Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #160

See

Cloudstack support for Xen (on Ubuntu)

I have a server running Ubuntu 13.04. I am planning to install Xen Hypervisor on that (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XenProposed#Xen_and_XAPI) Can I then have it managed (as a host) by Cloudstack 4.2 ? -pradeep

Re: Cloudstack support for Xen (on Ubuntu)

On 11.04.2014 10:10, Pradeep Cloudstack wrote: I have a server running Ubuntu 13.04. I am planning to install Xen Hypervisor on that (https://help.ubuntu.com/community/XenProposed#Xen_and_XAPI) Can I then have it managed (as a host) by Cloudstack 4.2 ? Not yet, there are plans to make it happe

NodeJS Client for CloudStack

Hello there, I’m writing nodeJS client application to interact with CloudStack. I notice csclient and node-cloudstack modules. csclient throws API error 432 for listVirtualMachines. Anybody has played with these modules in Node JS.  Appreciate your pointers/ recommendations. Cheers, Madan

Instance can't use data disk in Devcloud

Hi all, I am trying to build cloudstack 4.2 using my laptop with Devcloud by following this guideand, everything went smooth. But when I tried to create an instance with data disk offering I've got this following error

RE: can't get the simulator running on 4.4

Hi Tina, I have tried to get the Simulator working on branch 4.4 and I can confirm it works fine on Ubuntu. Now, the following entries are in my version table: 4.0.0 4.1.0 4.2.0 4.2.1 4.3.0 4.4.0 Maybe you could try cloning 4.4 to a different directory, drop DB and see if that helps. Regards,

Re: Instance can't use data disk in Devcloud

I assume you are using local storage for primary? If so you need to adjust the disk offering to use local storage. On Apr 11, 2014 11:48 AM, "dimas yoga pratama" wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to build cloudstack 4.2 using my laptop with Devcloud by > following this guide< > http://www.leaseweb

Re: Review Request 19922: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Removed XenServer stub code and used xapi.jar from the central repository instead.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/#review40150 --- Tina, I missed this on the first review. The current change adds x

Re: Cloudstack support for Xen (on Ubuntu)

True that, just xen hypervisor is not yet supported. However, if you also install the XCP over xen hypervisor it will work. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Nux! wrote: > On 11.04.2014 10:10, Pradeep Cloudstack wrote: > >> I have a server running Ubuntu 13.04. I am planning to install Xen >> Hy

Ceph RBD speed and snapshot usage improvements for CloudStack 4.4

Hi, I just pushed to commits to master and cherry picked them to the 4.4 branch to resolve a long outstanding issue with the time it takes to deploy templates and back up snapshots of RBD. The two commits [0][1] also address the space used by RBD snapshots on Secondary Storage. Before libr

Some problem registering ISO

Hi All,  I have installed cloudstack 4.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The system vm's were correctly created and are running.  I have also installed apache2 and configured it as shown below a few lines. I copied the ubuntu iso file to /var/www dir.   I tried to Templates -> Select View ISO, Register

Problem Registering an ISO

Hi All,  I have installed cloudstack 4.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The system vm's were correctly created and are running.  I have also installed apache2 and configured it as shown below a few lines. I copied the iso file to /var/www dir.   I tried to Templates -> Select View ISO, Register ISO, fro

Re: Review Request 19875: Fixed few issues for CLOUDSTACK-5674, CLOUDSTACK-6316

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19875/#review40154 --- Commit b2543efaca31bc7932ebe6ecefa963849049f39f in cloudstack's bran

Re: [RFC]Bypass Libvirt storage pool for NFS

On 03/20/2014 07:51 PM, Nux! wrote: On 20.03.2014 18:48, Wido den Hollander wrote: And it just went upstream! How great is that? Pretty great. That's how open source works. :) Quick question: there is no problem if instead of using NFS directly we use the "shared mount point" option, is

Review Request 20257: CLOUDSTACK-6390 : System vm failed to build with openssl installation error,

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20257/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Frank Zhang. Bugs: CLOUDS

Re: Review Request 19922: CLOUDSTACK-6251: Removed XenServer stub code and used xapi.jar from the central repository instead.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19922/ --- (Updated April 11, 2014, 2:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huan

Review Request 20258: CLOUDSTACK-1466: Automation tests for Primary Storage Limits Feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20258/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CL

Security Group bug impeding system VMs functionality

Hello, I'm on 4.3 right now, CentOS6.5 + KVM and SG ADV zone. What happens is that after a reboot or after disabling a zone, when the system VMs come back the iptables rules required for their proper functioning do not get set. It seems to be happening randomly and it may not be affecting both

Review Request 20261: CLOUDSTACK-6233: Add new tab "GPU" in Host detailView for gpu enabled hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20261/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: clou

Re: Review Request 20261: CLOUDSTACK-6233: Add new tab "GPU" in Host detailView for gpu enabled hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20261/ --- (Updated April 11, 2014, 4:49 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federl

RE: Review Request 19616: Added check for null return.

All, I've made the following changes to public Snapshot takeSnapshot(Long volumeId, Long policyId, Long snapshotId, Account account, boolean quiescevm), is this the preferred approach? I don't get any compilation issues with this. I want to ensure I've taken your comments on fully. try {

Re: Instance can't use data disk in Devcloud

Hey it works! Many Thanks. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > I assume you are using local storage for primary? If so you need to adjust > the disk offering to use local storage. > On Apr 11, 2014 11:48 AM, "dimas yoga pratama" wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am trying to build

Coding Standards Questions

All, As I've been looking through the code, I've seen a fair number of places where return statements are called within if statements and the like. I've always found that having one place to return is easier to debug and follow the code flow. Are there any guidelines on this? Or is it not a

Re: Cloudstack support for Xen (on Ubuntu)

Rafael, Once you put XCP on, do you gain features that belong to Xenserver or is it limited in someway? The only reason I am not using Xenserver is that I have to manage it differently than my other hosts. Tracy Tracy Phillips Weberize, Inc. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Rafael Weingartner

Re: Problem Registering an ISO

Is secstorage.allowed.internal.sites set correctly? Thanks, Amogh On 4/11/14 6:52 AM, "Giri Prasad" wrote: >Hi All, > > I have installed cloudstack 4.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. The system vm's >were correctly created and are running. > > I have also installed apache2 and configured it as shown belo

[CLOUDSTACK-5907] Issue regression / not fixed

I would like to draw attention to the aforementioned issue. With an out of the box fresh 4.3 release setup using RBD primary, S3 secondary and KVM hypervisors, I experience newly created volumes changing to "Ovm" format soon after creation. This disables snapshotting of volumes, which worked fine s

CS Upgrade from 4.1.x to 4.2.1, registering new System VMs

Hi folks, I am planning my upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.1, reading the docs here: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.1/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.1-to-4.2.1 . After I register the new system vm templates, do not I need to remove the old ones?

Re: Coding Standards Questions

H Alex, I agree with you that would be nicer if your function fits in a screen. Another coding convention we should adhere to. As it is I think it not so much 'not a major concern' as too much to ask for. Feel free to refactor and submit patches;) Daan On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Alex Hitch

Re: Review Request 19616: Added check for null return.

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > > if(snapshotInfoReturn.equals(null)){ > throw new ResourceAllocationException("Take snapshot for VolumeId: " > + volumeId + " failed.", ResourceType.snapshot); > } This will never throw a ResourceAllocationException. It

Re: Review Request 20257: CLOUDSTACK-6390 : System vm failed to build with openssl installation error,

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20257/#review40172 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Frank Zhang On April 11, 2014, 2:39 p.m., Ra

Re: Review Request 20257: CLOUDSTACK-6390 : System vm failed to build with openssl installation error,

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/20257/#review40171 --- Commit a5261cee3f63cbb30db06c7a4e5f35c8a5fa957c in cloudstack's bran

RE: Review Request 19616: Added check for null return.

OK, so that should be if(snapshotInfoReturn==null){ throw new ResourceAllocationException("Take snapshot for VolumeId: " + volumeId + " failed.", ResourceType.snapshot); } So I get null - I should raise an exception. Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587

Re: Review Request 19616: Added check for null return.

sure, I still don't like the fact that we need to throw an exception that we caught one level deeper. @Edison: can we change the internal api to throw the exception? On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > OK, so that should be > >if(snapshotInfoReturn==null){ >

RE: Review Request 19616: Added check for null return.

Cool, once I've been over it with a test I'll update the patch. Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587 - -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 11 April 2014 20:56 To: dev Cc: Alex Hitchins; Edis

RE: Coding Standards Questions

Daan, Are you referring to keeping line lengths up to 80 characters? Sorry - tired eyes. My thoughts were more that in a function there should only be one "return" statement rather than many, all nested in layers of if/else statements. Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587 -

Re: Coding Standards Questions

no I don't mean linelength, more no of lines. In a function of several 100s of lines you want to return asap. and you don't want a method of 100s of lines On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Alex Hitchins wrote: > Daan, > > Are you referring to keeping line lengths up to 80 characters? Sorry - tired

KVM, Re-create VR failed

Hi, It's can be some know bug? Possible it's already solved in new releases of CS but i need the work-around or fix before upgrade or reference to bug id. Environment: CS 4.1.1 libvirt-1.0.1 qemu-kvm-1.2 NFS Storage ( as primary for VR's ) Advanced VLAN isolation After hypervisor host crashing,

Re: CS Upgrade from 4.1.x to 4.2.1, registering new System VMs

Yes you will have to destroy the old ones and new ones will be created based on the new template you've uploaded. Regards ilya On 4/11/14, 11:29 AM, Rafael Weingartner wrote: Hi folks, I am planning my upgrade from 4.1.1 to 4.2.1, reading the docs here: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/A

Re: CS Upgrade from 4.1.x to 4.2.1, registering new System VMs

When I asked about removal, I meant the template by themselves. The running vms I knew that I would have to remove. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:28 PM, ilya musayev wrote: > Yes you will have to destroy the old ones and new ones will be created > based on the new template you've uploaded. > > Reg

[ANNOUNCE] Paul Angus as a committer

We are pleased to announce that Paul Angus was invited to be a committer on the Apache Cloudstack project and that he accepted, Join us in welcoming and congratulating Paul Angus, -Sebastien on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Paul Angus as a committer

Congrats! > On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > We are pleased to announce that Paul Angus was invited to be a committer on > the Apache Cloudstack project and that he accepted, > > Join us in welcoming and congratulating Paul Angus, > > -Sebastien on behalf of the Clou

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Paul Angus as a committer

Congrats, Paul! --Tuna On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Congrats! > > > On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > > > > We are pleased to announce that Paul Angus was invited to be a committer > on the Apache Cloudstack project and that he accepted, > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Paul Angus as a committer

Excellent news, congrats Paul! On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > Congrats, Paul! > > --Tuna > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Chip Childers >wrote: > > > Congrats! > > > > > On Apr 11, 2014, at 8:48 PM, Sebastien Goasguen > > wrote: > > > > > > We are pleased to ann

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Paul Angus as a committer

congrats Paul! :) On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > Excellent news, congrats Paul! > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > > > Congrats, Paul! > > > > --Tuna > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Chip Childers > >wrote: > > > > > Congrats! >