.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list
>>
>> It gives me an idea of the volume of such requests.
>>
>> On 1/30/14 3:34 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
>
+1
Measurable implies manageable.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 30 January 2014 17:49
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: dropping [Responsiveness report] dev list
>
> It gives me an idea
I find the report useful, unfortunately I find most requests from one off
users end up never being responding to by the op (which I would say is more
a mailing list issue - I had this issue when I sent my first question).
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
chiradeep.vit...@citri
It gives me an idea of the volume of such requests.
On 1/30/14 3:34 PM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
>wrote:
>> Definitely, somehow we have to find a way to make sure that all
>>questions get answered.
>
>I agree but don't have the feeling that my
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Definitely, somehow we have to find a way to make sure that all questions get
> answered.
I agree but don't have the feeling that my weekly exercise is serving this goal.
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:10 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H everyone,
>
> I've been putting out weekly reports on both the user - and the dev
> lists about unanswerred questions. I feel like dropping the one on the
> dev list. As I had not much feedback on them I was thinking of
> dropping both but
H everyone,
I've been putting out weekly reports on both the user - and the dev
lists about unanswerred questions. I feel like dropping the one on the
dev list. As I had not much feedback on them I was thinking of
dropping both but forcing myself to scan the old users mail still
seems like a valid
