our push for improved qua
