Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24902 --- Commit 6d86af85baa57bb20ec9642cbd1cd82c002dcfef in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24903 --- Commit dacc4e1a4f7dc3763f16acc2cddd936fdc2fbd42 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24904 --- Commit 64bb7007053d004fe7a8ac3b610e20df69f16bab in branch refs/heads

Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

My point is that all might be a lot and admin might want to filter some classification he made using a naming convention, by typing it in a filter box On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Daan > > The point is to see everything ROOT Admin and Domain Admin are entitled to > see

Re: Review Request 11626: Automation: Memory limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11626/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 7:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, sailaja mada,

Re: Master build failure

I have seen people ignoring a failure, but they had (good?) reason. The build has been failing for other reason then their code. another point is that the present implementation doesn't retry a build, afaik. and it should retry after each new upload, not regarding whether it failed or succeeded be

Re: Review Request 13428: CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/#review24907 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 8, 2013, 12:25 p.m., S

Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

On 08/09/2013 02:05 AM, Edison Su wrote: Hi All, For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, we set the io limit on kvm host as: I think you mean 200Mbit/s? From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it says above unit is KB/s, bu

Re: Review Request 13428: CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/#review24908 --- Commit c18492509692d590aa72133a3974512c7dff119e in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/#review24909 --- Commit 8f3be62cbe11fb71e817d2e538de8c7d4e9bcbd8 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/#review24910 --- Can you submit an updated patch to apply it on master. Patch applied

Re: Review Request 13428: CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/#review24911 --- Commit d6ebcd1924ad6fb0638a22386c921399fc68ae2d in branch refs/heads

Review Request 13438: CLOUDSTACK-2448: XenServer Guest OS Mapping Corrections.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13438/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Devdeep Singh, and Likitha Sh

Review Request 13439: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and ".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Likitha Shetty. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Review Request 13440: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13440/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Likitha Shetty. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Re: Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

> On Aug. 9, 2013, 9:56 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote: > > Can you submit an updated patch to apply it on master. Patch applied > > successfully on 4.2 but is failing on master. I have sent a seperate request for master branch, closing this one. - Sanjay

Re: Review Request 13438: CLOUDSTACK-2448: XenServer Guest OS Mapping Corrections.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13438/#review24913 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:07 a.m., S

Re: Review Request 13424: CLOUDSTACK-4123: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: On Adding VMWare Cluster to the Setup, 3.0.6 System VM Template for VMWare is downloaded instead of 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13424/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 11:50 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kav

Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

My testing result is same to what Wido mentioned. 2013/8/9 Edison Su > Hi All, > For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, > we set the io limit on kvm host as: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it say

Review Request 13441: CLOUDSTACK-3850: CPU cap should be per VM not per VCPU

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13441/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3850 Reposito

OVS

Hello I try to setup Cloudstack with OpenVSwitch, but SSVM and the proxy vm can't reach internet. I think it's a problem with cloud0 bridge in OVS. My config is: /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties network.bridge.type=openvswitch libvirt.vif.driver=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.OvsVifDriv

Re: Review Request 13439: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and ".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/#review24914 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Likitha Shetty On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:16 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 13438: CLOUDSTACK-2448: XenServer Guest OS Mapping Corrections.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13438/#review24916 --- Commit f168df3472b2b8415dcc397f2fdb5c9ef05f48fd in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13439: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and ".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/#review24915 --- Commit 822991a0e94b8128082e0cf884f00049be0794ae in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13440: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13440/#review24917 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Likitha Shetty On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:32 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 13438: CLOUDSTACK-2448: XenServer Guest OS Mapping Corrections.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13438/#review24920 --- Commit d95e3dacd6ab6dba3d6e3bff0b0b9b0dc462648a in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13439: CLOUDSTACK-2909: Fix for EN-US keys. Keys are ' and ".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13439/#review24919 --- Commit 7c708e00d24d1b7d79675e9044ffcea96a58a54e in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13440: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13440/#review24918 --- Commit 5c36766ad4f96fe2e8096f9519568deb9dc8c975 in branch refs/heads

RE: [DISCUSS] Binary diff and hot patch

I guess no way to do this :( > -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 5:51 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS] Binary diff and hot patch > > I was wondering if we can use binary diffs to hotpatch ACS. >

resourcecount.check.interval

Hi List. Today a number of my hosts stop reporting disk space free , and therefore VMS will not launch on the given host due to space allocation exceptions. I knew i needed to force resources recalculation somehow , so I've changed this: resourcecount.check.interval = 60 and that seemed to do th

Re: Review Request 12131: CLOUDSTACK-3215 Cannot Deploy VM when using S3 object store without NFS Cache

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12131/#review24922 --- Commit 6b905528559f1f1b6ae472edc550c31d59e8461d in branch refs/heads

Re: resourcecount.check.interval

the updateresourcecount api call seem interesting when u combine it with these resource ids: 56 @Parameter(name=ApiConstants.RESOURCE_TYPE, type=CommandType.INTEGER, description= "Type of resource to update. If specifies valid values are 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. If not specified w

Re: OVS

Is this 4.1/4.2/master? On 8/9/13 6:13 AM, "Thomas Schneider" wrote: >Hello > >I try to setup Cloudstack with OpenVSwitch, but SSVM and the proxy vm >can't reach internet. >I think it's a problem with cloud0 bridge in OVS. > >My config is: > >/etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties >network.brid

Re: OVS

this is 4.1 Le 09/08/2013 18:47, Chiradeep Vittal a écrit : > Is this 4.1/4.2/master? > > > On 8/9/13 6:13 AM, "Thomas Schneider" wrote: > >> Hello >> >> I try to setup Cloudstack with OpenVSwitch, but SSVM and the proxy vm >> can't reach internet. >> I think it's a problem with cloud0 bridge in

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review24925 --- api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

I seem to remember that the command line options were different and there are calls had explicit hard coded path to /usr/bin/vhd-util that were failing if I placed the new vhd-util in that location. When we bring a new XenServer online and download to /opt/xensource, I don't think we remove the

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

> On Aug. 9, 2013, 5:23 p.m., Toshiaki Hatano wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 172 > > > > > > Why don't we merge getValueFrom() and getValue()? > > > > public String getValue(URI uri)

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

> On Aug. 9, 2013, 5:23 p.m., Toshiaki Hatano wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 172 > > > > > > Why don't we merge getValueFrom() and getValue()? > > > > public String getValue(URI uri)

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

Yes. Do not replace the original vhd-util. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Soheil Eizadi [mailto:seiz...@infoblox.com] > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 10:30 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: Quick Question about System VM problem > > I seem to remember that the comm

RE: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

I see your point and I agree if we can implement flexible filtering! > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:07 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based > on their permision

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:41 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling > > > > On 08/09/2013 02:05 AM, Edison Su wrote: > > Hi All, > > For basic network, the io li

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

There is another issue, there is no way to change io speed from UI for system vm's guest network(nic2) in basic network model, which will impact all the template downloading in a negatively way. We'd better don't throttle system vm's io speed by default, or at least give admin the way to change

Offline next week

For network part, please refer to Anthony, Alena, and Chiradeep. Please refer to Animesh for emergency. Thanks! --Sheng

Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf > > Of Rohit Yadav > > Sent: 02 August 2013 22:43 > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simp

Re: OVS

I haven't tried it, but have you looked at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/15XlAQ On 8/9/13 10:23 AM, "Thomas Schneider" wrote: >this is 4.1 > >Le 09/08/2013 18:47, Chiradeep Vittal a écrit : >> Is this 4.1/4.2/master? >> >> >> On 8/9/13 6:13 AM, "Thomas Schneider" >>wrote: >> >>> Hello >

HyperV support in 4.2

Hi Chip, Are we planning to officially support HyperV in 4.2, or is it pushed to the next release? I'm seeing HyperV listed in the values for "hypervisor.list" Global config (the list of hypervisors CS supports) - meaning that the code is in - but the bug below claims that there is no HyperV in

CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

Hi folks, Looks like the previous thread failed to capture attention on the dev ML. I'm going forward with some decisions so as to move fast and as per our philosophy to ask for forgiveness later than just waste time on too much process polling now. Here are some proposals; - The version model w

Re: HyperV support in 4.2

No, not supported. On 8/9/13 2:02 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Hi Chip, > >Are we planning to officially support HyperV in 4.2, or is it pushed to >the next release? I'm seeing HyperV listed in the values for >"hypervisor.list" Global config (the list of hypervisors CS supports) - >meaning th

RE: HyperV support in 4.2

I see Donal's patch is pending in review board https://reviews.apache.org/r/12519/ but the branch mentioned is master. Donal can you confirm if this is for 4.2 as well. Alena here is another thread that has more context http://markmail.org/thread/asg62idkvrnn6ba7 > -Original Message

RE: HyperV support in 4.2

Donal if it is not for 4.2 then can you move this ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-999 out of 4.2. Copying Sudha as well > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 2:16 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers > Cc: Don

Re: HyperV support in 4.2

Animesh and Chiradeep, thanks for confirming. Donal, I see that there are some references to HypervisorType.Hyperv exist in 4.2 branch. We have to remove them all + all the type itself + global configs that I've mentioned, from 4.2 -Alena. From: Animesh Chaturvedi mailto:animesh.chaturv...@ci

[DISCUSS] Releasing cloudmonkey 5.0.0

Hi folks, I've uploaded a new cloudmonkey tarball on pypi channel[1] using the latest git HEAD 68d5fef065b882accae86a2e4cd327f7779fddb7 from the new repository [2]. I've already proposed in another thread why we should start with 5.x but any suggestions welcome. I request if someone could help re

Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3858 Reposito

Re: [Discuss] Making CloudMonkey simpler to use for admin tasks

On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:42 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Donal Lafferty > wrote: > >> I needed a different configuration than DevCloud provided, so I turned to >> CloudMonkey to automate setup of my test environment. >> >> This led to a blog on automating with CloudMonk

Re: Review Request 12811: CLOUDSTACK-3612: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/#review24953 --- Commit 52e10d6b202e99e2e4a24e859f2a3e16339875d7 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12811: CLOUDSTACK-3612: 3.0.6 to ASF 4.2 Upgrade: Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12811/#review24952 --- Commit ad508b7232e28ca02683bd8b60268cb87c71e36a in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/#review24954 --- Commit 90457edb416198dcb7a67e7009c42302c0272f18 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/#review24955 --- Commit e80fdcda9452fc08cf227f50634e1c144af856cf in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13453: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3858, 2.2.14 does not contions symbolic link to create sever.xml, we need to check both file or symbolic link exist or not in saved folder

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13453/#review24956 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Frank Zhang On Aug. 9, 2013, 11:09 p.m., Ray

CloudStack source which is on SourceForge but which should be with Apache?

The admin and install guides recommend pulling files from SourceForge. Specifically: SSH Key Gen script: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/cloudstack/SSH%20Key%20Gen%20Script/cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in?r=http%3A%2F%2Fsourceforge.net%2Fprojects%2Fcloudstack%2Ffiles%2FSSH%2520Key%2520Gen

Re: Review Request 12500: fix CLOUDSTACK-3495 xenserver 6.1 and 6.2 can not open vnc console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/#review24957 --- Commit f39937223310cffde9308b16f26157f2e883d018 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12500: fix CLOUDSTACK-3495 xenserver 6.1 and 6.2 can not open vnc console

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12500/#review24958 --- Commit 4333209af36ca001ca88935ddf2b4d981cc0150e in branch refs/heads

Review Request 13459: cloudstack-3759: deployVM with state set to be stopped, attach volume to it. The volume should not be created.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13459/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: cloudstack-3759 Reposito

Review Request 13460: VPC test case TestVMLifeCycleSharedNwVPC need to disabl, since its failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su, Frank Zhang, and Sheng Yang. Reposito

[DISCUSS][4.2] Using full-clone by default for VMware deployment

To better integrate with VMware features like storage live migration, fully utilize third-party integrations from vSphere eco-system, I'd like to change our default volume deploy mode from linked-clone to full-clone in VMware. If there is no objections, I'll make the change and starting from 4.

Re: Review Request 13460: VPC test case TestVMLifeCycleSharedNwVPC need to disabl, since its failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13460/#review24962 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On Aug. 10, 2013, 12:53 a.m., Raye

Re: CloudMonkey 5.0 (was Re: CloudMonkey's new home)

+1 move forward. On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi folks, > > Looks like the previous thread failed to capture attention on the dev ML. > I'm going forward with some decisions so as to move fast and as per our > philosophy to ask for forgiveness later than just waste time on

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Vijay Bhamidipati to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes an

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Congratulations, Vijay. -min On 8/9/13 10:00 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >Vijay >Bhamidipati to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that >they have >accepted. > >Being a committer allows many contributors

Re: Master build failure

The jenkins integration is broken atm. If someone has time to look into it please send a pull request with the fix here: https://github.com/CloudStack-extras/reviewboard-tools/issues/2 On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 10:35:01AM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi, > > Alex - sounds good, let's raise the Gerri

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:53:55AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4082 > > Not sure who to assign it to ... so I chose you :) I wish vhd-util had versioning in it. But I can't see anywhere within CloudStack where we invoke the -S (capital) option.

RE: [DISCUSS][4.2] Using full-clone by default for VMware deployment

+1 for this proposal to make full-clone as default. -Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com] > Sent: 10 August 2013 06:37 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [DISCUSS][4.2] Using full-clone by default for VMware deployment > > To better int

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Hearty Congratulations, Vijay! Well deserved. Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: 10 August 2013 10:31 > To: CloudStack Dev > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati

Congratulations Vijay. Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2013 10:32 AM To: CloudStack Dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vijay Bhamidipati The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack ha