Hi,everyone
No.1 i'm built cloudstack environment for 4.0, Advance Network mode, i'm
create a Network offering with Source NAT and other service(such as Static
Nat, LB, PF,FW,DNS,DHCP) , and RedundantRouter is Enabled, and GuestType is
Isolated, create Guest network and use this Network Offering,
You should be able to use 10.1 now.
Thanks,
Vijay V.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vijay Venkatachalam
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:56 AM
> To: 'Syed Ahmed'; 'Will Stevens'
> Cc: 'dev@cloudstack.apache.org'; 'Prasanna Santhanam'; Murali Reddy
> Subject: RE: Upgrading nitro API to
Has anyone been able to resolve this issue? This is holding up my ability
to launch VMs and test the fixes to my plugin. I need to resolve this
issue to move forward...
@Syed, are you still stuck on this as well?
Cheers,
Will
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> OK here is
Don¹t understand problem well enough for clean fix, but I updated
'template_version' from 3.0 to 4.3 of the VR in the domain_router table
that resolved the issue for me.
On 22/11/13 3:50 PM, "Will Stevens" wrote:
>Has anyone been able to resolve this issue? This is holding up my ability
>to la
Initial draft of the FS
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/User+VM+HA+using+native+XS+HA+capabilities
-Koushik
On 21-Nov-2013, at 9:59 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
> Cloudstack relies on custom HA logic for user VMs running on Xenserver. The
> reason for doing it like this may b
I will try this as a temporary solution. Thank you...
Will
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Murali Reddy wrote:
>
> Don¹t understand problem well enough for clean fix, but I updated
> 'template_version' from 3.0 to 4.3 of the VR in the domain_router table
> that resolved the issue for me.
>
>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Pavan Bandarupally
wrote:
> pavanb
ok
Had a quick look, It looks alright. One question/doubt: will we thigh
ourselves more to mysql if we code sql more directly instead of
abstracting away from it so we can leave db choice to the operator in
the future!?!?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> I've done a lot of a
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
>> > > > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>> > > > will make life simpler)
maybe some fever remnance but I envsion a happy monkey surfing the
cloud on a feather. looks cool to my inner eye
Hi Koushik:
In general I like the idea. A couple of comments:
The upgrade section has a manual step for enabling HA manually per
instance. Why a manual step? Why is CloudStack not checking the
desired state (e.g. if HA is enabled in the instance service group)
with the actual state (what is refle
No, please, don't use the feather.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Kirk Jantzer wrote:
>>> > > > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it
>>> > > > will make life simpler)
>
>
> maybe some fever remnance but I e
Hello,
we have a zone with 2 host and 1 NFS.
The configuration is set to work "LOCAL"
When we take a VM snapshot for an istance on host number 2 and we try to
start the VM, the following error occurs:
Resource [Host:1] is unreachable: Host 1: Unable to start instance due
to Local volume Vol
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15787/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Ian Duffy and Rajani Karuturi.
Bugs: 5231
ht
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15787/#review29287
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Nov. 22, 2013, 3:32 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15748/#review29289
---
makes sense but it doesn't apply to master and 4.2 is frozen for the
H,
This change makes sense to me but is there any guru that oposes to a
GuestOSCategory of 'None'?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yichi Lu
Date: Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:38 PM
Subject: Review Request #15566 - CLOUDSTACK-4969
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Dear Committers:
I subm
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15787/#review29290
---
Commit 8e580cc41184eac53969267234114d9d8ea23006 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15787/#review29292
---
Ship it!
8e580cc41184eac53969267234114d9d8ea23006
(had to edit bla
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15748/#review29294
---
Ship it!
4517b9277b4b6299b36a45844052882d856561e6
- daan Hoogland
Thanks Vijay. I'll check it out.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam
wrote:
> You should be able to use 10.1 now.
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay V.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Vijay Venkatachalam
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:56 AM
>> To: 'Syed Ahmed'; 'Will Stevens'
All,
I'm very interested in converting the current DAO framework to an ORM. I
didn't have any experience with java related ORMs, but I've done quite lots
of works with Django and LINQ. So can you add me if this project is started?
Thanks
Alex Ough
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Daan Hoogland
Thanks to help from many developers,
I sent my first review request in the cloudstack,
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15763/,
so please take a look at it and let me know if there is anything
missing/incorrect.
Thanks again.
Alex Ough
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Ough wrote:
> Hi Wido,
I just need to blow off some steam about the shifting sands of our
codebase. I went to look at the resizeVolume method today and found
that it has moved again, twice in about six months. It went from
StorageManagerImpl.java in 4.1 to VolumeManagerImpl.java in 4.2, and
now VolumeApiServiceImpl.java
I recommend QueryDSL. Having a quick look at JOOQ, it's very similar to
QueryDSL.
QueryDSL has been integrated into Spring for 2 years, and JOOQ haven't had
official doc for Spring.
Besides Sql, QueryDSL also gets fair credit on manipulating NoSql which is an
additional plus.
> -Original Me
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yichi Lu
Date: Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:38 AM
Subject: Review Request #15566 - CLOUDSTACK-4969
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Dear Committers:
I submitted this review request a week ago, but have not received any
response. I'd appreciate if someone co
Hi Yitao,
CloudStack scheduling policies are implemented by the DeploymentPlanner and
HostAllocator/StoragePoolAllocator components.
If you want to take a look at the source code of these components, this will
tell you where to look:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/VM+Dep
1. Redundant router supports all isolated network services. Could you add
log to show the error?
2. Currently redundant router doesn't support HA, because the other router
of the pair would take over immediately. And it's somehow complex to
implement the HA with redundant router, which itself is a
27 matches
Mail list logo
