Congratulations Pierre-Luc!!
~Rajani
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Thanks guys!
>
>
> PL
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Nux! wrote:
>
> > Congrats, Pierre-Luc! :)
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
Congratulations Ian!!
~Rajani
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Congrats, Ian, good job! :)
>
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Chip Childers"
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
I am not sure Carlos, but I think it was due to a fix of some other network
related issue in 4.3.1. I thought we wrote an update/fix for it. So I am
looking at how your env missed out.
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Sure, but I am not sure if the problem happened when I
Hi All,
I've created a 4.4.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20141006T1046
Commit: 3d8c09dd146241fedda2f0167dcd60fdf66b0b1d
List of changes:
http://docs.cloudstac
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26356/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rayees Namathponnan.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7671
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26356/
---
(Updated Oct. 6, 2014, 9:45 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala
changing subject due to a c&p bug, thanks Geoff
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.4.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=re
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25885/#review55486
---
def test_03_pt_deploy_vm_with_startvm_false(self):
in test03,why ar
Hi all,
Just clone master and tried to build the simulator in order to start testing.
Unfortunately, did not pass SNMP Alerts module:
---
T E S T S
---
Running org.apache.cloudstack.alert
+1 (binding)
On Monday, October 6, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 4.4.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20141006T1046
> Commit: 3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26361/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7660
https:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26361/
---
(Updated Oct. 6, 2014, 2:06 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Frank Zhang an
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26364/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-76
> On Oct. 6, 2014, 4:50 a.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> > It looks pretty straightforward, doesn't look like it will break anything,
> > and sounds like it works, so I'm ok with it. It looks like this performs a
> > "1 qcow2 vol per nfs mount" type storage?
>
> Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hey
Hi David,
So, I know we're a ways past code freeze, but we seem to have been
(rightly) focusing more of our dev effort as a community on 4.3.1 and 4.4.1
lately.
It seems that check-ins have gone into master in the recent past and that
you felt they should not be reverted.
That being the case, Ma
On Oct 3, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Alex Brett wrote:
> On 03 October 2014 13:52, Adrian Lewis [adr...@alsiconsulting.co.uk] wrote:
>> The only solution I can think of is to 'apt-get update bash' on every
>> system VM but clearly these get fired up dynamically. Is it possible to
>> boot the template, make
I would suggest that having some sort of built in functionality tied to the
management server would be a good thing, but don't make it overbearing. If
operators have their own patch methodolgies right now that's fine, and they
should be able to continue to use them. For smaller shops or operation
Is it just me, or does this branch/commit not exist?
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Monday, October 6, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've created a 4.4.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > Git Branch and C
Let me know if you require more detail:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7674
On Oct 6, 2014, at 1:53 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I am not sure Carlos, but I think it was due to a fix of some other network
> related issue in 4.3.1. I thought we wrote an update/fix for it. So I
I grabbed the most recent for 4.4.1.
Let me see if I can find 3d8c09dd146241fedda2f0167dcd60fdf66b0b1d
specifically.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Is it just me, or does this branch/commit not exist?
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidf
I'm seeing the last change as Oct 3rd here...
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=summary
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> I grabbed the most recent for 4.4.1.
>
> Let me see if I can find 3d8c09dd146241fedda2f0167dcd
I see it:
*SHA:*
3d8c09dd146241fedda2f0167dcd60fdf66b0b1d
*Author:*
Daan Hoogland
*Date:*
Mon Oct 06 2014 02:46:12 GMT-0600 (MDT)
*Subject:*
*Updating pom.xml version numbers for release 4.4.1*
*Refs:*
upstream/4.4-RC20141006T1046
*Parent:*
63fbd16dd11388bd93cdbec4ea7fe6de37aa7fc5
O
it is all but me, Marcus
I forgot to push The tar-ball is there I hope.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Is it just me, or does this branch/commit not exist?
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > O
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> So, I know we're a ways past code freeze, but we seem to have been (rightly)
> focusing more of our dev effort as a community on 4.3.1 and 4.4.1 lately.
>
Yes, as I've stated elsewhere, I am in some ways waiting for 4.4.1. to
Thanks! I did fall back to the tarball.
On Oct 6, 2014 12:07 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
> it is all but me, Marcus
> I forgot to push The tar-ball is there I hope.
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> > Is it just me, or does this branch/commit not exist?
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 6,
OK, thanks, David.
We can create a new branch for this Review Request and merge it to master
once 4.5 is cut.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:09 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > So, I know we're a ways past code freeze, but we s
H Carlos,
This still deludes me. The code to replace empty broadcastUris is in branch
4.3 and below the tag for 4.3.1. Your system should have been upgraded. Do
you still have the logs for the first start after upgrading?
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Let me know if y
Marcus, I use release branches, so if you look in the 4.3 branch only you
might miss it. It is a short fork from that. the branch name is
4.4-RC20141006T1046 (as in the title of this mail
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Thanks! I did fall back to the tarball.
> On Oct 6, 2014 12:
We have decided internally to set up a CIDR reservation with all new
accounts to give us the ability to easily attach dedicated hosts to
existing VM networks.
We were thinking it would be easier to set up the reservation before
deploying VMs. Setting up reservation after the fact can get complica
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/22#issuecomment-58073492
Hi @bhaisaab,
This is a new Pull Request in order to fix the conflicts we found in the
old pull request #19 .
Travis-CI is 100% green and this
Never mindŠ it¹s working again.
The problem was related to the test trying to reach my machine based on
the hostname.
I just added the hostname on the /etc/hosts and it worked.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 06/10/14 14:11, "Wilder Rodrigues"
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Just clone master and tried to build the sim
Do startip and endip createNetwork parameters not work for that (when
creating the network? That should carve out a subset of the network for
cloudstack use and leave the rest untouched.
On Oct 6, 2014 12:57 PM, "Logan Barfield" wrote:
> We have decided internally to set up a CIDR reservation wit
I see it now. Thanks for pushing it.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Marcus, I use release branches, so if you look in the 4.3 branch only you
> might miss it. It is a short fork from that. the branch name is
> 4.4-RC20141006T1046 (as in the title of this mail
>
> On Mon,
Hi Marcus,
I'll give that a shot. I didn't know if those parameters specified the
network CIDR or the guest CIDR.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Do startip and endip createNetwork parameters not work for that (when
> creating the n
Yes I do. Anything in particular I should look for?
2014-09-29 09:56:03,115 INFO [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) Is Data Base
High Availiability enabled? Ans : false
2014-09-29 09:56:03,381 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.ConnectionConcierge] (main:null)
Registering a database connection for LockMaster1
20
Specifying IPs doesn't work, and in the network details I see that
"specifyipranges" is set to false.
I should probably note that this is using Advanced Networking with an
Isolated Guest Network.
Thank You,
Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Logan Barfield
wrote:
Here's an example:
create network vpcid=7276bcca-469c-4d23-9dd1-3391e964c453
displaytext=testnet zoneid=5e5f35d3-acb1-4142-84c2-e7f0ea7a36f4
name=testnet networkofferingid=82c67af0-f92e-479d-b1b4-8732abeef9b7
gateway=10.10.10.1 netmask=255.255.255.0 startip=10.10.10.100
endip=10.10.10.110
This re
Hmm, well that used to work, but I just tried it with a 4.4 release and it
completely ignored the startip and endip parameters. I know at one point
there was a db entry allocated for every ip in the range. It was not a good
way to keep the info (large networks == lots of entries), so it may have
be
Yeah, that was my result as well.
It seems like you should be able to specify a 'guestcidr' when creating the
network, or at least with 'updateNetwork' without the network being in the
"Implemented" state. I'm sure there's a reason for it being that way, but
it doesn't make much intuitive sense.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26404/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7676
https:
Logan,
The reason why reservation is not enabled in create stage is the case of
External network devices.
When using external devices like NetScaler, CloudStack will not have a 'real'
cidr unless the network has been implemented.
So a cidr like /24 used at time of create may turn to /20 when th
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> 2014-09-29 09:56:03,519 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade430to431] (main:null)
> updating vlan URIs
> 2014-09-29 09:56:03,523 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade430to431] (main:null) Done
> updateing vlan URIs
>
This is what I wanted to have confirmed. It should
What is it looking for?
Where is that code? Maybe I can have a look.
On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> 2014-09-29 09:56:03,519 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.Upgrade430to431] (main:null) updating
> vlan URIs
> 2014-09-29 09:56:03,
I just had a look at the code and found a bug. It might have not thrown an
exception where it should have. sorry about that. I am fixing that and will
port it to later versions.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> What is it looking for?
>
> Where is that code? Maybe I can
That was definitely a bug but will not fix my problem. See my comment in the
JIRA.
On Oct 6, 2014, at 11:04 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> I just had a look at the code and found a bug. It might have not thrown an
> exception where it should have. sorry about that. I am fixing that and will
> p
45 matches
Mail list logo
