Re: Review Request: Automation: CPU limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

> On April 29, 2013, 8:30 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py, line 186 > > > > > > `delete` is not handled? Hi Prasanna, Can you please elaborate this? Delete condition s

Re: Review Request: Automation: CPU limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10828/#review21051 --- test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2327: make cloud-setup-agent ovs aware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11428/#review21052 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Hugo Trippaers On May 27, 2013, 1:46 a.m., H

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2327: make cloud-setup-agent ovs aware

> On May 27, 2013, 7:21 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > Ship It! Looking good, you can commit it yourself right? - Hugo --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11428/#review21052

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2327: make cloud-setup-agent ovs aware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11428/#review21055 --- Commit a16b707250fde01f24c9ab6f11189b630dd70962 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2327: make cloud-setup-agent ovs aware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11428/#review21054 --- Commit 8faf845889b28157a2ecbd6e406d73a326b27756 in branch refs/heads

Re: Question about Review Request

On May 27, 2013, at 1:55 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to submit code for the first time. > > I'm following the instructions here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Review+Board+Guidelines > > When it says to upload my diff, I assume it mea

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On May 24, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:41:30AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >> As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what >> does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each >> major feature release? >> >>

Commits into 4.1 without patch request

Hi Hiroaki, I've noticed you pushed a couple of commits into both master and 4.1 without going through the patch request on the mailinglist. For example in 4.1: * 9bc43930b822a294c863e954bc5b39fc4b506f46 * 8faf845889b28157a2ecbd6e406d73a326b27756 When the 4.1 branch was frozen the agreement w

[VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

Hi, After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the "Packt Book" [1] I would like to call a vote. Proposal: I propose to list CloudStack related books on our website [2]. The page listing these books would contain the following disclaimer: "This listing doe

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 Kind Regards Giles D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055 giles.sir...@shapeblue.com On 27 May 2013, at 09:27, "Sebastien Goasguen" mailto:run...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the "Packt Book"

Re: Commits into 4.1 without patch request

Hi Wido, Thank you for telling me that. I remembered that Chip has sent how to control 4.1 release. http://markmail.org/message/qkkxycablpsmogsx https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Release Chip, the commits I pushed into 4.1 were: - 2 patch commit for debian p

RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

Being in the habit of replying on my own mails as I seems to be on this list; This seems to be related to eclipse refresh/build code. Does anybody have a solution to it? The problem is not consistently present but all the more irritating. Regards, -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 2013/5/27 Giles Sirett > +1 > > > Kind Regards > Giles > > D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 > 2055 > giles.sir...@shapeblue.com > > On 27 May 2013, at 09:27, "Sebastien Goasguen" run...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > After a relatively long discussion

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 since it is the only English book on CloudStack as I know. Listing it on the official website does not necessarily mean promoting it, but it's important to keep the disclaimer. The quality of the book will be reflected in Amazon ratings or some other review blogs or even word of mouth. Be sure t

Re: patchviasocket: Why in Perl and not native Java?

On 05/26/2013 06:41 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: Yes, you're welcome to rewrite it in Python. You're spot on with why it's not in Java. Thanks for the clarification! As for why it's in Perl, it was simple for me to do and we already have a dependency on it. As far as I've seen, the majori

Re: Review Request: Automation: CPU limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

> On April 29, 2013, 8:30 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py, line 527 > > > > > > There's some confusion I have here: > > > > 1. you are using the apiClient of t

Re: Review Request: Automation: CPU limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

> On April 29, 2013, 8:30 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py, line 527 > > > > > > There's some confusion I have here: > > > > 1. you are using the apiClient of t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

Hi Chip, I'm sorry, this is a -1 again. Hiroaki found a bug in the Deb packaging again, with commit: c4d61897d93420093dfbb046502b3f5e0d31fb9f The agent wasn't depending on nfs-common, which would cause problems for users installing and running with NFS. I also found another bug in the Deb

Review Request: Update L10N strings for 4.1 (Italian and Chinese) from Transifex to repo

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11433/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- @chipc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

Is this am argument for keeping the Debian packaging in a seperate repo? cloudstack-deb, perhaps? Repositories are cheap. On Monday, 27 May 2013, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I'm sorry, this is a -1 again. > > Hiroaki found a bug in the Deb packaging again, with commit: > c4d61897d934

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2672: Adding isVolatile parameter in service offering response object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11373/#review21060 --- server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.java

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2672: Adding isVolatile parameter in service offering response object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11373/#review21061 --- server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.java

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2672: Adding isVolatile parameter in service offering response object

> On May 27, 2013, 12:27 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/ServiceOfferingJoinDaoImpl.java, line 71 > > > > > > Can offering.getVolatileVm() be null ? If yes then we should set false. It c

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2672: Adding isVolatile parameter in service offering response object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11373/#review21063 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On May 24, 2013, 12:22 p.m., Har

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 as well On 5/27/13 4:35 AM, "Giles Sirett" wrote: >+1 > > >Kind Regards >Giles > >D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 >2055 >giles.sir...@shapeblue.com > >On 27 May 2013, at 09:27, "Sebastien Goasguen" >mailto:run...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >Hi, > >After a

Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-2672: Adding isVolatile parameter in service offering response object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11373/#review21064 --- Commit 82974458a675c52e888c91f569f0f1ca278197d7 in branch refs/heads

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 Regards Geoff Higginbottom CTO / Cloud Architect D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540| M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com |www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place,

Re: Review Request: Automation: CPU limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

> On April 29, 2013, 8:30 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py, line 417 > > > > > > method name doesn't reflect intent. you are doing a checkResourceCount > > but doing an

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 Sent from my iPad On May 27, 2013, at 1:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the "Packt > Book" [1] I would like to call a vote. > > Proposal: > > I propose to list CloudStack related books on our websi

Re: Review Request: Automation: CPU limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

> On April 29, 2013, 8:30 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py, line 405 > > > > > > Should these utility methods be included in every test class? Can we > > not include th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

Ok. Vote cancelled. I'll re-spin a fifth round RC. On May 27, 2013, at 7:29 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I'm sorry, this is a -1 again. > > Hiroaki found a bug in the Deb packaging again, with commit: > c4d61897d93420093dfbb046502b3f5e0d31fb9f > > The agent wasn't depending on

Re: Review Request: Automation: CPU limits tests from Resource Limits Tests

> On April 29, 2013, 8:30 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_cpu_limits.py, line 405 > > > > > > Should these utility methods be included in every test class? Can we > > not include th

[GSoC] Results

Hi folks, Results for GSoC proposals will be announced in 5 hours and 15 minutes on the Google web site: http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013 Thanks to everyone for their proposals, -Sebastien

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fourth round)

(2013/05/27 22:34), Chip Childers wrote: Ok. Vote cancelled. I'll re-spin a fifth round RC. Thank you.

RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

Daan, The other possibility is that the test is affected by another test so that it breaks when the tests are in a certain order. Have you noticed what's the order of the tests ran when it breaks? --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com]

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

-0 I think we should be listing books, but I would prefer it to be on the wiki. (Note that your vote email should include +0 and -0, which are weak approval/disapproval.) On 27 May 2013 09:27, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about

Review Request: Cloudstack-2621 [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Failed to delete guest IP range from a new subnet/C

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das. Description

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2620 [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Guest vm's nameserver is not set to VRs guest IP address in case of multiple subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11436/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das. Description

RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

Alex, Can this change out of the box? I had the problem on a clean checkout of master. -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: maandag 27 mei 2013 15:55 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the > "Packt Book" [1] I would like to call a vote. > > Proposal: > > I propose to list CloudStack related books on our website [2]. The page > list

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

+1 of course! Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Noah Slater" To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" , "market...@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website Date: Mon, May 27, 2013 7:00 AM -0 I think we should be listing books, but I would pre

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2648 [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Reboot or start/stop router vm deletes the ip alises created on VR in case of multiple subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Koushik Das. Description

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-2621 [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Failed to delete guest IP range from a new subnet/C

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11435/#review21069 --- server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java

RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

And if not how do I manipulate the order of tests? -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: maandag 27 mei 2013 17:02 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest Alex, Can this change out

RE: Update on Hyper-V plugin work

Hi Chip, Thanks for clarifying the IP info required. I'll take a closer look ASAP. WRT collaboration, on the agent-side, I did the design work, and used colleagues working on CloudStack features for learning and some discussion. Reviews requests have flowed through this mailing list. Howeve

PLEASE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

I ran the test in eclipse, it passes, next I do a maven build in eclipse which fails on this test. How do I force it to pass, please. This is costing me serious time. I am not working on ACLs Regards, Daan Hoogland -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.

RE: PLEASE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest

What you might want to try to unblock yourself - whatever method you see is failing , go to that file and remove the @Test annotation written just above that method . This would skip that particular test . In your case it is this file - com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest.testCreateACLItem(N

LDAP auth broken?

Hi, I am using 4.1 commit "8a9206fd28872dd436b22b847e93466f06e043bc", and I am getting this error when trying to authenticate using LDAP: java.lang.NullPointerException at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapNamingEnumeration.getNextBatch(LdapNamingEnumeration.java:129) at com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapNa

[GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

Hi, I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by the 2013 Google Summer of Code: "CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning", Ian Duffy "Improving CloudStack support in Apache Whirr and Apache Provisionr incubating", Meng Han "Integration project to deploy and use Apache

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

-1 list of books etc. on website (binding, if committers are allowed to do that). The list should be on the project wiki and not on the website. Even if we have the right intention, the website should ought not be seen as platform of promoting anything other than the materials published within Apa

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1325) add password in response of RestoreVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9539/#review21071 --- Commit a5723992a0eeea9fc383c656b0d61dfc9e541ff9 in branch refs/heads/

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

Awesome! I pasted this list in my 'important' folder, lol - Original Message - From: "Sebastien Goasguen" To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 12:23:40 PM Subject: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code Hi, I am pleased to report that the follow

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

As a committer you have a binding vote. However, our by-laws do not make it clear what sort of decision-making process we use for non-technical matters such as this. So I am not sure whether your -1 counts as a veto. On 27 May 2013 19:14, Rohit Yadav wrote: > -1 list of books etc. on website (b

Re: Question about Review Request

Thanks for the reply, Sebastien! So, I went ahead and updated from upstream again and merged upstream/master to master, then merged master to solidfire_plugin. I created another patch file and tried to upload it to Review Board, but received the same error message. I then tried to apply the patc

Re: Question about Review Request

Regardless of those whitespace messages, it looks like my new branch (solidfire_plugin2) does have the changes in the patch file (they show up as modified, but not staged files or - in the case of new files - untracked files). On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solid

Re: Question about Review Request

Can you send the patch to the list as a txt attachment with a subject line that indicates you want to have it reviewed and committed? Perhaps we have to do this the old fashioned way. On May 27, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Regardless of those whitespace messages, it looks like my n

Re: Question about Review Request

Sounds good I have sent out an e-mail under the subject of "Patch File for Review (Storage Plug-in Related)". Thanks! I supposed we'll need to find out what wasn't working with Review Board if my next patch has similar trouble. :) On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Can yo

Re: Question about Review Request

Mike, I would encourage Review Board as the first preference. It provides a good medium to review code and encourage other project members to review patches, as well as, observe the review process. Thanks, -John On May 27, 2013, at 8:42 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Sounds good > > I have se

Re: Question about Review Request

Yeah, I certainly agree with you, John. Any thoughts on what I might do to make Review Board work in my situation? I am new to Review Board and don't know why my patch file won't upload, but does apply to a new branch in my local repo. Thanks! On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:24 PM, John Burwell wro

Re: Question about Review Request

I was going to use his attachment tomorrow, to figure out what's wrong with review board. Agreed that its a preference! On May 27, 2013, at 9:25 PM, John Burwell wrote: > Mike, > > I would encourage Review Board as the first preference. It provides a > good medium to review code and encourage o

Re: Question about Review Request

Mike, What error are you getting from Review Board? Have you rebased your branch to master recently? Finally, are you submitting a squashed patch? Thanks, -John On May 27, 2013, at 9:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Yeah, I certainly agree with you, John. > > Any thoughts on what I might do to

Re: Question about Review Request

Hi John, Here is a copy/paste of part of the e-mail chain. Thanks! Hi everyone, I'm trying to submit code for the first time. I'm following the instructions here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Review+Board+Guidelines When it says to upload my diff, I assume it means

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11379/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 1:46 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: Review Request: Patch 2: CLOUDSTACK-681: Dedicated Resources - Explicit Dedication, Private zone, pod, cluster or host

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11380/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 1:47 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

[ACS41][PATCH REQ]

Chip, please cherry-pick to 4.1. # This was my bug, sorry. Branch: master commit e9a6d47316d8de90eb662e9938ea7fcbe0ee0596 Author: Hiroaki KAWAI Date: Tue May 28 11:55:21 2013 +0900 agent: fix network.bridge.type to be optional New network.bridge.type was introduced, but for buckw

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

Thanks !! Looking forward to an exciting summer !! :) Thanks, Dharmesh On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Kelcey Jamison Damage wrote: > Awesome! I pasted this list in my 'important' folder, lol > > - Original Message - > From: "Sebastien Goasguen" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent:

Re: LDAP auth broken?

Check if the query filter is going to get the valid identifier for the particular user. If that looks fine then can you tell us what LDAP server you are using and also specifiy the query filter that you have configured. -abhi On 27/05/13 10:25 PM, "Francois Gaudreault" wrote: >Hi, > >I am using

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by > the 2013 Google Summer of Code: > > "CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning", Ian Duffy > > "Improving CloudStack support in Apache Whirr and Apache Provisio

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11307/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 5:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Likitha Shetty

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

> On May 23, 2013, 6:14 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_assign_vm.py, line 321 > > > > > > If a domain admin tries to move a VM to an account in a subdomain that > > belongs to a differ

Re: Review Request: Marvin logger output showing repeated log lines.

> On May 23, 2013, 6:15 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Can you create a bug report for this? Otherwise the patch LGTM. Created a bug report CLOUDSTACK-2703 - Ashutosh --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:

Re: Review Request: Marvin logger output showing repeated log lines.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11340/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 5:40 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santh

Re: Review Request: Marvin logger output showing repeated log lines.

> On May 23, 2013, 6:15 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Can you create a bug report for this? Otherwise the patch LGTM. > > Ashutosh Kelkar wrote: > Created a bug report CLOUDSTACK-2703 Thanks, this will correct the TestCase logger when running tests using python -m marvin.deployAndRun

Re: Review Request: CS-2273: Automation: Change account membership for VMs

> On May 23, 2013, 6:14 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote: > > Ashutosh, are you referring to TP 8 in the Test-Plan? If yes, then the TP is still valid because in the TP the sub-domains (SubDomain1 and SubDomain2) that we are trying to move the VM’s between are under the same domain(Doamin1). But fro

Re: [jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-2702) unable to install XenServer Support Package (CSP) on Xen cloud platform 1.6

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:18:19PM +, Dean Kamali (JIRA) wrote: > Dean Kamali created CLOUDSTACK-2702: > --- > > Summary: unable to install XenServer Support Package (CSP) on > Xen cloud platform 1.6 > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2702 >

Re: [GSOC] Five projects accepted for 2013 Google Summer of Code

Thanks! I'm ready for the beginning. Will try my best :-) Sent from my GT-N7000 On 28 May 2013 02:24, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: > Hi, > > I am pleased to report that the following projects have been accepted by > the 2013 Google Summer of Code: > > "CloudStack: LDAP user provisioning", Ian Duf

Re: Review Request: Automation: Add testcases for Affinity/Anti-Affinity Rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11067/ --- (Updated May 28, 2013, 6:28 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prachi Damle,

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2648 [Multiple_IP_Ranges] Reboot or start/stop router vm deletes the ip alises created on VR in case of multiple subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11437/#review21078 --- core/src/com/cloud/agent/resource/virtualnetwork/VirtualRoutingReso