Re: CloudStack-setup-management

From the log looks like you’re probably setting up KVM with Ubuntu (ufw is on Ubuntu by default); try this: - Stop tomcat6 daemon: service tomcat6 stop (when installing tomcat6 dependency on Debian/Ubuntu it starts tomcat6 by default) - Now start the management server - Configure rc.defaults as

Re: [4.3.0] System VM 64bit build disabled?

Thanks for the update, Rohit. Do you have any 4.3.0 systemvm (xen-vhd) available from where I I can download? Artefacts server or something like that? Cheers, Wilder On 05 Dec 2014, at 08:56, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Wilder, > >> On 05-Dec-2014, at 12:27 pm, Wilder Rodrigues >> wrote: >>

Re: 4.5.0 status

Did we report test results, upgrade paths. Are release notes ready ? -Sebastien > On 5 Dec 2014, at 05:16, David Nalley wrote: > > So we have no blockers currently logged, and are down to 15 critical > bugs. I am going to try and roll a 4.5.0 release candidate in the next > day or so. > > >

Re: [4.3.0] System VM 64bit build disabled?

Hi Wilder, Absolutely, I’ve latest 4.3.1 systemvm that you can use (works with 4.3.0 as well) that has shellshock and poodle fixes, download them from here: http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/ and there is Lucian’s mirror here: http://mirrors.coreix.net/packages.shapeblue.com/ Che

Re: [4.3.0] System VM 64bit build disabled?

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Wilder, > > > On 05-Dec-2014, at 12:27 pm, Wilder Rodrigues < > wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > > > > Any ideas why? It was available earlier this week. > > Those were removed recently because the master had no disk space left > (pro

Re: [4.3.0] System VM 64bit build disabled?

Cool! Super thanks, dude! Cheers, Wilder On 05 Dec 2014, at 09:23, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Wilder, > > Absolutely, I’ve latest 4.3.1 systemvm that you can use (works with 4.3.0 as > well) that has shellshock and poodle fixes, download them from here: > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/system

Re: [4.3.0] System VM 64bit build disabled?

Hi Eric, On Friday 05 December 2014 01:55 PM, Erik Weber wrote: That's the case now as well, see my previous email. Ah cool, sorry I did not read if it was already answered and replied to the first email. Cheers, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, ShapeBlue M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeb

[JENKINS] Full disk om master

Kicking of a separate email. The disk on the jenkins master is full. I tried modifying a few builds to keep fewer builds in the history, but I don't have permission to restart the slave threads. If anyone with more permissions could continue the fixing that'd be great. Filesystem Size Used

Review Request 28749: CLOUDSTACK-8029: Remove unused kaypairs from test_data.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28749/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-80

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use the new build env on Travis

Github user joshk closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Use the new build env on Travis

Github user joshk commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/43#issuecomment-65764727 Mysql is already installed, same with Python. But some of the other libs are not. If you can get your build working without sudo on Travis then you can opt int

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

I like the solutions that Will and Animesh are giving. We should incorporate them in our work. I want to stress however that we need to start working in a way that others, committers and non-committers can copy. One thing I am thinking of is that we create a gate through which commits *can* go if y

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-simulator #1352

See -- Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change Started by upstream project "build-master" build number 2029 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3919

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master" build number 2029 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #210

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-e98 (cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace

Review Request 28750: CLOUDSTACK-8028: Fix test_data.py - Separate virtual_machine dict having userdata key

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28750/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-80

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

I am good with 10 Dec 16 UTC meeting time. Preference will be for goto. Let the meeting details be published to all. If communication is open, congenial and the process is executed well we can get more committed participation. -abhi From: Daan Hoogland S

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #754

See -- [...truncated 8694 lines...] hard linking marvin/cloudstackAPI/updateIsoPermissions.py -> Marvin-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT/marvin/cloudstackAPI hard linking marvin/cloudstackAPI/updateLBHealthCheckPo

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-8026) Unable to Create/Delete the Firewall Rule

Seems that the connection between mgmt server and vRouter unavailable. Make sure the they can talk to each other . BTW, which ACS version r u running and it's system VM template. If you sure about the connectiin is OK, try logging into vRouter, check logs what happened On Dec 5, 2014 1:09 PM, "Arun

Re: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-8026) Unable to Create/Delete the Firewall Rule

Hi, Resource unreachable here means MS is failed to contact the VR. 1. Host may be not in up state. 2. There is communication failure. 3. Can be ssh key pair issue/mismatch. 4. Last is there is failure in the script execution and script exited with error. The script execution can be seen in th

Please confirm this is a bug and not misconifguration -> 4.3.1: Failed to create a volume from snapshot

Hi guys, can someone please look at the exemption from the log and confirm this is a bug and not misconfiguration. If we are on the road to 4.3.2 release, it might get fixed and included in it. Thank you! The bug report is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8014 Regards, F.

Re: Review Request 28749: CLOUDSTACK-8029: Remove unused kaypairs from test_data.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28749/#review63986 --- Ship it! 8d5ce97edc21cbaf427dba5d61e09210e58b553e 4.5 84aaef25d9b86

Re: Review Request 28750: CLOUDSTACK-8028: Fix test_data.py - Separate virtual_machine dict having userdata key

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28750/#review63987 --- Ship it! a72b6a7f999e028f1056e8aa4c1ef7d2b2f2d3da 4.5 84aaef25d9b86

Re: Review Request 28741: CLOUDSTACK-8018: Improve code quality - test_redundant_router.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28741/#review63989 --- Ship it! 100e46bf4e855871c7d05dad9746b8f05c4ce046 master Patch doe

weird db setup issue

Hi, I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue: Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management server node IP[ OK ] Preparing /etc/cloudstack/management/db.properties

CloudStack and Cisco APIC integration

I asked this on the users mailer and was referred to the dev mailer -- I’ll preface this with, “this is an End user question”.. I’m working with a private cloud provider who is looking to use CloudStack for their compute and storage orchestration and use Cisco APIC with the Nexus 9k switches for

Re: weird db setup issue

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. > > When running cloudstack-setup-database I hit this weird issue: > > Detected local IP address as 172.17.0.25, will use as cluster management > server node IP[

Re: CloudStack and Cisco APIC integration

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Bill Wade wrote: > I asked this on the users mailer and was referred to the dev mailer -- > I’ll preface this with, “this is an End user question”.. I’m working with > a private cloud provider who is looking to use CloudStack for their compute > and storage orchest

Re: weird db setup issue

Hi Sebastien, Which build/version of CloudStack are you using? > On 05-Dec-2014, at 7:22 pm, Erik Weber wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to dockerize the whole cloudstack installation process. >> >> When running cloudstack-setup-dat

revert 83656a6ea81ce9b85c2f480e576fd02d8a58c357.

Hi David, I just reverted commit 83656a6ea81ce9b85c2f480e576fd02d8a58c357. because it bring another issue. The systemvm/routers will reboot automatically in the startup if the systemvm.iso changes. In this case, they will stuck in its second start due to this commit, because the virtio-port becom

Review Request 28748: CLOUDSTACK-8021: Change test cases to use host information from configurableData section in test_data.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28748/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-80

Re: Review Request 28741: CLOUDSTACK-8018: Improve code quality - test_redundant_router.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28741/#review63995 --- pushed to 4.5 too. - SrikanteswaraRao Talluri On Dec. 5, 2014, 6:

Re: Please confirm this is a bug and not misconifguration -> 4.3.1: Failed to create a volume from snapshot

I'm not a dev but this seems strange: > 2014-12-03 12:20:46,612 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.a.ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator] (Job-Executor-166:ctx-d915e890 ctx-d7a11540) Removing pool Pool[208|IscsiLUN] from avoid set, must have been inserted when searching for another disk's tag > 2014-12-03 12:20:46,614 D

Status of CLOUDSTACK-6181 for XenServer

I see that in Jira that the issue has been resolved, what is the status for XenServer as I have seen on the list that KVM is supported. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181 Matthew Midgett

Re: 4.5.0 status

Yeah, now that we're getting really close on 4.5, I'd like to rerun my regression tests early next week. They're not all automated yet so it generally takes me 2 to 3 days. On Friday, December 5, 2014, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Did we report test results, upgrade paths. > Are release notes re

IPv6 Support Status

Currently the documentation still states that an experimental SystemVM is needed for IPv6 support: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ipv6.html Looking at the link provided there the most recent experimental/IPv6 template I see is for 4.2. I also don't see anything related to

Re: IPv6 Support Status

No, not yet. I talked to the Schuberg Phillis guys and we want to keep a 2 (?) day sprint in Q1 to get this fixed. We'll keep this sprint in Amsterdam, anybody is welcome to join! Date is not set yet though. Wido > Op 5 dec. 2014 om 16:34 heeft Logan Barfield het > volgende geschreven: >

[CFP] CloudStack Day Brazil

All Marco & Cyrano are organising a "CloudStack day" in Sao Paulo, Brazil on 12 February 2015. Format will be single track (maybe 5-6 talks) ,no "pay to play" talks , target 300 attendees. There will be sponsors, but the event will be run on a non-profit basis The University of Sao Paulo have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: noncritical fixes on packaging script

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/51#issuecomment-65822688 +1 LGTM. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature en

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: noncritical fixes on packaging script

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/51 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Update ConsoleProxyPasswordBasedEncryptor...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10#issuecomment-65823752 What does this PR do? What is the issue and what does this fix do? This is same as #11 please close one of them. Thanks. --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: listDirectory method updated to use Objec...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/25#issuecomment-65824180 Can you rebase against latest master in the PR? After that I can help merge this after you rebase and TravisCI passes for this PR. --- If your project is set up for

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Ovmsupport

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9#issuecomment-65824504 Hey, @snuf can you rebase this against master, let's merge it on master if it works functionally and the build passes with smoke tests? --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: cloudbyte storage plugin

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.3

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.2

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

Re: Review Request 18795: Sanity code review for: JIRA CloudStack-764 nTier Apps 2.0 : Redundant Virtual Router for VPC

> On March 6, 2014, 10:09 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Are you contemplating redundant routing on a per network basis? It would > > seem to me that the router, hence the whole vpc with all it networks is > > redundant or not. > > Karl Harris wrote: > The description below is what my init

Re: Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the original setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/#review64021 --- If this is still valid, can you send a new patch for master or close

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/#review64022 --- Interesting feature, can you send another patch that applies cleanly

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/ --- (Updated Dec. 5, 2014, 5:56 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20078/#review64023 --- Interesting feature, can you fix and send one that applies cleanly o

Re: Review Request 20078: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20078/ --- (Updated Dec. 5, 2014, 5:58 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Anshul Gangwar

Re: Review Request 20343: WIP: Force reload of the JS files only in MSIE

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20343/#review64025 --- Hey Laszlo, that's a nice feature please advise if you want to submi

Re: Review Request 16973: Contrail Event Interceptor fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16973/#review64027 --- ping, any progress on this review? - Rohit Yadav On Jan. 21, 2014

Re: Review Request 20184: CLOUDSTACK-6369: Qcow2's cluster_size option support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20184/#review64028 --- Hi Yoshikazu, can you send a new patch that applies on master? Thank

Re: Review Request 21192: Project Invitation & System Alert Message Email Send SMTP Auth & Port Fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21192/#review64030 --- Interesting feature, can you send a new patch that applies cleanly o

Re: Review Request 21924: [Automation] Disabling the failed test cases in XenServer and KVM runs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/#review64032 --- Is this already merged or requires additions? Please close if alread

Re: Review Request 22511: Allow use of simulator hypervisor from client gui

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22511/#review64033 --- Looks like a handy feature, Leo can you send a new patch or have a d

Re: Review Request 17120: added an extra column to mark the imported ldap users as from ldap

> On Jan. 24, 2014, 6:52 a.m., Prachi Damle wrote: > > I see many files unrelated to this fix have been updated and present in the > > patch. > > Please can you update the patch with changes needed for the fix only? > > > > Following are some such files. > > api/src/com/cloud/user/AccountServic

Re: Review Request 20343: WIP: Force reload of the JS files only in MSIE

> On Dec. 5, 2014, 6:03 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hey Laszlo, that's a nice feature please advise if you want to submit a > > tested patch that applies on master or you want to close it? > > Thanks. Hi Rohit, I plan to finish all tests in the next few weeks/days and send a fully tested ver

Re: Review Request 22693: Added VirtualRouterElements, InternalLoadBalancerElements classes to base.py- Extended methods in DiskOffering, StoragePool and Physical Network classes to accept more parame

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22693/#review64040 --- ping. - Rohit Yadav On June 17, 2014, 7:25 p.m., Chandan Purushot

Re: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review64041 --- Hari, your fix is already on 4.3; but not on 4.4, 4.5 or master. Can

Re: Review Request 20343: WIP: Force reload of the JS files only in MSIE

> On Dec. 5, 2014, 6:03 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hey Laszlo, that's a nice feature please advise if you want to submit a > > tested patch that applies on master or you want to close it? > > Thanks. > > Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > I plan to finish all tests in the next

Re: Review Request 25289: CLOUDSTACK-7474-Failed-to-start-MS-with-java7-version

> On Sept. 4, 2014, 5:21 p.m., Frank Zhang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Rohit Yadav wrote: > Rayees can you please fix it and upload a second patch; don't commit on > master yet please. ping. - Rohit --- This is an automatically genera

Re: Review Request 23192: Adding Readme and run checkbox at the end of the installation. Also installing mysql connector

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23192/#review64046 --- ping, any update on this? - Rohit Yadav On July 3, 2014, 11:58 a.

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (New Plugin)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17790/#review64047 --- ping. any update on this? - Rohit Yadav On June 27, 2014, 5:04 p.

Re: Review Request 28114: RabbitMQ integration, make SSL protocol configurable rather than hard coded

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28114/#review64049 --- Damodar, we're hardcoding TLSv1 here? How can users call the setSslP

Re: Review Request 22693: Added VirtualRouterElements, InternalLoadBalancerElements classes to base.py- Extended methods in DiskOffering, StoragePool and Physical Network classes to accept more parame

> On Dec. 5, 2014, 6:32 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > ping. Hello Rohit, Sorry for my delayed action on this review request. I will get to this as soon as I am done with fixing issues in Automation test suites, Thank you, Chandan. - Chandan -

Re: Review Request 22693: Added VirtualRouterElements, InternalLoadBalancerElements classes to base.py- Extended methods in DiskOffering, StoragePool and Physical Network classes to accept more parame

> On Sept. 16, 2014, 11:57 a.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote: > > Chandan, Please post the fresh patch. Talluri, I will get back to you on this patch. I am sorry for my delayed response and delayed action. - Chandan --- This is an a

Re: weird db setup issue

On Dec 5, 2014, at 9:20 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > Which build/version of CloudStack are you using? this is 4.3.1 from packages, ubuntu 14.04 but I think it's an issue with my setup. that schema file has not changed in more than a year and is the same in all branches. I will

Re: A secure way to reset VMs password

Decent idea… > On Dec 3, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Alireza Eskandari > wrote: > > It is possible if we provide password service on port 8080 with current > insecure method and on port 8443 with secure method. > with this solution we can use both old and new password reset service. > > Origin

Re: 4.5.0 status

All of the test results I am aware of are on jenkins.buildacloud.org Generally, people don't start testing until we get RCs ready - hence me trying to push out an RC. I want folks to start testing upgrade paths, etc. I fully suspect we'll find issues with this first attempt. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 a

Re: 4.5.0 status

On Dec 5, 2014, at 3:58 PM, David Nalley wrote: > All of the test results I am aware of are on jenkins.buildacloud.org > Generally, people don't start testing until we get RCs ready - hence > me trying to push out an RC. I want folks to start testing upgrade > paths, etc. it's one way to go, as

Re: Review Request 19995: VM Userdata field at GUI VM creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19995/#review64088 --- Does the feature include the capability to update or change userdata

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-8038) Create a new reusable tinylinux appliance for all hypervisors

Just make sure it has virtio drivers, please :-) On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Rohit Yadav (JIRA) wrote: > Rohit Yadav created CLOUDSTACK-8038: > --- > > Summary: Create a new reusable tinylinux appliance for all > hypervisors >

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

Agreed > -Original Message- > From: williamstev...@gmail.com [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Will Stevens > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 2:41 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Steve Wilson > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process > > I am speaking as a commit

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (New Plugin)

Rohit, please refer to the thread with "Review Request 20099” subject and concerns raised by John Burwell. -Alena. From: Rohit Yadav mailto:bhais...@apache.org>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, Rohit Yadav mailto:bhais

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (New Plugin)

On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > Rohit, please refer to the thread with "Review Request 20099" subject > and concerns raised by John Burwell. > > -Alena. > Thanks for replying Alena, I was just going through pending reviews and was tryin

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

GTM if voice required although, wouldn't make more sense to use #cloudstack-meeting as it keep record of discussions and is the regular channel? either way, I will be in on 10 Dec 16 UTC On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > Agreed > > > --

Re: Review Request 23991: CLOUDSTACK-7195: log wide exceptions in security_group.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23991/ --- (Updated Dec. 5, 2014, 10:23 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Pierre-Luc

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (New Plugin)

The discussion wasn’t published on the review board, so yes, please search in the mailing list for the subject "Review Request 20099” Let me know if you need more details. -Alena. From: Rohit Yadav mailto:bhais...@apache.org>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: Review Request 23991: CLOUDSTACK-7195: log wide exceptions in security_group.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23991/#review64097 --- Ship it! commited into master. - Pierre-Luc Dion On Dec. 5, 2014

Re: Review Request 23098: Updated Marvin code to support more properties.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23098/#review64099 --- the patch cannot be merge into 4.5 or master, could it be possible t

Re: Review Request 23098: Updated Marvin code to support more properties.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23098/ --- (Updated Dec. 5, 2014, 10:37 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowsk

VPN

Is the VPN down? I can't get in and it seems like I'm not the only one. Thanks -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud *™*

Re: Review Request 23098: Updated Marvin code to support more properties.

Thanks, Vania! On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Vania Xu wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/23098/ > Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski and Pierre-Luc Dion. > By Vania Xu. > > *Updated Dec. 5, 2014, 10:37 p.m.* > *R

Re: 4.5.0 status

Yeah, I'd love to wait for a formal RC before re-running automated and manual tests, but sometimes 3 days isn't really long enough. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2014, at 3:58 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > > All of the test results I am aware of are on je

Re: Review Request 17790: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among Multiple Regions (New Plugin)

Alena and Rohit, I am only phone ATM, and can't easily locate the thread, but I am strong -1 on that patch in its current form due to the highly likelihood data corruption when network partitions occur. Thanks, -John > On Dec 5, 2014, at 5:25 PM, Alena Prokharchyk > wrote: > > The discussio

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

> having said so, I propose to set a date for our first (irc/goto) meeting; > wednesday 10 december 16:00 UTC? [Animesh] Can we push it out by 1 hour to 17:00 UTC, the current time falls out on my time for dropping kids to school. If it does not work for others I can join @14:00 UTC (6:00 AM P

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

Let's fixed the time off the ML: http://doodle.com/xhp57mymv7hyim55 On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi < animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > having said so, I propose to set a date for our first (irc/goto) meeting; > > wednesday 10 december 16:00 UTC? > [Animesh] Can

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

Done > -Original Message- > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 3:57 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process > > Let's fixed the time off the ML: http://doodle.com/xhp57mymv7hyim55 > > > > On Fri, Dec

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6212: Let vm_instance table's ...

GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/52 CLOUDSTACK-6212: Let vm_instance table's ID field be unique and auto_inc... ...rement `vm_instance` table's id column is unique but does not auto_increment like other resource table

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6212: Let vm_instance table's ...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/52#issuecomment-65876210 @ke4qqq please review and see if we can allow this fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6212 in 4.5? --- If your project is set up for it, you ca

4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

Hi All, I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for review: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20141206T0129 Commit: fcfc3060ff5a7aa2c57548ded90298c0920921fd Source release (checksums a

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

I'd like to attend, i will be commuting during the meeting hours getting to work - my connection will be choppy but i can listen in. On 12/5/14, 2:20 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: GTM if voice required although, wouldn't make more sense to use #cloudstack-meeting as it keep record of discussions a

Re: 4.5.0 status

So my plan is to let the first RC sit for a few days before calling for a vote. Hopefully an RC being around for testing will be enough for folks to actually go do some testing. We'll see how that works out. --David On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Yeah, I'd love to wait

Re: 4.5.0 status

That sounds really good. I can run my tests on RC0 then. If the vote for that one doesn't pass, I'm always free then for subsequent RCs to view what's been checked in since RC0 and determine if I think any of my tests should be re-run on the new RC. Thanks On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 6:58 PM, David N

Re: 4.5.0 status

RN just started, here are regular questions: 1. Do we need a new set of systemvmtemplate? 2. Any special consideration with 4.5? 3. Does new features from this filter is valid for the RN? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7739?filter=12329800 4. Does it really contain 188 fixed from

Re: VPN

Ha...looks like I did it again (meant this to go to d...@solidfire.com). :) We've been upgrading our lab infrastructure and the VPN's been unreliable today. On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Is the VPN down? > > I can't get in and it seems like I'm not the only one. > > Th

Re: 4.5.0rc0 - available for testing.

The upgrade path require a systemvm-template otherwise the database upgrade fail, I've create this one: CLOUDSTACK-8041 Could it be possible to just look for the latest template to exist during a db upgrade? with the current check, to upgrade from 4.2.1 require to have the systemvm-template of 4.3

  1   2   >