Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #169

See

Re: [DISCUSSION] CI

I use rspec in Ruby these days and find it get complex to maintain pretty quickly. It's good for dealing with REST apis and middleware but with Marvin (and python in general) I find infrastructure handling easier. Stack traces of BDD code is also a little bit hard to troubleshoot and comprehend. I

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

Right, seems like the SF zones are more popular than I thought. :-) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "John Kinsella" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Wednesday, 20 August, 2014 11:59:27 PM > Subject: Re: IPv6 ~

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

Of course, I meant SG (from security groups) Good morning Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Nux!" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, 21 August, 2014 8:20:20 AM > Subject: Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Netwo

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for vGPU resources & VM lifecycle tests)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24420/ --- (Updated Aug. 21, 2014, 8:13 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark, s

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #170

See

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0

On 21-Aug-2014, at 8:10 am, David Nalley wrote: > Rohit: > > This is a new set of artifacts. You need to cancel the existing vote > and start a new one for your new set or artifacts. Sure. Cancelling this thread. > > --David > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Rohit Yadav > wrote: >> H

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #2)

Hi All, There was an issue identified with the previous candidate, so starting a new voting thread. I've created a 5.2.0 release candidate of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #171

See

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

> On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and > > design doc on the wiki. > > > > Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any > > problem with using them but a

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #172

See

Re: Review Request 23928: Test script to verify CS-5986 fix for vpc networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23928/#review51164 --- test/integration/component/test_vpc_vms_deployment.py

Re: Integration Tests on TravisCI

Santosh, What command/flags did you use for the above test output? On 14 August 2014 17:22, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > Ian, > > I just installed latest marvin after cloudstack build on master, and ran > tests against the simulator from smoke folder, below are the results. All > passed, except

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #173

See

Re: [DISCUSSION] CI

Thanks for you responses, The revamp of marvin look promising, I'll have a closer look at it, even if I'm not Python fan ;). In our side, we have close to fully automated installation of CloudStack, XenServer hypervisor and an initial zone creation. Our missing part is automated test cases to us

RE: Integration Tests on TravisCI

Something like below: nosetests-2.7 --with-marvin --marvin-config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg --with-xunit --xunit-file=/tmp/output_18thaug.xml -w test/integration/smoke -a tags=advanced,required_hardware=false --zone=Sandbox-simulator --hypervisor=simulator -s Santhosh __

Re: Integration Tests on TravisCI

Hey guys, Just to make sure we are all on the same page on this. There are several initiatives to bolster our CI capabilities and some of them are overlapping. * There are ongoing discussion to push for a CI environment at the ASF * There are a number of companies donating hardware/cloud instan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #2)

On Aug 21, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi All, > > There was an issue identified with the previous candidate, so starting a new > voting thread. > > I've created a 5.2.0 release candidate of CloudMonkey, with the following > artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH:

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for vGPU resources & VM lifecycle tests)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24420/ --- (Updated Aug. 21, 2014, 12:33 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #2)

On Aug 21, 2014, at 4:57 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi All, > > There was an issue identified with the previous candidate, so starting a new > voting thread. > > I've created a 5.2.0 release candidate of CloudMonkey, with the following > artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #2)

Hi, On 21-Aug-2014, at 2:28 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > If I am allowed a light hearted joke…: > I am going to veto -1 this release…because it totally breaks the recipes that > I just wrote in my book :( :) Sorry about dropping the server related configs (host, port, protocol, path etc),

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #2)

On 21-Aug-2014, at 2:37 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Checked the signatures > Installed, modified config to have a profile set > Tested on prod cloudstack > > ps1: neat pick, you should use .sha512 extension so it makes it clear you > used sha512... > ps2: we need to think a

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #174

See

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

> On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and > > design doc on the wiki. > > > > Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any > > problem with using them but a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #2)

21. aug. 2014 15:04 skrev "Rohit Yadav" følgende: > > Hi, > > On 21-Aug-2014, at 2:28 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > > If I am allowed a light hearted joke…: > > I am going to veto -1 this release…because it totally breaks the recipes that I just wrote in my book :( > > :) Sorry about dropping

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #2)

Thanks for raising your concerns Erik and Sebastien, I’ve added code to honour backward compatibility for options: host, port, path and protocol so you won’t have to change your recipes and scripts. When users will set those deprecated options, they will be told about this and this will create,

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #175

See

[VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0 (take #3)

Hi All, Thanks to concerns raised by Sebastien and Erik, I’ve added backward compatibility to cloudmonkey to support now deprecated options: host, port, protocol and path. Setting them will cause cloudmonkey to warn users but set the url option using those values instead. Looking forward to com

Review Request 24931: CLOUDSTACK-7385: Fixed LB creation issue in test_persistent_networks.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24931/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACk-7385

Review Request 24932: CLOUDSTACK-7386: Fixed cleanup issue in test_escalations_volumes.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24932/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7386

Master build failure

Hi, I tried to build the simulator environment with latest master but it failed: "mvn -Pdeveloper -Dsimulator clean install" [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - SNMP Alerts . SUCCESS [ 13.012 s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Syslog Alerts ... SUCCESS [ 11.734 s] [INFO] Apach

Re: Master build failure

Hi Sanjeev are you using latest master? Let me check again. On 21-Aug-2014, at 5:59 pm, Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote: > Hi, > I tried to build the simulator environment with latest master but it failed: > "mvn -Pdeveloper -Dsimulator clean install" > > [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - SNMP Alerts

Review Request 24936: RPM build failing with RHEL7

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24936/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Rayees Namathponnan and Hugo Trippaers. Bugs: ht

Re: Master build failure

Sanjeev, On 21-Aug-2014, at 5:59 pm, Sanjeev Neelarapu wrote: > I tried to build the simulator environment with latest master but it failed: > "mvn -Pdeveloper -Dsimulator clean install" With simulator option the build was successful for me. I reviewed and merged the GloboDns plugin integrati

Re: Master build failure

Hi, Sanjeev Didn't see any problems here. Was there any messages as to why the build for GloboDNS failed for you? [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Network VXLAN .. SUCCESS [4.750s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - GloboDNS ... SUCCESS [9.287s] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin

RE: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

> -Original Message- > From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 3:15 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches > > > > > > > > > There are several proposals from Citrix: > > > > http://markmail.org/thread/c4pded5

RE: [DISCUSSION] CI

> -Original Message- > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:06 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Will Stevens > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] CI > > Thanks for you responses, > > The revamp of marvin look promising, I'll have a closer

Re: Review Request 24936: RPM build failing with RHEL7

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24936/#review51191 --- packaging/centos63/cloud.spec

RE: Integration Tests on TravisCI

> -Original Message- > From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:10 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Integration Tests on TravisCI > > Hey guys, > > Just to make sure we are all on the same page on this. >

Re: Review Request 24600: Test script to verify if there is an error in editing network without network domain specified

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24600/#review51197 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On Aug. 12, 2014, 11:47 a.

Re: [DISCUSSION] CI

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] > > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 5:06 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: Will Stevens > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] CI > > > > Thanks for you res

Should CloudStack support forced password reset?

For legacy reasons the MD5 and plaintext plugins are included in the list of authenticators. If a company has been using CloudStack for awhile they may want to move all their users to a stronger plugin such as SHA256SALTED (which is now the default). Is there a mechanism to do that? It doesn'

Re: [GSoC] Fwd: Wrap-Up phase and final evaluations

Hey, I write a blog post on my experiences of the summer http://brogand93.blogspot.ie/2014/08/the-summer-of-code.html Darren On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi > > > It would be great to see a slide deck that summarizes your work this > summer or some nice wrap-up/blog po

Fwd: [NOTICE] Planned downtime for issues.apache.org

Heads up that Jira will be down this weekend. Please plan accordingly. --David -- Forwarded message -- From: Mark Thomas Date: Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:44 PM Subject: [NOTICE] Panned downtime for issues.apache.org To: "operati...@apache.org" Cc: "infrastruct...@apache.org" Thi

Re: Review Request 24936: RPM build failing with RHEL7

Since this is a new Major Centos/RHEL version change. why not packaging/centos7.x So when it is time to deprecate centos6 there is an issue. Just a thought. Patrick Patrick Miller ▪ Senior Systems Engineer ▪ Sungard Availability Services 2481 Deerwood Dr, San Ramon, Ca 94583 ▪ Office: 925-831-7

RE: [DISCUSSION] CI

> -Original Message- > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 11:21 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Will Stevens > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] CI > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > > > > -Original Mess

Hotfix for CLOUDSTACK-7260 is back ported to 4.3

Hi Ilya, Per your request and instruction, I have back ported hot fix for CLOUDSTACK-7260 to ACS 4.3 branch. Thanks -min

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #176

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #177

See

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #178

See

Re: Review Request 24936: RPM build failing with RHEL7

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24936/#review51250 --- client/tomcatconf/server-nonssl.xml.in

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #179

See

Re: Review Request 24936: RPM build failing with RHEL7

> On Aug. 22, 2014, 4:39 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > client/tomcatconf/server-nonssl.xml.in, line 29 > > > > > > Aren't we loosing the jmx support on tomcat6 by commenting this? As of my understanding it is to man

Re: Review Request 24936: RPM build failing with RHEL7

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24936/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2014, 5:37 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Rayees Namath

Re: Review Request 24936: RPM build failing with RHEL7

> On Aug. 22, 2014, 4:39 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote: > > client/tomcatconf/server-nonssl.xml.in, line 29 > > > > > > Aren't we loosing the jmx support on tomcat6 by commenting this? > > Damodar Reddy Talakanti wrote:

Guest VMs not able to start on Cloudstak HA

Hi, I am running ACS 4.3 with 3 xenserver 6.2 SP1 host in single cluster, primary & secondary storage is nfs, exposed from glusterfs, Also using Cloudstack HA feature for guest VMs. underneath we have 2 glusterfs node (node-1, node-2) for replication & ctdb service on top of glusterfs is providin

Re: Review Request 23452: CLOUDSTACK-4840: Automation tests - LB for secondary IP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23452/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2014, 6:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, suresh sadhu,

Re: Review Request 23452: CLOUDSTACK-4840: Automation tests - LB for secondary IP

> On Aug. 12, 2014, 11:07 a.m., sanjeev n wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_lb_secondary_ip.py, line 205 > > > > > > Add Assertion to check whether assigning lb rule to secondary ip > > address is success or

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #180

See