Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 6:59 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

RE: Writing to volume attached to VM

Cool Gaurav and you can do without reboot also and it's up to you choose which one is feasible to you . General way: echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_host//scan[ search for " linux scan lun with out reboot"] eg: echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_host/host1/scan or reboot the vm will detec

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 7:42 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 7:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 01:06:37PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> ok, the down side will be that the semantics of the versioning are >> confusing when cloudstack 5 comes and the version numbers don't match. >> still a +1 from me though. > >

Re: Review Request 13805: CLOUDSTACK-3806: OS Preference can not be set

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13805/#review25602 --- Commit c059dacfc49b0757e4cd78498fef0d424a462c54 in branch refs/head

Re: [DISCUSS] Gearing up for an official CloudMonkey independent release

On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking at what it's going to take to get CloudMonkey out as an > official release. Thanks Chip for taking this further. > Here's what I believe needs to be done: > > 1) Legal doc check (I think we're good here, since I ju

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 8:17 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: Review Request 13806: CLOUDSTACK-4407: Use extractTemplate API to get hypervisor specific template information

> On Aug. 27, 2013, 5:33 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py, line 891 > > > > > > extract works on an existing Image/Template. Why should it be a > > classmethod? > >

[OFFLINE] Going away for some time

Hi folks, I'm not able to participate on the MLs and contribute code to the project for past couple of months now. So, I reached out to the pmc and some friends on the ML on this issue. Right now the project bylaws has no information on committer moving to emeritus status so I just want to tell yo

Re: why 2 spaces for xml?

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:53 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > I have always preferred two spaces because xml can be indented so far so > quickly I must +1 and a lot this argument of Alex' But sleep tight anyway Darren. No killing issue.

Review Request 13856: CLOUDSTACK-4303: Add missing base.py changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13856/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Jayapal Reddy, and Prasanna San

RE: HA redundant virtual router

Hi Sheng, Thanks for your reply. I'll see if we can replay this scenario. With respect to point 1: a good principal IMHO. Point 2: Why do we force a keepalived node to become master and not wait for keepalived to become master? This way there is less reason to intervene and less risk of multip

Re: Review Request 13856: CLOUDSTACK-4303: Add missing base.py changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13856/#review25605 --- Commit a7833cdfb4b4a3dfcf9b185241056620651b6eb1 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13856: CLOUDSTACK-4303: Add missing base.py changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13856/#review25606 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jayapal Reddy On Aug. 27, 2013, 10:23 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 13856: CLOUDSTACK-4303: Add missing base.py changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13856/#review25607 --- Commit 6e64fa53c62d927e6dc4c0053abc5d3f9f8329dc in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 10:42 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 10:47 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meh

Re: Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 10:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 10:53 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/#review25610 --- server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java

Re: Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/#review25611 --- Commit 37d500d2a6b71c267af20a83208eb6049157f95f in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/#review25612 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On Aug. 27, 2013, 10:53 a.m., Ha

Re: Review Request 13842: CLOUDSTACK-4482: getVMPassword() API call does not return password for Vms that are deployed with password enabled templates.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13842/#review25614 --- Commit 81938c68acd3a049aa0fcb0c5ea8bc4a822d3200 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 11:20 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meh

Re: Review Request 13771: CLOUDSTACK-4346 replace URI getHost() and create(String) calls

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13771/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 11:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vi

Re: [Doc] Please review: Zone-wide primary storage doc

Jessica, I have provided my review comments in the bug CLOUDSTACK-864. Thanks, ~Talluri On 27/08/13 3:21 AM, "Jessica Tomechak" wrote: >Hi, >New doc on zone-wide primary storage is ready for review. You can view the >updated text at the links below. Or -- since there were several changes --

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

> On Aug. 26, 2013, 10:09 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: > > test/integration/component/cpu_limits/test_project_limits.py, line 275 > > > > > > use listResourceLimits API to get the resource limits of respective > > acc

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, noon) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar,

Re: Review Request 13559: Automation: Portable IP test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13559/#review25613 --- test/integration/component/test_portable_ip.py

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/#review25615 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On Aug. 27, 2013, 11:20 a.m., bh

SSVM request handling in VMWare

Hi All, I was performing some operations related to snapshots and templates on VMWare with CS 4.2. Initiated create snapshot and while that was in processing tried to create template from another existing snapshot. In /var/log/cloud.log I could see logs related to snapshot creation process but

Re: Review Request 12545: CLOUDSTACK-1800: Add automation tests for reset sshkey to access VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12545/#review25616 --- Hi Girish Shilamkar, Apologies for late review. Some changes needs t

RE: Review Request 13771: CLOUDSTACK-4346 replace URI getHost() and create(String) calls

How were the changes tested? > -Original Message- > From: daan Hoogland [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of > daan Hoogland > Sent: 27 August 2013 12:37 > To: Sheng Yang; Dave Cahill; Chiradeep Vittal; Hugo Trippaers > Cc: daan Hoogland; cloudstack > Subject: Re: Review Reques

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 1:32 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Re: Review Request 13771: CLOUDSTACK-4346 replace URI getHost() and create(String) calls

Donal, These were tested creating and deleting various types of networks with clients. to be precise: a standard network a bridged network a nicira based network a standard vpc with two tiert networks. kind regards, On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > How were the changes

Re: Review Request 13807: we should not reserve memory and cpu for vmware VMs if the vmware.reserve.cpu and vmware.reserve.mem are set to false.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13807/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 1:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: [ACS4.2] Don;t use libvirt 0.10.2+ if you are using NFS as primary storage on KVM

On 08/25/2013 07:20 AM, Edison Su wrote: There is a "bug" in libvirt 0.10.2+: /* Short-circuit if already mounted */ 385 if ((rc = virStorageBackendFi

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

On Aug 19, 2013, at 3:09 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > On XenServer (from Citrix), there is no JVM, not sure if you can install > it even after the open sourcing. > > I'd be surprised if you could not do it on Xen Project. > On 8/19/13 10:38 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >> >> On Aug

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

> > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= > > refs/heads/4.2 > > Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f > > > > I notice Edison's fix is missing although it is on 4.2. Is this > intended? > [Animesh>] Edison checked it in

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/#review25619 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. - Sanjay Tripathi On Aug. 27, 2013, 1

[ACS42] Please cherry-pick 3315159de62620166c119dbf72dad9cf661cc0cb

Hi, In a commit in May I enabled the deployment of SystemVMs on RBD, but this was unintentionally reverted by a different commit (merge). I didn't notice this up until now and fixed it in both master and 4.2-forward. Can 3315159de62620166c119dbf72dad9cf661cc0cb be cherry-picked to 4.2? Wid

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= > > > refs/heads/4.2 > > > Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f > > > > > > > I notice Edison's fix is

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

Just to throw in my two cents. I personally think the effort of adding a new hypervisor to CloudStack is too difficult. This is an area I'd like to focus on, along with another 15 things :) I personally see a motivation for an xl integration. This is something I've researched in the past (an

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

On Aug 27, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > Just to throw in my two cents. I personally think the effort of adding a new > hypervisor to CloudStack is too difficult. This is an area I'd like to focus > on, along with another 15 things :) > > I personally see a motivation for an

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On 08/27/2013 05:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h= refs/heads/4.2 Commit: 9103984d349927a87b0683048dda2d8004e6854f I notice Ediso

[ACS42] Cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4423 (93b40b0ca6a796ffbacd80c40897f6ada6284bc4)

Hi, Can you cherry-pick 93b40b0ca6a796ffbacd80c40897f6ada6284bc4 into 4.2? It fixes CLOUDSTACK-4423 and enables RBD volumes to be migrated to other primary storages. Thank you! Wido

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

Wido, with all due respect, the data shows that the RC is ready. https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12320942 There's 2 blockers, both of which existed prior to 4.2 QA is merely going to repeat the test cases they already executed? Are we hoping they are going to fin

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:46:24PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > > On 08/27/2013 05:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:29:51PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > >> > >> > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=

Network object in KVM hypervisor plugin

Hi guys, Do we have Network object in KVM hypervisor plugin? I see the LibvirtNetworkDef but it's unused. I wonder how ACS manage Networks on KVM hosts? Thanks, -- N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U

CloudStack "distros"

Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack besides CloudPlatform. Anybody have some insight in that space? Thanks. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp Direct: 1.919.476.5042

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:12 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round) > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:46:24PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

> -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 11:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round) > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 06:36:53AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > H

Re: CloudStack "distros"

Not that I am aware of. Also I believe once ACS 4.2 is released, ACS and CCP will be the same code base. I could be wrong. On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David wrote: > Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack > besides CloudPlatform. > > Anybody have some

Re: Review Request 13759: Fix CLOUDSTACK-4466 - DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/#review25630 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Aug. 23, 2013, 11:31 a.m., Dav

Re: Review Request 13759: Fix CLOUDSTACK-4466 - DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/#review25629 --- Commit a55c75bbd201e53f0aca3e8f8f9dee08cd132a95 in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 13759: Fix CLOUDSTACK-4466 - DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

> On Aug. 27, 2013, 7:08 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! I've pushed to 4.2-forwarding. But Dave, could you rebase to master? I cannot apply it clearly on MASTER. Also, it's better to use git-format-patch to generated patch. Thanks! - Sheng ---

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.2.0

Hi Dave, I've committed your patch to 4.2-forwarding. But it cannot apply on MASTER, so please rebase it. And it would be better if you use git-format-patch to generate patch. Thanks! --Sheng On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi Sheng, > > Thanks for reviewing. > > The

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Ian Duffy

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Ian Duffy to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

What's your timeframe you'd like to see here? Do you plan on working on this yourself or are you looking for some people from the community to take this up. I have some interest in this. I'd like to enhance ACS to make adding hypervisors easier and using xen arm as a POC would be good. I want

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Ian Duffy

Welcome Ian! -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:17 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Ian Duffy wooohooo! congrats Ian! On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Ian Duffy

wooohooo! congrats Ian! On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Ian Duffy to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

On Aug 27, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote: > What's your timeframe you'd like to see here? Do you plan on working on this > yourself or are you looking for some people from the community to take this > up. > Opennebula has already demoed it, so I think we should try to do it asap

Re: CloudStack "distros"

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David wrote: > Hi all, was curious to know if there are other flavors of CloudStack > besides CloudPlatform. > > Anybody have some insight in that space? > > Thanks. > So naturally there is Citrix - and they produce a product based on CloudStack. CloudSa

Re: CloudStack "distros"

CloudSand... http://www.cloudsand.com/ On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Todd Pigram wrote: > Not that I am aware of. Also I believe once ACS 4.2 is released, ACS and > CCP will be the same code base. I could be wrong. > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:24 PM, La Motta, David > wrote: > > > Hi all

RE: CloudStack "distros"

My understanding of future of CPP was the same as Todd's. Post ACS 4.2 release, it will be the same code base -just a different name and support. I manage a flavor of CloudStack called CloudSand, but its only to bring most needed features from dev branch into a stable release - with ability to u

[VOTE] [Cancelled] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

Cancelling this round, I will pick up the outstanding cheery-picks and start another round later today Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 11:37 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (second round)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Ian Duffy

Thanks guys. It been a great experience so far! Learning lots and very fast. On 27 August 2013 20:22, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Welcome Ian! > > -Original Message- > From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 3:17 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sub

RE: Review Request 13759: Fix CLOUDSTACK-4466 - DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

Cherry picked this commit for next 4.2 RC build > -Original Message- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Sheng > Yang > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:10 PM > To: Hugo Trippaers > Cc: Sheng Yang; Dave Cahill; cloudstack > Subject: Re: Review Request 13759

[ACS42] Next RC coming soon

I am working on cutting another RC build later today, I am picking up the latest cherry pick requests and some of the important issues that got fixed recently. If there are specific fixes that are needed or in progress call me out to wait. Thanks Animesh

Re: CloudStack "distros"

Interesting, and thanks for the replies. I had not heard of CloudSand, so thanks for bringing it up. David La Motta Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp Direct: 1.919.476.5042 On 8/27/13 3:28 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >My understanding of future of CPP was the same as T

Re: Review Request 13759: Fix CLOUDSTACK-4466 - DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/#review25634 --- Commit 41d2fb3d1704273042fbd02d85a276b2ec00c737 in branch refs/heads

RE: [ACS42] Please cherry-pick 3315159de62620166c119dbf72dad9cf661cc0cb

Done will be in next RC build > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 8:07 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS42] Please cherry-pick > 3315159de62620166c119dbf72dad9cf661cc0cb > > Hi, > > In a commit in May I

RE: [ACS42] Cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4423 (93b40b0ca6a796ffbacd80c40897f6ada6284bc4)

Done will be in next RC build > -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:37 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS42] Cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4423 > (93b40b0ca6a796ffbacd80c40897f6ada6284bc4) > > Hi, > > Can y

Re: CloudStack "distros"

I haven't heard CloudSand either, interesting... Thanks On Tuesday, August 27, 2013, La Motta, David wrote: > Interesting, and thanks for the replies. I had not heard of CloudSand, so > thanks for bringing it up. > > > David La Motta > Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp >

Review Request 13864: fix exception message

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13864/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Alena Prokharchyk. Repository: cloudstack-git

[ACS42] CLOUDSTACK-4466: Fix DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

Hi Animesh, Please cherry-pick the following commit from 4.2-forward branch. commit a55c75bbd201e53f0aca3e8f8f9dee08cd132a95 Author: Dave Cahill Date: Tue Aug 27 11:55:49 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-4466: Fix DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet A recent code change in NetworkManager

RE: [ACS42] CLOUDSTACK-4466: Fix DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

Done From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:29 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi; Subject: [ACS42] CLOUDSTACK-4466: Fix DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet Hi Animesh, Please cherry-pick the following commit from 4.2-forward branch. commit a55c75bbd201e53f0ac

Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes

>From 4.2-forward. (1) *Commit:* 2d08a322dd976e696783535a0f3d174483adf155 [2d08a32] *Parents:* a55c75bbd2 *Author:* Jessica *Date:* August 27, 2013 1:37:40 PM PDT CLOUDSTACK-2121. DOC. New docs for affinity groups. (Commit message is wrong on that one - it's really for CLOUDSTACK-818)

Review Request 13865: Extend support of CloudStack-managed storage to KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4527 Repository: cloudstack-g

RE: Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes

Done > -Original Message- > From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 2:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes > > From 4.2-forward. > > (1) > > *Commit:* 2d08a322dd976e69

Re: VMware error

Mike, If you constantly encounter this error in a fresh VMware API session, you need to check the parameter you passed into the API call. You may need to look at ESX host log file to get more specific info about the failure. If VMware session has been idle for some time, you may encounter some ra

[4.3 Proposal] Extend support of CloudStack-managed storage to KVM

Hi, I've drawn up a Review Board Request for 4.3 and assigned it to myself. https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/ Here is the JIRA ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4527 Here is the gist: This patch is part two of the SolidFire plug-in. Part one is described in Review Req

[ACS42] Please cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4520 and CLOUDSTACK-4516

Hi Animesh, Can you please cherry-pick the following two commits from 4.2-forward? commit 21cb33a02ce2ff1e1b22af275068451a3ab6add5 Author: Min Chen Date: Tue Aug 27 14:11:55 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-4516:[Upgrade][VMWare] MySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException while performing any ta

Re: Review Request 13865: Extend support of CloudStack-managed storage to KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13865/ --- (Updated Aug. 27, 2013, 3:17 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUD

Re: VMware error

Hi Kelven, I would be happy to check on that. I don't have much experience looking at ESXi logs, however. Are you thinking I should be looking at logs on the ESXi box or CS logs (or probably both)? If ESXi logs, would you be able to tell me where I go for those? Also, this works fine on one of m

RE: [ACS42] Please cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4520 and CLOUDSTACK-4516

Done From: Min Chen Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 2:17 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS42] Please cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4520 and CLOUDSTACK-4516 Hi Animesh, Can you please cherry-pick the following two commits from 4.2-forward? commit 21

[ACS42]Cherry pick cfe3a0fee39379c4ab1fdad9150924b9e46becd6

As the file lock between kvm hosts are removed, then the data inconsistence between kvm hosts occurred: create one volume from one host, but not shown up on another kvm host. It can be caused by nfs cache(I already ask Rayees to add "noactimo=0" in /etc/nfsmount.conf , then try again) and change

[GSoC] CloudMonkey index out of range error

Hi folks, I am adding an api (launch cluster) to CloudStack and using CloudMonkey to test the api. From the CloudMonkey log file I can see that the request was executed on the server side and return correct response, however, CloudMonkey was forced to quit because the following error: l

Re: [4.3 Proposal] Extend support of CloudStack-managed storage to KVM

Is there a patch, or is this to document work on a forthcoming patch? I'd just be interested in looking at the KVM Storage Adaptor. On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I've drawn up a Review Board Request for 4.3 and assigned it to myself. > > https://reviews.apache.o

Re: [4.3 Proposal] Extend support of CloudStack-managed storage to KVM

Just a document to work on a patch. :) On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Is there a patch, or is this to document work on a forthcoming patch? > I'd just be interested in looking at the KVM Storage Adaptor. > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > >

Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment

Hi, I've tried twice to create a new 4.2 environment (clean DB, starting over from scratch), but both times I received the following exception (below). System VMs won't start. Any thoughts on this? Thanks! Mike INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) No runn

Re: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment

By the way, I just have a single XenServer 6.1 host in this env. On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've tried twice to create a new 4.2 environment (clean DB, starting over > from scratch), but both times I received the following exc

RE: Volunteers to Complete the 4.2 Release Notes

Community help is needed to fix up the release notes, any volunteers Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 1:01 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Volunteers

database upgrades

It seems like on startup of the management server DatabaseUpgradeChecker runs and upgrades the database performing DDL and DML. Is there a way to upgrade the database that doesn't include starting the management server? Darren

RE: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment

Sounds related to bug 21cb33a02ce2ff1e1b22af275068451a3ab6add5 > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:01 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment > > Hi, > > I've tried

RE: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment

Can you pull in latest, I had already cherry picked Min's fix CLOUDSTACK-4516 > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:02 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Can't bring up a new 4.2 environment > >

simulator in master borked?

I've been working around some issues, but no luck. Primarily the storage refactor seems to have bypassed the simulator functionally. Anybody got this to work in 4.2? Otherwise I'm going back to 4.1 (!)

RE: simulator in master borked?

It's working in 4.2. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 5:14 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: simulator in master borked? > > I've been working around some issues, but no luck. Primarily the stor

Review Request 13877: CIFS Secondary Storage

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13877/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal and Devdeep Singh. Repository:

  1   2   >