On 01/07/14 3:39 am, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
>I would like to re-start this discussion.
>
>Rajani made some good points and someone mentioned Gitflow:
>
>http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/
>
>Thinking about our release procedure, we clearly need more tests and a
>CI. How
Hi Devs,
I recently noticed on master that after starting, stopping and starting the
management server again I get stacktraces about every second.
After some digging with Daan we found that part of the
a600d8408ea86782318139c17cf346c84979943d0 commit causes this. The problem is
however deeper r
Funs, Santhosh fixed this problem yesterday.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7079 has more details.
Thanks,
Likitha
-Original Message-
From: Funs Kessen [mailto:fkes...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 2:10 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Daan Hoog
Hi Likitha,
Ah cool thanks!
Cheers,
Funs
> -Original Message-
> From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:50 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Daan Hoogland
> Subject: RE: "Bug" introduced by part of commit
> a600d8408ea86782318139
Doesn’t seem related to that particular commit, the function
invalidateRunSession appears to be dead code.
I’ll do some digging.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 10 jul. 2014, at 10:40, Funs Kessen wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> I recently noticed on master that after starting, stopping and starting the
> manageme
Fixed already, good job Santosh
Cheers,
Hugo
On 10 jul. 2014, at 10:58, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Doesn’t seem related to that particular commit, the function
> invalidateRunSession appears to be dead code.
>
> I’ll do some digging.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
> On 10 jul. 2014, at 10:40, Fun
I have a new install of CS 4.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. I currently dont have any
vm's or applications or volumes configured or running on the CS 4.1. Basically
a freshly installed Ubuntu kernel and CS 4.1.
The storage setup on the Ubuntu host pc is
XXX.XXX.1.5:/export/primary on /mnt/primary1
X
Yeah I see that Ipasted the wrong bit of code *doh*, it was update that was the
problem from the same file:
@@ -129,24 +133,29 @@
@DB
public void update(long id, long runid, Date lastUpdate) {
TransactionLegacy txn = TransactionLegacy.currentTxn();
-PreparedStatement ps
Santhosh, I pulled the latest code and unfortunately the issue still exists.
Looks like the problem is because we try to close the transaction after it has
been committed (which implicitly closes the transaction) -
/framework/cluster/src/com/cloud/cluster/dao/ManagementServerHostDaoImpl.java
The mentioned issue by Funs was existing earlier as well but was hidden by just
logging it when update was failed, now with new change, we resurfaced the
problem by throwing it. Its not because of close though. We can see to fix the
original problem.
Santhosh
__
Hi Santhosh,
You're right indeed, it's the update statement in the update itself that adds
the runid in the where clause, it came in three years and three months ago by
the looks of it.
Cheers,
Funs
> -Original Message-
> From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com]
>
Hi,
I am getting below logs on CS 4.3 on Xenserver 6.2 SP1
i m getting huge amount of of memory allocated to vms, where it is not
actully..
2014-07-10 16:43:16,643 DEBUG [c.c.a.AlertManagerImpl]
(CapacityChecker:ctx-d205d3de) Done executing storage capacity update
2014-07-10 16:43:16,643 DEBUG [c
Hi,
I'm trying to read the code and follow architectural and design changes.
I see most of the code and various layers have the same workflow and
architecture, same as last year except for few places. Can anyone point
me to documentations and goals of cloud-engine and cloudstack-framework
modules
This email is being cross-posted specifically because bylaws changes are
required to occur on the dev@ list. However, the content of this
message may be primarily of interest to those on the marketing@ list.
For background, please see:
http://s.apache.org/EXe
http://s.apache.org/r9Y
I have atta
LGTM
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> This email is being cross-posted specifically because bylaws changes are
> required to occur on the dev@ list. However, the content of this
> message may be primarily of interest to those on the marketing@ list.
>
> For background, pl
Are you guys are referring to the update method that is throwing the error,
'update(long id, long runid, Date lastUpdate) ?. Agreed that this is just a
symptom.
But I was referring to the first update method in the file which is
'update(long id, long runid, String name, String version, String s
Libcloud is a Python library that abstracts away the differences among
multiple cloud provider APIs. It allows users to manage cloud services
(servers, storage, loadbalancers, DNS) offered by many different providers
through a single, unified and easy to use API.
We are pleased to announce the rel
Hi Likitha,
You are absolutely spot on! This is the error message I found:
INFO [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) Management server 90520734207775
is being started
WARN [c.c.u.d.T.Transaction] (main:null) txn: Commit called when it is not a
transaction:
-Transaction.execute:38-Transactio
My bad,
Obviously the wrong list.
On Jul 10, 2014, at 11:49 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Libcloud is a Python library that abstracts away the differences among
> multiple cloud provider APIs. It allows users to manage cloud services
> (servers, storage, loadbalancers, DNS) offered by many
I just reverted the changes done to this specific file, then
built the management server, stopped and started again twice, issue is not
reproducible
deployed a data center post the revert on simulator, it worked.
Please check. It seems, TransactionLegacy now implements Closeable, new change
un
Hi,
I am seeing this error when trying to build master branch :
Tests in error:
getTableName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest)
getTableName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could not initialize class
com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionLegacy
closeStatement(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest): Could not initialize
I just updated to the latest on master and was able to successfully build
the codebase. I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Amogh Vasekar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing this error when trying to build master branch :
> Tests in error:
> getTableName(com.cloud.utils.DbUtilTest
Without disabling the tests?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 7/10/14 12:07 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote:
>I just updated to the latest on master and was able to successfully build
>the codebase. I'm on Ubuntu 12.04.
>
>
>On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Amogh Vasekar
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am seeing this er
Check out the thread below.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201403.mbox/%3C7594
2ed3fd12d64eabe71209bd0f62cc1ba...@sjcpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 10/07/14 12:07 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
>I just updated to the latest on master and was able to successfu
I used mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install.
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote:
> Check out the thread below.
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201403.mbox/%3C7594
> 2ed3fd12d64eabe71209bd0f62cc1ba...@sjcpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Nit
I had faced this problem sometime back, here is the thread, check if this
applies to your setup:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201403.mbox/%3c75942ed3fd12d64eabe71209bd0f62cc1ba...@sjcpex01cl02.citrite.net%3E
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Amogh Vasekar [mailt
Hi,
In ACS JIRA unable to view the ticket CLOUDSTACK-967
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-967
Error is,
---
Permission Violation
It seems that you have tried to perform an operation which you are not
permitted to perform.
If you think this message is wrong, please contact yo
If it is a security issue I think we don't have permission to view them
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 7:11 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to view JIRA ticket CLOUDSTACK-967
Hi,
In ACS J
Hi,
Due to power blackout i have to recreate ssvm & cpvm, i am able to deploy
new vms also create new template but on System Capacity, & General Alerts
area, latest alerts are not populating.
Also ssvm & cpvm status is 'running' but Agent state is not displayed in
Cloudstack UI.
I have producti
If i recreate ssvm & cpvm, guest vm will be affected?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Tejas Gadaria
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to power blackout i have to recreate ssvm & cpvm, i am able to deploy
> new vms also create new template but on System Capacity, & General Alerts
> area, latest alerts are
hi,
try restarting the MS and see whether agent and MS are in sync.
also check the ssvm by running the health script by logging into to the
ssvm.
for more troubleshooting refer this link
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
NO it won't impact guet vms .destroy the ssvm and cpvm , it will recreate
again and during that time you can't create new guest vms.
--sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 July 2014 11:53
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.
Before destroying the cpvm and ssvm ,please analyse the logs. May be agent is
not up.
Also check below
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
regards
sadhu
-Original Message-
From: Suresh Sadhu
Sent: 11 July 2014
33 matches
Mail list logo
