Hey Pranav, Likitha,
You need to refresh your database after these to patches, that will fix it.
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 7:53 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Hugo Trippaers
>
Thanks for fixing Chip and sorry for not noticing :-(
> -Original Message-
> From: dcah...@midokura.jp [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Dave
> Cahill
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 3:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RAT test failing in master
>
> Thanks for
This is great :)
-Original Message-
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 12:40 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to dramatically reduce the build time:)
holy moly, thats a serious bash one liner.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:18 PM,
On 04/04/2013 02:36 AM, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
As a follow up on the discussion we had on the IRC meeting , I have updated
the existing doc bug relating to upgrade - CLOUDSTACK-1837 , to include the
following 2 steps as well as part of upgrade:
1. If someone has made changes to your exi
Hey Wido,
I've reverted this commit. These files are used by people like me that run
cloudstack using the jetty:run target. I need at least the components and log4j
files in there to work. It is also part of the put-everyting-in-a-single-webapp
plan that will allow us to redistribute the manage
If I understand you correctly, you would like to add an additional IP address
to you current running instances? Firstly, It is not possible to add a nic to
a current running instance. One way of doing this would be to add a new network
offering and then add a new network for the account, templa
On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:37 AM, L Radhakrishna Rao wrote:
> So are we going to report it into python?
>
> What's the entire plan?
>
Rao, there is no real plan but instead things that we should do as a community.
Deltacloud is an apache project http://deltacloud.apache.org that offers among
oth
On 04/04/2013 11:26 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
Hey Wido,
I've reverted this commit. These files are used by people like me that run
cloudstack using the jetty:run target. I need at least the components and log4j
files in there to work. It is also part of the put-everyting-in-a-single-webapp
pl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10137/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Add OS X 10.6 and 10.7 supp
Sorry for the delay in responding.
The GET / POST limit to HTTP verbs simplifies exposing the agent with HTML
forms. Using these verbs the agent interface can be exposed via HTML forms
should the developer want to use a browser for diagnostics, experimentation or
testing. IIRC, HTML 5 expands
I noticed that the CloudStack UI allows VM control to accounts that don't have
an API key set defined.
How does its authentication mechanism work? E.g.
1. How are API calls authenticated and authorized if they are
not signed with API keys?
2. Does this work
Rohit,
I submitted my first patch to review board. Can you please take a look when you
get a moment I want to make sure I did everything correctly. Also, other than
submit to review board do I need to forward anything to the dev mailing list
saying that I have a review request or will the revie
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/
---
(Updated April 4, 2013, 12:35 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinanda
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/
---
(Updated April 4, 2013, 12:36 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinanda
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:42:45AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:37 AM, L Radhakrishna Rao
> wrote:
>
> > So are we going to report it into python?
> >
> > What's the entire plan?
> >
>
> Rao, there is no real plan but instead things that we should do as a
> com
No problem!
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:16:28AM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Thanks for fixing Chip and sorry for not noticing :-(
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dcah...@midokura.jp [mailto:dcah...@midokura.jp] On Behalf Of Dave
> > Cahill
> > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 3:14 AM
>
Le 04/04/2013 05:51, aprat...@apache.org a ecrit :
Updated Branches:
refs/heads/4.1 489010123 -> f1c7f4022
bug CLOUDSTACK-1842: adding the missing os type in upgrade script
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/clo
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:44:33AM +0100, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>
> The GET / POST limit to HTTP verbs simplifies exposing the agent with HTML
> forms. Using these verbs the agent interface can be exposed via HTML forms
> should the developer want to use a b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/#review18684
---
Good test coverage included. Thanks for that.
- Chip Childers
On
Thanks Alex for the fix!
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 10:43 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:07:54AM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> > I'll take it over.
>
> Many thanks Alex!
>
> >
> > --Alex
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.c
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:54 PM, prasanna wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 01:18, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > Awesome, thanks for your work Prasanna, do we have a jenkins job yet?
> >
> This one needs mysql db to be present. So i'll have to run it on a
> fresh new node. I'll probably set it up if no one uses
Chip:
Please pull in:
542a339f967f504fbb7c203743808123209a4fce
--David
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10137/
---
(Updated April 4, 2013, 1:28 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yan
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:45:05AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Chip:
>
> Please pull in:
> 542a339f967f504fbb7c203743808123209a4fce
>
> --David
>
Done:
commit 0ef3e6dd5a0f687bbf0a4eeea1c6c8d225a636dd
Author: David Nalley
Date: Thu Apr 4 09:37:13 2013 -0400
CLOUDSTACK-1936 add cloudstac
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:18:22PM -0700, Edison Su wrote:
> As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a way may
> help you a little bit to build cloudstack as quick as possible:
> mvn -pl `git status --porcelain |sed '/^?/d'| awk '{print $2}' |sed
> 's/\/src/$/'|cut -d $
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> I noticed that the CloudStack UI allows VM control to accounts that don't
> have an API key set defined.
>
> How does its authentication mechanism work? E.g.
>
>
> 1. How are API calls authenticated and authorized if they
>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 05:42:45AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 4, 2013, at 12:37 AM, L Radhakrishna Rao
>> wrote:
>>
>> > So are we going to report it into python?
>> >
>> > What's the entire plan?
>> >
>>
>> Rao, there is
Abhi,
Can you please review? This is now a blocker.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Milamber wrote:
>
>
> Le 04/04/2013 05:51, aprat...@apache.org a ecrit :
>
>> Updated Branches:
>>refs/heads/4.1 489010123 -> f1c7f4022
>>
>>
>> bug CLOUDSTACK-1842: adding the missing os type in upgrade sc
Thanks Edison, now we can build like a boss™ [1]
[1]
https://github.com/bhaisaab/dotfiles/commit/965c9d5594cb29e0e86f3bcdfc9b0947d88b50c6
Cheers.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> As a poor man, don't have luxury build machine as Alex has, I find a way
> may help you a littl
I've reverted that commit from 4.1.
Abhi, please correct the change and commit to master. Please then
provide either a Patch Request email for me to cherry-pick over to the
4.1 branch, or submit a reviewboard entry for me to apply to 4.1.
Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Chip Childers w
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10275/
---
(Updated April 4, 2013, 2:01 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yada
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:21:30PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One of our graduation checklist items is to get the cloudstack.org
> > domain migrated to ASF infra for registration ownership and probably
> > also for name
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:12:45PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote:
> I raised CLOUDSTACK-1917, it is not a functional bug, but to finalize the
> way for plugin developers to add/remove feature related components &
> related configuration. It seems to make sense to cut its final style in
> 4.1 for its fir
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:31:19PM -0700, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> In this morning's IRC chat, it was very properly pointed out that
> CloudStack could use more doc writers.
>
> We have a backlog of suggestions for large, new documentation projects. We
> collected these suggestions under the Doc
That's true. I don't believe the design itself is REST. It's http call but to
me it's a much simpler transition path than coming up with a full REST for the
agents. I don't think we necessarily need full REST for the agents because
they're not really full services anyways.
The http calls jus
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 04 April 2013 2:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism
>
> On Thu, Apr 4,
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 07:19:18AM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> That's true. I don't believe the design itself is REST. It's http call but
> to me it's a much simpler transition path than coming up with a full REST for
> the agents. I don't think we necessarily need full REST for the agents
> b
On Apr 4, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 11:44:33AM +0100, Donal Lafferty wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay in responding.
>>
>> The GET / POST limit to HTTP verbs simplifies exposing the agent with HTML
>> forms. Using these verbs the agent interface can be expo
Hi,
Hugo and I were on IRC today and he found
f1259d50bdd6120174717f4cce6a45dc12b6645b
I also noticed this on 4.1 and this fix seems to resolve it.
There is no Jira ticket I could find and since Hugo isn't online right
now I'm requesting it this way.
Or do we want a Jira ticket first?
Wid
My two cents
We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
The other way is to reach out to students and offer internship to those who are
interested in writing. ..In the due course, both parties are mutually
ben
On Apr 4, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
wrote:
> My two cents
>
> We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
> CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
>
> The other way is to reach out to students and offer internship to those who
> are
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:52:15PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Hugo and I were on IRC today and he found
> f1259d50bdd6120174717f4cce6a45dc12b6645b
>
> I also noticed this on 4.1 and this fix seems to resolve it.
>
> There is no Jira ticket I could find and since Hugo isn't online
Hey Chip,
This method used to be called from AgentManagerImpl, but it now uses the
default constructor with Inject. So this method is no longer needed and I
decided to remove it to avoid confusion. I dislike leaving constructor and
methods around that are not used anymore as they tend to be unm
Yes, I will take a look.
On 04-Apr-2013, at 7:27 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> Abhi,
>
> Can you please review? This is now a blocker.
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Milamber wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 04/04/2013 05:51, aprat...@apache.org a ecrit :
>>
>>> Updated Branches:
>>> refs/heads
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:59:34AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
> wrote:
>
> > My two cents
> >
> > We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
> > CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
> >
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:53:51PM +, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> My two cents
>
> We should go to conferences specifically meant for writers, and market
> CloudStack. That way, we could attract good freelancers.
>
> The other way is to reach out to students and offer internship to those wh
Chip,
Thanks for reverting.
-Abhi
On 04-Apr-2013, at 7:30 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> I've reverted that commit from 4.1.
>
> Abhi, please correct the change and commit to master. Please then
> provide either a Patch Request email for me to cherry-pick over to the
> 4.1 branch, or submit
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:06:21PM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey Chip,
>
> This method used to be called from AgentManagerImpl, but it now uses the
> default constructor with Inject. So this method is no longer needed and I
> decided to remove it to avoid confusion. I dislike leaving constr
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> We discussed this in the March 20 IRC meeting [1] (see the "# 4. Active
> Feature
> Release: Docs Status #" section). If someone wants to propose this as a
> feature merge requirement, I'd +1 it. As long as we're not being too
> onerous abo
Doo eet!
Ahmad
On Apr 4, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:54 PM, prasanna wrote:
>
>> On 3 April 2013 01:18, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>> Awesome, thanks for your work Prasanna, do we have a jenkins job yet?
>> This one needs mysql db to be present. So i'll have to r
We do have functional spec. What exactly are we demanding for ?
-Original Message-
From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 8:49 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] More OSS writers needed
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Chip Childer
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> > Of Rohit Yadav
> > Sent: 04 April 2013 2:52 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> > S
On 04/04/13 7:23 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Donal Lafferty
>wrote:
>
>> I noticed that the CloudStack UI allows VM control to accounts that
>>don't
>> have an API key set defined.
>>
>> How does its authentication mechanism work? E.g.
>>
>>
>> 1.
> -Original Message-
> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf
> Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: 04 April 2013 4:36 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack UI Authentication Mechanism
>
> On Thu, Apr 4,
Limited access from 4/22-4/28. Back 4/29.
--Alex
I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key exception.
I guess to fix this we need to remove this os type from the template
instead of 40 to 410 up
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:17:26PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
> Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key exception.
>
> I guess to fix
On 04/04/13 9:51 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:17:26PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts
>>these
>> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
>> Since I added these os types in 40-410 i
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:17:26PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
> Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key exception.
>
> I guess to fix
Hey Donal,
Sorry , I should have responded you a bit earlier but had no access to email
today . Yeah you are absolutely right . UI uses Jsession ID to bypaas login
check something like this as shown below -
// Use this for checking the session, to bypass login screen
bypassLoginCheck: fu
(moved to dev@)
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:46:43PM +, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> Hi Fabrice,
>
> To change the Passwords for ESXi try this procedure.
>
> To change host passwords the password must be changed on both the host and in
> the CloudStack database.
>
> ESXi
> 1. Connect to
Just an update on this, as I ran into further issues. I'm going to change
the cpu mode in the xml to 'host-passthrough', and remove the machine type.
I had an issue with the machine type today after updating qemu/libvirt, it
was set to pc-1.0 and when I removed this option from the live xml, it wa
Hi Everyone,
Some of you may know that I started CloudStack University at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+University
I just reworked the page to divide it into two categories:
-Courses
-Student Projects
I welcome any help with it, especially content for the cou
Hi List.
I'm having issues when deploying a big number of virtual machines across a
number of nodes.
the imporession that i get ( from the logs) is that the AsyncJobExecutor is
pulling jobs from the queue and do them one by one (which when you are
deploying a big number of virtual machines could
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek <
abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I was wondering that during a clean install the template.sql inserts these
> os types in DB and then runs the upgrade from 40 to 410.
> Since I added these os types in 40-410 it throws duplicate key except
Hi Jeronimo,
The StartCommands for the Virtual machine are executed sequentially by the
agent. This behavior is set as "executeInSequence" flag on the command
level.
You might look at the Command abstract class (StartCommand extends it) to
see how it works. But basically if this flag is set to tr
Note that each deployment to local storage has to download the base
template to local disk from secondary storage. How big is the template?
How fast is your secondary storage?
On 4/4/13 11:36 AM, "Jeronimo Garcia" wrote:
>Hi List.
>
>I'm having issues when deploying a big number of virtual mach
Thanks Alena, im checking that out now.
Chiradeep , I'm using the default centos template that comes with the
secondary storage sys vm.
Thanks!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Note that each deployment to local storage has to download the
Hi.
I can see the override on *agent/api/StartCommand.java*
*
*
*@Override*
*public boolean executeInSequence() {*
* return true;
*
*}*
*
*
I'm guessing this can't be changed from the gui or api right?
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at
Devdeep,
I was looking at this. A few comments.
- On open issues 3: It makes more sense to create a new response object for
your use. HostResponse really should be for listing hosts. Cramming a
storagemigraterequired flag in there makes it weird for other APIs. Others may
modify your respo
Devs, what do you think? :P
Should I open a feature request?
On 2013-04-04 3:13 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
I dont believe this exists in cloudstack today. You might need to
limit whats presented or reject api calls which request more than two
networks (something fronting cloudstack that parses t
No, it can't be updated using UI/WebServices APIs.
I remember somebody in the dev list mentioned that he modified
StartCommand.java with executeInSequence=false and tested it with KVM
hypervisor, and it worked for him. Not sure how concurrent starts (and how
many) are supported by other hypervisor
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> We do have functional spec. What exactly are we demanding for ?
Ideally something that actually gives a "how to use this feature"
bare-bones framework to write docs off of. If the FS takes care of that,
that's fine - but I'm not sure t
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:33:23PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> > We do have functional spec. What exactly are we demanding for ?
>
> Ideally something that actually gives a "how to use this feature"
> bare-bones framework to write d
Ok I'll rebuild and see the differences and wether we want to have this
live or not .
Thanks a lot for your help!
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> No, it can't be updated using UI/WebServices APIs.
>
> I remember somebody in the dev list
At first glance it seems like this would go into compute offering, perhaps
as a "max networks" setting. This could be checked on deployvm, add nic, or
any future additions.
You could alternatively do something with the design to leverage
permissions such that each account can only see one network,
Most of commands are executed in sequence at per-host scope, there will be
some concurrency when VMs are being deployed among different hosts.
However, for each individual orchestration flow, concurrency is usually
not in consideration in current code base.
Kelven
On 4/4/13 12:39 PM, "Jeronimo G
Hey all,
So working on the Release Notes, I notice that our first section is on
"Submitting Feedback and Getting Help." It *looks* like this has carried
over a tradition from Cloud.com/Citrix docs. Looking at the Release
Notes from CloudStack 2.2.14, it has a "contacting support" section.
So my q
It all depends on how the networks are setup. It can be completely done
outside of cloudstack so I don't think we should drive it into cloudstack
itself.
Permissions is one way to do it. Another would be to implement checks within
the ui itself.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From:
Jeronimo,
Do you mind filing a bug for this?
There's some legacy with this that went all the way back to 1.0 of our product.
Back then, multiple commands executing on the same hypervisor was just not
very reliable. Xen 3 would sometimes brick when multiple vm commands were
executed. I dou
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:09:00PM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> Jeronimo,
>
> Do you mind filing a bug for this?
>
> There's some legacy with this that went all the way back to 1.0 of our
> product. Back then, multiple commands executing on the same hypervisor was
> just not very reliable. Xe
Hey all,
Following up on some previous discussions, I'd like to propose a slight
change of practice. (Some folks may already be doing this, in which case
- please carry on, and thanks!)
Currently we require an FS for new features, and developers have (AFAIK)
been great about creating an FS for co
Hi All.
Thanks for the help .
I'll be trying to fill a bug about this today/tomorrow.
Thanks Again
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:09:00PM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> > Jeronimo,
> >
> > Do you mind filing a bug for this?
> >
> > There's some l
Oh, I should mention I did this on the 4.1 branch.
On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Ryan Dietrich wrote:
> I have written a test plugin, but it is not being picked up by spring.
>
> Specifically, I am looking at ApiDiscoveryServiceImpl.java
>
>@Inject protected List _services = null;
> My newly
+1!
Why write it if people can't use it!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [PROPOSAL][DOCS] Revise FS Before Features Land
>
> Hey all,
>
> Following up on some
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:09 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Job-Executor workers
>
> Jeronimo,
>
> Do you mind filing a bug for this?
>
> There's some legacy with this that went all the way back to 1.0 of our
> product
Before posting a bug for this issue...
Using 4.1, we added some users in the default admin account, and now we
cannot delete them from the UI. Do we have to delete them using the
API/DB? UI should permit that isn't it (at least for the non default
admin user)? :P
--
Francois Gaudreault
Archi
Ryan,
Did you add it to componentscontext.xml?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Dietrich [mailto:r...@betterservers.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 1:16 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Plugin woes...
>
> Oh, I should mention I did this on the 4.1 branch.
>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> So working on the Release Notes, I notice that our first section is on
> "Submitting Feedback and Getting Help." It *looks* like this has carried
> over a tradition from Cloud.com/Citrix docs. Looking at the Release
> Notes from
I agree with you... the ui should allow you to delete the 'other' admins :)
I'd file it.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Francois Gaudreault <
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> Before posting a bug for this issue...
>
> Using 4.1, we added some users in the default admin account, and now we
> c
I have organized the componentContext.xml to be in plugin friendly style,
I'll add a updated document for this as well. will commit to 4.1 today
Kelven
On 4/4/13 1:24 PM, "Alex Huang" wrote:
>Ryan,
>
>Did you add it to componentscontext.xml?
>
>--Alex
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ry
I was told that if I used:
@Component
on the object that extended PluggableService I did not have to add it to
componentsContext.xml ..
Side note, given that I'm using Jetty, does that even get touched? (it's in a
tomcat client configuration directory)
On Apr 4, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Alex Huang
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1940
Thank you all.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jeronimo Garcia wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Thanks for the help .
>
> I'll be trying to fill a bug about this today/tomorrow.
>
> Thanks Again
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Chip Childers
> wro
I had this working yesterday and never touched componentContext.xml
… I did a git pull this morning, and everything broke. I'm going off the
current documentation and some notes that Rohit++ sent me.
The current documentation does not mention anything about componentContext.xml:
https://cwiki.ap
Done :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1941
On 2013-04-04 4:26 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote:
I agree with you... the ui should allow you to delete the 'other'
admins :) I'd file it.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Francois Gaudreault
mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com>> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:24 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> My personal thoughts - we should be using Feedback.xml in the brand
> rather than one-off sections like this.
> That allows us to have one piece of common content - and turn it on
> and off as appropriate per the document.
That sounds like a
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:24 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> My personal thoughts - we should be using Feedback.xml in the brand
>> rather than one-off sections like this.
>> That allows us to have one piece of common content - and turn it on
>>
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:37 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> You said that you didn't know if it was needed in release notes.
> RN is a completely different type of document than the guides.
Well, what I meant was I didn't know if it was needed in the release
notes vs. other guides - if it's going to o
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013, at 03:37 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> You said that you didn't know if it was needed in release notes.
>> RN is a completely different type of document than the guides.
>
> Well, what I meant was I didn't know if it was nee
Ryan,
I believe it's something Kelven added recently. Auto-Scanning via @Component
has been disabled. There are numerous reasons why auto-scanning is bad. Take
for example the case of someone extending a component with the @Component
annotation, they don't want to modify the parent class at
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
