Resize Data Volumes feature Test Plan

Hi, Attached is the proposed test plan for Data Volumes Resize feature [http://bugs-ccp.citrix.com/browse/CS-17497 ]. Please provide your comments and suggestions on the same. Regards, Pavan ResizeDataVolumes_TestPlan.xlsx Description: ResizeDataVolumes_TestPlan.xlsx

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)

Hi, -1 due to the opened issue : - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2895 Le 26/07/2013 05:42, Marcus Sorensen a écrit : > +1 binding, CentOS 6.4. Used devcloud-kvm advanced zone marvin config, > started up a VPC, registered a template, started a VM. Tested NFS, > local, CLVM prim

Re: Review Request 12961: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12961/#review23916 --- Review 12961 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Review Request 12962: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fix params of AffinityGroup.delete API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12962/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3594 R

Re: Review Request 12948: Affinity Groups: Adding new test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12948/#review23917 --- I changed quite a bit of this test suite last night. Can you please

Re: Review Request 12962: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fix params of AffinityGroup.delete API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12962/#review23918 --- I've changed the library method to only accept delete by id last nig

Re: Review Request 12962: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fix params of AffinityGroup.delete API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12962/#review23919 --- Review 12962 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Review Request 12937: CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12937/ --- (Updated July 26, 2013, 8:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meht

Re: Review Request 12937: CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare

> On July 26, 2013, 6:45 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > engine/schema/src/com/cloud/vm/VMInstanceVO.java, line 149 > > > > > > we need to start showing it in response as well I have changed the uservm view table to get

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review23920 --- test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py

Re: Review Request 12759: CLOUDSTACK-3669: Bringing down the dynamic scalable check (for VM whether it has xstools or vmware tools in it) to the management layer.

> On July 26, 2013, 6:14 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 1192 > > > > > > You should just say tools not installed. Can be vmware as well right Fixed this in following

RE: Build failure on master...anyone know what this is?

AFAIK, using 'mvn clean install' to build master is deprecated. See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch#Howtobuildonmasterbranch-BuildingCloudStack for updated instructions. DL > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@cit

help submitting to review board.

I'm trying to submit my first patch to review board... however it says I need at least one reviewer or group. I can't seem to add anything under Reviewers. For Groups, what should I add? The patch is against the ConfigurationManager. Thanks! Tom. -- Cloudian KK - http://www.cloudian.com/get-star

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

> On July 25, 2013, 6:25 a.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 99 > > > > > > Please check the below configurable option for egress firewall rules. > > > > http

Review Request 12963: Fix some simple typos in ConfigurationManager

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

RE: help submitting to review board.

In the groups, use "cloudstack" This should be enough to create the request. Thanks Rajesh Battala > -Original Message- > From: Thomas O'Dowd [mailto:tpod...@cloudian.com] > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 2:34 PM > To: Cloudstack DEV > Subject: help submitting to review board. > > I'm try

Re: help submitting to review board.

That worked a charm! Thanks. I also *blush* just re-read the instructions on this page: http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-committer.html Thanks again. Tom. On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 09:06 +, Rajesh Battala wrote: > In the groups, use "cloudstack" > This should be enough to create the req

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

> On July 26, 2013, 8:46 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 253 > > > > > > I think we already have alike mechanism for executing inside user VM? > > Check get_ssh_cli

Open up ports beyond 80/443/8080 for downloading templates

Hi all, Just curious if there is any reason to limit the ports that we can download templates from? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3219 Tom. -- Cloudian KK - http://www.cloudian.com/get-started.html Fancy 100TB of full featured S3 Storage? Checkout the Cloudian® Community Edit

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

> On July 26, 2013, 8:46 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 166 > > > > > > Missing clean up for account and domain. > > Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: > No, cleanup for a

Re: Review Request 12961: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12961/ --- (Updated July 26, 2013, 9:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Proofreading of our procedure to cleanly re-create vrouters and restart CloudStack on a running VMware cluster after an interruption

Hi, Thanks for your help. We made another test using the API (stopRouter with force=true) and restart network. All resources have been released. We need to update the CloudStack's database in the same state as the VMWare's database (like : VM host, VM state, ) We would like to make this reques

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

> On July 26, 2013, 8:46 a.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 253 > > > > > > I think we already have alike mechanism for executing inside user VM? > > Check get_ssh_cli

S3 Configuration bugs

Hi all, I've a couple of configuration related bugs filed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3211 This one is for the configuration of the timeouts related to S3. It is not clear from the GUI what units to use (or are expected) for the timeouts. ie, I can't tell if they are

Re: Physical Network / Guest Network / Service Offering Interactions for Basic Networking

Soheil, I noticed your post not being replied to so I wondered what it was about, I can make a guess but it doesn't contain a question, only an observation. Do you mean to have some question about the behavior you are seeing? regards, Daan Hoogland On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Soheil Eizadi

Re: Review Request 12948: Affinity Groups: Adding new test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12948/ --- (Updated July 26, 2013, 9:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna S

unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

H, Some time ago yours truly volunteered to report on unanswered questions on the list for a couple of weeks. I waited a till the end of this week to report on last week as to give some time for answering. for the week 15 till 21 there where 4 unanswered mails, one of which did not have a clear qu

Re: Review Request 12961: CLOUDSTACK-3723: System VM Template for XenServer has wrong guest OS type Information on the Database.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12961/#review23926 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On July 26, 2013, 9:34 a.

Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:47:55AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > Some time ago yours truly volunteered to report on unanswered questions on > the list for a couple of weeks. I waited a till the end of this week to > report on last week as to give some time for answering. for the week 15 > t

Re: Review Request 12963: Fix some simple typos in ConfigurationManager

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/#review23927 --- Review 12963 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Questions about command sequences when doing transport in agent

The command transported to agent can be kept in sequence or not. If the command needs to be sent in sequence, it will make other non-sequencepending in the same host. For example, the migration command is labeled as keep-in-sequence, if we do following on the same host: 1. migrate vm-1 from host

Re: Questions about command sequences when doing transport in agent

It really depends on the hypervisor. A lot of the "in-sequence" flags were set back when CloudStack supported open-source Xen and the toolstack on OSS Xen was really flaky in the context of concurrent requests. On 7/26/13 3:29 PM, "Gavin Lee" wrote: >The command transported to agent can be kept

Review Request 12965: CLOUDSTACK-3780: G11N: JA: Garbled code display on Pod configuration & Host configuration pages during "Add zone".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12965/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3780 Reposi

Re: Review Request 12809: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3703: change service offering of stopped vm on kvm is failing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12809/ --- (Updated July 26, 2013, 10:05 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Redd

Re: Physical Network / Guest Network / Service Offering Interactions for Basic Networking

Did you modify the code in com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl to do this? AFAIK, basic zone always creates a default guest network based on the defaultSharedSGNetworkOffering offering. You may create additional offerings, but I suspect the code won't let you create additional guest networks b

Re: Switch dialog actions based on result from API call.

Got this going this morning. Thank you for your help. Its a little messier than I would like but there doesn't seem to be a work around. With LDAP - http://ianduffy.ie/cloudstack/screen1.png Without LDAP - http://ianduffy.ie/cloudstack/screen2.png Thanks again, Ian

xs-tools

Does anybody know where and how the xs-tools.iso comes from on the ISOs page? It is downloaded and ready after the SSVM shows up. But I don't see it anywhere in the urls in the template table or in the codebase. Is it already in the XS hypervisor? Or is it pre-built? From? * * https://github.com/

Re: Review Request 12898: CLOUDSTACK-3544: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12898/#review23929 --- Commit c0eec551fec363bbdf8616ff8e2559aa3942c912 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12838: CLOUDSTACK-3488: listStoragePools throws NPE if any of the storage pools are not in the right state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12838/#review23930 --- Commit f4eab352e04bdafc5307bd7aa21a4433c58ba871 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12965: CLOUDSTACK-3780: G11N: JA: Garbled code display on Pod configuration & Host configuration pages during "Add zone".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12965/#review23928 --- Commit 567e4a849618110ead82d08c6c2d982064e8a248 in branch refs/heads

Re: Reviewboard and jenkins

Hey Chip, Working on it! :-) Cheers, Hugo On Friday, July 26, 2013, Chip Childers wrote: > Hugo, > > Any chance you could add some logic to pick the right branch for the build > test? > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Hugo Trippaers > > > wrote: > > > The job is running on jenkins.clouds

Re: xs-tools

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:43:57PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Does anybody know where and how the xs-tools.iso comes from on the > ISOs page? It is downloaded and ready after the SSVM shows up. But I > don't see it anywhere in the urls in the template table or in the > codebase. > > Is it

Re: Review Request 12963: Fix some simple typos in ConfigurationManager

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/#review23931 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rajesh Battala On July 26, 2013, 9:07 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 12898: CLOUDSTACK-3544: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12898/#review23933 --- Commit 5b46e93d28e67727aaba136f372b07056da00c36 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12965: CLOUDSTACK-3780: G11N: JA: Garbled code display on Pod configuration & Host configuration pages during "Add zone".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12965/#review23932 --- Commit 71e387f1fa9e8c4e810ccb9b6eb59b46aaa55811 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12838: CLOUDSTACK-3488: listStoragePools throws NPE if any of the storage pools are not in the right state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12838/#review23934 --- Commit 13fc4690fc39ebded2cf80895d8fd3a622c5b957 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12838: CLOUDSTACK-3488: listStoragePools throws NPE if any of the storage pools are not in the right state.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12838/#review23935 --- Ship it! Looks good. Kindly close the request. - Devdeep Singh O

Re: Review Request 12898: CLOUDSTACK-3544: Xen 6.2 hosts are tagged with Xen 6.1.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12898/#review23936 --- Ship it! Changes pushed to 4.2 and master - Devdeep Singh On Jul

Re: Review Request 12965: CLOUDSTACK-3780: G11N: JA: Garbled code display on Pod configuration & Host configuration pages during "Add zone".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12965/#review23937 --- Ship it! Pushed the changes on faith. Changes seems to be correct a

Re: Open up ports beyond 80/443/8080 for downloading templates

No idea why this is done, but it has annoyed me in the past too. The code doing it is in /utils/src/com/cloud/utils/UriUtils.java specifically line 141. On 26 July 2013 10:22, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > Hi all, > > Just curious if there is any reason to limit the ports that we can > download templat

Re: Review Request 12965: CLOUDSTACK-3780: G11N: JA: Garbled code display on Pod configuration & Host configuration pages during "Add zone".

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12965/#review23938 --- Review 12965 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Review Request 12962: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fix params of AffinityGroup.delete API

> On July 26, 2013, 8:21 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I've changed the library method to only accept delete by id last night. Can > > you reuse that? We need to keep the delete operations consistent across the > > integration library. > > If a custom delete is required, then that can be

Re: Review Request 12962: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fix params of AffinityGroup.delete API

> On July 26, 2013, 8:21 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I've changed the library method to only accept delete by id last night. Can > > you reuse that? We need to keep the delete operations consistent across the > > integration library. > > If a custom delete is required, then that can be

Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

Do you want me to include links to those four messages or do you state that there are more, that I have missed? Daan On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:47:55AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > H, > > > > Some time ago yours truly volunteered

Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:02:49PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Do you want me to include links to those four messages or do you > state that there are more, that I have missed? Sorry - I mean the links/subjects to those emails so I can find them in my mail client. -- Prasanna., --

Re: Review Request 12905: Multiple VLAN range API need to accept a list rather than "add" or "remove" per command

> On July 26, 2013, 4:56 a.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote: > > Review 12905 failed the build test : FAILURE > > The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #42 is : > > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/42/ this patch did not apply. will rebase with master and r

Re: Review Request 11626: Automation: Memory limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11626/ --- (Updated July 26, 2013, 11:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna

Re: Review Request 11858: CLOUDSTACK-2340 [AWS Style Health Checks] Response of the API listLoadBalancerRuleInstances should show the service state of a VM if health check is configured for it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review23943 --- Ship it! Changes had already been reviewed and comments incorporate

Review Request 12966: overcommited memory is not getting displayed at zone level and used % is based on actual memory

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12966/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: Cloudstack-

RE: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

+1 on the markmail link > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: 26 July 2013 10:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:47:55AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > H, > > > >

Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

http://markmail.org/message/ixrfexdeut3e3z3p Event table. by Jeronimo Garcia http://markmail.org/message/m63d4eqlpf7pjtah any idea about upgrade xenserver 6.0.2 to 6.1 with CloudStack 4.1 management server by William Jiang http://markmail.org/message/ac

Re: Review Request 11858: CLOUDSTACK-2340 [AWS Style Health Checks] Response of the API listLoadBalancerRuleInstances should show the service state of a VM if health check is configured for it

> On July 26, 2013, 11:31 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote: > > Changes had already been reviewed and comments incorporated. Applied the > > patch. Kindly close the request. Thanks for pushing the patch - Rajesh --- This is an automatically g

Review Request 12967: Not enough cpu avialable in cluster according to new overcommit ratio but all stopped Vms can be started without any failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12967/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: Cloudstack-

Re: [DISCUSS] Upgrade path to ACS 4.2 from CCP

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:35:57PM +, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > The code is committed to master/4.2 branch with commit > f1706e2c4bec158670b229b420229732cabc966e. RAT fails on these: setup/db/db/schema-304to305-cleanup.sql setup/db/db/schema-304to305.sql setup/db/db/schema-305to306-cle

Re: Review Request 11626: Automation: Memory limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11626/#review23945 --- Review 11626 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/#review23939 --- test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py

BuiltIn appliance for use in integration tests

Almost all the integration tests use the built-in CentOS template in the deployment for their test scenarios. Sometimes this is less desirable since the tests can verify functionality within cloudstack that requires certain services to be up within the guest. For instance the VPC tests ensure loadb

Review Request 12968: CLOUDSTACK-3686: Registering a template does not generate a usage event.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Min Chen. Bugs: 3686 Repository: cloudstack

Re: Review Request 12967: Not enough cpu avialable in cluster according to new overcommit ratio but all stopped Vms can be started without any failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12967/#review23946 --- Review 12967 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Build failure on master...anyone know what this is?

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:05:04AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Fixed this fd62a22. This _always_ breaks when we add a new API :) Indeed... if not _always_, at least very close to _always_. I wonder if it wouldn't be worth adding some logic that figures out the categories at build time? >

Cloudstack Head does not compile

Hi everyone, I have just clone cloudstack and the HEAD (32c8cd3cd74016e3d478...) can not compile with : * mvn clean install -P systemvm,developer* The error message is : * [ERROR]* Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) on project clo

Re: Cloudstack Head does not compile

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:07:17PM +0200, Nicolas FOATA wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have just clone cloudstack and the HEAD (32c8cd3cd74016e3d478...) can not > compile with : > * mvn clean install -P systemvm,developer* > > The error message is : > * [ERROR]* Failed to execute goal > org.apache

Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

Daan, This is *super* useful. Thanks for tracking this! I'll see about answering the Event table question. On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:48:23PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > http://markmail.org/message/ixrfexdeut3e3z3p Event table. by Jeronimo Garcia > http://markmail.org/message/m63d4eqlpf7pjtah

Re: BuiltIn appliance for use in integration tests

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:02:04PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Almost all the integration tests use the built-in CentOS template in > the deployment for their test scenarios. Sometimes this is less > desirable since the tests can verify functionality within cloudstack > that requires certain

Re: Review Request 12966: overcommited memory is not getting displayed at zone level and used % is based on actual memory

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12966/#review23947 --- Review 12966 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Events table.

I believe that the ID or parent ID are the UUID of the VM in question. Worst case, the Vm Id shown in the description field is the database id field in the vm_instance table for that VM. On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote: > hey there. > > Is there any way to correlate the

Re: Cloudstack Head does not compile

Thanks for you quick answer, After your answer, I clone again cloudstack and now it seems it compiles, so sorry for my first e-mail and your time. Have a good day Nicolas

Review Request 12969: Complete LDAP user provisioning UI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12969/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Pranav Saxena, and Sebastien

Re: Build failure on master...anyone know what this is?

Donal, The page (found after following instructions on the page not found page) says, mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm How is this deprecated? Or do you mean that not adding the -P option is? On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > AFAIK, using 'mvn clean install' to b

Re: Cloudstack Head does not compile

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nicolas FOATA wrote: > Thanks for you quick answer, > > After your answer, I clone again cloudstack and now it seems it compiles, > so sorry for my first e-mail and your time. > > Have a good day > > Nicolas > Not a problem Nicolas. Good luck with whatever you ar

Re: Review Request 12968: CLOUDSTACK-3686: Registering a template does not generate a usage event.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12968/#review23948 --- Review 12968 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Review Request 12969: Complete LDAP user provisioning UI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12969/#review23949 --- Review 12969 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: [ACS42] Duplicate S3 and Swift Object Storage Features

Edison, Unfortunately, given the time remaining the 4.2 release cycle, the most that can likely be done is to remove these global options. Due to the massive amount of cruft that will be created when these global options are removed, I am disappointed that a more a comprehensive code removal w

Re: help submitting to review board.

Thomas, What is the link to your review request? Thanks, -John On Jul 26, 2013, at 5:10 AM, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > That worked a charm! Thanks. I also *blush* just re-read the > instructions on this page: > http://cloudstack.apache.org/develop/non-committer.html > > Thanks again. > > Tom. >

RE: Build failure on master...anyone know what this is?

Copy paste error. Meant this link: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudStack#HowtobuildCloudStack-BuildingCloudStack It used to be enough to use 'mvn clean install', and you see these instructions on older pages. E.g. "Maven procedure developed for Clouds

Re: help submitting to review board.

Hi John, https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/ Tom. On Jul 26, 2013, at 23:20, John Burwell wrote: > Thomas, > > What is the link to your review request? > > Thanks, > -John > > On Jul 26, 2013, at 5:10 AM, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > >> That worked a charm! Thanks. I also *blush* just re-read

Re: Build failure on master...anyone know what this is?

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Copy paste error. Meant this link: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+CloudStack#HowtobuildCloudStack-BuildingCloudStack > > It used to be enough to use 'mvn clean install', and you see these > instructi

Re: Review Request 12963: Fix some simple typos in ConfigurationManager

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/#review23950 --- Ship it! Looks clean to me. Good cleanups. - John Burwell On Ju

Re: Review Request 12963: Fix some simple typos in ConfigurationManager

Has this actually been applied yet? On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:33 AM, John Burwell wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/#review23950 > ---

RE: Build failure on master...anyone know what this is?

+1 Our *Cmd.java files are basically a DSL written in Java. As such anything required to generate the doc should reside with Cmd.java files. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 6:01 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.a

Re: Ruby dev wanted

On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > I'm interested in the rOCCi project. I'd like to join. > However, I know nothing about the OCCI and will spend some time on it in > next few days. Please kindly let me know more information about the > project(status,

Re: Ruby dev wanted

On Jul 25, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > I'm interested in the rOCCi project. I'd like to join. > However, I know nothing about the OCCI and will spend some time on it in > next few days. Please kindly let me know more information about the > project(status,

Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

On Jul 26, 2013, at 9:13 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Daan, > > This is *super* useful. Thanks for tracking this! > > I'll see about answering the Event table question. Daan, could you do the same for users@ list ? > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:48:23PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> http://

[GSoC] (Screencast/Demo) LDAP user provisioning

Hi Guys, The latest patch I uploaded to review board ( https://reviews.apache.org/r/12969/ ) brings the "LDAP user provisioning" project to a "prototype" stage. If anybody wants to give feedback the ldapplugin branch should have all features shown in the screencast once the above patch is shipped

Re: Review Request 12969: Complete LDAP user provisioning UI.

> On July 26, 2013, 1:57 p.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote: > > Review 12969 failed the build test : FAILURE > > The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #51 is : > > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/51/ Please note jenkins attempts to apply this patch to the

Re: unanswerred questions 15-21 juli

I could for the coming time. At the moment I use the gmail label and thread functionality. I am only subscribed to the user list with my schubergphilis.com address so will have a look over the weekend about what is wise and convenient. regards, Daan On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Sebastien Goa

Re: Commit broke vm_data for Xen

Seems like we'll have to take care of both when changing userdata in the future - shell + python. Any chance we can make this work for Xen too using python or is that not possible? On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:52:59PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Thanks for taking care of that. > > On Thu, Jul

Re: Review Request 12969: Complete LDAP user provisioning UI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12969/ --- (Updated July 26, 2013, 4:13 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

RE: [GSoC] (Screencast/Demo) LDAP user provisioning

Ian Watched screencast and you did an amazing job! I want to backport this into my customized 4.1 cloudstack edition called cloudsand. CloudSand is a hybrid of CloudStack stable version with some urgently needed features pulled from master to speed up cloudstack adoption by enterprises. The wor

Re: [ACS42] NFS Cache Naming

Hi John, I saw the blocker defect filed by you regarding this Nomenclature issue(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3818). Honestly speaking, this does not qualify as a BLOCKER since it is not blocking any functionality. One question I commented on the bug is: do you want to chang

  1   2   >