Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the code uses > > getRealPath and Files which are not compatible across all serlvet > > containers and this implementation forces a lot of file system stat() > > calls, but tha

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/#review26694 --- Some questions and comments that probably need to be answered before

Re: [1/2] Refactor Storage Related Resource Code These changes are a joint effort between Edison and I to refactor some of the code around snapshotting VM volumes and creating templates/volumes from V

I some outstanding questions I just posted to the review. Any thoughts on those questions? https://reviews.apache.org/r/14477/ On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:07 PM, wrote: > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master c9f41d404 -> 180cfa19e > > > > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob

RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment

> -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 12:10 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Components in JIRA and bug assignment > > Response in line: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Santhosh Eduku

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the code uses > > getRealPath and Files which are not compatible across all serlvet > > containers and this implementation forces a lot of file system stat() > > calls, but tha

Re: Review Request 12228: wip: static resource compression

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 6:52 p.m., Darren Shepherd wrote: > > I would prefer not to do this. From a technical perspective the code uses > > getRealPath and Files which are not compatible across all serlvet > > containers and this implementation forces a lot of file system stat() > > calls, but tha

Re: [DISCUSS] Breaking out Marvin from CloudStack

Fair warning - some of this is a straw man argument to explore the situation, and a little bit of ranting at the end. On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 05:57:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'll summarize and address the concerns raised so far. > > Marvin has been in this repo for a long time for

Master doesn't build

[INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 55.164s [INFO] Finished at: Fri Oct 04 15:20:55 MDT 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 40M/483M [INFO] [ERROR] Fail

Re: Master doesn't build

Here is how I tried to build it: mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -Dnoredist On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE > [INFO] > > [INFO] Total time: 55.164s > [INFO] Finished at

Re: Master doesn't build

Looks like the missing files were just added. We should be OK now. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Here is how I tried to build it: > > mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install -Dnoredist > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.c

Re: Review Request 14477: Refactor Storage Related Resource Code

> On Oct. 4, 2013, 8:23 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/snapshot/RevertSnapshotCmd.java, > > line 36 > > > > > > Are there any unit or integration tests for this new API ca

RE: Master doesn't build

Sorry, forget to check in some files. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:25 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Master doesn't build > > Looks like the missing files were just added. > > We sh

Re: [HOW-TO] Custom REST call on Destroy and Deploy

Once the Spring work gets merged to master this will change as componentContext.xml or the nonoss version is gone now. You would need to create a file like META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-eventbus-context.xml on the classpath, so if this was production, that would probably be /etc/cloudstack/manag

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Well, it seems OK, but I think we should keep on discussing our options. One concern I have with the global config approach is that it adds manual steps for 'installing' extensions. Each extension must have installation instructions to indicate which global configurations it must be included in

Re: Hi

Thanks! On 10/2/13 10:33 PM, "Koushik Das" wrote: >Hi Steve, > >Welcome to CloudStack. Looking forward to working with you. > > >On 02-Oct-2013, at 6:10 PM, Chip Childers >wrote: > >> Welcome Steve! >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Steve Wilson >>wrote: >> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>>

Re: Hi

I'll try to live up to that! Thanks for the welcome! On 10/3/13 1:37 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >H Steve, > >I wish you luck with managing the Citrix - Community interaction and given >the continued huge importance of Citrix to Apache CloudStack I am taking >the liberty of calling you our frien

Re: Hi

Thanks! Looking forward to working with you too! On 10/3/13 4:35 AM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: >Hi Steve, > >Welcome to CloudStack. I look forward to working with you in the >community. > > >On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:07 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > >> H Steve, >> >> I wish you luck with managing the C

Re: Hi

Thanks! On 10/3/13 4:37 AM, "Wei ZHOU" wrote: >Welcome Steve! > > >2013/10/2 Steve Wilson > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> I just wanted to take a second and introduce myself. I recently joined >> Citrix as the VP of Cloud Engineering, and I'm responsible for the >>Citrix >> CloudPlatofrm (powered by A

Re: [PROPOSAL] Modularize Spring

Sure, I'm open to suggestions. Basically I think we've discussed 1) Global Setting 2) canHandle() returns an int 3) Strategy has an enum type assigned I'm open to all three, I don't have much vested interest in this. Darren On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:00 PM, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Well, i

[ACS4.3] Tasks in JIRA for ACS 4.3

Hi, I see the date to propose features has passed [1]. When would the tasks be created to see full scope for 4.3?? [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+4.3+Release Thanks /sudha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

Well just make sure that your script is resilient to its own crashes as well. On 10/4/13 1:59 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" wrote: >Hi, > >I am planning to write script utility to monitor processes and restart on >the event of failure. It will also logs the events. > >Thanks, >Jayapal > >On 02-Oct-2

Re: [DISCUSS] Leaky abstractions [was review requests 13238, 13896, 14320]

I've checked the Netscaler and HAProxy docs, this appears to be artifact of the HAProxy implementation (inability to support keep-alive). For a cloud operator that chooses Netscaler or F5 for load balancing, this won't make any sense. On 10/3/13 12:55 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >On Thu, Oct 3, 2

Re: Hypervisor Questions

For anyone who is interested in the outcome of this thread, this seems to answer the XenServer part: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Enabling+Storage+XenMotion+for+XenServer "CloudStack currently allows live migration of a virtual machine from one host to another only withi

Re: Hypervisor Questions

This implies live migration between VMware clusters is supported in CloudStack: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4265 On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > For anyone who is interested in the outcome of this thread, this seems to > answer the XenServer part: >

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Perhaps Marcus can answer this from a KVM standpoint? On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > This implies live migration between VMware clusters is supported in > CloudStack: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4265 > > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Mike Tu

[DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

In 4.2, we added VM snapshot for Vmware/Xenserver. The current workflow will be like the following: createVMSnapshot api -> VMSnapshotManagerImpl: creatVMSnapshot -> send CreateVMSnapshotCommand to hypervisor to create vm snapshot. If anybody wants to change the workflow, then need to either cha

Re: [ACS4.2.1] UI tickets

Done ! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6840 -abhi On 04/10/13 10:37 pm, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >Abhi > >It is best to set up a shared filter. You will need to open a INFRA >ticket like this one https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/INFRA-6145 >to get relevant permissions for

Re: Hypervisor Questions

>From a kvm standpoint, a cluster has admin-defined meaning. Its not always going to map to some externally defined cluster. I can make my whole data center a cluster, and not use zone-wide storage, or still use zone wide storage. If you have zone-wide storage, maybe you want to keep VMs within sm

RE: System VM

Hi All, Before setting up the cloudstack repo, we argued that doc should be in a different repo. At that time, nobody listened to our argument of doc having a different life cycle. I am wondering why this back and forth decisions changes now for docs. -Original Message- From: Chip Chil

Re: [DISCUSS] Pluggable VM snapshot related operations?

Well, my first thought on this is that the storage driver should not be telling the hypervisor to do anything. It should be responsible for creating/deleting volumes, snapshots, etc. on its storage system only. On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Edison Su wrote: > In 4.2, we added VM snapshot for

Re: Hypervisor Questions

Right, Marcus, what you say makes sense. You brought up a point I was going to ask about: If you can migrate between clusters, what's the point of a cluster? That point aside, I was really more interested (for the purposes of this e-mail thread) to find out how this works for KVM today (not to re

<    1   2