Re: [VOTE] [RESULTS] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Great news! Have a nice weekend, guys and gals! Cheers, Wilder Sent from my iPhone > On 21 Mar 2014, at 20:08, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > wrote: > > > > The vote has *passed* with the following results (binding PMC votes indicated > with a "*" next to their name: > > +1 : Animesh*, Edison*,

RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)

At what stage is the DB upgrade performed ? Is it handled by the new version of CS on first time start, or does the admin have to run something manually ? I have followed the upgrade instructions here and there was nothing mentioned about a database upgrade step (please note I am using XenServer)

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.4-maven-build #35

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace

Re: [VOTE] [RESULTS] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

I did find some issue - but relatively minor and nothing that could not have been fixed via UI. I will open JIRA to address the issues. In the nutshell, i noticed some UI inconsistency and the way some pages are presented - this is minor but the issue was seen in both latest Firefox and Chrom

[QUESTION] JavaScript Question

Hi, I have a JavaScript question. Of course, feel free anyone to answer it, but I CCed Brian, Jessica, and Alena since they seem to do a lot of our GUI work. While testing a feature of mine for 4.4, I came across a minor GUI issue. For 4.4 I added the ability for Compute Offerings to support Sto

Re: [VOTE] [RESULTS] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (ninth round)

Sure lets track them for 4.3.1 and 4.4 Thanks Animesh On Mar 22, 2014, at 3:56 PM, "ilya musayev" wrote: > I did find some issue - but relatively minor and nothing that could not have > been fixed via UI. > > I will open JIRA to address the issues. > > In the nutshell, i noticed some UI inc

Re: [QUESTION] JavaScript Question

I actually think it has to do with the CSS. It looks like the "No Thanks" radio button's height is not taken into consideration when we shrink the height of the Disk Offering container to fit in the custom compute and custom storage QoS controls. I also noticed that if you select a custom Disk Of

Re: [QUESTION] JavaScript Question

FYI that I fixed the "No Thanks" radio-button issue in both 4.4 and master. On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I actually think it has to do with the CSS. > > It looks like the "No Thanks" radio button's height is not taken into > considerati

Re: [QUESTION] JavaScript Question

Just another comment on the "No Thanks" radio button: When it is not present (ex. when you build a VM from an ISO), the custom compute and custom storage QoS controls have enough space in the wizard. They are not under the control of a scroll bar (like they are with the Compute Offering equivalent)

Re: [QUESTION] JavaScript Question

By the way, when I said, "I fixed the "No Thanks" radio-button issue in both 4.4 and master," I meant I fixed the issue where the custom compute and/or custom storage QoS controls were not disappearing when you clicked on the "No Thanks" radio button. On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Mike Tutkows