Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:29:00AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: > CLOUDSTACK-1810 is not a bug, update the bug with detailed explanation. Min, Please see David's follow up question about 4.0.x compatibility. > > Thanks > -min > > On 3/27/13 7:34 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >As Pr

Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:00:52PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > Chip > > > > Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples > > would be nice. > > > > Thanks > > ilya > > > Hi Ilya: > > So the short descriptio

Re: Review Request: Add docs for MidoNet networking plugin [CLOUDSTACK-996]

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10136/#review18453 --- docs/en-US/plugin-midonet-about.xml

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

It makes sense that the system VMS would need to be restarted since we have new software for them too (new systemvm.iso). On Mar 27, 2013 8:16 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:43:50PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > > I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binari

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

To answer David's question, this behavior has been there since 3.0.x, API refactoring didn't touch this listTemplateCmd. Thanks -min Sent from my iPhone On Mar 27, 2013, at 7:17 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:29:00AM -0700, Min Chen wrote: >> CLOUDSTACK-1810 is not a

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Min Chen wrote: > To answer David's question, this behavior has been there since 3.0.x, API > refactoring didn't touch this listTemplateCmd. > > Thanks > -min Min thanks for putting up with my paranoia :) --David

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 28/03/13 7:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:31:05PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: >> For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. >> >> For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can >>unlock >> developers temporarily on master branch > >Good work-around for now

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

>> Deploying Vms in existing networks succeed. But Vms are not given any ip >> address. >> In router, I see that the mac address of the Vm is not populated correctly. >> root@r-4-VM:~# cat /etc/dhcphosts.txt >> 02:00:42:47:00:01,set:10_1_1_17,10.1.1.17,test123,infinite >> -4,set:10_1_1_195,10.1.1.

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

There are two things, upgrade of system VM, and upgrade of software on system VM. Any time you start a system VM the latest scripts get copied to it. This isn't the same as using the new ipv6 template. I can understand needing to reboot the system VMS if the scripts change, but its not the same as

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x to 4.0 as well. We had all of these new vpc scripts that added brand new functionality that needed to go on the virtual routers. The system VM template stayed the same, even though new scripts were added via systemvm.iso. On Ma

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x to > 4.0 as well. We had all of these new vpc scripts that added brand new > functionality that needed to go on the virtual routers. The system VM > template stayed th

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Hard to say. Sometimes functionality/implementation changes even though the feature is the same. On Mar 27, 2013 9:20 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Marcus Sorensen > wrote: > > Just to clarify a step further, this should have been the case with 3.x > to > > 4.0 as

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

We can look into it, my guess is that an existing script now has new and/or different parameters. Perhaps it could be adjusted to be backward compatible so people can reboot at their leisure. All just guesswork. On Mar 27, 2013 9:21 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: > Hard to say. Sometimes functional

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Jetty is failing to start on latest master building oss. Am on the latest master, building oss and starting jetty is failing with below error. Error creating bean with name 'globalLoadBalancingRulesServiceImpl': Injection of autowired dependencies failed; nested exception is org.springframewor

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 3/27/13 7:53 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 28/03/13 7:42 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >>On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:31:05PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: >>> For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. >>> >>> For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can >>>unlock >>> developers te

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 3/27/13 8:30 PM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: >Jetty is failing to start on latest master building oss. >Am on the latest master, building oss and starting jetty is failing with >below error. > >Error creating bean with name 'globalLoadBalancingRulesServiceImpl': >Injection of autowired dependen

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 28/03/13 9:00 AM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >> >>I was running Non-oss builds, so could not hit this issue. My apologies >>for the breaking OSS build. >> >>Kelven, >> >>I am not sure how to fix this issue. If there is no implementing class, >>why should inject fail? I was under impression it will be

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On 28/03/13 9:00 AM, "Rajesh Battala" wrote: >Jetty is failing to start on latest master building oss. >Am on the latest master, building oss and starting jetty is failing with >below error. > >Error creating bean with name 'globalLoadBalancingRulesServiceImpl': >Injection of autowired dependenc

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Thanks a lot Murali > -Original Message- > From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:07 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Kelven Yang > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due t

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Thanks Murali and Kelven for fixing this . I was almost about to revert the two commits I mentioned :) Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 9:11 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Kelven

Fwd: CloudStack: Attaching Additional Volumes

Greetings,I am utilizing CloudStack-oss-3.0.2-1 on CentOS 6.3 | KVM.It's running wonderfully, however, I have a Windows Instance I would like to attach a 'storage' volume to. However, when I go to add the volume it only lists the Linux falvor instances that are running to attach to.How can I get th

Re: [ACS4.1] blockers

There is some encouraging movement on 4.1 issues but still we have some of the blockers and criticals open: CLOUDSTACK-1819 Kishan Kavala CLOUDSTACK-1805 Kelven Yang CLOUDSTACK-1755 Sheng Yang CLOUDSTACK-1664 Murali Reddy -abhi On 27/03/13 8:03 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: >Text only li

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Ok, found the issue. The 4.0 script in the system vm that adds DHCP entries parses args like this: # edithosts.sh -- edit the dhcphosts file on the routing domain # $mac : the mac address # $ip : the associated ip address # $host : the hostname # $4 : default router # $5 : nameserver on default ni

Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

I fixed those on transifex. Please feel free to tell me if you still have trouble in building ja-JP docs. :-) Thanks (2013/03/24 19:28), Sebastien Goasguen wrote: I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1796 I can't publican build japanese docs. I managed to fix chinese and po

Re: [ACS4.2] master blockers

Once again a reminder to close the following blockers and criticals in master, if you are assigned but cannot figure out the issue please reach out. >CLOUDSTACK-1687Mice Xia >CLOUDSTACK-1677Kelven Yang >CLOUDSTACK-1774Rohit Yadav >CLOUDSTACK-1721Prachi Damle >CLOUDS

RE: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

Many thanks Hiroaki. -Original Message- From: Hiroaki KAWAI [mailto:ka...@stratosphere.co.jp] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:33 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs I fixed those on transifex. Please feel free to tell me if you still have tro

RE: [ACS4.2] master blockers

Abhi Thanks for following up on the issues, do you mind sending the list sorted by the assignee for better readability and spotting overloaded folks? Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:05 P

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

> On March 20, 2013, 1:51 a.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > Kawai-san, it looks OK since most NetworkElement::release do not do > > anything, but if you look at the other plugins (e.g., NiciraNvp), they > > destroy the logical port on the NVP switch when release is called. Perhaps > > we need

Re: [ACS4.2] master blockers

I have sorted the list in order of criticality like blockers first. On 28/03/13 10:40 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: >Abhi > >Thanks for following up on the issues, do you mind sending the list >sorted by the assignee for better readability and spotting overloaded >folks? > >Animesh > >> -

[PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-1828] NAT on private gateway

I would like to propose feature NAT on private gateway. This feature is sub feature of nTier2.0 apps. Using this feature we can enable/disable the source NAT on the vpc private gateway . Jira ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1828 FS : https://cwiki.apache.org/conflue

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

Awesome work Prasanna! CloudMonkey only needs the request section, and your changes are in the response where you go ahead and serialize class objects which have may objects again, recursively. I'll see the code, otherwise from the gist you shared, the response json looks fine and won't break clou

VI Java API Question

Hi, I was wondering if anyone could answer this question for me. I've been looking at all sorts of properties of various VI Java Objects to find out how to do this and don't see any answers on the web either. I have list line of code: HostScsiDisk[] lstHostScsiDisks = hostDatastoreSystem.queryA

[PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

I would like to propose the new feature ACL on private gateway. This feature is sub feature of the nTier 2.0 apps. Currently we do not have way to control the traffic on the private gateway. Using this feature we can configure the ingress/egress ACL on the private gateway. Jira Id: https://issu

RE: Question pertaining to NAT on Private Gateway Feature of N-Tier

Hi Chandan, You can enable the source NAT for each private gateway. In private gateway is deletion process, we also delete NAT rules on it. There is no separate thread to do it. Thanks, Jayapal From: Chandan Purushothama Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 6:09 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Ja

Review Request: Remove duplicate plugin dependency, fixes maven build warning

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10165/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- Patch rem

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1818) DatabaseCreator is not invoking UpgradeChecker to run upgrade logic written in Java, which is required for a success upgrade process

We need to fix reply-to email from issues@ ml. Will open a ticket on INFRA. Re-posting comment from issue 1818 to dev list, just want to understand the recent patch; In 4.1, DatabaseCreator is only used by developers to deploy database, users will still use cloud-setup-databases so why does it ev

KVM Tools

Hello, I've been seeing some idle chatter about possible KVM Guest Tools, like there are for VMware and Xen Server. Has anything be done about this?

Re: KVM Tools

What specifically? A large chunk of the tools for VMware/xen are upgraded drivers, which aren't necessary with Linux and already available for other operating systems. There's also the qemu-guest-agent which can be installed in the host to do things like write files from host to guest, but cloudsta

Re: KVM Tools

The qemu guest agent is installed in the guest, that is... On Mar 28, 2013 12:48 AM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: > What specifically? A large chunk of the tools for VMware/xen are upgraded > drivers, which aren't necessary with Linux and already available for other > operating systems. There's also

<    1   2