Re: DOC ACS 4.2 - Need of CSP with xenserver 6.2 for EIP

Hi Travis, Great! Thanks for the response. Regards, Benoit 2013/10/7 Travis Graham > CSP was included in XS 6.1 forward so there's no need to install it. > > Travis > > On Oct 7, 2013, at 11:58 AM, benoit lair wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm reading the docs of ACS 4.2, and about Xenserver CS

[4.2] [xenserver] [system vms] Xentools

Hi all, The current XenServer system VM template doesn't seem to include XenServer Tools - is this by design? systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2 Regards Paul Angus Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect [cid:image002.png@01CE1071.C6CC9C10] S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 |

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Comments Inline. -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 4:18 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack Few questions: 1. About the "more object-ori

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > One basic rule for component maintainer to assign the ticket, can be: Fix > your own code. > I agree with Sheng. And with Ilya on the point that I think we will have to revisit this procedure soon. What I am thinking of is the expectation of a

Re: Review Request 14468: CLOUDSTACK-702: Added test for verifying dns service on alias IP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14468/#review26767 --- Ship it! Ship It! - venkata swamy babu budumuru On Oct. 3, 2013

Re: Review Request 14468: CLOUDSTACK-702: Added test for verifying dns service on alias IP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14468/#review26768 --- Commit 1efd544ee27fd0c7c9eac4649568647c0dcbc85b in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 14468: CLOUDSTACK-702: Added test for verifying dns service on alias IP

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14468/#review26769 --- Commit f6c6f03fad5dafa2f28a7a8e8b9d8ab89bf22bf8 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 14334: CLOUDSTACK 4705: Fixed domain memory limits test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14334/#review26770 --- Ship it! Ship It! - abhinav roy On Sept. 25, 2013, 11:06 a.m., G

RE: [4.2] [xenserver] [system vms] Xentools

Hi, Earlier there was discussion on putting xen tools in systemvms. Please look into that. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201309.mbox/%3cce676527.4398b%25abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com%3E From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013

Review Request 14531: CLOUDSTACK-702: Verify Userdata and Password service on alias ip on VR

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14531/ --- Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru, SrikanteswaraRao Ta

Re: [DISCUSS] Return ssh publickeys in listSSHKeyPairs

On Oct 5, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi, > > With the development of gClouds, a google compute interface for > cloudstack I have found the need to get access to the ssh public keys > that Cloudstack generates as part of a keypair. > > The publickeys are currently not exposed in any w

Re: marvin over https

H Prasanne, I didn't get around this bit a few days. Cloudmonkey works throught the same connection. I will find some time the coming days to test this with debug enabled marvin. regards, Daan On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 04:21:38PM +020

RE: [DISCUSS] Return ssh publickeys in listSSHKeyPairs

Hi guys , >From my fundamentals of security I do not think returning a public key is >wrong . What is sensitive is the private key. As long as that is bit exposed in any way then all should be well. Thanks and good day Sent from my Windows Phone From: sebgoa

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

+1 I think we need another tool to do this . Maybe set up trac or RT. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Alena Prokharchyk Sent: ‎10/‎4/‎2013 10:12 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Musayev, Ily

Re: ACS 4.2 - Error when trying to declare a LB rule in a vpc to a tier network with lb offering

Hello! Any ideas for this problem ? Thanks for your help. Regards, Benoit. 2013/10/7 benoit lair > Hi, > > I'm working with a CS 4.2, Xenserver 6.2 in a centos 6.3 > > Deployed a VPC, multiples tiers, each with a Network offering with LB > activated. > > When i navigate on the vpc summary p

marvin create network offering incomplete?

H, I am building an integration test with marvin and the following data: "network_offering": { "name": 'Test Network offering', "displaytext": 'Test Network offering', "guestiptype": 'Isolated', "supportedservices": 'Conn

Re: [MERGE] marvin-refactor to master

Edison - thanks for the review! I've answered inline. (I've brought the technical review to the right thread from the one about marvin's repo separation) > Few questions: > 1. About the "more object-oriented" CloudStack API python binding: Is the > proposed api good enough? As long as the cloud

Re: FWD: [IP CLEARANCE] Contrail Plugin for CloudStack

I'll proceed with accepting this patch now. IP clearance is now done. -chip On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 01:52:13PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > FYI - We have received the SGA for this plugin, and the 72 hours of lazy > consensus over at general@incubator.a.o has started. > > I'll update this threa

Re: Review Request 14325: Contrail network virtualization plugin.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14325/#review26771 --- Ship it! This has been pushed to the "contrail" branch. IP clearan

Re: Review Request 14076: New test added for template copy feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/ --- (Updated Oct. 8, 2013, 1:45 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamk

Re: Review Request 14076: New test added for template copy feature

> On Oct. 6, 2013, 7:47 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_templates.py, line 441 > > > > > > Is this a blocking call ? Have you tested this ? Does it return success Added method in base.py s

Re: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

I don't think we need to add another tool for this. I'm sure Jira is fully capable of doing what's needed, it's just finding the right configuration and the person who knows how to get things setup to work. Travis On Oct 8, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Frankie Onuonga wrote: > +1 I think we need another

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

All - thanks for your detailed thoughts on this so far. It seems like this should've come with a fair bit of notice. I will hold on this separation for now. May be a couple more releases to see the level of participation in the QA and if it still feels like a hindrance we'll discuss separating it l

Re: marvin create network offering incomplete?

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:27:10PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I am building an integration test with marvin and the following data: > > "network_offering": { > "name": 'Test Network offering', > "displaytext": 'Test Network offering', >

Re: ACS 4.2 - Error when trying to declare a LB rule in a vpc to a tier network with lb offering

Hello! I don't understand wht is going wrong : When i'm looking into the official docs, i see that vpc is still declared to be able to do lb only on one tier ?? However, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2367 says that this feature is implemented. I have already configured severa

Re: Review Request 13841: Missing tests from QA repo to ASF - 3 tests from test_vmware_drs.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13841/ --- (Updated Oct. 8, 2013, 2:14 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamk

Re: marvin over https

H Prasanna, $ ./zoneCommand.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "./zoneCommand.py", line 91, in print "zones: " + repr(blub.listZones(conn)) File "./zoneCommand.py", line 42, in listZones resp = conn.marvin_request(lz) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/marvin/cloudstackC

Contrail plugin

As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail branch. I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new files in that branch. I think we have to complete the following in order to merge into master. 1) I'd like to see the package structure changed to m

Re: marvin over https

Ok, this is a bug. requests lib is verifying SSL by default while cloudmonkey is probably ignoring SSL. There are two options 1) Fix marvin to accept SSL while detecting your default certs in /etc/ssl/certs? Or use an env variable 2) Ignore SSL auth from marvin. Can you please file a bug report?

Re: Contrail plugin

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail > branch. > > I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new files > in that branch. I think we have to complete the following in order to

Re: Contrail plugin

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:59:24PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > > 3) I'd love if we could get some consensus on what additional tests and / > > or changes to the test approach are needed. Prasanna - as with Hugo and > > Chirade

Latest Master DB issue

Hi, I compiled Master this morning, and there is a small DB issue. One field is missing in the account table (field default). CS will not start because of that. 2013-10-08 11:01:42,623 FATAL [o.a.c.c.CallContext] (Timer-2:null) Exiting the system because we're unable to register the system c

Re: ACS 4.2 - Error when trying to declare a LB rule in a vpc to a tier network with lb offering

On 08/10/13 7:41 PM, "benoit lair" wrote: >Hello! > >I don't understand wht is going wrong : > >When i'm looking into the official docs, i see that vpc is still declared >to be able to do lb only on one tier ?? > >However, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2367 says that >this feat

Re: [DISCUSS] Return ssh publickeys in listSSHKeyPairs

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 01:05:32PM +, Frankie Onuonga wrote: > Hi guys , > From my fundamentals of security I do not think returning a public key is > wrong . > What is sensitive is the private key. > As long as that is bit exposed in any way then all should be well. +1 to Frankie's comment

Re: Wiki access

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 06:14:39AM +, Rajani Karuturi wrote: > May I get access to edit pages as well? > username: rajanik Looks like this was already taken care of.

Re: marvin over https

i made an issue for form https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4832 implemented the simple solution and commit 10938612cc9f518e254f8756581548eeb52913b4 contains the hack thanks, Daan On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Ok, this is a bug. requests lib is veri

Re: Contrail plugin

On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:36 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 07:59:24PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:23:32AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >>> 3) I'd love if we could get some consensus on what additional tests and / >>> or changes to the test approach

Re: Latest Master DB issue

It is not a small issue. is_default filed was added to the table as a part of the 41-42 db upgrade. Looks like the code tries to retrieve system user before the db upgrade is completed. DB upgrade is a major part of system integrity check; no queries to the DB should be made before its completed.

Re: Contrail plugin

Chip, On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail > branch. > > I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new files in > that branch. I think we have to complete the following in order to merg

RE: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 8:22 AM > To: > Subject: Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers! > > I think you might be able to help though! > > We basically need to structure the work around various

Re: marvin create network offering incomplete?

I've used marvin without the testdata construct fine. never the ui. I'll lookup the code once back at desk. Next afternoon Thanks Prassana (formerly known as Prussia, almost called Praag by the spellchecker ) mobile biligual spell checker used Op 8 okt. 2013 16:01 schreef "Prasanna Santhanam" : >

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Whomever wants to take the lead for 4.3 should probably (IMO), start a > > discussion on (1) coordination of work and > [Animesh>] Since we are getting closer to code freeze date and we cannot find > overall release manage

Re: Contrail plugin

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 09:43:39AM -0700, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: > Chip, > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > > > As stated, I've imported the contrail plugin donation into the contrail > > branch. > > > > I've taken the time to add the ASF license header to all of the new

Re: Latest Master DB issue

It's a fresh master RPM install. Francois On 10/8/2013, 12:40 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: It is not a small issue. is_default filed was added to the table as a part of the 41-42 db upgrade. Looks like the code tries to retrieve system user before the db upgrade is completed. DB upgrade is a m

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

>From what I can gather it seems that master currently fails the BVT (and know when I say BVT I mean that black box that apparently exists somewhere doing something, but I have no clue what it really means). So in turn my spring modularization branch will additionally fail BVT. Citrix internal QA

Re: Contrail plugin

I'll take some time and review this code too. I already know there's going to be a conflict with the stuff I did in the spring modularization branch. Moving to full spring we have gotten rid of the custom ACS AOP for the mgmt server. This code relies on that framework so it will have to move to

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Hmm... I just checked the DB version and it's 4.0??? It should be 4.3.0 no? mysql> select * from version; ++-+-+--+ | id | version | updated | step | ++-+-+--+ | 1 | 4.0.0 | 2013-10-08 10:58:49 | Co

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

My only comment is that having the return type as boolean and using to that indicate quiesce behaviour seems obscure and will probably lead to a problem later. Your basically saying the result of the takeVMSnapshot will only ever need to communicate back whether unquiesce needs to happen. Maybe s

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Ok, this is what going on - the DB upgrade procedure is different on developer's setup and when deployed using cloudstack-setup-databases On developers setup: 1) you deploy the code 2) Deploy the DB using 'mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb'. As a part of this step, the DataBaseUpgradeChec

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Just throwing in a pitch for my spring-modularization branch. The DB initialization stuff should all be fixed in the spring-modularization branch. If it isn't we can better address it there anyhow. The current initialization of spring in master is pure madness. When it works, its because it jus

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Thanks Alena for the explaination. What is the better path to fix this on our setup? Should I wait for a fix in master or should I manually run the deploydb with mvn? I guess the second option won't work since I used RPM? Francois On 10/8/2013, 1:47 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: Ok, this is

Re: Hypervisor Questions

OK, so, I've collected a bunch of info with regards to how CS handles HA, DRS, FT, and LV. Can people confirm or deny this information: CloudStack 4.2: XenServer: HA: Request made by CloudStack (handled by hypervisor). No prioritization*. FT: No such feature (warm secondary VM...HA with e

Re: Latest Master DB issue

I'm not familiar with RPM install, but I don't think that the workaround would be valid for everyone - QA folks will not have mvn install on their machines, so this issue is a blocker for them. You can try it on your setup though to unblock yourself. It does have to be fixed in master, either by s

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Deploy db from maven will drop all the tables. Not sure if this is fresh install or not. For master, running mvn will be your best bet. Otherwise you can look at running com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseCreator manually if your adventurous. Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Francois Gaudreault

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

I'm not getting any notifications of BVT test failures. Where do I subscribe? On 10/8/13 10:20 AM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >From what I can gather it seems that master currently fails the BVT >(and know when I say BVT I mean that black box that apparently exists >somewhere doing something, but

Re: Latest Master DB issue

I guess in my case, it's fine. It was a fresh install... Francois On 10/8/2013, 2:08 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: Deploy db from maven will drop all the tables. Not sure if this is fresh install or not. For master, running mvn will be your best bet. Otherwise you can look at running com.cloud.u

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

I can comment on the second half. Through storage operations, storage providers can create backups much faster than hypervisors and over time, their snapshots are more efficient than the snapshot chains that hypervisors create. It is true that a VM snapshot taken at the storage level is slightl

[New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Hi, I have been working on adding SSL offload functionality to cloudstack and make it work for Netscaler. I have an initial design documented at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSL+Offloading+Support and I would really love your feedback. The bug for this is https://iss

Re: Call for 4.3 and 4.2.1 Release Managers!

+1. We should get a call out to the community to see who is expecting to merge for 4.3. Although 10/31 is the feature freeze date, proposals and branches should be in already IMHO. On 10/8/13 9:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:49:24PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: >

RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

> -Original Message- > From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 1:28 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack > > Comments Inline. > > -Original Message- > From: Edison

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

So in the implementation, when we say "quiesce" is that actually being implemented as a VM snapshot (memory and disk). And then when you say "unquiesce" you are talking about deleting the VM snapshot? In NetApp, what are you snapshotting? The whole netapp volume (I don't know the correct term),

RE: Latest Master DB issue

Here the defect created for this issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4825 Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 11:15 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Latest Maste

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Technicality here, can we call the functionality SSL termination? While technically we are "offloading" ssl from the VM, offloading typically carries a connotation that its being done in hardware. So we are really talking about SSL termination. Couple comments. I wouldn't want to assume anything

Typo in KVM docs

Hi, I see the KVM install guide says: tcp_port = "16059" I'm wondering if this is correct or if it should be 16509, which is what is in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf by default. Thanks, -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:41:42AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Technicality here, can we call the functionality SSL termination? > While technically we are "offloading" ssl from the VM, offloading > typically carries a connotation that its being done in hardware. So > we are really talking abo

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Yep, that's a typo. Should be 16059 like libvirtd.conf has by default. If you'll open a Jira for it I'll submit a patch the docs. Travis On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I see the KVM install guide says: > > tcp_port = "16059" > > > I'm wondering if this is corre

Re: Typo in KVM docs

I have some other KVM docs that I've been updating as I do my development work, so I should be able to modify this, as well. Thanks! On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Travis Graham wrote: > Yep, that's a typo. Should be 16059 like libvirtd.conf has by default. > > If you'll open a Jira for it I

Re: Typo in KVM docs

On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 12:44:43PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I see the KVM install guide says: > > tcp_port = "16059" > > > I'm wondering if this is correct or if it should be 16509, which is what is > in /etc/libvirt/libvirtd.conf by default. Which doc version? I found these bug

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Careful which branch you are working on Mike. I think that David's plan is that we are baselines on 4.2 in the new docs repo, and he was going to then pull from 4.2 into master (again, in the new repo). On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I have some other KVM docs that I'v

Re: Typo in KVM docs

I was actually looking at what's on the web for 4.2 (even though I'm developing on master). When I went to find this isssue in 4.3, it appears the problem has been corrected. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Careful which branch you are working on Mike. I think that Davi

[ACS 4.2][Upgrade Issue] System VM template caching

Hi, Several of us in the community have found that with the 4.2 upgrade, when we download and install the latest system VM template, CloudStack refuses to use this template for new system VM creation. CloudStack appears to be usin a cached or master-clone variant of the old template. This is

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Thanks for the feedback guys. Really appreciate it. 1) Changing the name to SSL Termination. I don't have a problem with that. I was looking at Netscaler all the time and they call it SSL offloading. But I agree that termination is a more general term. I have changed the name. The new page is a

VM Backup plug-in framework

Hi, Can anyone tell me if there are plans to implement a more comprehensive mechanism to backup data within guest VM's, or to provide a framework for backup vendors to plug into? This is needed because: 1. The native volume snapshot functionality is slow and does not provide the required f

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

-- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > So in the implementation, when we say "quiesce" is that actually being > implemented as a VM snapshot (memory and

JIRA - release 4.3 required in Affected and Fix version list

Hi Jira Admins, I am want to create defect against master, but there is no option to select 4.3 "Affected and Fix Version", someone with admin access please add this ? Regards, Rayees

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Ok now I am mixed up :P libvirtd.conf has 16509 by default. (at least on CentOS) So is it 16509 or 16059? :P Francois On 10/8/2013, 2:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: I was actually looking at what's on the web for 4.2 (even though I'm developing on master). When I went to find this isssue in 4.

Re: Review Request 14522: [CLOUDSTACK-4771] Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14522/#review26786 --- ui/scripts/storage.js

Re: Typo in KVM docs

We decided it is 16509 (which is what is the default and was - at one point - written incorrectly in the documentation as 16059). On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Francois Gaudreault < fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote: > Ok now I am mixed up :P > > libvirtd.conf has 16509 by default. (at least on

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

A question about implementation. I was looking at other commands and the execute() method for each of the other commands seem to call a service ( _lbservice for example ) which takes care of updating the DB and calling the resource layer. Should the Certificate management be implemented as a se

Re: Typo in KVM docs

Ok great, I wasn't sure since Travis kinda made the same typo like the docs ;P Thanks! Francois On 10/8/2013, 4:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: We decided it is 16509 (which is what is the default and was - at one point - written incorrectly in the documentation as 16059). On Tue, Oct 8, 2013

Re: Review Request 14522: [CLOUDSTACK-4771] Support Revert VM Disk from Snapshot

> On Oct. 8, 2013, 8:18 p.m., edison su wrote: > > ui/scripts/storage.js, line 1763 > > > > > > The ui change here, is there way to disable it from ui, if the storage > > provider is not NetApp? Or move the ui change

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

The API should do input validation on the SSL cert, key and chain. Getting those three pieces of info is usually difficult for most people to get right as they don't really know what those three things are. There's about a 80% chance most calls will fail. If you rely on the provider it will proba

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

Who is going to decide whether the hypervisor snapshot should actually happen or not? Or how? Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 12:38 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > > -- > Chris Suich > chris.su...@netapp.com > NetApp Software Engineer > Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions > Citrix, Cisco & R

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

Thanks Darren for your reply. Do you happen to have any info on a library that I can use for certificate validation? Thanks, -Syed On Tue 08 Oct 2013 04:53:40 PM EDT, Darren Shepherd wrote: The API should do input validation on the SSL cert, key and chain. Getting those three pieces of info

Re: VM Backup plug-in framework

Hi Simon, The answer to your question is 'kind of'. The Storage Subsystem API (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Storage+subsystem+2.0) allows storage providers to implement a suite of methods for the purpose of storage management, including taking and reverting snapshots o

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

Whether the hypervisor snapshot happens depends on whether the 'quiesce' option is specified with the snapshot request. If a user doesn't care about the consistency of their backup, then the hypervisor snapshot/quiesce step can be skipped altogether. This of course is not the case if the default

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Hey, I half way introduced this issue in a really long and round about way. I don't think there's a good simple fix unless we merge the spring-modularization branch. I'm going to look further into it. But here's the background of why we are seeing this. I introduced "Managed Context" framework

Re: VM Backup plug-in framework

Hi Chris, Correct, I am talking about a way to orchestrate backing up and restoring an entire VM (or set of VM's), but using more efficient technique at the back end to transfer data. Today we do the following: - When a CS account is created we create a corresponding vSphere folder, and we ensur

Re: Latest Master DB issue

Some more info about this. What specifically is happening is that the VmwareContextPool call is creating a Timer during the constructor of the class which is being constructed in a static block from VmwareContextFactory. So when the VmwareContextFactory class is loaded by the class loader, the ba

Latest automation result on master

Here the BVT automation result on KVM, You can see the result @ http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/ We had 100% pass rate in 4.2, but in latest master its reduced around 85%, observed below issues with latest master run https://issues.apache.org/jira/br

Re: JIRA - release 4.3 required in Affected and Fix version list

Done. On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi Jira Admins, > > I am want to create defect against master, but there is no option to select > 4.3 "Affected and Fix Version", someone with admin access please add this ? > > Regards, > Rayees

Re: Latest automation result on master

Thanks Rayees - this is helpful. --David On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Here the BVT automation result on KVM, You can see the result @ > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/ > > We had 100% pass rate in 4.2, but in latest mas

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

A hypervisor snapshot will snapshot memory also. So determining whether do to the hypervisor snapshot from the quiesce option does not seem proper. Sorry, for all the questions, I'm trying to get to the point of understand if this functionality makes sense at this point of code or if maybe their

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

So...got some good news: I spent a couple hours setting up a KVM environment on Ubuntu 12.04.1 from scratch (Installing SSH, Open iSCSI, Java 7, KVM, Git, CloudStack, CloudStack DEBs, KVM system template, etc.) and I can now add this KVM host to CloudStack (on a related note, no errors in agent.er

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Although the host is added to KVM, I do see the following issues in the CS MS console (any thoughts on this?): WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee) Was unable to find lock for the key template_spool_ref2 and thread id 2049868806 INFO [c.c.v.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (secstora

Re: [New Feature FS] SSL Offload Support for Cloudstack

BouncyCastle, its already in ACS. Off list I'll send you some sample code on how to validate this stuff. Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote: > Thanks Darren for your reply. > > Do you happen to have any info on a library that I can use for certificate > validation? > > Than

Re: [MERGE] spring-modularization to master - Spring Modularization

So what's the verdict? What would it take for everyone to feel warm and fuzzy about this merge, given the troubled past this community has had with Spring. I'm not saying the code is perfect, but so far its not terribly bad :) Darren On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I

RE: Latest automation result on master

Correction, this result on Xen not KVM; KVM automation stopped in http://jenkins.buildacloud.org due to KVM blocker; I will publish the result once its available. Regards, Rayees From: Rayees Namathponnan Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 2:41 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Latest

[DISCUSS] make commands.properties the exception, not the rule

I would like to largely remove commands.properties. I think most API commands naturally have a default ACL that should be applied. I think it makes sense to add to the @APICommand flags for user, domain, admin. Then, as an override mechanism, people can edit commands.properties to change the def

Re: Review Request 14381: KVM: add connect/disconnect capabilities to StorageAdaptors so that external storage services can attach/detach devices on-demand

Can you mount the secondary storage from your KVM host? On Oct 8, 2013 4:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > Although the host is added to KVM, I do see the following issues in the CS > MS console (any thoughts on this?): > > WARN [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2] (secstorage-1:ctx-c1c573ee) Was unable to > f

  1   2   >