---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16551/#review31007
---
plugins/hypervisors/hyperv/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/hyperv/discover
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16550/#review31008
---
Ship it!
Committed in a4d4d4b09aaff5b5606d1f9f58b2b80c92aee0a9
- D
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16551/#review31009
---
Ship it!
Committed in e74889ac91c919ab26852da3d93133eaeae874c8
- D
On 31.12.2013 23:47, Edison Su wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 6:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC
On 23.12.2013 05:42, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
It gives me immense pl
Ensure that command executed in management host.
SSH the "Link Local IP Address" of the System VM
XenServer/KVM Hypervisors using: /root/.ssh/id_rsa.cloud
ESXi Hypervisors using: /var/lib/cloudstack/management/.ssh/id_rsa
在 2014年1月1日，2:05，Yichi Lu 写道：
> Sanjeev Neelarapu writes:
>
>> Hi Yic
> While I've got your attention, what's the deal with isolation method vs
> broadcast method? These are always set to the same thing as far as I've seen.
I've been asking this but haven't found the answer yet. There is an
overlap but both have some extra values the other hasn't.
I don't like eit
On 31.12.2013 19:48, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
Nux,
Defect 5393 [1] is not reproducible in 4.3 so that got closed. Can
you open a new one for 4.2.1 with exact problem you are having.
Done.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5709
I have installed a new ACS today, single-host to ke
That's just it. The isolation type *is* provided when creating
physical network. If I create a physical network with isolation type
'VXLAN', and then add traffic type of 'Public', it doesn't obey it.
There's physical_networks and networks, when the zone is created, an
entry goes in network that is
Hey guys,
The NPE I saw last night was related to "isolation id." Is it possible this
NPE is related to something new that was put that you are talking about
here?
Thank!
ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (1583467451@qtp-185135566-2:ctx-ae5d80b2
ctx-5c12c4d9) unhandled exception executing api command: cre
Which branch? I see these in master, you can check out the commit just
before these and see if it helps:
commit b477e4e830597100f0c0171dd8e56f4033bd07aa
Author: Daan Hoogland
Date: Tue Dec 31 12:52:51 2013 +0100
some xtra cases
commit 2cf356e047e26977c1d294fafc57e986c04fc5f4
Author: Daan
This is in 4.3.
I know the file is NetUtils, but I'm not sure in Git how to look at the
history of a particular file like I could do in SVN.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Which branch? I see these in master, you can check out the commit just
> before these and see if
You can do "git blame (file)" and it will show you each line and the
commit. You can also do a git log on the file. The issue may not be as
obvious as that, though, there may be something totally unrelated causing
that object to end up null in this code. Or it may be specific to your
setup, some o
Yeah, in my case I'm just setting up a basic zone with a XenServer host.
The code in NetUtils checks for null or "" on the variable in question
that's passed in. However, in a certain case, null for that variable can
slip by and lead to a NPE.
if ((one == null || one.equals(""))
I should say this check doesn't have to catch it...it might, but it doesn't
have to (depends on the value of one).
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Yeah, in my case I'm just setting up a basic zone with a XenServer host.
>
> The code in NetUtils checks for null or "" on t
Yeah, it would be clearer if they were checked separately:
if (one == null || one.isEmpty()) {
return true;
} else if ( other == null || other.isEmpty()) [
return true;
}
or something like that.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> I should say this check doesn't hav
Yeah, but I wasn't sure of the coder's intend and if your replacement code
meet their expectations, so I didn't change it. I was hoping someone would
claim the code and chime in. :)
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Yeah, it would be clearer if they were checked separatel
git blame will show you the commit and committer.
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Yeah, but I wasn't sure of the coder's intend and if your replacement code
> meet their expectations, so I didn't change it. I was hoping someone would
> claim the code and chime in. :)
>
>
OK, thanks!
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> git blame will show you the commit and committer.
>
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > Yeah, but I wasn't sure of the coder's intend and if your replacement
> code
> > meet their expectations, so I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16560/
---
Review request for cloudstack and koushik pv.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Desc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16465/
---
(Updated Jan. 2, 2014, 6:01 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16560/
---
(Updated Jan. 2, 2014, 6:07 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das
Looks like Daan added the method:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blobdiff;f=utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java;h=a315b935495469648a0a82a25c39c9c53f0226f6;hp=11a483c3f7e420056dce7893a86946de5c40e244;hb=94abbb1367bc817bae98f369e78679f0ddb7727f;hpb=6897984970df145
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5551
https:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/
---
(Updated Jan. 2, 2014, 6:55 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16541/#review31020
---
Commit 8f15fc1fc13c2aa4ebb6ccc618b5192eae2e6063 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/
---
(Updated Jan. 2, 2014, 7:09 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16541/#review31021
---
Ship it!
Committed to 4.3 and master.
- Girish Shilamkar
On Dec.
Yeah, this does appear to be a bug.
I re-ran the attempted creation of my CloudStack cloud with a different
XenServer host and was left in the same state (NPE).
I plan to try this with KVM tomorrow (er, later today, I guess).
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@soli
here are the files in the above directory.
as it seems the required files are available in the code. but build gives
that error anyway.
Thanks.
bad_format_cert.crt root_chain.crt rsa_random_pkey.key
dsa_self_signed.crt rsa_ca_signed2.crt rsa_self_signed.crt
dsa_self_signed.key rsa_ca_si
hi,everyone
i have some question about cloudstack,
No.1: how can i use External DHCP Server(not use VirtualRouter VM DHCP
Server), i set global settings
direct.attach.network.externalIpAllocator.enabled = true,and restart
management server,but vm's ip address also provide for VirtualRouter, how
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16541/#review31023
---
Commit 97ede2524c1e19a5de68deab7c5d8327d26a81e9 in branch refs/heads
There are some other issues near that commit as well. A fix for
CLOUDSTACK-5502 that makes 'untagged' invalid needs to be backed out.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Yeah, this does appear to be a bug.
>
> I re-ran the attempted creation of my CloudStack cloud with a di
32 matches
Mail list logo
