> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:54 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?
>
> A hypervisor snapshot will snapshot memory also. So determin
There is command in ACS, UploadCustomCertificateCmd, which can receive ssl
cert, key can chain as input. Maybe can share some code?
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:54 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
On 10/8/13 3:23 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>I would like to largely remove commands.properties. I think most API
>commands naturally have a default ACL that should be applied. I think
>it makes sense to add to the @APICommand flags for user, domain,
>admin. Then, as an override mechanism, pe
I think commands.properties is not just providing ACL on the API - but it also
serves as a whitelist of APIs available on the deployment.
It can be a one-step configuration option to disable certain functionality.
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph..
That's what I get for not fact checking. Dagnabbit.
On Tuesday, October 8, 2013, Francois Gaudreault wrote:
> Ok great, I wasn't sure since Travis kinda made the same typo like the
> docs ;P
>
> Thanks!
>
> Francois
>
> On 10/8/2013, 4:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>
>> We decided it is 16509 (whi
Hi there,
In working with RBAC design, I am really puzzled by the two query parameter
"listAll" and "recursive" for all BaseListDomainResourceCmd.
@Parameter(name = ApiConstants.LIST_ALL, type = CommandType.BOOLEAN,
description = "If set to false, " +
"list only resources belo
On 10/8/13 4:28 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>In working with RBAC design, I am really puzzled by the two query
>parameter "listAll" and "recursive" for all BaseListDomainResourceCmd.
>
>
>@Parameter(name = ApiConstants.LIST_ALL, type = CommandType.BOOLEAN,
>description = "If set to fal
Thanks Edison for the reply.
I see that there is already an implementation of KeystoreManager which
does certificate validation and saves it in the keystore table. Also,
the API (UploadCustomCertificate) is only callable from admin. I could
add functionality to this class for handling certif
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14549/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
Hi,
I have questions about registerIso API and updateIsoPermissions API.
(1) A normal user is allowed to specify isextractable property when registering
an ISO (through registerIso API),
but NOT allowed to update isextractable property when updating an ISO (through
updateIsoPermissions API).
Is
On 10/8/13 5:10 PM, "Jessica Wang" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have questions about registerIso API and updateIsoPermissions API.
>
>(1) A normal user is allowed to specify isextractable property when
>registering an ISO (through registerIso API),
>
>but NOT allowed to update isextractable property when u
Answers inline.
From: Jessica Wang mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com>>
Date: Tuesday 8 October 2013 5:10 PM
To: "mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>"
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Cc: Alena Prokharchyk
mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>>, Nitin
Mehta mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>, Shweta A
The problem seems to me is whether or not a background job that touches
with database respects the bootstrap initialization order. As of
VmwareContextPool itself, its background job does something fully within
its own territory (no database, no reference outside). and vmware-base
package was origin
Darren,
Using ActionEvents is not desirable for the plugin either... today CloudStack
lacks the ability for a component/plugin to associate itself to the life-cycle
of an object. It would be ideal if there was a generic way to accomplish that...
The contrail plugin wants to know about project cre
Maybe we could consider switching from a whitelist to a blacklist, then. A
whitelist is certainly easier in terms of a one-step configuration, but a
blacklist would allow for much easier plugin development, installation and
removal. Perhaps we could find write a script that generates the complet
Thanks Alena for the clarification.
If you try ListVMsCmd as a domain admin, if I pass listAll=false, what
should be the expected behavior?
Should he be able to see VMs under his domain but not owned by him? The
current CloudStack behavior will
show all VMs under his domain. This seems contradicto
On 10/8/13 5:48 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Thanks Alena for the clarification.
>
>If you try ListVMsCmd as a domain admin, if I pass listAll=false, what
>should be the expected behavior?
The same as if you don't pass anything. The domain admin will see his own
resources (the ones that belong to his
Just simple listVMsCmd with page information, passing listAll=true or not
passing listAll returns the same set of data.
Thanks
-min
On 10/8/13 5:55 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
wrote:
>On 10/8/13 5:48 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>
>>Thanks Alena for the clarification.
>>
>>If you try ListVMsCmd as a dom
This is a bug.
=Alena.
On 10/8/13 6:12 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Just simple listVMsCmd with page information, passing listAll=true or not
>passing listAll returns the same set of data.
>
>
>Thanks
>-min
>
>On 10/8/13 5:55 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk"
>wrote:
>
>>On 10/8/13 5:48 PM, "Min Chen" wrote:
Doh! I didn't restart the necessary service after exporting my NFS share.
The system VMs come up now; however, SSVM has a dash (-) for its Agent
State and the CS MS console keeps printing out the following:
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-3:ctx-018adc41)
No running ssvm
You may just have to wait a bit. That means the VMS are started but the
services aren't up. Usually takes 5-10 min to get both up in my fusion vm.
If that doesn't get better you may have to log into the system VMS and see
what's going on.
On Oct 8, 2013 7:25 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Doh! I d
Looks like I'll have to dig up that doc on debugging SSVM...it's been about
30 mins since the VMs came up.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> You may just have to wait a bit. That means the VMS are started but the
> services aren't up. Usually takes 5-10 min to get both up
You could start by trying to ping them from mgmt server, or trying to VNC
to them if the OS isn't up. I'm assuming you prepped a current system vm
template (maybe you're even reusing a secondary storage). If you can ping
their 169.254 addresses, you can "cloudstack-ssh 169.254.x.x" as root on
the k
CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address.
SSVM can ping CS MS.
I think we had a nice debug document for SSVM mentioned on a CS
e-mail...I'll try to find it.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> You could start by trying to ping them from mgmt server, or trying to VNC
>
Found it.
As an FYI, this is the doc I was referring to:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address.
>
> SSVM can ping CS MS.
Might be this one:
*
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
Travis
On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> CS MS can ping the SSVM's public IP address.
>
> SSVM can ping CS MS.
>
> I think we had a nice debug d
This seems similar to a problem I had on 4.3 Master with System VM creation. If
it is the same problem you can check from API command ListTemplateCommand(),
from CloudMonkey and see if it returns a bogus cached value. Then you know it
is the same problem.
-Soheil
http://mail-archives.apache.or
I'm not too sure that its going to be worth it to reuse
KeyStoreManager. That code is for storage of certs for the systemvm.
So you need to ensure that your changes don't overlap with the
systemvm code. Additionally, I don't see that the code handles the
chain also. I could be wrong, but just fr
I'm personally +1. Simulator seems to work
On 10/8/13 3:12 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>So what's the verdict? What would it take for everyone to feel warm
>and fuzzy about this merge, given the troubled past this community has
>had with Spring. I'm not saying the code is perfect, but so far
So I'm saying if you want to disable a command you put myBadCmd=0 in
the commands.properties. So yes, a blacklist over a whitelist. For
people paranoid about maybe some command exists that they don't know
about, we can even add a "blacklist=false to the command properties.
Then the commands.prope
it was the /etc/hosts script i had to modify, i had change my ip from dhcp
to static, so had to include my ip in the hosts file.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Interesting...I see you have another e-mail out on this, as well.
>
> I'd be c
Perhaps you might know something about this, Marcus.
My instance suffers a Kernel panic while booting up.
I'm just using the built-in KVM template (CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM))
with 1 CPU and 512 MB memory.
http://i.imgur.com/QuPH2Ub.png
I tried to just use an ISO instead, but apparently th
Use my tiny centos image. I'm not sure what's up with that crufty old
default centos template.
Register this qcow2 template:
http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/tiny-centos-63.qcow2
Needs a service offering with at least 192MB to run.
On Oct 8, 2013 11:36 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
Great - thanks!
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Use my tiny centos image. I'm not sure what's up with that crufty old
> default centos template.
>
> Register this qcow2 template:
> http://marcus.mlsorensen.com/cloudstack-extras/tiny-centos-63.qcow2
>
> Needs a service o
Not password enabled, root password is just 'password'. I mainly just use
it for devcloud-kvm testing.
On Oct 8, 2013 11:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Great - thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Use my tiny centos image. I'm not sure what's up with that c
Perfect
Almost done downloading...I'll give it a try in a moment.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Not password enabled, root password is just 'password'. I mainly just use
> it for devcloud-kvm testing.
> On Oct 8, 2013 11:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
>> Great -
Excellent...that template worked like a charm.
Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Perfect
>
> Almost done downloading...I'll give it a try in a moment.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>
>> Not password e
Why is a placeholder nic created before the VRs for the VPC are created?
Darren
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 11:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!
>
> +1.
> We should get a call out to the community to see who is expectin
Hi Wido and all,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail reply.
Yes, from the agent logs I can see that the RBD snapshot was created.
However, it seems that CPU utilisation goes up drastically during the
copying over of the snapshot from primary storage to the secondary storage.
===
2013-
Team,
Will be looking for inputs from you all in prioritising the tickets for
4.2.1. Do write back if you think some bug is must fix for the maintenance
release.
-abhi
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
