Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-02-04 Thread Daan Hoogland
>>> for >>>>> new contributors than the current one >>>>> * Committers cannot be forced to use it, but the benefits should be so >>>>> obvious that it's the norm (except for emergencies or security patches) >>>>> * We propose GitHub

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-02-04 Thread Rohit Yadav
as ill yesterday. But I wasn't sure what more we had to discuss before the hardware arrives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 January 2015 12:39 To: dev Subject: Re: quality improvement project status (fyi !=

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-02-04 Thread Daan Hoogland
utomated tests, and we >>> shouldn't accept the pull request until they've passed >>> >>> What have I forgotten? And does anyone think we're not on the right track? >>> >>> -- >>> Stephen Turner >>> >>> >&

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-02-04 Thread David Nalley
quest until they've passed >> >> What have I forgotten? And does anyone think we're not on the right track? >> >> -- >> Stephen Turner >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 29 J

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-02-03 Thread Rajani Karuturi
're not on the right track? > > -- > Stephen Turner > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 29 January 2015 12:25 > To: dev > Subject: Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your > information) > >

RE: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-01-29 Thread Stephen Turner
e're not on the right track? -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 29 January 2015 12:25 To: dev Subject: Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information) no worries, everybody is busy with glibc

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-01-29 Thread Daan Hoogland
hardware arrives. > > -- > Stephen Turner > > > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: 28 January 2015 12:39 > To: dev > Subject: Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your > information) >

RE: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-01-29 Thread Stephen Turner
Sorry, I was ill yesterday. But I wasn't sure what more we had to discuss before the hardware arrives. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 January 2015 12:39 To: dev Subject: Re: quality improvement project status

Re: quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-01-28 Thread Daan Hoogland
I did not see any reactions, are we on for tonight? On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > This is a question for feedback (fyi == For Your Input;). In the > meetings we had so far, we created a couple of lists. These are our > only deliverables to date. In order to know

quality improvement project status (fyi != just for your information)

2015-01-25 Thread Daan Hoogland
H, This is a question for feedback (fyi == For Your Input;). In the meetings we had so far, we created a couple of lists. These are our only deliverables to date. In order to know if we are on the right track I would like some feedback. First of all there is the highlevel requirement [1]. It shou