Re: [Responsiveness report] users 2013w33

Hi Daan, My issue is still unfortunately not resolved, I am unaware what is causing the excessive 'Disconnect, reconnect' issue. The functionality Jonathan (?) requires certainly isn't possible in the web interface, but I'm sure it would be easy to create a script which monitors VM instances and u

RE: [Doc] nTier App is Ready for Review

Hi Radhika, Few additions in the section 15.27.11.2 N-Tier InternalLB for VPC feature : 1. In section 15.27.11.2.3 you can mention that there in the network offerings a default offering for Internal LB is present with the name "DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingForVpcNetworksWithInternalLB" . 2. I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

Congratulations :-) Sent from my iPhone On 20 aug. 2013, at 02:55, Go Chiba wrote: > Congrats Hatano-san! > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >> has asked Toshiaki Hatano to become a committer and we

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

congratulation On Aug 19, 2013, at 8:55 PM, Go Chiba wrote: > Congrats Hatano-san! > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > >> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >> has asked Toshiaki Hatano to become a committer and we are pleased >> to announ

[Doc] Please review: Windows 8 VMs

Hi, New doc on Windows 8 VMs is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. This one is only mentioned in Release Notes. Since we don't already list all possible guest VM types in the Admin Guide, it did not make sense to sta

RE: 4.2 S3 storage question

Hi Tom, vmsnapshots are not backed up to secondary storage. They will be stored on primary itself. Apart from templates,ISOs and snapshots, volumes will be stored in s3 in the following scenarios: 1.Upload volume 2.Extract volume(download volume) Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From:

Re: [Doc] Please review: CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc

I have incorporated not only Nitin's comments in this email thread, but also others in the bug itself. Please check and verify the fix so I may close the doc bug for 4.2.0. This is checked in to both 4.2 and master. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=2796f01 Bug: htt

Re: 4.2 S3 storage question

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:27:29AM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > For S3 secondary storage, I'm wondering exactly what types of objects we > are storing in S3: > > 1. templates - working. > 2. snapshots - working. > 3. vmsnapshots - not working (at least I don't see these going to s3) > 4. volumes

[Doc] Cisco VNMC Doc Is Ready for Review

Hi all The doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-906 Thanks in advance -Radhika

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

> On Aug. 20, 2013, 6:30 a.m., venkata swamy babu budumuru wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_netscaler_lb.py, line 166 > > > > > > Since you have multiple test suites trying to add the same netscaler > > dev

RE: [Doc] Cisco VNMC Doc Is Ready for Review

Hi Radhika, As discussed with you please find the minutes below ( Review comments provided by Koushik & Myself) == Introduction : Works only on isolated. Remove: connection timeout, TCP intercept: Use case: they are not use cases.

Review Request 13682: CLOUDSTACK-2247: Automation - Reset a VM on Reboot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13682/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2247 R

Re: Review Request 13644: CLOUDSTACK-4257: [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13644/#review25342 --- Commit 9ed5083f9bd9eb668ea152635c98e1598c38f7c2 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13644: CLOUDSTACK-4257: [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13644/#review25343 --- Commit ed745d3489340eb0394264a379a22a10c76092b9 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13644: CLOUDSTACK-4257: [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13644/#review25345 --- Commit a9e45bf7766728c8439fcc0e3a1a6e3af074b2b7 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13644: CLOUDSTACK-4257: [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13644/#review25346 --- Ship it! Applied with additional asserts - Prasanna Santhanam On

Re: Review Request 13644: CLOUDSTACK-4257: [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13644/#review25344 --- Commit a82f66e0fa8c9e20b0468aae82871c46a9f8b67e in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13642: Cloudstack-4356: Implicit planner - Added check for empty host, Skip if no empty host found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13642/#review25347 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 19, 2013, 12:55 p.m., Gaura

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

Congrats :) On 20/08/13 4:26 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack >has asked Toshiaki Hatano to become a committer and we are pleased >to announce that he has accepted. > >Being a committer enables easier contribution to the >project since th

MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

I started a fresh clean install this morning and am unable to start the management server: Error [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (Timer-3:null) System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Database version 4.3.0 is higher than management software

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

Congrats Toshiaki! On 20-Aug-2013, at 4:26 AM, Marcus Sorensen mailto:shadow...@gmail.com>> wrote: Toshiaki

Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks

On Aug 9, 2013, at 7:21 PM, Pedro Roque Marques wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal Lafferty >> wrote: >> >>> I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned to >>> CloudMonkey to automate setup of my te

Re: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

What branch? On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:48 AM, SuichII, Christopher < chris.su...@netapp.com> wrote: > I started a fresh clean install this morning and am unable to start the > management server: > > Error [c.c.u.c.ComponentContext] (Timer-3:null) System integrity check > failed. Refuse to startu

Re: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

Master. Then, after commenting out the offending code, rebuilding, redeploying the db and rerunning, this exception is thrown when attempting to start the MS: ERROR [o.s.w.c.ContextLoader] (main:null) Context initialization failed org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error cr

Re: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

I would suggest playing around with 4.2 branch, should be much more stable On 20/08/13 7:18 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: >Master. > >Then, after commenting out the offending code, rebuilding, redeploying >the db and rerunning, this exception is thrown when attempting to start >the MS: > >ER

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RAT checks to the default build

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:19:28PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I think developers will anyway try to optimize their build time. > This cannot be helped. > The danger of course is that they 'git push' before running the full build. Agreed, but I'd at least like to ensure that the full build in

Re: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

I've made some contributions to the UI which are only on master. I could cherry pick them into 4.2 locally, but I'd like to avoid doing that. On Aug 20, 2013, at 9:50 AM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > I would suggest playing around with 4.2 branch, should be much more stable > > On 20/08/13 7:18 PM, "S

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

Congratulations! On 20-Aug-2013, at 1:06 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Congratulations :-) > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 20 aug. 2013, at 02:55, Go Chiba wrote: > >> Congrats Hatano-san! >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> >>> The Project Management Committ

RE: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

Unless you are fixing a defect for 4.2 please refrain from checking new code in to 4.2 at this time. RC is supposed to be cut yesterday and will be done in any minute. Any new code would introduce stability issues. Appreciate all of your understanding at this time. Thanks /Sudha -Origina

Re: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

Sorry for not being clear, I have no intentions of checking any code in to 4.2. I was simply saying that the only way for me to really work against the 4.2 branch would be to pull in my UI changes locally. Either way, that would not be ideal for me - I would like to be working against master. O

master build fails in LibvirtComputingResourceTest

H, Is someone working on LibvirtComputingResource.createVMFromSpec()? It is tested in two of the failing tests. regards, Daan

Re: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

What's your HEAD? I'm on 3a29c734475184cf28135acaca271fea1c90554a and don't see a problm starting up the server. I haven't configured my zones/pods etc. Also I started with a fresh DB. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 01:47:50PM +, SuichII, Christopher wrote: > Master. > > Then, after commenting out t

Re: master build fails in LibvirtComputingResourceTest

On 08/20/2013 04:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: H, Is someone working on LibvirtComputingResource.createVMFromSpec()? It is tested in two of the failing tests. Not actively. I created a test a while ago due to a compat issue between 4.0 and 4.1, but that test seems to break now. When I wrot

Re: master build fails in LibvirtComputingResourceTest

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:34:46PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > Is someone working on LibvirtComputingResource.createVMFromSpec()? It > is tested in two of the failing tests. > Don't wait for anyone. There'll be plenty of opportunity to send in little patches esp. for master :) This one

Re: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

I was on cc18ca79fc6d58fb639ffbb455791caeb021589a and tried rolling back to a commit I have been able to deploy with before (b727001f483012012c061e8c352c1ebfe7d3fecd) and got the same result. On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > What's your HEAD? I'm on 3a29c734475184cf2813

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

Thanks, Marcus, Dave, Chiba-san, Hugo, Sebastian, Nitin, Koushik, Jaypal! :) -- Toshiaki -Original Message- From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 08:03 To: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano Congratulations!

Re: [4.2] [KVM]

Hi, On 08/20/2013 06:43 PM, Paul Angus wrote: Hi Guys, I’m unable to deploy system VMs on KVM using 4.2 anymore libvirtd.log contains: 2013-08-20 15:17:03.996+: 3299: warning : qemuSetupCgroup:395 : Could not autoset a RSS limit for domain s-13-VM 2013-08-20 15:17:04.092+: 3299: warn

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

Things in open source generally tend to move a good deal faster, and ideally we avoid the entire waterfall experience. IMO, (and I am not doing the work so take it for what its worth) I've looked at the blockers, and they largely don't seem blocker-worthy. I'd personally cut an RC. If nothing else

[4.2] [KVM]

Hi Guys, I'm unable to deploy system VMs on KVM using 4.2 anymore libvirtd.log contains: 2013-08-20 15:17:03.996+: 3299: warning : qemuSetupCgroup:395 : Could not autoset a RSS limit for domain s-13-VM 2013-08-20 15:17:04.092+: 3299: warning : qemuDomainObjTaint:1377 : Domain id=1 name

RE: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

> On the rapid influx of fixes, I don't think that we should tell people to stop > pushing fixes into 4.2, but we also want to minimize churn. > Animesh and I were discussing this in person yesterday and I wonder if we > should branch 4.2 temporarily (perhaps call it 4.2-forward) stabilize the 4.2

Re: [4.2] [KVM]

When you say "anymore", it sounds like you were previously using 4.2 without issues, is that correct, or is this a fresh upgrade. If it's fresh, note that 4.2 requires a new system vm image (this will be a part of the upgrade instructions when it's released). As Wido mentions, patch disk is no lon

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> On the rapid influx of fixes, I don't think that we should tell people to >> stop >> pushing fixes into 4.2, but we also want to minimize churn. >> Animesh and I were discussing this in person yesterday and I wonder if we >> should branch 4.2

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

Yeah, I totally agree that if fixes need to be made in 4.2, then we should be putting fixes into 4.2. My only concern was the lack of time between the branch "settling down" and it going into the field. As long as we have a sufficient amount of time for me to perform some manual regression testing

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RAT checks to the default build

Sounds good to me. While devs will always optimize their build, I hope everybody does at least a full build once before committing. Cheers, Hugo Sent from my iPhone On 20 aug. 2013, at 15:54, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:19:28PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> I think

RE: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:11 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Alex Huang > wrote: > >> On the rapid influx of fixes, I don't

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RAT checks to the default build

LGTM On 8/20/13 6:54 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:19:28PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> I think developers will anyway try to optimize their build time. >> This cannot be helped. >> The danger of course is that they 'git push' before running the full >>build. > >Agr

cloud-set-guest-password in docs

According to http://s.apache.org/aU6 , the script is available at http://cloudstack.org/dl/cloud-set-guest-password But that link 301 redirects to http://cloudstack.orgdl/cloud-set-guest-password Note the missing slash and the resulting failure.

Re: cloud-set-guest-password in docs

I am getting the following results: http://cloudstack.org/dl/cloud-set-guest-password >> http://cloudstack.apache.orgdl/cloud-set-guest-password Even when this is resolved, http://cloudstack.apache.org/dl/cloud-set-guest-password results in a 404. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Chiradeep Vitta

RE: [4.2] [KVM]

The problem may be that I'm still using the older system VM templates, what are the paths for the new templates? management-server-install-systemvm.xml on the 4.2 branch still has the older system vm paths. Regards, Paul Angus S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus paul.an...

RE: Breaking docs out

The docs for 4.2 are not settled yet and may take another couple of days. David are you considering the change for 4.2? > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 12:11 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: Breaking docs out > > ok

RE: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

> -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 10:52 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa

Re: [4.2] [KVM]

I'm not sure where the official 4.2 one is, but these should work: http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/ On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > The problem may be that I'm still using the older system VM templates, what > are the paths for the new te

Re: Breaking docs out

Regarding David's point about the Install, Admin, and Dev guides having a lot of similar content, making it hard to break their source files apart: it's possible most of the similar content is in the "Infrastructure Concepts" section, where we explain "what is a zone, what is a pod," etc. I'm not

Re: [Doc] Please review: Health checks for load balanced instances doc

Please re-check to see that the review comments are incorporated correctly. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=3905381 Bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-816 Regards, Jessica T. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Hi, > N

[DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

All, In capturing my thoughts on storage, my thinking backed into the driver model. While we have the beginnings of such a model today, I see the following deficiencies: Multiple Models: The Storage, Hypervisor, and Security layers each have a slightly different model for allowing system func

RE: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

I'm on 61c5b4bf7520080d88ae5a9aad38dee7e0348fa2 and got same error. I've wiped and redeployed DB by using 'cloud-setup-database' command, then I confirmed there're no 'default_value' column in table 'configuration'. The column should be created by schema-420to430.sql. So, for some reason, the SQL

Re: [Doc] Please review: Update base image of VMs doc

I have incorporated Hari's review comments. Please re-check to see that the update is correct. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a6d7651 Bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-871 Regards, Jessica T. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Harikrishna Pat

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Hey John, I think this is some great stuff. Thanks for the write up. It looks like you have ideas around what might go into a first release of this plug-in framework. Were you thinking we'd have enough time to squeeze that first rev into 4.3. I'm just wondering (it's not a huge deal to hit that r

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Mike, Before we can dig into timelines or implementations, I think we need to get consensus on the problem to solved and the goals. Once we have a proper understanding of the scope, I believe we can chunk the across a set of development lifecycle. The subject is vast, but it also has a far re

cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

Hi All, cs-maven.midokura.com is down ? I am unable to create new build [INFO] Apache CloudStack Console Proxy Plugin SKIPPED [INFO] Apache CloudStack AWS API Bridge .. SKIPPED [INFO] [INFO]

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

I agree, John - let's get consensus first, then talk time tables. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 4:31 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > Before we can dig into timelines or implementations, I think we need to > get consensus on the problem to solved and the goals. Once we have a > proper understandi

RE: MS fails to start due - Incorrect code version

It looks chicken and egg situation. Bean injection requires 4.3 upgraded database. DB upgrade process executed by DatabaseUpgradeChecker runs after bean injection. At least I found a workaround, upgrade DB by hand like below. $ cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:cloud@localhost --deploy-as root $

[Doc] Please review: External SNMP and Syslog manager alerts

Hi, Documentation on sending administrator alerts to external SNMP or Syslog managers is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Please provide your feedback. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.g

Re: DevCloud2 not working with 4.2

Still can't get DevCloud2 to work with 4.2 (updated 4.2 again today). Anyone else seeing this? I can get a CS env up and running if I create a zone manually. Thanks On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've been trying to ge

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

I know this isn't terribly useful, but I've been drawing a lot of squares and circles and lines that connect those squares and circles lately and I have a lot of architectural ideas for CloudStack. At the rate I'm going it will take me about two weeks to put together a discussion/proposal for t

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Darren, Actually, loading and unloading aren't difficult if resource management and drivers work within the following constraints/assumptions: Drivers are transient and stateless A driver instance is assigned per resource managed (i.e. no singletons) A lightweight thread and mailbox (i.e. actor

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Darren, My response does hand wave two important issues -- hot code reloading and PermGen leakage. These are tricky, but well trod issues that can be solved in variety of ways (e.g. instrumentation, class loaders, OSGi). It would require a some research/experimentation to determine the best a

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Sure, I fully understand how it theoretically works, but I'm saying from a practical perspective it always seems to fall apart. What your describing is done excellently in OSGI 4.2 Blueprint. It's a beautiful framework that allows you to expose services that can be dynamically updated at runti

Re: Secondary IP (4.1.1)

It would seem to be perhaps I can add something via this segment in the security policy. try: 193 # -s ! 52:54:0:56:44:32 -j DROP 194 execute("ebtables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i " + vif + " -j " + vmchain_in) 195 execute("ebtables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o " +

Re: Instance Names

You suggest that I should leave my mistake as is. If you are unsure of the issues it may cause upon instance rebooting, I just thought it would be easy to just update a line in the database as it was mentioned to me, in the vm_instance table… On Aug 19, 2013, at 11:46 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote

Re: Review Request 12623: CLOUDSTACK-2328: Linux native VXLAN support on KVM hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12623/ --- (Updated Aug. 21, 2013, 2:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Re: cloud-set-guest-password in docs

I got it in the repository http://goo.gl/QYLyIM On 8/20/13 12:12 PM, "Marty Sweet" wrote: >I am getting the following results: >http://cloudstack.org/dl/cloud-set-guest-password >> >http://cloudstack.apache.orgdl/cloud-set-guest-password > >Even when this is resolved, >http://cloudstack.apache.o

Re: Secondary IP (4.1.1)

you can add the below rules on the host. Also you need to update the iptables filter rules. You need to add rules on host in vm reboot, on VM reboot the old rules get added on host. Thanks, Jayapal On 21-Aug-2013, at 6:49 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote: > It would seem to be perhaps I can add somet

RE: cloud-set-guest-password in docs

Hi, There is a defect for this issue, and is fixed in the latest guide: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1316 http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/bindir/cloud-set-guest-password.in -Original Message- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sen

Re: [Doc] Please review: Update base image of VMs doc

Thank you Jessica for the update. Changes looks good for me. -Harikrishna On 21-Aug-2013, at 3:30 AM, Jessica Tomechak mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com>> wrote: I have incorporated Hari's review comments. Please re-check to see that the update is correct. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/

Re: [Doc] Please review: CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc

LGTM. Thanks very much Jessica :) From: Jessica Tomechak mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday 20 August 2013 2:55 PM To: Nitin Mehta mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>> Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>, "us...@cloudsta

Re: 4.2 S3 storage question

Hi Sanjeev, That's exactly the info I was looking for. I tried to download a volume and was able to successfully do that (it came via S3 as you said). I then tried to upload the volume but it didn't go to S3 (don't see any exceptions though). The UI shows the new uploaded volume but I attaching it

RE: Instance Names

Have you looked at CLOUDSTACK-778? -Original Message- From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice.law...@me.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:25 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Marcus Sorensen Subject: Re: Instance Names You suggest that I should leave my mistake as is. If you are unsu

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

> On Aug. 20, 2013, 6:30 a.m., venkata swamy babu budumuru wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py, line 62 > > > > > > IMO, we don't have to go for an additional library call for > > add_netscaler ra

Re: Breaking docs out

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Regarding David's point about the Install, Admin, and Dev guides having a > lot of similar content, making it hard to break their source files apart: > it's possible most of the similar content is in the "Infrastructure > Concepts" section

Re: cs-maven.midokura.com is down ?

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi All, > > cs-maven.midokura.com is down ? I am unable to create new build > Is there a reason this isn't on maven central. --David

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

John, Nice work. Given the maturity of OSGi, I'd say lets see how it fits. One criteria would be can we limit the bundles that may be loaded based on what Cloudstack supports (and not allow loading pydev) if not we need to bake our own. But though I think your work is valuable I disagree on desig

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Hi John, This is really good thinking on the future of cloudstack driver/plugin architecture. I would be very happy if we can decouple the ACS releases from vendor specific releases. I also agree on the research & experiments (POCs, tools) that needs to be undertaken to conclude if decoupled dri

UNABLE TO INSTALL a new VM instance on the HOST from a ISO

hi folks, im trying to instantiate a new VM on my Xenserver , because my freebsd iso is not getting REGISTERED , [image: Inline image 1]how to get the iso into ready state , thank you. regards, punith s CB