ot tried the patch. I've missed it. Do I need to rebuild the ACS to
>>apply
>>the patch or would making changes to the two files suffice?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Andrei
>>----- Original Message -
>>> From: "Remi Bergsma"
>>>
grading from 4.5.2 to 4.6.2, I also face this issue. We use
both
KVM and XenServer. Any stable workaround for this?
Thanx
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andrei Mikhailovsky [mailto:and...@arhont.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Dezember 2015 02:55
An: users
Betreff: Re: upgrading 4
anks
>
>Andrei
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Remi Bergsma"
>> To: "dev"
>> Sent: Tuesday, 5 January, 2016 05:49:05
>> Subject: Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout
>
>> Hi Andrei,
>>
>> Did you try
5 January, 2016 05:49:05
> Subject: Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Did you try it in combination with the patch I created (PR1291)? You need both
> changes.
>
> Regards, Remi
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 04 Jan 2016
know if
>>> this issue is being looked at for the next release?
>>>
>>> I've just upgraded to 4.6.2 and have similar issues with three virtual
>>> routers
>>> out of 22 in total. They are all failing exactly the same way as described
>>> h
t;
> To: "dev"
> Sent: Monday, 4 January, 2016 10:44:43
> Subject: Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout
> Hi Andrei,
>
> Missed that mail, sorry. I created a PR that allows for longer timeouts [1].
>
> Also, you can bump the router.aggregat
gt;
>- Original Message -
>> From: "Stephan Seitz"
>> To: "users"
>> Sent: Monday, 30 November, 2015 19:53:57
>> Subject: Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout
>
>> Does anybody else experiemce problems due to (
described here.
Has anyone found a permanent workaround for this issue?
Thanks
Andrei
- Original Message -
> From: "Stephan Seitz"
> To: "users"
> Sent: Monday, 30 November, 2015 19:53:57
> Subject: Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter up
