RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Congrats Vijay!! > > On Saturday 10 August 2013 10:30 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has > > asked Vijay Bhamidipati to become a committer and we are pleased to > > announce that they have accepted. > > > > Being a committer allows

Review Request 13491: Fix specifying db passwd in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13491/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Review Request 13469: CLOUDSTACK-3946 [KVM] [Zone Wide Primary Storages] migrateVolume is deleting the volume if the source and destination pool are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24983 --- Commit 4c193a1b6950932698270828a831fcd994c7ae4a in branch refs/heads

[ACS42] Listtemplates API respone without any Zone configuration

Hi, I have the setup with latest code. When I tried to view the list if templates without configuring zone , it is listing all the system vm templates and default cent OS templates . I have not observed this behavior before. Is it introduced intentionally or is It a issue with API response ?

Re: Review Request 13469: CLOUDSTACK-3946 [KVM] [Zone Wide Primary Storages] migrateVolume is deleting the volume if the source and destination pool are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24984 --- Commit be9dbcc2c5edb995c48558ea5e1a87c8d3012965 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13469: CLOUDSTACK-3946 [KVM] [Zone Wide Primary Storages] migrateVolume is deleting the volume if the source and destination pool are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24985 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 12, 2013, 6:48 a.m., R

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Congrats Vijay!

Re: Review Request 13469: CLOUDSTACK-3946 [KVM] [Zone Wide Primary Storages] migrateVolume is deleting the volume if the source and destination pool are same.

> On Aug. 12, 2013, 8:25 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote: > > Ship It! Thanks for reviewing and pushing the changes. - Rajesh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13469/#review24985

Re: Review Request 13491: Fix specifying db passwd in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13491/#review24987 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On Aug. 12, 2013, 7:14 a.m.,

Review Request 13493: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for ; and : keys for IE and chrome.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2909 Reposi

Re: Review Request 13491: Fix specifying db passwd in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

> On Aug. 12, 2013, 8:59 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! master 062eab8df44ba76dad28800599d87ef131bb0bec 4.2 9d053d04ecd08ca3ae7cbf6d6530cf96c3007687 - Hugo --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https:

Re: Review Request 13491: Fix specifying db passwd in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

Thanks! I'm going for the smallest patch of the year prize (1 character). :) On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Hugo Trippaers < htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/13491/ > > On August 12th, 2013, 8:5

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Congrats Vijay! 2013/8/12 Ian Duffy > Congrats Vijay! >

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Congrats! :D > -Original Message- > From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] > Sent: maandag 12 augustus 2013 11:12 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati > > Congrats Vijay! > > > 2013/8/12 Ian Duffy > > > Congrats Vijay! > >

RE: Review Request 13491: Fix specifying db passwd in cloud-install-sys-tmplt

:D This is going to be hard to beat unless we start counting the changes in bits when indivdual characters change. Cheers, Hugo From: Dave Cahill [mailto:dcah...@midokura.com] Sent: maandag 12 augustus 2013 11:05 To: Hugo Trippaers Cc: cloudstack Subject: Re: Review Request 13491: Fix specify

Change history lost for upgrade sql script schema-412to420.sql

I noticed that the upgrade sql script (earlier used to be schema-410to420.sql) has been renamed and in the process all the change history is lost. Can we ensure as a process to do a proper git file rename instead of creating a new file so that the changes history is not lost? In this case is the

Re: [ACS42] Listtemplates API respone without any Zone configuration

We mark all the system and default templates as downloaded and during template sync we remove the template entries that are not there. I guess this we have introduced recently, this may cause listing all the templates. Thanks Harikrishna On 12-Aug-2013, at 1:46 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi, >

Re: Review Request 13318: Update documentation for LDAP authentication

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13318/#review24989 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On Aug. 6, 2013, 8:45 a.m

Re: Review Request 13472: make apache server listen on all the ipaliases to provide access to meta-data.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13472/ --- (Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 10:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vi

RE: Change history lost for upgrade sql script schema-412to420.sql

See if this helps https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo?p=cloudstack.git;a=history;f=setup/db/db/schema-410to420.sql;h=60335318c7b792a401cab36b8b456e652d47f2a6;hb=e61a38087d158da51f7b945d16e4749a83512ab5 Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Koushik Das [mailto:

Re: Review Request 13472: make apache server listen on all the ipaliases to provide access to meta-data.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13472/ --- (Updated Aug. 12, 2013, 10:42 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vi

RE: Change history lost for upgrade sql script schema-412to420.sql

This is fine but is it possible to bring this history to the renamed file? Also one has to know that there existed a file 410to420.sql. > -Original Message- > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 4:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Su

Re: Review Request 12941: [GSoC] refactor gre controller

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12941/#review24990 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On Aug. 1, 2013, 1:41 a.m., t

Re: Review Request 12941: [GSoC] refactor gre controller

> On Aug. 12, 2013, 11:30 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! Targeted to the sdnextensions branch. Commit id : 0d6125f36449b1fcbbc5d296496c4a01f2208fc4 - Hugo --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https:

Re: Review Request 12623: CLOUDSTACK-2328: Linux native VXLAN support on KVM hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12623/#review24992 --- Ship it! I'm also OK with this patch. Documentation is pending, but

Review Request 13495: CLOUDSTACK-4189: [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4189 Reposi

Re: Master build failure

Prassana, What is broken? Do you have some details (just got back from some time off, so i might have missed a few mails) By the way on the subject on gerrit, we had this discussion before. If anyone wants to refresh the arguments from last time: http://markmail.org/message/inerurmjtc6v57ba C

running BVT locally

H, (Prasanna?) Can I run the integration tests at Schuberg Philis' and what do I need to do so? If there is document on how to set up these (and smoke tests) can I get a link? You may know; I want to get some work on vpc gateways on sdn accepted. regards,

more review feedback for 12849?

Is there more to say about https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ ? Is it commit worthy? or if not what is missing?

Re: Review Request 13493: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for ; and : keys for IE and chrome.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/#review24996 --- Commit 86d2e8bdae1e7edef013a9cf01dbf2dee7528531 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13495: CLOUDSTACK-4189: [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/#review24995 --- Commit 2eceb7dcbe767f0f8a6cc3fb15655fb10d330406 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13493: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for ; and : keys for IE and chrome.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/#review24998 --- Commit ead3b848d5652b4b8b2619e617af2bb9f025fc26 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13495: CLOUDSTACK-4189: [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/#review24997 --- Commit 5510bca9e5223730dc469b443b50d26550533360 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13493: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for ; and : keys for IE and chrome.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13493/#review25000 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 12, 2013, 9:02 a.m., S

Re: Review Request 13495: CLOUDSTACK-4189: [UI] In multi zone setup, dedicating a single zone to a domain, shows other zones dedicated as well

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13495/#review24999 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 12, 2013, 12:28 p.m.,

Re: Review Request 13472: make apache server listen on all the ipaliases to provide access to meta-data.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13472/#review25001 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Jayapal Reddy On Aug. 12, 2013, 10:42 a.m.,

Review Request 13496: changes for guest vm password script for parallel vm deployment

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13496/ --- Review request for cloudstack, anthony xu, Abhinandan Prateek, Chiradeep Vittal,

Re: Review Request 13490: [DOC] add document - custom cpu model for kvm guest.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13490/#review25003 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Wei Zhou On Aug. 12, 2013, 6:57 a.m., Jijun

Re: Review Request 13490: [DOC] add document - custom cpu model for kvm guest.

> On Aug. 12, 2013, 1:37 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote: > > Ship It! committed: 8d53887cec514e1eeed899e4d6b6465b02aa39a3 in master, and df1756b6197f42abff6a01c55a1b1cbfc9d83eb5 in 4.2 - Wei --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To repl

Did we already started developing support VxLAN?

Hi guys My company has a project to delivery support of VxLAN network , using CloudStack. I know the version 4.x does not support vxlan. So I wonder what the plan to support vxlan network . We have a team about 5 guys in charge of developing the feature, So if there is anybody in this thin

Re: Did we already started developing support VxLAN?

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:44 AM, 曹建林 wrote: > > Hi guys > > My company has a project to delivery support of VxLAN network , using > CloudStack. > I know the version 4.x does not support vxlan. > So I wonder what the plan to support vxlan network . > > We have a team about 5 guys in charge of de

Re: Master build failure

Apart from false failures because of wrongly targetted branch I saw the job fail the build on master for patches that were to be applied on master. Haven't seen the job reporting in the last few days however. Have you started on the fix for the branch mapping? If not - I could start taking a look

Re: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11942/#review25005 --- Hi Reviewers, Any feedback on this patch? :) - Laszlo Hornyak

[Responsiveness report] users 2013w32

only two unanswerred mails on users last week: http://markmail.org/message/rxl5mwhj2xgmm24e Does CS support Xen XCP? by Jason Pavao http://markmail.org/message/pgchyajufif5ylwi Why can't I choose a different network offering? by Nux! regards, Daan

Re: understanding cloudstack networking

sounds great Ron, I'm sure I am not the guy you need for this but I'll keep an eye on it. The 'someone who actually knows what it s supposed to say' is bound to be around on this list or dev. regards, Daan On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote: > I have been reading and correcting

Re: Password requested when starting CS MS

does this only happen on a new installation/clean db? Sounds like admin account not enabled yet. Daan On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Mike Tutkowski > Date: Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:19 AM > Subject: Password requested when st

Re: Question about GUI refresh logic

Mike, expunging is not a reply to an api call, destroying is. I have been wondering about this as well but I think I just came up with the answer (cs gurus:}?) regards, On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I'm curious when I should expect the GUI to refresh and when I

[Responsiveness report] dev 2013w32

http://markmail.org/message/jrgonqu5lmgscgnl Deleting affinity group while it's still in use by Gaurav Aradhye http://markmail.org/message/3brunuewgccrfmfy Upgrading form 4.1.0 to 4.1.1 success; some issues with console proxy by France regards,

Re: Question about GUI refresh logic

I would imagine that pane to refresh every so often, reflecting against the view. meaning after a vm is expunged, it should disappear from that view. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Mike, > > expunging is not a reply to an api call, destroying is. I have been > wondering

13317

Can committer review https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/, please? regards, Daan

Re: running BVT locally

Daan, This is possible. All the tests are under test/integration. test/integration/smoke -> bvt test/integration/component -> feature specific tests I'll assume you have cloudstack setup manually and just want to fire all the tests against this deployment. This could be your laptop from where yo

Re: 13317

Did you attach a patch to this? I see nothing. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Can committer review https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/, please? > > regards, > Daan Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Re: Password requested when starting CS MS

I got around this by running the CS server as root. Would that be an option for you, Mike? On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:19 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > does this only happen on a new installation/clean db? Sounds like > admin account not enabled yet. > > Daan > > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Mike

Re: 13317

yes, it contains _upgradeMap.put("4.1.1", new DbUpgrade[] { new Upgrade410to420(), new Upgrade420to430() }); to add to the DatabaseUpgradeChecker Daan On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Did you attach a patch to this? I see nothing. > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013, at 1

Re: running BVT locally

A bit of a stupid question, I guess On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: ... > I'll assume you have cloudstack setup manually and just want to fire > all the tests against this deployment. This could be your laptop from > where you have your management server running. Just o

Re: running BVT locally

On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 06:20:58PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > A bit of a stupid question, I guess > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > ... > > I'll assume you have cloudstack setup manually and just want to fire > > all the tests against this deployment. This could

Re: [ACS42] Listtemplates API respone without any Zone configuration

This seems introduced by storage refactoring where we have gotten rid of previous direct sql to use db view to search for templates. Please file a bug for this. Thanks -min On 8/12/13 1:16 AM, "Sailaja Mada" wrote: >Hi, > >I have the setup with latest code. When I tried to view the list if >te

Re: Password requested when starting CS MS

Yeah, it seems to only happen when I have a fresh install. I also notice - in this situation - that I get a password prompt in my console when trying to upload an ISO for the first time. Chris - I once wondered about running the CS MS as root, but someone warned me not to because it might cover u

Re: understanding cloudstack networking

I'm just going to chime in on this. What we need to put together is a primer. Our docs work fairly well and are CloudStack centric, which I see as most peoples issue. On the topic of networking, building a cloud requires a very strong understanding of core Linux networking, which is technically

Re: running BVT locally

Prasanna, I checked out the marvin and tst setuyp pages. I have marvin $ python Python 2.7.3 (default, Dec 18 2012, 13:50:09) [GCC 4.5.3] on cygwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import marvin; >>> marvin >>> but still $ nosetests --with-marvin --ma

Re: understanding cloudstack networking

One last note. As far as stability is concerned... 4.1.x is the recommended build, and many of us(myself included) are running our production on 4.0.2 which is rock solid for all standard features. Thanks - Original Message - From: "Kelcey Jamison Damage" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Review Request 13499: [GSoC] Add staticNat support to GRE controller

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13499/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien Goasguen and Hugo Trippaers. Repositor

Re: Password requested when starting CS MS

Mike, If you create a cloudstack-management package and run "cloudstack-setup-management" before starting the management server you can run the MS as user cloud without experiencing these issues... It sets up the correct privileges. Pedro. On Aug 12, 2013, at 9:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:

Re: Review Request 12623: CLOUDSTACK-2328: Linux native VXLAN support on KVM hypervisor

> On Aug. 12, 2013, 11:38 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > I'm also OK with this patch. Documentation is pending, but i'm fine with > > committing this to master. It needs a rebase to the latest state of master, > > but after that we should commit this. OK Chiradeep? OK. - Chiradeep --

[RESULTS] (Was: Re: [VOTE] Update by-laws: non-technical decisions and other minor changes)

3 +1 votes, and the vote passes. I will update the by-laws now. Thanks! On 6 August 2013 20:06, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > +1 > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 1:58 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.or

Re: [RESULTS] (Was: Re: [VOTE] Update by-laws: non-technical decisions and other minor changes)

Ignore this. Unfortunately, we only have 2 +1 votes from the PMC. I am going to try to get a third. Sorry for the confusion. On 12 August 2013 18:55, Noah Slater wrote: > 3 +1 votes, and the vote passes. I will update the by-laws now. > > Thanks! > > > On 6 August 2013 20:06, Musayev, Ilya wro

Re: [VOTE] Update by-laws: non-technical decisions and other minor changes

Bumping the thread for a 3rd +1 vote from the PMC. Our by-laws stipulate we need 3 +1 PMC votes. Thanks. On 5 August 2013 22:43, Noah Slater wrote: > Hi dev, > > I have some more by-law changes to propose. This is essentially round 2 > for these changes. I incorporated feedback from the last t

Re: 13317

I get The following: >From badb31ba4f5b1ed833a4509bd65a02d2977e41dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daan Hoogland Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:26:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] db upgrade 4.1.1 -> master --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 inserti

Re: Password requested when starting CS MS

Ah, thanks, Pedro On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Pedro Roque Marques < pedro.r.marq...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mike, > If you create a cloudstack-management package and run > "cloudstack-setup-management" before starting the management server you > can run the MS as user cloud without experienci

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Thanks Rohit, Bharat, Sanjay, Abhinav, Hari, Issac, Radhika, Animesh, Likitha, Saksham, Anshul, Krishnan, Sadhu, Ian, Wei, Hugo! ^_^ Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 2:13 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apa

Build failure in 4.2 with Midokura Midonet

Has anyone else been seeing this? [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Midokura Midonet ... FAILURE [1.864s] It doesn't happen all the time, but I've seen it three times in a row now. I assume it's a test failure, but I haven't looked into it much. -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Develo

Re: Build failure in 4.2 with Midokura Midonet

Often times if I do a clean, then install, it fixes the problem. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Has anyone else been seeing this? > > [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Midokura Midonet ... FAILURE [1.864s] > > It doesn't happen all th

Template Folder Path (KVM/Libvirt)

Hi all, I've hit a problem that I have been chewing on for the past few hours. A few months ago I changed the local storage path naming convention (examples below) and updated the corresponding records in the cloudstack database manually. This works great until old templates are used. I understand

Re: Template Folder Path (KVM/Libvirt)

just dawned on me, you might have to forget the storage pools (if no vm's are running) on the hosts. Then reconnect the kvm agents (by restarting the service on the hosts or from cloudstack-> force reconnect command). they should get programmed correctly! On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Marty Sw

Re: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11942/#review25036 --- Ship it! This is very straightforward patch. Java filesystem api is

Re: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

Laszlo, I was only concerned about the lack of asserts in the original test case. That has been updated, so it looks good to me now. Thanks, -John On Aug 12, 2013, at 5:43 PM, "Frank Zhang" wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically gen

Re: IPv6 plan - questions

has there been any further discussion that I might have missed around ipv6 in VPC? On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I am glad it fits your need. That's our target. :) > > --Sheng > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: >> Hi Sheng, >> >> Thanks for

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4149) [upgrade][2.2.13 -> 2.2.14 -> 4.2][KVM] When we try to upgrade the KVM agent from 2.2.14 to 4.2 using the "U" option in install.sh script, management server al

Copying Hugo > -Original Message- > From: frank zhang (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:08 PM > To: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4149) [upgrade][2.2.13 -> > 2.2.14 -> 4.2][KVM] When we try to upgrade the KV

make cloud-daemonize obsolete using cloudstack-agent instead of cloudstack-management

Hi Hugo: I have an issue needing to double confirm with you. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4149 In short, we used to make old cloud-daemonize obsolete using cloudstack-management that makes it unnecessarily installed during upgrading KVM agent(cloud-agent) on h

Re: Review Request 13459: cloudstack-3759: deployVM with state set to be stopped, attach volume to it. The volume should not be created.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13459/#review25039 --- please update your test result - Frank Zhang On Aug. 10, 2013, 12

Re: Build failure in 4.2 with Midokura Midonet

Hi Mike, If you get a failure like this, Maven should also print out more details on the cause - could you paste those? 4.2 was building fine for me yesterday, but I'll take a look and see if something has changed since. Thanks for the heads up, Dave. 2013年8月13日火曜日 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...

RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

Is this really needed for 4.2? 4.2 is in limited updates and only blocker/critical bug fixes and doc and test updates are allowed. All commits to 4.2 should have associated BUG id. > -Original Message- > From: Frank Zhang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Frank > Zhang > S

RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

Emm. Actually it's not a blocker or even critical for 4.2. Though I thought it's not harm, if needs I can revert it from 4.2 but still keep it in master. > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:37 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang;

RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

We should keep it for master > -Original Message- > From: Frank Zhang > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:40 PM > To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell > Cc: Laszlo Hornyak > Subject: RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup > > Emm. Actually it's not a blocke

RE: Did we already started developing support VxLAN?

Hello Mr. 曹, I'm currently working on VXLAN specifically to KVM with Linux Bridge (not OVS) and Multicast mode. I think some network plugin also supports (or will support) VXLAN as tunneling protocol. For what environment (KVM, Xen, VMware (Nexus 1kV maybe?), etc.) and which type of VXLAN (Mu

RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

ProcessUtilTest is missing Apache License Header and failing rat-test > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:40 PM > To: Frank Zhang; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; John Burwell > Cc: Laszlo Hornyak > Subject: RE

RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

I reverted it from 4.2. now is adding the Apache header to master > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 5:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Frank Zhang; John Burwell > Cc: Laszlo Hornyak > Subject: RE: Review Request 11942: ProcessUtil cleanup

Re: Build failure in 4.2 with Midokura Midonet

Hi Mike, I'm not seeing any failures with the latest 4.2. It sounds like the failure you were seeing was intermittent, so if it crops up again, just paste in some more logs and I'll take a look. Thanks, Dave. On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi Mike, > > If you get a fai

Re: Review Request 13496: changes for guest vm password script for parallel vm deployment

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13496/#review25048 --- #1. if you add fork to the TCP_LISTEN option of SOCAT, then it will

Re: more review feedback for 12849?

I kind of lost the plot (perhaps because I was missing for a few weeks). I didn't get why we need the change (or perhaps it is reverting an older change?) On 8/12/13 5:47 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >Is there more to say about >https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ >? > >Is it commit worthy? or if

[ACS 42] Closing resolved defects

Hi All, There are still 200+ critical and blocker defects pending to be validated. Even if a small %age of these gets rejected, that would cause quality issues for release. Pl make sure to close these ASAP. First column shows Total defects and second column shows Blocker/Critical. You can prior

Quick ISO-related question

Hi, When you spin up a VM based on an ISO, you have to specify the hypervisor. Just curious, but why does the user pick this? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud

RE: HyperV support in 4.2

Alena/Murali, Can one of you review and cleanup Hyper-V specific entries?? Thanks /sudha -Original Message- From: Donal Lafferty Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 3:40 PM To: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers Cc: Sudha Ponnaganti; Murali Reddy Subject: RE: HyperV

Re: Quick ISO-related question

One reason is that unlike the hypervisor specific templates, there's no such information predetermined. Consider a cloudstack zone with both xen and KVM clusters. User needs to choose which hypervisor to deploy in. Its also important since the resulting install from iso will be in the chosen hyperv

RE: HyperV support in 4.2

Sudha, Devdeep had removed the HyperV config yesterday. Thanks Rajesh Battala -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 8:13 AM To: Donal Lafferty; Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers Cc: Mura

Re: Quick ISO-related question

Yeah, I guess I thought the end user wasn't generally concerned about hypervisors...that CloudStack typically handles that, but maybe CloudStack is more responsible for handling which cluster of the same hypervisor type to place a new VM on. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to d1b4a8d

So this fixes the specific problem referred to, but it also leaves some crud around. Historically (2.2.x and 3.0.x) -daemonize was required by -console-proxy -usage, and -agent. At a minimum this likely means that you'll need to add a similar obsoletes to -usage, or folks with -usage installed will

RE: [ACS42] Listtemplates API respone without any Zone configuration

Thanks Min. Jira ticket @ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4277 Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:16 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS42] Listtemplates API respone without

Review Request 13523: 7 New tests for affinity groups

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13523/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Prasanna Santhanam. Reposit

Question: Has VolumeManager and VolumeManagerImpl been refactored/removed in master

Hi, I was curious to learn more about VolumeManager and VolumeManagerImpl in master. They appear to be gone and I was interested in learning how this code has been refactored. Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7

  1   2   >