Re: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23605/#review48204 --- Why would we want to disable test cases that fail? Doesn't this mean

Replace primary & secondary storage

Hi, I have production vms running on ACS 4.3 with xen 6.2 SP1. I have requirement to change primary & Secondary storage. I am planning live storage migration for all running vms, after adding new storage as primary storage storage in same cluster. ( correct me if i am missing anything)..but how c

Re: Review Request 23282: CLOUDSTACK-6845 : First Code drop for NuageVsp Network plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23282/#review48208 --- Ship it! commit 03de9cc33507400e0e06ccd84a36334a4660ef4e Author: Su

Re: Review Request 23282: CLOUDSTACK-6845 : First Code drop for NuageVsp Network plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23282/#review48207 --- Commit 03de9cc33507400e0e06ccd84a36334a4660ef4e in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23282: CLOUDSTACK-6845 : First Code drop for NuageVsp Network plugin

Heya all, I’ve pushed support for the NuageVSP feature just now. Technically two days after the intended feature freeze for 4.6, but i think i can get away with it for the following reasons: * The feature was submitted on the review board before the feature freeze * The feature includes extensi

Re: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases

> On July 21, 2014, 1:03 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Why would we want to disable test cases that fail? Doesn't this mean we > > need to fix something else so they don't fail anymore? Hi Hugo, Whenever we found a test case failing, we create bug for that, may it be a test script issue or

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1171

See Changes: [htrippaers] CLOUDSTACK-6845 : NuageVsp Network plugin -- [...truncated 4511 lines...] [INFO] Compiling 146 source files to

Re: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases

Hey Gaurav, That doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. If the test sequence fails because of a bug it should keep failing until the bug is resolved, otherwise the tests will report that the situation is OK while in all reality it is not. These test should be in indication that Apache CloudStack is

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

In the case that it's a product bug, wouldn't it be better to keep running the test even if you know it's going to fail? That way, you get a consistent view of the overall pass rate from build to build. If you disable all the tests that are failing, you're going to get a 100% pass rate, but you

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1171

Should be fixed by commit 40d133dd7358be1940edd8e2a776e035c230c226 I didn’t see the error on my dev system as the proper jar file was present in my local maven cache so it could be found by mvm during the regular compile. Good find by Jenkins. Cheers, Hugo On 21 jul. 2014, at 11:01, jenk...@

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #1172

See Changes: [htrippaers] NuageVSP is a noredist component -- Started by user Hugo [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-a84 (clo

Re: [DISCUSS] Acquire New Ip from a different range on shared networks

On 15/07/14 3:29 AM, "Silvano Nogueira Buback" wrote: >Hi guys, > >At Globo.com we are working in a load balancer plugin for Cloudstack >with a network api developed internally. This api manages shared networks >and is working with cloudstack 4.3 (as a network guru implementation). Our >load

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #1173

See

Re: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Hugo, Stephen, We have been following this practice as part of Continuous Integration changes as defined in doc [1]. I personally think that tagging test case with BugId is good idea to map the test cases with bugs, but the test case should not be skipped when tagged. We can have discussion on thi

Re: Review Request 23282: CLOUDSTACK-6845 : First Code drop for NuageVsp Network plugin

On 19 jul. 2014, at 02:49, Suresh Ramamurthy wrote: > I had following questions regarding compiling only nuagevsp plugin > a) To build only nuagevsp, is below command correct. > mvn clean install -P developer,nuagevsp Correct > > b) To run client with nuagevsp in development setup

Re: Review Request 23603: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6983: unable to register lxc template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/ --- (Updated July 21, 2014, 9:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Hi Vihar, Are you referring to /etc/resolv.conf on the VR itself or on the guest VM? On the VR itself, there are only two entries on /etc/resolv.conf pointing to both Google public DNS servers. On the guest VM, there are 3 entries, one to the VR and two to the Google public DNS servers. If I com

Wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+-+Continuous+Integration

Hey Santosh, On the wiki page there are two URLs in the paragraph of the Log Upload Job that i (and presumably a majority of the community can’t access) can you fix this? This is bit: Log Uploader Job: This job post the CI run uploads all logs to nfs share. All logs post the run are available u

RE: Wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+-+Continuous+Integration

sure. Those are example ref links, anyways, i just updated some thing like below, please let me know if its ok. Log Uploader Job: This job post the CI run uploads all logs to nfs share. All logs post the run are available under designated nfs share at configured location in CI, EX: //example-nf

Re: Guidelines on Functional Test for plugins

Santosh, Talluri, Can you guys make sure the functional tests created by Suresh are integrated in the CI runs? test/integration//component/test_nuage_vsp.py Cheers, Hugo On 15 jul. 2014, at 14:07, Suresh Ramamurthy wrote: > Hi All, > > Can any one please point me to any document or examp

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

All, Alex, wanted to disable test cases in between CI( continuous integration) runs for the below "reason" for failures. I only, provided a way to achieve the same using tags, so that it will work for dual purpose, one not to effect community and can be used in CI as well, it will not effect if

Re: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Hey Santosh, For keeping track of which component fails its generally better to let jenkins figure it out. As we use nosetest (i think) we can store all the test reports and jenkins can determine which component failed in which test run without having to disable tests. Especially if en/disabli

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

In the beginning to get CI up and running, it would be ok to disable these handful of tests while getting fixes in, to achieve 100% pass rates. When CI runs in production, code changes need to be reverted if there are any "new" failures to keep CI pass rates at 100% (a known state to make CI

Re: Wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+-+Continuous+Integration

Ok, I didn’t realize they were samples, isn’t the CI system running somewhere already? So the logs should be available somewhere right? Cheers, Hugo On 21 jul. 2014, at 12:09, Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > sure. Those are example ref links, anyways, i just updated some thing like > below, pl

Re: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Hey Sudha, Sorry, but i disagree. The purpose of tests should not be to get a 100% pass rate. The tests should show an accurate state of the how the tests are doing versus the current state of the branch being tested. If tests fail we should fix why the tests fails and the system should not rep

RE: Wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+-+Continuous+Integration

Yes, its running inside now and so logs are available only to internal users, "but" there was a discussion on dev list to make it public, which was not concluded( i believe ). Once it will be made public, we can adopt the similar approach to facilitate others for viewing\other action. Regards,

Re: Replace primary & secondary storage

Hi, I found this article http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX135229 I was just going through this but could not get some of the points. Currently I have no snapshots and all templates are public & another secondary storage is not added yet. 1) In above article 2nd point says "Copy the snapshot

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding a plugin to check the password strength of all users

For the first part I am planning to add parameters to global settings. But for the 2nd part I think it depends on where we are integrating this plugin. To start with I will integrate it with abstract layer of Authenticator implementations and we can override in the corresponding authenticator on

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Tagging is good: that will allow you to see whether a failure is new or known about. Maybe the tag could even contain a date when it was added, to spot failures which are not receiving attention. But I don’t like to see tests skipped whenever we have a bug that is causing them to fail. -- Steph

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

abandoning vote due to bad quorum :( On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Ran into issue when trying to upgrade from 4.2.1. Got the following > database upgrade failure: http://pastebin.com/wkkAVYu0 > > Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7140 > > > > *Pier

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Hugo, I absolutely agree with you that tests should not be disabled and fixes should be made before check in. As per what Alex has mentioned in his CI enablement mail [1], premise of CI is that it runs at 100% pass rates and if any check in causes failure in CI Run, the bad check-in is easily

Re: Review Request 23603: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6983: unable to register lxc template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/#review48211 --- Commit 58bad41910970fb3b08aa4d21875af6d04c8bf2e in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 23603: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6983: unable to register lxc template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/#review48212 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kishan Kavala On July 21, 2014, 3:23 p.m., R

RE: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Is there not a way we could have the best of both worlds? Tag them, but leave them running, and reject a check-in if it triggers a failure in an untagged test only? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: 21 July 2014 12:

Re: Disabling failed test cases (was RE: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases)

Hey Sudha, OK, clear. I agree the CI system should be running as soon as possible. However the automated revert bit, i don’t agree with and will give a -1 on that. Cheers, Hugo On 21 jul. 2014, at 13:42, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Hugo, > > I absolutely agree with you that tests should not

Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, John Dilley, Santhosh Edukulla, an

Review Request 23737: Improve usability of deployDataCenter.py and advanced zone config

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23737/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Hugo Trippaers, and Wei Zhou. Rep

Re: Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/#review48216 --- tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg

Re: Review Request 23735: Fix deployment of data center with marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/#review48217 --- tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/#review48220 --- Can you rebase on latest master as the patch currently fails to appl

Re: Review Request 23737: Improve usability of deployDataCenter.py and advanced zone config

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23737/#review48219 --- tools/devcloud/devcloud-advanced.cfg

Re: rfc: newsystemvm

Hey Chiradeep, Thanks for taking a look. I’ve now re-done this work, but carefully and cleanly and on top of current master, in 37 small commits instead of 2 scary ones. Please take a look at https://github.com/schubergphilis/cloudstack/compare/systemvm-refactor Summarizing this kind of thin

Re: Review Request 23609: Signature changes to delete method in VirtualMachine class in base.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23609/#review48224 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On July 17, 2014, 9:22 a.m

Re: Replace primary & secondary storage

That article only applied to ACS 4.1 and older versions. In ACS 4.2 storage refactor, db tables are changed. template_host_ref has been deprecated and replaced with template_store_ref. Thanks -min On 7/21/14 3:47 AM, "Tejas Gadaria" wrote: >Hi, > >I found this article http://support.citrix.com/

Re: Review Request 23617: Add Nic UUID to the context so that we can read the same in event bus after create a nic

> On July 17, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 960 > > > > > > Why is it made create=true when it is not a BaseAyncCreate cmd ? > > create=true should be add

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAML2 plugin for SSO/SLO in CloudStack

+1. Very well-written FS and email, Rohit. Those open questions are very valid, I added a little comment in your FS regarding the flow. Thanks -min On 7/20/14 8:35 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Hi, > >I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward >with the first implement

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAML2 plugin for SSO/SLO in CloudStack

Rohit, definite +1 Thanks, ilya On 7/20/14, 8:35 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi, I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward with the first implementation starting next week but will be mostly offline till 28th July. Regards. Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi guys, There has b

[QUESTION] Baremetal DHCP Server - Abstracting Router VM

We are trying to abstract router vm completely from our environment as it has dual nics which is big "no no" in hardened security environments. This is for shared (non-vpc) advanced security zone. CloudStack already has a support for "Baremetal DHCP Server" under Network Service Providers. W

RE: Tomcat version issue while building cloudstack on RHEL7 RPMS

Hi Hugo, Do you have any ETA for this ? Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 9:27 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Tomcat version issue while building cloudstack on RHEL7 RPMS Thanks Hugo, defect https://issues.apache.o

Re: Review Request 23282: CLOUDSTACK-6845 : First Code drop for NuageVsp Network plugin

Hi Hugo, Thanks for reviewing NuageVsp plugin on time and making it part for CloudStack's virtual networking solution. Thanks, Suresh On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya all, > > I’ve pushed support for the NuageVSP feature just now. Technically two > days after the

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

> On July 21, 2014, 2:02 p.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Can you rebase on latest master as the patch currently fails to apply. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Hugo > > > > > > patching file api/src/com/cloud/network/Network.java > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 132. > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 224 (offset 3 lines

Re: Review Request 22863: CLOUDSTACK-6823 : First code drop for Brocade Network plugin to orchestrate Brocade VDX switches for L2 connectivity.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/ --- (Updated July 21, 2014, 7:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Hugo Tripp

Re: [DISCUSS] Acquire New Ip from a different range on shared networks

Silvano, This is not exactly a help you've asked about. But something along the similar concept, we've requested a feature known as IP POOL. As an example, you have several networks either guest or public that can be put into 1 large pool. In case network x runs out of IP space, you would ge

Re: [DISCUSS] Acquire New Ip from a different range on shared networks

Do you want to acquire IPs for the VIP (front-end)? From: Silvano Nogueira Buback mailto:silv...@corp.globo.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Monday, July 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: [QUESTION] Baremetal DHCP Server - Abstracting Router VM

Are you trying to get rid of the virtual router? Have you looked at the DNSAPI implementation discussed earlier? From: ilya musayev mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Monday, July

Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.0 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20140716T1409

Pierre-Luc, I¹ve closed the bug as invalid. Here is the explanation why: The first attempt to upgrade failed because the new system template wasn't pre-downloaded prior to upgrade (the requirement reflected in Release notes, for the cases when template is changed between CS versions) What should

Re: Tomcat version issue while building cloudstack on RHEL7 RPMS

Hey Rayees, Not really, but at least before the 4.6 feature freeze. By that time centos 7 will be stable and we will some time to properly test will all the new versions of the components. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone > On 21 jul. 2014, at 20:47, Rayees Namathponnan > wrote: > > Hi Hu

Need help clearing out the Async Queue

Folks, Looks like I have a job stuck in the async queue that I need to clear. How do you clear out the async queue please? Thanks Matt

Daily CI test summary 07/21/14

Hi All, You can see the current master builds automation status at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/RAGTAg Simulator 100% pass KVM 4 failures Xen 2 failures There is no new issue reported with latest build Regards, Rayees

RE: [DISCUSS]CLOUDSTACK-6191

Its not a false positive though, the complain is about possible null de-reference, the calling method declaration and definition provides that scope, i now made a change to accommodate null checks for vnetid and protocol values, only inside few cases where it is locally applicable, submitted a

Review Request 23750: Fixed Coverity Reported Issues

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23750/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Koushik Das, and Hugo Trippaers.

Re: Re: Why is the I/O speed of VM so terrible when using CloudStack4.2 + KVM deployment

could it be possible it is the Global settings: network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate ? what if you set them to 0 and restart systemvms,vr and Instances? Pierre-Luc On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:20 PM, evanitsharp wrote: > Hi, David: > Thanks for your suggest. > But I had tested

Resource [DataCenter:6] is unreachable: Unable to apply userdata and password entry on router

Dear all, Suddenly I am not able to create new VMs on my zone. The error message I found on management-server.log: 2014-07-22 11:25:51,632 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-3:job-17146 = [ b780cd9c-2d0b-499f-b396-269064995e30 ]) Unable to contact resource. com.cloud.excepti

Ceph Question (Wido?)

Hi, I'm thinking Wido knows the answer to this, but - of course - anyone feel free to chime in. :) I was looking at this video of Wido's from CCCEU13 in Amsterdam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57voBP_zdf8&feature=youtu.be In it, Wido talks about cloning a template on the Ceph cluster, then d

Re: Replace primary & secondary storage

Hi Min, Thanks for clarification, "template_store_ref" provided me install_path & secondary storage id information. it was quite helpful. I found this blog http://stankirdey.com/content/cloudstack-merging-secondary-storages but he is using `template_host_ref`for ACS 4.2. Is there any documente

Re: Review Request 23679: CLOUDSTACK-7130: Tagging failed test cases with product bug Id

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23679/#review48342 --- Commit 88f35179ef90dc4f7696b6fe2e8ee7ca4d00586c in cloudstack's bran

FUEL-CLOUD : Frequently used entries for Localization of cloud technologies

Hello, We are pleased to release the first draft version of FUEL-CLOUD. FUEL-CLOUD is a collection of commonly used entries for localization of cloud computing related software and docs. Today, Cloud is very new to this world and is an emerging technology to the future. Lots of companies are switc

Re: Review Request 23609: Signature changes to delete method in VirtualMachine class in base.py

> On July 21, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > Ship It! please add bugid. - Santhosh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23609/#review48224 --

Re: Review Request 23609: Signature changes to delete method in VirtualMachine class in base.py

> On July 21, 2014, 2:36 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > Ship It! > > Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > please add bugid. 88f3517..4596ae9 master -> master - Santhosh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: htt

[ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani Karuturi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that she has accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eli

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani .. well Deserved .. -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Rajani

Re: Review Request 20123: Fix for cloudstack-6328 to Prevent console proxy support scripts from spawning multiple java processes

> On April 29, 2014, 12:29 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > Ship It! > > Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > If we don't have any review issues pending, can some body with commit > rights push this patch? Saurav, Please update BugId and Branch fields. This review submission is pending since lon

[PROPOSAL] *LET'S ABANDON 4.4*

I had no vote's on the last release candidate. I move we abandon releasing 4.4 or stop releasing at all. +1 if you are in favor of not releasing 0 if you are in favor of just not releasing 4.4 -1 if you are very sorry you didn't vote, will better your life and volunteer to be the next RM kind reg

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

welcome Rajani, have fun On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Shweta Agarwal wrote: > Congrats Rajani .. well Deserved .. > > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 11:53 AM > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karutu

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani. -Original Message- From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.com] Sent: 22 July 2014 11:57 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer Congrats Rajani .. well Deserved .. -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congrats Rajani :) cheers! On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Suresh Sadhu wrote: > Congrats Rajani. > > -Original Message- > From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.com] > Sent: 22 July 2014 11:57 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as c

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rajani Karuturi as committer

Congratulations Rajani :) -Harikrishna On 22-Jul-2014, at 12:11 pm, Punith S wrote: > Congrats Rajani :) > > cheers! > > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Suresh Sadhu > wrote: > >> Congrats Rajani. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.c