Re: [ACS42] Issues that need to bre resolved for RC on Monday 8/19

On 08/19/2013 07:49 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: Here is the latest list of issues that need to be resolved for RC tomorrow. Wido can you pick up 4249 related to Ceph? Yes, I'll do that! I'll pick up 4249 | Assignee | Issues Id: Summary

Re: Ruby dev wanted

On Aug 1, 2013, at 6:03 AM, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > I've read the ruby client project by Chips. It's pretty looks like > I'm doing now for _https://github.com/isaacchiang/cloud_ruby. Please have a > look. I believe there are > some code segments that would be helpful to the r

Re: Review Request 13641: Fix for build failure in 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13641/#review25291 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Ram Ganesh On Aug. 19, 2013, 6:26 a.m., Raje

Re: ACS 4.2 planned RC on Monday 8/19 - Push to RC

On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > Folks our planned RC date is on Monday 8/19 and we have a bunch of blockers > and critical to take care of. I hope we can bring them to resolution by > Monday morning PST. > > Sebastien I also need help on getting translation tak

USAGE problem with SNAPSHOT

Hello, the "listUsageRecords " response in case of *Snapshot *response is: array(12) { ["account"]=> string(23) "x...@netsons.com" ["accountid"]=> string(36) "72e16957-0a22-4739-b353-729da63018

RE: USAGE problem with SNAPSHOT

Antonio, Usageid in response "658b084e-3e52-4baf-888b-2fd471d9181e" refers to snapshot UUID. You can use this to refer the snapshot. ~kishan From: Antonio Petrocelli [mailto:a.petroce...@netsons.com] Sent: Monday, 19 August 2013 4:02 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: USAGE problem with S

Review Request 13642: Cloudstack-4356: Implicit planner - Added check for empty host, Skip if no empty host found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13642/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Rayees Namathponnan and Prasanna Santhanam. Repo

Review Request 13643: Unplug the nic when there are no ips set on the interface

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13643/ --- Review request for cloudstack, anthony xu, Abhinandan Prateek, and Murali Reddy.

Review Request 13644: CLOUDSTACK-4257: [Automation] test_storage_motion test cases failed during with unexpected result in listStoragePool API call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13644/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOU

RE: [Doc] nTier App is Ready for Review

Thanks Radhika. Minor corrections under: 15.27.11.1.2. Creating a Network Offering for External LB 1. Please edit " To have internal LB support on VPC," to "To have external LB support on VPC," 2. Under "Supported Services", choose Load Balancer Provider as Netscaler or VpcVirtualRouter 3. Load

Re: Ruby dev wanted

Hi Sebastien, Chip's cloudstack_ruby_client is almost ready (waiting for second time pull request). I'll spend some time on rOCCi in next few weeks. Currently I still can't have the pictures of what exactly the rOCCi is doing. I'll try to find myself more use cases. Thanks for the provid

RE: [Doc] nTier App is Ready for Review

Thanks Sowmya. Kishan, could you please sign off because I need developer's sign off for each feature. Let me know if that is not necessary. Regards -Radhika -Original Message- From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:43 PM To: dev@clou

RE: [Doc] nTier App is Ready for Review

Thanks Radhika for the Doc. Please find my comments below: 15.27.3.6 Add Tier -> ACL List selection is missing in the screenshot. 15.27.4 and 15.27.4.1 All outgoing traffic is not blocked by default. Behaviour is as follows: "By default, all incoming traffic to guest networks is blocked. All ou

Re: Ruby dev wanted

On Aug 19, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > Chip's cloudstack_ruby_client is almost ready (waiting for > second time pull request). I'll spend some time on rOCCi in next few weeks. > Currently I still can't have the pictures of what exactly the rOCCi is > doing.

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/#review25292 --- test/integration/component/cpu_limits/test_cpu_limits.py

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

> On Aug. 19, 2013, 11:49 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: > > test/integration/component/cpu_limits/test_domain_limits.py, line 718 > > > > > > if i am not wrong, the api_client should be api_client_cadmin_2 Can you plea

Re: Review Request 13642: Cloudstack-4356: Implicit planner - Added check for empty host, Skip if no empty host found

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13642/ --- (Updated Aug. 19, 2013, 12:55 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Rayees Namat

Re: Review Request 13641: Fix for build failure in 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13641/#review25294 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.2 in 6c593b0b16f37951c0c30b2ad3cff69835085f

Re: Review Request 13641: Fix for build failure in 4.2

> On Aug. 19, 2013, 1:01 p.m., Devdeep Singh wrote: > > Committed to 4.2 in 6c593b0b16f37951c0c30b2ad3cff69835085fe2 Thanks for the review and pushing to repo - Rajesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http

Re: Review Request 13615: [Autoscale] Account deletion doesn't delete all autoscaled LB rules created by the account

> On Aug. 17, 2013, 9:03 a.m., Murali Reddy wrote: > > 4.2 a03c5f5b1bb3e45b5b2a8365b0c09d48778e426a > > master bb26b854fb89ef71c5183e2c23ef17898d9d Thanks Murali for reviewing and pushing the patch - Rajesh --- This is an automatica

Re: [DOC] cloudstack.apache.org Search

On Aug 18, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Marty Sweet wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Not sure if your aware but the doc search feature is broken on > http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/ > > The search feature takes users to the following URL (searched templates): > https://www.google.com/search?q=templates&sit

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

Kind of on that same vein: Anyone interested in modifying the KVM agent to support "pure" Xen without xapi. I think it might be possible to just use the kvm agent and modify the libvirt calls to talk to xl , that way there would be no need for xapi... Which if I am not mistaken would give us Xe

RE: [Doc] nTier App is Ready for Review

I had gone through the doc. Whatever Sowmya had listed, apart from that looks good to me. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Sowmya Krishnan [mailto:sowmya.krish...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 4:43 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org;

RE: Documentation issue in CloudStack 4.1

+ Dev list. +1 We should have someone to sign off each section before the release. -Original Message- From: Ron Wheeler [mailto:rwhee...@artifact-software.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 7:03 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Documentation issue in CloudStack 4.1 It

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

2013/8/19 Sebastien Goasguen > Kind of on that same vein: > > Anyone interested in modifying the KVM agent to support "pure" Xen without > xapi. > > I think it might be possible to just use the kvm agent and modify the > libvirt calls to talk to xl , that way there would be no need for xapi... >

[Responsiveness report] users 2013w33

I noticed i missed some mails before, so I am getting less selective what i put in this list. The second included an answer to himself. The first one is illegible from all my mail readers so i did the base64 decoding by hand, see at the bottom. http://markmail.org/message/br52s3flymghcjxh Managin

[Responsiveness report] dev 2013w33

nothing to report :) some well known posters didn't get feedback, but no people that are possibly new to the community, which was why I started reporting in the first place. regards, Daan

RE: [Doc] nTier App is Ready for Review

Thanks Rajesh, Kishan, and Sowmya. I shall share the final docs once I finish fixing them. -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 7:30 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Chandan Purushothama; K

Re: [DOC] cloudstack.apache.org Search

Hi Sebastien, It still seems to be 'searching' localhost for me. Thanks, Marty On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Marty Sweet wrote: > > > Hi Guys, > > > > Not sure if your aware but the doc search feature is broken on > > http://clouds

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

I thought libvirt supports xen as well? Why "modify libvirt calls to talk to xl" ? On 8/19/13 6:40 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Kind of on that same vein: > >Anyone interested in modifying the KVM agent to support "pure" Xen >without xapi. > >I think it might be possible to just use the kvm

Re: [DOC] cloudstack.apache.org Search

On Aug 19, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Marty Sweet wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > It still seems to be 'searching' localhost for me. > did you clean your cache ? > Thanks, > Marty > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> >> On Aug 18, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Marty Sweet wrote:

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

On Aug 19, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I thought libvirt supports xen as well? Why "modify libvirt calls to talk > to xl" ? > what I meant is that I believe our current Xen support makes use of xapi not libvrit. So I would think we could "copy" the KVM agent and modify the "

Re: Review Request 13643: Unplug the nic when there are no ips set on the interface

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13643/#review25308 --- Ship it! Ship It! - anthony xu On Aug. 19, 2013, 10:58 a.m., Jay

Re: [DOC] cloudstack.apache.org Search

Ah forgot that! Thanks! On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Marty Sweet wrote: > > > Hi Sebastien, > > > > It still seems to be 'searching' localhost for me. > > > > did you clean your cache ? > > > > Thanks, > > Marty > > > > > > On Mon,

[DISCUSS] Adding RAT checks to the default build

Hey all, Apache RAT 0.10 has been released, improving the speed for a RAT check quite a bit. I've gone ahead and changed the builds.a.o jobs to use version 0.10. I'd like to propose that we add the plugin to our default build, now that it's faster. You can see the speed by running: mvn --proje

Re: Whats involved in adding an extra hypervisor

On XenServer (from Citrix), there is no JVM, not sure if you can install it even after the open sourcing. On 8/19/13 10:38 AM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > >On Aug 19, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Chiradeep Vittal > wrote: > >> I thought libvirt supports xen as well? Why "modify libvirt calls to >>talk >

DevCloud2 not working with 4.2

Hi everyone, I've been trying to get DevCloud2 running with the most recent from 4.2, but keep getting tons of exceptions (some of which are below). Is this a known issue? With the 4.2 RC build slated to happen soon, I wasn't expecting any problem getting 4.2 to run. Thanks! com.cloud.utils.ex

SSVM problem

I am having an issue getting my SSVM up and running. After pulling, rebuilding and seeding with the newest system vm template, I was unable to register an ISO, so when I logged in to the SSVM to run ssvm-check.sh, I found that the script was not present on my ssvm. So my first question is, was

Re: SSVM problem

It looks like the scripts/java binaries have not been copied into the SSVM? See this thread http://markmail.org/thread/niu2qwsdydkuh2fe for how it is supposed to work (response from Alex) On 8/19/13 12:32 PM, "SuichII, Christopher" wrote: >I am having an issue getting my SSVM up and running. Aft

VMware support broken in 4.2

Hi, I can't seem to add a VMware datacenter to a zone in the latest from 4.2: WARN [cloud.api.ApiServer] (2097719126@qtp-1366270629-15:) Unknown API command: listVmwareDcs INFO [cloud.api.ApiServer] (2097719126@qtp-1366270629-15:) Unknown API command: listVmwareDcs WARN [cloud.api.ApiServer] (

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

Looks like we have serious issues as of today in 4.2 (I've noticed DevCloud2 not working and VMware support is broken) (aside from plenty of blocker defects still to be completed). When do we start talking about how the 4.2 RC build is not going to happen until the codebase calms down a bit? I hav

RE: VMware support broken in 4.2

Last blocker was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4403 and got resolved this morning Can you pl log a defect for this one? -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 1:27 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Su

Fwd: Call for Participation: Gluster Community Days

This is to invite you to participate in upcoming Gluster Community Day events. We would love to have more content on Apache CloudStack storage interfaces and/or deploying CloudStack with GlusterFS. If you have ideas for topics, please send them to cfp (at) gluster.org. Thanks! John Mark Walker

Re: VMware support broken in 4.2

I was just about to. I then recompiled a moment ago and it works. Not sure what I did. Maybe my first compile didn't turn on nonoss. On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: > Last blocker was https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4403and

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:33:33PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Looks like we have serious issues as of today in 4.2 (I've noticed > DevCloud2 not working and VMware support is broken) (aside from plenty of > blocker defects still to be completed). > > When do we start talking about how the 4.2

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

I still believe it is, but the VMware "problem" was my fault - I must not have had nonoss on b/c it works now. :) On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:33:33PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > Looks like we have serious issues as of today in 4.2 (I've

Re: VMware support broken in 4.2

It looks like you forgot to turn on nonoss and the API was not included in the package because of that. Kelven On 8/19/13 1:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >I was just about to. I then recompiled a moment ago and it works. Not sure >what I did. Maybe my first compile didn't turn on nonoss. > > >

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

"it is" meaning "premature" On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I still believe it is, but the VMware "problem" was my fault - I must not > have had nonoss on b/c it works now. :) > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Chip Childers > wrote:

Re: VMware support broken in 4.2

Yeah, Kelven - thanks :) Just sent an e-mail out about that. On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Kelven Yang wrote: > It looks like you forgot to turn on nonoss and the API was not included in > the package because of that. > > Kelven > > On 8/19/13 1:45 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: > > >I was ju

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

I think we need some kind of process in place to monitor the number of critical and blocker defects over the course of the release and make sure they're tapering off as we approach a RC build. My main comment about this release (this is the first CS release that I've participated in) is that I've

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

You can always look at the release dashboard https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12320942 This is exactly what has been happening Animesh has been sending this out fairly regularly. On 8/19/13 2:01 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >I think we need some kind of process

Review Request 13664: Fix for rhel 5 upgrade failure defect CLOUDSTACK-4370

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13664/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Repository: cloudstack-git Des

RE: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

If you look at the Release Dashboard daily trend graph of created v/s resolved you will see that we have tapered off significantly this week. I have been actively triaging and monitoring issues. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent:

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

Yeah, I agree it's been tapering down, but 150 or so in the last week doesn't really seem like a good place to end before building a RC. On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > You can always look at the release dashboard > https://issues.apache.

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

What are you thoughts, Animesh, on so many check ins in the final week, though? I'm just not familiar with a release working like that. Just curious to get your take on that. Do you feel we have a sufficient number of automated regression tests in place to catch any new issues? On Mon, Aug 19, 20

Re: Password requested when starting CS MS

Mike, CLOUDSTACK-1389 [1] was opened in February regarding this defect. To me, the biggest issue is that, in some scenarios, our daemons may require a tty because this script uses sudo. As a matter of general system etiquette, under no circumstances a daemon should never require user input or

Re: Password requested when starting CS MS

Yeah, I agree, John. Thanks for the info! On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > CLOUDSTACK-1389 [1] was opened in February regarding this defect. To me, > the biggest issue is that, in some scenarios, our daemons may require a tty > because this script uses sudo. A

Re: Review Request 13664: Fix for rhel 5 upgrade failure defect CLOUDSTACK-4370

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13664/#review25318 --- Commit 12f36b8dbbfd0f24ca35280215bbd6e797e985d1 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13664: Fix for rhel 5 upgrade failure defect CLOUDSTACK-4370

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13664/#review25320 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Frank Zhang On Aug. 19, 2013, 9:19 p.m., Ray

Re: Review Request 13664: Fix for rhel 5 upgrade failure defect CLOUDSTACK-4370

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13664/#review25319 --- Commit c09bbd316c1e2648fe0a07fffb81befc6bb93d31 in branch refs/heads

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding RAT checks to the default build

I think developers will anyway try to optimize their build time. This cannot be helped. The danger of course is that they 'git push' before running the full build. On 8/19/13 11:39 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hey all, > >Apache RAT 0.10 has been released, improving the speed for a RAT check >qui

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Toshiaki Hatano to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should

Re: Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review25322 --- Commit bc43784e013dd761f6b0ffad015584ac2f0bb750 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12364: Follow up fix for CLOUDSTACK-2777

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12364/#review25321 --- Commit a71f41401ba5c04f213f170e76856723655a9204 in branch refs/heads

[ACS42] QA Tasks that are not complete

Feature owners/Community members, Can you pl review these tasks and update them. If anyone is interested any of these features, can you pl review changes and see if these tasks can be closed. At the moment looks like JIRA is down. I will update once it is backup CLOUDSTACK-946CLOUDS

[ACS42] QA Subtasks that need to be resolved

Thanks all who have worked on these features. All but 2 are closed and following up on the 2 that are left over. Thanks /sudha From: Sudha Ponnaganti Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS42] QA Subtasks that need to be resolved Hi All, Following

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

Also, just to clarify a bit, what I'm mainly wondering about is if we can find a way to make sure our defects are not only trending downward once we get to a certain point in the release, but also approaching zero well in advance of a RC build. I know Animesh sends out regular updates and I defini

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

Congratulations Toshiaki! On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Toshiaki Hatano to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribut

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Toshiaki Hatano

Congrats Hatano-san! On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Toshiaki Hatano to become a committer and we are pleased > to announce that he has accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution t

4.2 S3 storage question

For S3 secondary storage, I'm wondering exactly what types of objects we are storing in S3: 1. templates - working. 2. snapshots - working. 3. vmsnapshots - not working (at least I don't see these going to s3) 4. volumes - n/a 5. other? How do files on the secondary storage staging area get clean

Secondary IP (4.1.1)

Greetings, Does anyone have experience in adding a secondary IP address (by way of altering the ebtables / security script) in basic networking mode (KVM) I have reviewed the script that is called to setup the ebtables, but if I alter that, I would believe that would open all ports on all my i

Agent State missing or Disconnected for SSVM

Hi, Can anyone tell me why SSVM would show up with a missing (a dash shown) or a Disconnected Agent State? I'm running in 4.2 (updated this morning). I figured I would try destroying SSVM and seeing what happened. Instead of being in the Disconnected State, its state is now missing (just a dash i

API doc build in 4.2

Hi All, Anyone know, how to build API doc build in 4.2 ? I tried with below command, but its failed + mvn -P developer -pl tools/apidoc clean install [INFO] Scanning for projects... [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache

Re: Agent State missing or Disconnected for SSVM

These are some of the print outs I'm seeing in the console (I'm not sure what the msg about i-3-6-VM means either because it shows up just fine in the GUI and looks like it's running fine in vSphere Client): INFO [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) No running sec

Re: API doc build in 4.2

https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/how-to-generate-cloudstack-api-documentation.html --David On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > Hi All, > > Anyone know, how to build API doc build in 4.2 ? > > I tried with below command, but its failed > > > + mvn -P developer -pl to

Instance Names

Greetings, I'm hoping someone can point me into the right direction, I have provisioned an instanced; however, I failed to create a name for it. Now in my list of instances, I see the UUID and not a 'custom' name so to speak. I'm sure this can easily be manipulated via the database, however; I

RE: [ACS42] QA Tasks that are not complete

Hi All, With initial cleanup below 11 items are remaining to be addressed. Some have owners and seem to be in progress - some still need contribution ( 5 features at the bottom of the list). Pl review features and see if you can pick up validation aspect. CLOUDSTACK-2800 CLOUDSTACK-1

Re: Instance Names

vm_instance On Monday, August 19, 2013, Maurice Lawler wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm hoping someone can point me into the right direction, I have > provisioned an instanced; however, I failed to create a name for it. Now in > my list of instances, I see the UUID and not a 'custom' name so to speak.

Re: API doc build in 4.2

Thanks David On 8/19/13 7:56 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/how-to-generate-cloudstack-api-documen >tation.html > >--David > >On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Rayees Namathponnan > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Anyone know, how to build API doc build in 4.2 ? >> >> I

Re: Secondary IP (4.1.1)

Well, it depends on how you edit the security_group.py script, it certainly wouldn't have to open up everything. You could add a one-liner in there that would pass the instance name to a separate script that looked up the vm in a table or database and applied extra rules (in post_default_network_ru

Re: Instance Names

You can edit the display name via API or the UI's edit button, but that only changes what shows up in the UI, not the name of the host itself (e.g. when you log in and do 'hostname'). To change the actual name in the vm_instance table, column 'name'. I'm not entirely sure what the repercussions of

RE: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

Mike The originally planned RC date was for 8/19. Striving for a specific date brings urgency and also helps keep time-based release. We are on a short time based release cycle of 4 months and had agreed to a three week RC after code freeze. If the releases ends up taking a long time to GA afte

Re: CloudStack 4.2 Quality Question

Hi Animesh, Thanks for the detailed response! First off, I want to make sure it doesn't seem like I don't appreciate your efforts in keeping track of issues over the course of a release as I certainly do. :) I was just a bit startled this week to see so many fixes going in at the "last minute" (

Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/ --- Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru and Prasanna Santhan

Re: Review Request 13633: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13633/#review25339 --- discarded for https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/ - Prasanna Santha

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2013, 6:18 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy

Re: Review Request 13680: CLOUDSTACK-3927, CLOUDSTACK-3928 Fix to add/remove NS devices in setupClass/tearDownClass

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13680/#review25340 --- test/integration/component/test_netscaler_lb.py

RE: [Doc] Developer Guide API Section for Review

Hi Radhika, New APIs introduced in 4.2 due to Object Storage feature: addImageStore createSecondaryStagingStore listImageStores listSecondaryStagingStores >From 4.2 onwards we will be using only above APIs to create and list any >secondary storage. We will not be supporting addS3 and listS3 AP