No, nothing in particular. I just noticed in my pervious ventures with
Cloudstack / XEN / ESXI that there were some tools you could (or were required
/ suggested by installation guides) I just did not know if there was anything
like that.
On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:49 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Attempting to create a VM from a template I created (Twice) getting this in my
logs:
013-03-28 02:07:17,873 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher] (Job-Executor-22:job-77)
class com.cloud.api.ServerApiException : Unable to create a deployment for
VM[User|i-2-11-VM]
2013-03-28 02:07:17,873 DEBUG [clou
It seems you have a cluster of management servers. It is possible that the
host/agents are owned by the the management server that is inactive:
2013-03-28 02:07:22,340 INFO [cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl]
(Cluster-Heartbeat-1:null) Management node 1 is *detected inactive* by
timestamp but is p
+1, thanks for proposing and working on this feature.
On 28/03/13 11:32 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
wrote:
>I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway.
>This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps.
>
>Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private
>gat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/
---
(Updated March 28, 2013, 8:36 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh
Hi ,
There seems to be a problem with the latest master branch code though I did not
happen to see any exception being thrown.
The system VM's don't come up and the primary storage added as part of the zone
creation wizard does not show up on the host in the XenCenter UI .
Anyone else happened
Pranav,
While creating primary ,did you select scope as zone or cluster.
By default its setting the scope as zone.it won't work. There is no support
(zone wide primary storage)t for xen ,at this moment supported hypervisor is
kvm .
so select the scope as cluster.
Regards
Sadhu
-Origi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/
---
(Updated March 28, 2013, 9:10 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaer
What most people seem to associate with guest tools is the ability for greater
console interactions (drag and drop/shared clipboard), as well as API login
functions in the API.
I myself have brought these up many times, if your interested in other
features, the. Please describe in detail.
Than
On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:00:52PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
>>> Chip
>>>
>>> Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples
>>> would be nice.
>>>
>>> Th
Yes, I saw the same issue yesterday evening.
On 28/03/13 2:29 PM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
>Hi ,
>
>There seems to be a problem with the latest master branch code though I
>did not happen to see any exception being thrown.
>
>The system VM's don't come up and the primary storage added as part of
>
Can you grep for job-77 in the logs and see if there are any exceptions ?
On 28/03/13 12:42 PM, "Maurice Lawler" wrote:
>Attempting to create a VM from a template I created (Twice) getting this
>in my logs:
>
>013-03-28 02:07:17,873 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
>(Job-Executor-22:job-77) clas
Ok , Suresh was right in pointing that out that we need to select "cluster "
right now as the scope for primary storage with xenserver as the hypervisor .
With "Zone-wide" , we see this error . Perhaps I can introduce a check in the
UI for the scope depending upon the hypervisor type (xen/KVM) s
Chandan,
User can assign any number as rule priority. But the number has to be unique
within the container. Two ACLs in the same container cannot have same priority
number.
e.g.
ACL1 - number 10
ACL2 - number 40
ACL3 - number 30
In the above example, ACL1 will have the highest priority followe
We might need to disable scope field for non -KVM zones to avoid such mistakes.
Thanks,
~Talluri
> -Original Message-
> From: Suresh Sadhu [mailto:suresh.sa...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 2:35 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [master branch issue ]Problem
On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Hiroaki KAWAI wrote:
> I fixed those on transifex. Please feel free to tell me if you still
> have trouble in building ja-JP docs. :-)
thanks, I pulled all new translations. I am not sure what you did in transifex
but it did not fix the issue :)
I ended fixing it
On Mar 28, 2013, at 6:00 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Ok , Suresh was right in pointing that out that we need to select "cluster "
> right now as the scope for primary storage with xenserver as the hypervisor .
Sounds like we should actually have the default behavior match the
previous versions,
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:24 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary Storage
> in latest Master
>
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 6:00 AM, Pranav Saxena
> wrote:
>
> >
Hi,
I have been pulling all translations (docs and UI) and committing them in 4.1
branch to make the deadline.
I have not yet committed them to master and now I am wondering if we should.
There would be tons of small files pushed in master.
-Sebastien
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:54:53PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could answer this question for me. I've been
> looking at all sorts of properties of various VI Java Objects to find out
> how to do this and don't see any answers on the web either.
Mike,
Just s
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:54:53PM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone could answer this question for me. I've been
>> looking at all sorts of properties of various VI Java Objects to find out
>> how to do thi
Abhinandan,
Why the push on master? We should probably focus on 4.0.2 and 4.1.0. I
know that testing is happening against master for some features, but
those are probably best handled in feature-specific threads. I'm
concerned that this might be diluting everyone's focus on the active
releases.
I'm looking into CLOUDSTACK-1819. I'll be able to close it by Friday.
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 28 March 2013 10:28 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: cloudstack dev
> Subject: Re: [ACS4.1] blockers
>
> T
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:02:59AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been pulling all translations (docs and UI) and committing them in 4.1
> branch to make the deadline.
>
> I have not yet committed them to master and now I am wondering if we should.
>
> There would be tons of
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:27:33PM +, Asmita Vagyani wrote:
> By when do you think Cloudstack 4 will be supporting S3 AWS APIs fully? Which
> version of Cloudstack?
> And I have raised JIRA defects
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1821
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
On 27/03/13 9:49 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:39:25PM +, Murali Reddy wrote:
>> On 27/03/13 8:04 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Murali Reddy -
>> > CLOUDSTACK-1673 AWS Regions - Events - User disable event does not
>> >include the UUID of the user that was
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:33:15PM +, Murali Reddy wrote:
> On 27/03/13 9:49 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:39:25PM +, Murali Reddy wrote:
> >> On 27/03/13 8:04 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Murali Reddy -
> >> > CLOUDSTACK-1673 AWS Regions -
I think both the branches are important, yes 4.1 is close to release and
people assigned issues should give priority to 4.1.
There are also many people trying to test there features in master and
unstable master is resulting in wasted cycles.
Having said that I guess people having issues assigned
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10151/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Change to r
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:44:30PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> I think both the branches are important, yes 4.1 is close to release and
> people assigned issues should give priority to 4.1.
> There are also many people trying to test there features in master and
> unstable master is resultin
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:00:52PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> > Chip
> >
> > Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples
> > would be nice.
> >
> > Thanks
> > ilya
>
>
> Hi Ilya:
>
> So the short descriptio
Hi Chip,
I was actually using the open source one you referred to (1).
I had done some research on this a week or so ago and people were
complaining about (2) and recommending (1).
That book does look useful. Maybe I'll stop in at the bookstore on my way
into work.
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 28, 20
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:01:32AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I was actually using the open source one you referred to (1).
>
> I had done some research on this a week or so ago and people were
> complaining about (2) and recommending (1).
So I agree that VIJava is a easier to c
I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to
stabilize master by allowing devs to quickly setup CloudStack using
simulated hypervisors and run some basic tests against it.
The bvt branch integrates the testing of cloudstack using marvin and
the simulator hypervisor. Altern
On 28-Mar-2013, at 7:20 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:44:30PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>> I think both the branches are important, yes 4.1 is close to release and
>> people assigned issues should give priority to 4.1.
>> There are also many people trying to test
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10165/#review18461
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1:
commit 7678987ca030a711854fb30fa6cc5351f7
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 08:28 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Before we get to this, I have a broader question: Do we want to move
> the docs to their own git repo? We manage them with different rules,
> especially WRT code freeze and whatnot. This translation question just
> adds to the logic to pu
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:19:06PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> On 28-Mar-2013, at 7:20 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:44:30PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> >> I think both the branches are important, yes 4.1 is close to release and
> >> people assigned iss
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:27:00AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 08:28 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Before we get to this, I have a broader question: Do we want to move
> > the docs to their own git repo? We manage them with different rules,
> > especially WRT code freez
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 07:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been pulling all translations (docs and UI) and committing them in
> 4.1 branch to make the deadline.
>
> I have not yet committed them to master and now I am wondering if we
> should.
Shouldn't we push the UI bits, at
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:27:00AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 08:28 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> > Before we get to this, I have a broader question: Do we want to move
>> > the docs to their own git repo? We ma
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 06:36:25PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > I've noticed that some of the projects separate discussions between dev
> > and general administrative items via a general@ and a dev@ list. For
> > example, the last email
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:45:41AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:27:00AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 08:28 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> >> > Before we get to this, I have a broader q
I have merged the feature with commit below.
commit 3e4430d811d5e148c4fef1900bdd8dd07a38bdeb
Author: Nitin Mehta
Date: Thu Mar 28 16:43:37 2013 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-658 - Scale vm support for Xenserver
Added the framweork so that it can be extended for vmware and kvm as
well.
Added uni
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:38:57AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 07:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been pulling all translations (docs and UI) and committing them in
> > 4.1 branch to make the deadline.
> >
> > I have not yet committed them to ma
Thanks Nitin for Marvin Tests. Girish is going to extend the initial set of
Marvin tests in due course.
Prashanth - pl do check the test results in subsequent automation runs.
I have crated Automation task and assigned it to Girish.
Thanks
/Sudha
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta
On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:38:57AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 07:02 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have been pulling all translations (docs and UI) and committing them in
>>> 4.1 branch to make t
On 28/03/13 7:59 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:19:06PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>> On 28-Mar-2013, at 7:20 PM, "Chip Childers"
>>wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:44:30PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>> >> I think both the branches are important, y
I would like to propose the egress firewall rules feature for the external
firewall device SRX guest network.
Currently egress firewall rules is supported in the VR isolated network. With
this feature egress firewall rules
is supported in the external device SRX guest networks.
Jira Id:
https:/
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 03:37:15PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>
>
> On 28/03/13 7:59 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:19:06PM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
> >> On 28-Mar-2013, at 7:20 PM, "Chip Childers"
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 01:44:
It is one sever. Handling it all. CentOS with KVM. that's it. Not sure where to
go to correct this.
Abhinandan Prateek wrote:
>It seems you have a cluster of management servers. It is possible that the
>host/agents are owned by the the management server that is inactive:
>
>2013-03-28 02:07:2
No, there isn't really anything in particular I was getting at. Was simply
making sure with my setup I wasn't missing anything
"Kelceydamage@bbits" wrote:
>What most people seem to associate with guest tools is the ability for greater
>console interactions (drag and drop/shared clipboard), as
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 09:57 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Given that we have a mix of responses to this question (some for it and
> some against it), and that the pattern seems to be tied to the unliked
> practice of creating umbrella communities, I believe that we should not
> make the change wit
Can we get a confirmation on the approach we want to take?
1. We are going to fix the router for the case - " if the router has upgraded
its scripts, and then adjust how we call edithosts.sh" ?
2. Going to suggest a reboot (start and stop) of all the system Vms (SSVM,CPVM
and routers) as part o
It's sounds like you have everything you need then :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> No, there isn't really anything in particular I was getting at. Was simply
> making sure with my setup I wasn't missing anything
>
> "Kelceydamage@bbits" wrote:
>
Greetings,
I am utilizing CloudStack-oss-3.0.2-1 on CentOS 6.3 | KVM.
It's running wonderfully, however, I have a Windows Instance I would like to
attach a 'storage' volume to. However, when I go to add the volume it only
lists the Linux falvor instances that are running to attach to.
How can
+1 from me as well. It duplicates or segregates, neither of which seem like a
positive change.
-kd
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 09:57 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> Given that we have a mix of responses to this question (some f
You'd be right! I'm pretty set, just trying to figure out spinning up my VM's
from templates -- Having issues! :-(
- M.
On Mar 28, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote:
> It's sounds like you have everything you need then :)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:44 AM, Maur
Reviewing the logs, grepping for job 77 I get the following errors: This is
when spinning up a instance from a template.
[root@lunder ~]# cat /var/log/cloud/management/management-server.log |grep
job-77
2013-03-28 02:07:17,540 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(catali
This is a significant step no doubt!
One comment - I think the deployDataCenter.py should move out of the
phase of the devcloud/pom.xml. When it runs the install
phase which includes the package phase the build will fail with the
following stack:
https://gist.github.com/vogxn/5264956
In the bv
Abhi,
As Chip and I said, CLOUDSTACK-1755 is not a release blocker and would
be fixed in 4.2(as issue indicated).
--Sheng
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> There is some encouraging movement on 4.1 issues but still we have some of
> the blockers and criticals open:
>
Just a note that the previous two +1 votes are actually -1 votes in the
context of the DISCUSS topic.
I am also ready to cast my -1 vote.
On 28 March 2013 16:56, Kelceydamage@bbits wrote:
> +1 from me as well. It duplicates or segregates, neither of which seem
> like a positive change.
>
> -kd
2 - Public VLAN created on vSwitch0 even if we tell to use vSwitch2.
For some reason, CS creates a tagged port-group on the vSwitch0 for the
public interface of the VR even if we told CS to use vSwitch2. In fact, CS
creates and uses the public port-group on the vSwitch2... So why it creates
an
I am trying to implement the non-overlapping cidrs right now and I have
some questions. Does the ExternalGuestNetworkGuru create networks with
non-overlapping cidrs by default? Or do I need to override it's 'design'
and 'implement' methods to implement non overlapping cidrs?
If I have to write m
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:51:16AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
> Can we get a confirmation on the approach we want to take?
>
> 1. We are going to fix the router for the case - " if the router has
> upgraded its scripts, and then adjust how we call edithosts.sh" ?
> 2. Going to suggest a r
bumping and adding in the resident kvm gurus.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Maurice Lawler wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am utilizing CloudStack-oss-3.0.2-1 on CentOS 6.3 | KVM.
>
>
> It's running wonderfully, however, I have a Windows Instance I would like
> to attach a 'storage' volume to. Howe
Stumbled upon Open Source Version of Java API for VSphere on
vijava.sourceforge.net
Wanted to get the feel of developers if we can consider using these APIs
instead and make VMWare support as an Open Source build (vs nonoss as of now).
Need to install virtio disk pv driver inside Windows guest VM, otherwise the
disk will not be shown up.
From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Marcus Sorensen; Edison Su
Subject: Re: Attaching Volumes to Windows Insta
But I cannot attach it to the Windows Instance. When I attempt to attach, the
only things listed in the Attachment list is the linux flavors. So, once I get
this installed, reboot the device; I will then be able to see the Windows
Instances in the attachment list?
On Mar 28, 2013, at 1:03 PM,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Stumbled upon Open Source Version of Java API for VSphere on
> vijava.sourceforge.net
>
> Wanted to get the feel of developers if we can consider using these APIs
> instead and make VMWare support as an Open Source build (vs nonoss as of no
i agree, if there is feature parity between the sdk's we should use the
opensource one.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:07 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> > Stumbled upon Open Source Version of Java API for VSphere on
> vijava.sourceforge.net
> >
>
I'm also not confident that option 1 really fixes anything. The user has to
reboot their system VMS eventually, and even if we fix this one thing to
help them get by until they do, what other lingering issues will arise?
On Mar 28, 2013 11:38 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 0
Then we can go with the option of reboot (start and stop) of all the system Vms
(SSVM,CPVM and routers) as part of Upgrade procedure ?
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:21 AM
To: Chip Childers
Cc: d
> Reviewing the logs, grepping for job 77 I get the following errors: This is
> when spinning up a instance from a template.
>
>
>
> [root@lunder ~]# cat /var/log/cloud/management/management-server.log |grep
> job-77
> 2013-03-28 02:07:17,540 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobMan
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Ilya Musayev to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more
autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
el
Congrats Ilya . Welcome :)
Regards,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 12:06 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New Committer: Ilya Musayev
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
brilliant news, congrats Ilya!
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Pranav Saxena wrote:
> Congrats Ilya . Welcome :)
>
> Regards,
> Pranav
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 12:06 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
It's about time :)
Congrats!
-kd
>-Original Message-
>From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:36 AM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: New Committer: Ilya Musayev
>
>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> -Original Message-
> From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:02 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [master branch issue ]Problem with SystemVMs and Primary
> Storage in latest Master
>
>
>
> > -
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to
> stabilize master by allowing devs to quickly setup CloudStack using
> simulated hypervisors and run some basic tests against it.
>
> The bvt branch integrat
For optional dependencies, JSR330 injection requires using setter
injection.
You should write
@Inject void setGslbProvider(GslbProvider provider) {
this._gslbProvider = provider;
}
On 3/27/13 8:36 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>On 28/03/13 9:00 AM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote:
>
>>Jetty is failing
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:28:33AM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
> Then we can go with the option of reboot (start and stop) of all the system
> Vms (SSVM,CPVM and routers) as part of Upgrade procedure ?
Sounds like it. Care to add a note to the release notes wiki page to
this effect?
>
>
Hi Mike,
Say hi to John from me. He is an amazing guy and most likely I will meet
him during the OS summit.
We don’t have any hypervisor-specific code for manipulating with storage
objects. There was no such a need for the OpenStack drives. Inside of our
systems, we usually provide a direct a
Hi,
A bunch of us were talking about hypervisor limitations on the number of
iSCSI connections the other day. Hopefully this is accurate, but the
thinking was we'd run out of VLANs first.
I sent you and Edison a little VMware code to create a datastore earlier
today. Hopefully we can complete i
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no
need to go via the patch submission p
Congrats Animesh !:) .
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 1:27 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Animes
>
>Wow this is awesome. Will you consider writing a blog post about this?
Yes, sure.
One thing that is not 'ready' is the operational / packaging side of
things.
Copying systemvm.zip around and starting daemons without some kind of init
script isn't ideal.
Also the UI still shows "0" system vm
Congrats Animesh!
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 3:57 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: New Committer: Animesh Chaturvedi
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has a
+1
On 3/28/13 12:00 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>> I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to
>> stabilize master by allowing devs to quickly setup CloudStack using
>> simulated hypervisors and run som
Congrats Animesh!
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:57:24PM -0700, Alex Huang wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
> that they have accepted.
>
>
>
> Being a committer enable
Send your congrats to Animesh.
Sateesh should always be congratulated but he is already a committer. :P
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 12:57 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: New Committer: Anim
Grats!
On 28 March 2013 19:57, Alex Huang wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Animesh Chaturvedi to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
>
>
> Being a committer enables easier contribution to the pr
Comments embedded in below.
From: Vladimir Popovski [mailto:vladi...@zadarastorage.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 12:22 PM
To: Mike Tutkowski; Edison Su
Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs
Hi All,
I was away for couple of days, so sorry fo
The author, Steve Jin wrote this API, he also co-wrote and designed the
original non open source VmWare APIs. (I even have one of his books).
This project is now supported by community and Steve.
I'd say the chance of it being very much similar to non opensource version - is
very high, but I wi
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:14:17PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> The author, Steve Jin wrote this API, he also co-wrote and designed the
> original non open source VmWare APIs. (I even have one of his books).
>
> This project is now supported by community and Steve.
>
> I'd say the chance of it
Create a doc bug for documenting these steps - CLOUDSTACK-1837 - Additonal
Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy vhd-utils) to be included in the
upgrade procedure from 4.0 -> 4.1
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thurs
I guess a small world for you Chip :)
For those who would like to learn more or just curious, the README file has
some interesting things we should consider.
--
WHAT IS VI JAVA API?
VI Java API is a set of Java libraries that aim to ease the usage of VI
SDK Web Services interfaces. It's now
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013, at 02:57 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Please join me in congratulating Animesh!
Congrats, keep up the good work!
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/
---
(Updated March 28, 2013, 8:26 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippae
I just resolved all of my bugs:
>CLOUDSTACK-1730Jessica Wang
>CLOUDSTACK-1728Jessica Wang
>CLOUDSTACK-1616Jessica Wang
>CLOUDSTACK-1731Jessica Wang
-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 2
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
