Yes, that is all that is required. This doesn't enable the internal lb
provider for you?
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 10:41:02PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> So this look right to you?
>
> diff --git a/tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg
> b/tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg
> i
I didn't have it. I ran across it this afternoon, but wasn't sure if
it did all of the proper setup or if it was the equivalent of enabling
the provider (which as mentioned wasn't enough when I tried manually).
Thanks for confirming, I'll commit it.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Prasanna Santha
+1 for "*If we wish to do async stuff it should be based off of java 5
futures or guava's ListenableFutures. Those APIs and libraries are far
more natural to java devs in the wild. Or we can get inspiration from
scala and akka on how to do async well in java. In short, if we have a
real use
IntelliJ The idea of paying for development tools makes me sad (but I'm
sure you got an open source project license). Spring support is not in the
open source version of IntellijIDEA.
Darren
On Sep 5, 2013, at 9:42 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> Odd that eclipse detects the .xml to und
See if this helps -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+API+Development
.
Thanks,
Likitha
>-Original Message-
>From: Amit Das [mailto:amit@cloudbyte.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 7:17 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: maven storage
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14010/
---
Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru and Prasanna
Santhan
My view is that when a feature is added the developer should give a short
overview of how to use all of the items which have been added, a doc
contributor can then write this up in a user friendly manner which is
similar to the whole style of the rest of the documentation.
Example description of d
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
