Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

2013-09-25 Thread Pranav Saxena
Congratulations Rajesh :) Regards, Pranav On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: > Congrats Rajesh! > > On 25 September 2013 15:45, Ahmad Emneina wrote: > > awesome stuff Rajesh! congrats. > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Kishan Kavala >wrote: > > > >> Congratulations

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala

2013-09-25 Thread Animesh Chaturvedi
Congrats Rajesh > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:30 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Rajesh Battala > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack ha

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

2013-09-25 Thread David Nalley
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > > Currently in virtual router there is no way to recover and notify if some > service goes down unexpectedly. > > This feature is about monitoring all the services rendered by the virtual > router, ensure that the services are r

Re: Libvirt-java 0.5.0 has been released

2013-09-25 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Hi, I've been having a difficult time getting the KVM agent on master to start on Ubuntu 12.04. The trouble seems to have begun after the Libvirt upgrade. Any thoughts on this: Thanks! log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.commons.httpclient.params.DefaultHttpParams). l

Re: Libvirt-java 0.5.0 has been released

2013-09-25 Thread Wei ZHOU
Mike, Do you test the latest source code? Pointer.nativeValue is introduced in jna-3.2.6 http://upstream-tracker.org/java/compat_reports/jna/3.2.5_to_3.2.6/bin_compat_report.html and Native.free is introduced in jna-3.3.0 http://upstream-tracker.org/java/compat_reports/jna/3.2.7_to_3.3.0/bin_co

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

2013-09-25 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it generate alerts. It is simply too generic for the requirements outlined here. The proposal does not talk about modifying monit, just using it. That wouldn't trigger the AGPL. I think the idea is to have a tight monitoring loop that scales: so exec

Re: ubuntu LTS for system vm? and 64bit?

2013-09-25 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
32-bit theoretically performs better on Xen. Debian is just more stable than Ubuntu, hence the preference. On 9/25/13 4:38 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >Is there any technical reason why we couldn't use ubuntu LTS (12.04 >and soon to be 14.04) for the system VM. Additionally is there any >techn

Re: Documentation on VPC?

2013-09-25 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
CloudStack VPC is quite similar to AWS VPC, except for some of the differences listed here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/vhHMAQ On 9/25/13 3:30 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote: >I've been trying to go through the GUI and do stuff with VPC and I'm >really quite lost. Are there any user docs

Re: Documentation on VPC?

2013-09-25 Thread Darren Shepherd
Yeah conceptually I get it. I just can't seem to navigate the UI, but I got most of it working. Darren > On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > > CloudStack VPC is quite similar to AWS VPC, except for some of the > differences listed here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/conf

Re: ubuntu LTS for system vm? and 64bit?

2013-09-25 Thread Darren Shepherd
Yeah, for sure 32bit PV is faster. Do we require a specific minimum kernel version? I though I heard something about upgrading the template for multicore networking or something like that. Darren > On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > > 32-bit theoretically performs

Re: [PROPOSAL] Service monitoring tool in virtual router

2013-09-25 Thread Darren Shepherd
I think monit is already in the current system vm template. I know at least the scripts in tools/appliance add it (maybe that was a post 4.2 change). +1 for monit. Darren > On Sep 25, 2013, at 10:27 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > > SNMP wouldn't restart a failed process nor would it gen

Re: [VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache CloudStack

2013-09-25 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
+1 On Sep 26, 2013, at 12:17 AM, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Definitely +1 on this :) > > Francois > > On 2013-09-25 1:13 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> As stated in other threads, Juniper is proposing the donation of a >> Contrail plugin to Apache CloudStack. The code itself ha

<    1   2