RE: Tags on storagePool

Alena, I don't know why it was designed this way in first place - a design like host_tags where we have separate table to store tags is much better for Allocators to work on. It is a bug, but will cause problem only if we land up with situation explained below: Given the existing design of st

Review Request 14889: Expose as much type information to commands.xml as well as to the generated python clasesss for Marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14889/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Marcus Sorensen and Prasanna Santhanam. Reposito

Re: [Proposal] Improve VR upgrades

looks alright Kishan, two litle remarks Alex is mentioning redundant router. Can we add some kind of spec that the redundant pair is guaranteed not to be upgraded at the same time? As for the downloading the template to primary storage before rebooting; I think it is safe to download it to all p

Re: Review Request 14889: Expose as much type information to commands.xml as well as to the generated python clasesss for Marvin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14889/ --- (Updated Oct. 23, 2013, 9:38 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Marcus Sorens

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

I fixed all the compilation errors in engine/storage/integration-test. I don't know how to run those test though, so I can't validate the changes. Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Yep. I’m running on a clean master. > > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

My understanding is that it is still a work in progress to get those test back running. Is this correct, Edison? -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:

Unable to start SSVM in latest code of master branch: "Unable to start s-15-VM due to java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56FP1Resource.createVmFromTemplate(Xe

Hi, My management server is unable to start SSVM in latest code of master branch. Does anyone see the same error? 2013-10-23 15:02:25,287 WARN [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:ctx-2593db33) Unable to start s-15-VM due to java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.hypervisor.

Re: Unable to start SSVM in latest code of master branch: "Unable to start s-15-VM due to java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56FP1Resource.createVmFromTemplat

Yes - I sent out an email about it earlier. I’ll bump the thread. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 6:19 PM, Jessica Wang wrote: > Hi, > > My management server is unable to start S

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

Bumping this as system vms still can’t be deployed on master. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at 12:43 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Adding the commit author. > > -- > Chris S

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

Darren, Would you be able to look into copy the logic back into your refactoring today or tomorrow? If not, I may be able to in the morning. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 23, 2013, at

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

Sorry, I don't follow your question. I have time today. What would you like me to do? As it stands right now, what is on master, I'm not aware of any issues. Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 3:22 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Darren, > > Would you be able to look into copy the logic back in

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

Take a look at revision 3 of my changes here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/diff/3/#index_header The changes I made were due to discussion in the reviews. It should be simpler, cleaner and more efficient logic than using comparators. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

+1 On Oct 21, 2013, at 11:11 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is proposing the donation of > source for an RDP client. After donation, the client would be integrated > with the console system VM in order to provide access to Hyper-V based VMs. > > The cl

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

So your asking to not use the sorting logic and instead do the style of Priority highestPriority = Priority.CANT_HANDLE; Priority priority = strategy.canHandle(...); if (priority.ordinal() > highestPriority.ordinal()) { highestPriority = priority; strategyToUse = strategy; } The problem I

Re: Tags on storagePool

Filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4942 -Alena. From: Prachi Damle mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com>> Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 2:04 PM To: Alena Prokharchyk mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>, "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

I found the problem. disconnectPhysicalDiskByPath is being passed in (in my situation) the following: /var/lib/libvirt/images/9887d511-8dc7-4cb4-96f9-01230fe4bbb6 Due to the name of the method, my code was expecting data such as the following: /dev/disk/by-path/ip-192.168.233.10:3260-iscsi-iqn.

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

If there are arguments against it, then lets keep the discussion going. I’m fine with sorting as well - it was requested by someone else to optimize this. However, just to play devil’s advocate: where would you need a sorted list of strategies rather than just needing the best fit? -- Chris Su

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

Frankly, I don't really care, I'll just change it to how it was before. I'll remove the get methods that return a collection. Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > If there are arguments against it, then lets keep the discussion going. I’m > fine with sorting as

Re: StrategyPriority changes w/ Spring Changes

Updated f3e968b9830a667cb3b55477f1fe8259e56ceffb Darren On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Frankly, I don't really care, I'll just change it to how it was > before. I'll remove the get methods that return a collection. > > Darren > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Suich

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

It should be sending the path info for each disk per the XML of the VM... so it will send all disks regardless of whether or not your adaptor manages that disk, and it's up to your adaptor to ignore any that aren't managed by it. There should be notes to that effect in the code near the disconnectP

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

Slightly off topic but I've noticed that the scripts used to create the vm templates are slightly out of sync between 32bit and 64bit. I just assumed nobody used 64bit and that's why it got out of sync. Darren > On Oct 23, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Marty Sweet wrote: > > What would be the main reaso

Re: How does HA work?

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/dwn8AQ On 10/23/13 10:51 AM, "Kelcey Jamison Damage" wrote: >I can tell you it uses 'Storage-Heartbeat" method for HA, unless that's >changed. That means the heartbeat ring is via the primary storage. > > >- Original Message - > >From: "Nux!" >To: d

Re: [ASF4.2.1] default to 64-bit system VM template

32-bit vms also "generally" perform better on XenServer (depending on the workload). The issue with 32-bit Linux is that it has usually only has 800M for so for available for the kernel [1]. This limits the number of connections that can be tracked by the conntrack module to around 800/300 =~ 2.5 m

Re: how to use hashes on c.a.o?

This is the output of gpg -v --print-md SHA512, generated as part of the release procedure [1] by tools/build/build_asf.sh 1: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+Procedure On Oct 17, 2013, at 7:56 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > The hashes that are on c.a.o for the re

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Thanks, Marcus...I hadn't read that note, but that makes sense. Yes, that must be the root disk for the VM. I can put in code, as you recommend, to handle only my volumes. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > It should be sending the path info for each disk per the XML of t

Re: Unable to reboot instance: "Unable to find service offering: [NUMBER] corresponding to the vm"

Dear all, Wondering if anyone can advise on this? Or am I the only one who seem to having this problem? :) Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Indra Pramana wrote: > Dear all, > > Anyone can advise on this? > > > Looking forward to your reply, t

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

OK, Marcus, I made the change to detect my volumes and it seems to work just fine. Perhaps another day of testing and we can check this code in. What do you think? On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks, Marcus...I hadn't read that note,

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Sure. The majority of it only affects people who are on your storage anyway. Perhaps you can post a patch and I can run it through the simulator to verify that the minor change to the existing code hasn't broken the standard storages. I don't think it is since I've thoroughly tested the code I post

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

Is this a clean revert? I would revert the commit as it's blocked the tests running on jenkins as well. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:22:17PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Bumping this as system vms still can?t be deployed on master. > > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.com > NetApp So

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Sure, I can create a diff file and attach it to Review Board. On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Sure. The majority of it only affects people who are on your storage > anyway. Perhaps you can post a patch and I can run it through the > simulator to verify that the minor c

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

Sorry - appears to have been fixed because the tests have progressed. From: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-setup-advancedzone/1798/console To: http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-setup-advancedzone/1799/console On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:16:19AM

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

I'm trying to attach my diff to https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/, but I don't see the necessary buttons. I wonder if I need to get edit access back again? We had trouble with the Wiki. Was this also impacted? On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wro

Re: Deploy systemvms broken on master

This looks been fixed by the commit for CLOUDSTACK-4649 by Anthony. 2013/10/24 Prasanna Santhanam > Sorry - appears to have been fixed because the tests have progressed. > > From: > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-setup-advancedzone/1798/console > To: > > http://jen

RE: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

+1 -Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > Sent: 21 October 2013 23:42 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack > > As stated in a previous thread [1], Citrix is propo

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of RDP client code into Apache CloudStack

New to community, but like this idea and think it supports platform agnostic nature of cloudstack. +1 -Ryan Shafer

Re: Unable to reboot instance: "Unable to find service offering: [NUMBER] corresponding to the vm"

Hi Indra, While rebooting, the VM looks for the same service offering which was used to deploy the VM earlier. If due to some reason the service offering gets deleted, this issue arises. Regards, Gaurav On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Indra Pramana wrote: > Dear all, > > Wondering if anyone

Re: Unable to reboot instance: "Unable to find service offering: [NUMBER] corresponding to the vm"

Hi Indra, This could happen if Compute Offerings are deleted, do all the VMs have the same compute offering? You can check this by clicking on a VM in Instances. If they don't, yet the same issue occurs with all of them (and the set compute offerings exists under the Service Offerings page), then

<    1   2