No problem :)
Just wanted to let you know that it's there and that I believe I've
completed all of what you, Wei, and I talked about.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:42 AM, John Burwell wrote:
> Mike,
>
> I am booked up this afternoon. I will start my review tomorrow and
> complete as nec
You've possibly seen the auto-generated e-mail that I updated Review Board
with a new diff. This third diff is comprehensive in that it includes all
of the changes I've made for this feature.
I believe I have now completed all actions that were required of me.
Please let me know if you have quest
Mike,
I am booked up this afternoon. I will start my review tomorrow and complete as
necessary on the flight Saturday.
Thanks,
-John
On Jun 20, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> You've possibly seen the auto-generated e-mail that I updated Review Board
> with a new diff. This third
Well...it's not "necessary" per se. :) I just wanted to throw it out there
and get people's thoughts. I certainly don't want to take anything away
from your feature that you may value a lot.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> Mike,
>
> You can remove them from UI if necessary.
>
One thing I have been noticing is that there are now a lot of columns in
the Service Offerings - Disk Offerings table since Wei's four hypervisor
QoS fields are there. I don't know if others have observed this, but this
many columns seems to skew the table a bit: The columns don't entirely line
up.
Maybe I'll just have to start doing bold like this: Bold even if it
just displays as text. :)
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:34:58AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> > Comments below in red.
>
> We can't see the red for text emails. ;-)
>
--
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:34:58AM -0600, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Comments below in red.
We can't see the red for text emails. ;-)
Comments below in red.
Thanks
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:35 AM, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> Since the threads discussing these patches have been very long, I want to
> roll up the issue list, and ensure that we are on track to have them
> resolved before the 4.2. The following is my current
All,
Since the threads discussing these patches have been very long, I want to roll
up the issue list, and ensure that we are on track to have them resolved before
the 4.2. The following is my current issue list and the associated status:
Mutual Exclusion of hypervisor throttled I/O and storag
