Review Request 28535: core project can not pass junit test on mac platform .

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28535/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: root resize support in the UI

BTW, the code needed to enable custom root size during instance creation is very small, functionality is already there. This patch is needed https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=8fec09ba481fbd3b8c2a9e4d31ef06f113b037cb , I tested it and it works fine. And this is

RE: Random placing of Snapshots on multiple Secondary Storages

Hi, Can anyone help me with this? -Original Message- From: Wadia, Yohan [mailto:ywa...@virtela.net] Sent: 28 November 2014 15:25 To: 'dev@cloudstack.apache.org' Subject: Random placing of Snapshots on multiple Secondary Storages Hi I have a Cloudstack 4.2 setup running in my Lab.. 1 Z

Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)

For the RN, does 4.4.2 require to have a new systemvm ? otherwise the upgrade path from 4.4.1 to 4.4.2 will not include system vm upgrade steps. make sense? I've tested 4.4.2. using 4.4.1 system vm and so far I don't see any issues. Thanks, On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Daan Hoogland wr

RE: root resize support in the UI

Nux, Can you give more information about this functionality? I am particularly interesting to show to the user this field, but don't know how it will work. Particularly is interesting: 1. Does it work for all hypervisors or just KVM? 2. Does it depend on the template root partition (i.e

Re: Review Request 28535: core project can not pass junit test on mac platform .

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28535/#review63285 --- core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/routing/SetFirewallRulesCommand.java <

Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)

no, no new systemvm needed On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > For the RN, does 4.4.2 require to have a new systemvm ? otherwise the > upgrade path from 4.4.1 to 4.4.2 will not include system vm upgrade steps. > make sense? > > I've tested 4.4.2. using 4.4.1 system vm and s

Re: [ACS44]release 4.4.2 release candidate RC20141121T0341 (#2)

Good thanks, the release note is ready for 4.4.2. *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683 *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_ On S

Re: root resize support in the UI

I believe we require GUI changes to leverage what already works in the API (I think this is KVM only at the time being, too). On Saturday, November 29, 2014, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote: > Nux, > > Can you give more information about this functionality? I am > particularly interesting to sho

Re: Review Request 28535: core project can not pass junit test on mac platform .

> On Nov. 29, 2014, 11:32 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/routing/SetFirewallRulesCommand.java, line 50 > > > > > > If you want insertion ordered iteration or array (toArrary output) why > > n

Re: Review Request 28535: core project can not pass junit test on mac platform .

> On Nov. 29, 2014, 3:32 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/routing/SetFirewallRulesCommand.java, line 50 > > > > > > If you want insertion ordered iteration or array (toArrary output) why > > no

Re: Review Request 28535: core project can not pass junit test on mac platform .

> On Nov. 29, 2014, 11:32 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/routing/SetFirewallRulesCommand.java, line 50 > > > > > > If you want insertion ordered iteration or array (toArrary output) why > > n

Jenkins build is back to stable : simulator-singlerun #715

See

Re: Review Request 28535: core project can not pass junit test on mac platform .

> On Nov. 29, 2014, 3:32 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > core/src/com/cloud/agent/api/routing/SetFirewallRulesCommand.java, line 50 > > > > > > If you want insertion ordered iteration or array (toArrary output) why > > no

Re: root resize support in the UI

Vadim, 1. Only KVM for now, due to lack of interest I guess 2. The root disk value needs to be equal or larger than that of the template, otherwise you end up with a broken disk, obviously. So go for minimal (say under 10G) templates that can resize themselves, such as the ones at http://dl.ope

Re: Review Request 24991: CLOUDSTACK-6697: BigSwitchVns plugin update

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24991/ --- (Updated Nov. 30, 2014, 2:49 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vit